1 |
guez |
3 |
! |
2 |
|
|
! $Header: /home/cvsroot/LMDZ4/libf/phylmd/newmicro.F,v 1.2 2004/06/03 09:22:43 lmdzadmin Exp $ |
3 |
|
|
! |
4 |
|
|
SUBROUTINE newmicro (paprs, pplay,ok_newmicro, |
5 |
|
|
. t, pqlwp, pclc, pcltau, pclemi, |
6 |
|
|
. pch, pcl, pcm, pct, pctlwp, |
7 |
|
|
s xflwp, xfiwp, xflwc, xfiwc, |
8 |
|
|
e ok_aie, |
9 |
|
|
e sulfate, sulfate_pi, |
10 |
|
|
e bl95_b0, bl95_b1, |
11 |
|
|
s cldtaupi, re, fl) |
12 |
|
|
use dimens_m |
13 |
|
|
use dimphy |
14 |
guez |
38 |
use SUPHEC_M |
15 |
guez |
3 |
use nuagecom |
16 |
|
|
IMPLICIT none |
17 |
|
|
c====================================================================== |
18 |
|
|
c Auteur(s): Z.X. Li (LMD/CNRS) date: 19930910 |
19 |
|
|
c Objet: Calculer epaisseur optique et emmissivite des nuages |
20 |
|
|
c====================================================================== |
21 |
|
|
c Arguments: |
22 |
|
|
c t-------input-R-temperature |
23 |
|
|
c pqlwp---input-R-eau liquide nuageuse dans l'atmosphere (kg/kg) |
24 |
|
|
c pclc----input-R-couverture nuageuse pour le rayonnement (0 a 1) |
25 |
|
|
c |
26 |
|
|
c ok_aie--input-L-apply aerosol indirect effect or not |
27 |
|
|
c sulfate-input-R-sulfate aerosol mass concentration [um/m^3] |
28 |
|
|
c sulfate_pi-input-R-dito, pre-industrial value |
29 |
|
|
c bl95_b0-input-R-a parameter, may be varied for tests (s-sea, l-land) |
30 |
|
|
c bl95_b1-input-R-a parameter, may be varied for tests ( -"- ) |
31 |
|
|
c |
32 |
|
|
c cldtaupi-output-R-pre-industrial value of cloud optical thickness, |
33 |
|
|
c needed for the diagnostics of the aerosol indirect |
34 |
|
|
c radiative forcing (see radlwsw) |
35 |
|
|
c re------output-R-Cloud droplet effective radius multiplied by fl [um] |
36 |
|
|
c fl------output-R-Denominator to re, introduced to avoid problems in |
37 |
|
|
c the averaging of the output. fl is the fraction of liquid |
38 |
|
|
c water clouds within a grid cell |
39 |
|
|
c pcltau--output-R-epaisseur optique des nuages |
40 |
|
|
c pclemi--output-R-emissivite des nuages (0 a 1) |
41 |
|
|
c====================================================================== |
42 |
|
|
C |
43 |
|
|
c |
44 |
|
|
REAL, intent(in):: paprs(klon,klev+1) |
45 |
guez |
10 |
real, intent(in):: pplay(klon,klev) |
46 |
guez |
3 |
REAL t(klon,klev) |
47 |
|
|
c |
48 |
|
|
REAL pclc(klon,klev) |
49 |
|
|
REAL pqlwp(klon,klev) |
50 |
|
|
REAL pcltau(klon,klev), pclemi(klon,klev) |
51 |
|
|
c |
52 |
|
|
REAL pct(klon), pctlwp(klon), pch(klon), pcl(klon), pcm(klon) |
53 |
|
|
c |
54 |
|
|
LOGICAL lo |
55 |
|
|
c |
56 |
|
|
REAL cetahb, cetamb |
57 |
|
|
PARAMETER (cetahb = 0.45, cetamb = 0.80) |
58 |
|
|
C |
59 |
|
|
INTEGER i, k |
60 |
|
|
cIM: 091003 REAL zflwp, zradef, zfice, zmsac |
61 |
|
|
REAL zflwp(klon), zradef, zfice, zmsac |
62 |
|
|
cIM: 091003 rajout |
63 |
|
|
REAL xflwp(klon), xfiwp(klon) |
64 |
|
|
REAL xflwc(klon,klev), xfiwc(klon,klev) |
65 |
|
|
c |
66 |
|
|
REAL radius, rad_chaud |
67 |
|
|
cc PARAMETER (rad_chau1=13.0, rad_chau2=9.0, rad_froid=35.0) |
68 |
|
|
ccc PARAMETER (rad_chaud=15.0, rad_froid=35.0) |
69 |
|
|
c sintex initial PARAMETER (rad_chaud=10.0, rad_froid=30.0) |
70 |
|
|
REAL coef, coef_froi, coef_chau |
71 |
|
|
PARAMETER (coef_chau=0.13, coef_froi=0.09) |
72 |
|
|
REAL seuil_neb, t_glace |
73 |
|
|
PARAMETER (seuil_neb=0.001, t_glace=273.0-15.0) |
74 |
|
|
INTEGER nexpo ! exponentiel pour glace/eau |
75 |
|
|
PARAMETER (nexpo=6) |
76 |
|
|
ccc PARAMETER (nexpo=1) |
77 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
c -- sb: |
79 |
|
|
logical ok_newmicro |
80 |
|
|
c parameter (ok_newmicro=.FALSE.) |
81 |
|
|
cIM: 091003 real rel, tc, rei, zfiwp |
82 |
|
|
real rel, tc, rei, zfiwp(klon) |
83 |
|
|
real k_liq, k_ice0, k_ice, DF |
84 |
|
|
parameter (k_liq=0.0903, k_ice0=0.005) ! units=m2/g |
85 |
|
|
parameter (DF=1.66) ! diffusivity factor |
86 |
|
|
c sb -- |
87 |
|
|
cjq for the aerosol indirect effect |
88 |
|
|
cjq introduced by Johannes Quaas (quaas@lmd.jussieu.fr), 27/11/2003 |
89 |
|
|
cjq |
90 |
|
|
LOGICAL ok_aie ! Apply AIE or not? |
91 |
|
|
LOGICAL ok_a1lwpdep ! a1 LWP dependent? |
92 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
REAL sulfate(klon, klev) ! sulfate aerosol mass concentration [ug m-3] |
94 |
|
|
REAL cdnc(klon, klev) ! cloud droplet number concentration [m-3] |
95 |
|
|
REAL re(klon, klev) ! cloud droplet effective radius [um] |
96 |
|
|
REAL sulfate_pi(klon, klev) ! sulfate aerosol mass concentration [ug m-3] (pre-industrial value) |
97 |
|
|
REAL cdnc_pi(klon, klev) ! cloud droplet number concentration [m-3] (pi value) |
98 |
|
|
REAL re_pi(klon, klev) ! cloud droplet effective radius [um] (pi value) |
99 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
REAL fl(klon, klev) ! xliq * rneb (denominator to re; fraction of liquid water clouds within the grid cell) |
101 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
REAL bl95_b0, bl95_b1 ! Parameter in B&L 95-Formula |
103 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
REAL cldtaupi(klon, klev) ! pre-industrial cloud opt thickness for diag |
105 |
|
|
cjq-end |
106 |
|
|
c |
107 |
|
|
c Calculer l'epaisseur optique et l'emmissivite des nuages |
108 |
|
|
c |
109 |
|
|
cIM inversion des DO |
110 |
|
|
DO i = 1, klon |
111 |
|
|
xflwp(i)=0. |
112 |
|
|
xfiwp(i)=0. |
113 |
|
|
DO k = 1, klev |
114 |
|
|
c |
115 |
|
|
xflwc(i,k)=0. |
116 |
|
|
xfiwc(i,k)=0. |
117 |
|
|
c |
118 |
|
|
rad_chaud = rad_chau1 |
119 |
|
|
IF (k.LE.3) rad_chaud = rad_chau2 |
120 |
|
|
pclc(i,k) = MAX(pclc(i,k), seuil_neb) |
121 |
|
|
zflwp(i) = 1000.*pqlwp(i,k)/RG/pclc(i,k) |
122 |
|
|
. *(paprs(i,k)-paprs(i,k+1)) |
123 |
|
|
zfice = 1.0 - (t(i,k)-t_glace) / (273.13-t_glace) |
124 |
|
|
zfice = MIN(MAX(zfice,0.0),1.0) |
125 |
|
|
zfice = zfice**nexpo |
126 |
|
|
radius = rad_chaud * (1.-zfice) + rad_froid * zfice |
127 |
|
|
coef = coef_chau * (1.-zfice) + coef_froi * zfice |
128 |
|
|
pcltau(i,k) = 3.0/2.0 * zflwp(i) / radius |
129 |
|
|
pclemi(i,k) = 1.0 - EXP( - coef * zflwp(i)) |
130 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
if (ok_newmicro) then |
132 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
c -- liquid/ice cloud water paths: |
134 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
zfice = 1.0 - (t(i,k)-t_glace) / (273.13-t_glace) |
136 |
|
|
zfice = MIN(MAX(zfice,0.0),1.0) |
137 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
zflwp(i) = 1000.*(1.-zfice)*pqlwp(i,k)/pclc(i,k) |
139 |
|
|
: *(paprs(i,k)-paprs(i,k+1))/RG |
140 |
|
|
zfiwp(i) = 1000.*zfice*pqlwp(i,k)/pclc(i,k) |
141 |
|
|
: *(paprs(i,k)-paprs(i,k+1))/RG |
142 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
xflwp(i) = xflwp(i)+ (1.-zfice)*pqlwp(i,k) |
144 |
|
|
: *(paprs(i,k)-paprs(i,k+1))/RG |
145 |
|
|
xfiwp(i) = xfiwp(i)+ zfice*pqlwp(i,k) |
146 |
|
|
: *(paprs(i,k)-paprs(i,k+1))/RG |
147 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
cIM Total Liquid/Ice water content |
149 |
|
|
xflwc(i,k) = xflwc(i,k)+(1.-zfice)*pqlwp(i,k) |
150 |
|
|
xfiwc(i,k) = xfiwc(i,k)+zfice*pqlwp(i,k) |
151 |
|
|
cIM In-Cloud Liquid/Ice water content |
152 |
|
|
c xflwc(i,k) = xflwc(i,k)+(1.-zfice)*pqlwp(i,k)/pclc(i,k) |
153 |
|
|
c xfiwc(i,k) = xfiwc(i,k)+zfice*pqlwp(i,k)/pclc(i,k) |
154 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
c -- effective cloud droplet radius (microns): |
156 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
c for liquid water clouds: |
158 |
|
|
IF (ok_aie) THEN |
159 |
|
|
! Formula "D" of Boucher and Lohmann, Tellus, 1995 |
160 |
|
|
! |
161 |
|
|
cdnc(i,k) = 10.**(bl95_b0+bl95_b1* |
162 |
|
|
. log(MAX(sulfate(i,k),1.e-4))/log(10.))*1.e6 !-m-3 |
163 |
|
|
! Cloud droplet number concentration (CDNC) is restricted |
164 |
|
|
! to be within [20, 1000 cm^3] |
165 |
|
|
! |
166 |
|
|
cdnc(i,k)=MIN(1000.e6,MAX(20.e6,cdnc(i,k))) |
167 |
|
|
! |
168 |
|
|
! |
169 |
|
|
cdnc_pi(i,k) = 10.**(bl95_b0+bl95_b1* |
170 |
|
|
. log(MAX(sulfate_pi(i,k),1.e-4))/log(10.))*1.e6 !-m-3 |
171 |
|
|
cdnc_pi(i,k)=MIN(1000.e6,MAX(20.e6,cdnc_pi(i,k))) |
172 |
|
|
! |
173 |
|
|
! |
174 |
|
|
! air density: pplay(i,k) / (RD * zT(i,k)) |
175 |
|
|
! factor 1.1: derive effective radius from volume-mean radius |
176 |
|
|
! factor 1000 is the water density |
177 |
|
|
! _chaud means that this is the CDR for liquid water clouds |
178 |
|
|
! |
179 |
|
|
rad_chaud = |
180 |
|
|
. 1.1 * ( (pqlwp(i,k) * pplay(i,k) / (RD * T(i,k)) ) |
181 |
|
|
. / (4./3. * RPI * 1000. * cdnc(i,k)) )**(1./3.) |
182 |
|
|
! |
183 |
|
|
! Convert to um. CDR shall be at least 3 um. |
184 |
|
|
! |
185 |
|
|
c rad_chaud = MAX(rad_chaud*1.e6, 3.) |
186 |
|
|
rad_chaud = MAX(rad_chaud*1.e6, 5.) |
187 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
! Pre-industrial cloud opt thickness |
189 |
|
|
! |
190 |
|
|
! "radius" is calculated as rad_chaud above (plus the |
191 |
|
|
! ice cloud contribution) but using cdnc_pi instead of |
192 |
|
|
! cdnc. |
193 |
|
|
radius = |
194 |
|
|
. 1.1 * ( (pqlwp(i,k) * pplay(i,k) / (RD * T(i,k)) ) |
195 |
|
|
. / (4./3. * RPI * 1000. * cdnc_pi(i,k)) )**(1./3.) |
196 |
|
|
radius = MAX(radius*1.e6, 5.) |
197 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
tc = t(i,k)-273.15 |
199 |
|
|
rei = 0.71*tc + 61.29 |
200 |
|
|
if (tc.le.-81.4) rei = 3.5 |
201 |
|
|
if (zflwp(i).eq.0.) radius = 1. |
202 |
|
|
if (zfiwp(i).eq.0. .or. rei.le.0.) rei = 1. |
203 |
|
|
cldtaupi(i,k) = 3.0/2.0 * zflwp(i) / radius |
204 |
|
|
. + zfiwp(i) * (3.448e-03 + 2.431/rei) |
205 |
|
|
ENDIF ! ok_aie |
206 |
|
|
! For output diagnostics |
207 |
|
|
! |
208 |
|
|
! Cloud droplet effective radius [um] |
209 |
|
|
! |
210 |
|
|
! we multiply here with f * xl (fraction of liquid water |
211 |
|
|
! clouds in the grid cell) to avoid problems in the |
212 |
|
|
! averaging of the output. |
213 |
|
|
! In the output of IOIPSL, derive the real cloud droplet |
214 |
|
|
! effective radius as re/fl |
215 |
|
|
! |
216 |
|
|
fl(i,k) = pclc(i,k)*(1.-zfice) |
217 |
|
|
re(i,k) = rad_chaud*fl(i,k) |
218 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
c-jq end |
220 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
rel = rad_chaud |
222 |
|
|
c for ice clouds: as a function of the ambiant temperature |
223 |
|
|
c [formula used by Iacobellis and Somerville (2000), with an |
224 |
|
|
c asymptotical value of 3.5 microns at T<-81.4 C added to be |
225 |
|
|
c consistent with observations of Heymsfield et al. 1986]: |
226 |
|
|
tc = t(i,k)-273.15 |
227 |
|
|
rei = 0.71*tc + 61.29 |
228 |
|
|
if (tc.le.-81.4) rei = 3.5 |
229 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
c -- cloud optical thickness : |
231 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
c [for liquid clouds, traditional formula, |
233 |
|
|
c for ice clouds, Ebert & Curry (1992)] |
234 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
if (zflwp(i).eq.0.) rel = 1. |
236 |
|
|
if (zfiwp(i).eq.0. .or. rei.le.0.) rei = 1. |
237 |
|
|
pcltau(i,k) = 3.0/2.0 * ( zflwp(i)/rel ) |
238 |
|
|
. + zfiwp(i) * (3.448e-03 + 2.431/rei) |
239 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
c -- cloud infrared emissivity: |
241 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
c [the broadband infrared absorption coefficient is parameterized |
243 |
|
|
c as a function of the effective cld droplet radius] |
244 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
c Ebert and Curry (1992) formula as used by Kiehl & Zender (1995): |
246 |
|
|
k_ice = k_ice0 + 1.0/rei |
247 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
pclemi(i,k) = 1.0 |
249 |
|
|
. - EXP( - coef_chau*zflwp(i) - DF*k_ice*zfiwp(i) ) |
250 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
endif ! ok_newmicro |
252 |
|
|
|
253 |
|
|
lo = (pclc(i,k) .LE. seuil_neb) |
254 |
|
|
IF (lo) pclc(i,k) = 0.0 |
255 |
|
|
IF (lo) pcltau(i,k) = 0.0 |
256 |
|
|
IF (lo) pclemi(i,k) = 0.0 |
257 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
IF (lo) cldtaupi(i,k) = 0.0 |
259 |
|
|
IF (.NOT.ok_aie) cldtaupi(i,k)=pcltau(i,k) |
260 |
|
|
ENDDO |
261 |
|
|
ENDDO |
262 |
|
|
ccc DO k = 1, klev |
263 |
|
|
ccc DO i = 1, klon |
264 |
|
|
ccc t(i,k) = t(i,k) |
265 |
|
|
ccc pclc(i,k) = MAX( 1.e-5 , pclc(i,k) ) |
266 |
|
|
ccc lo = pclc(i,k) .GT. (2.*1.e-5) |
267 |
|
|
ccc zflwp = pqlwp(i,k)*1000.*(paprs(i,k)-paprs(i,k+1)) |
268 |
|
|
ccc . /(rg*pclc(i,k)) |
269 |
|
|
ccc zradef = 10.0 + (1.-sigs(k))*45.0 |
270 |
|
|
ccc pcltau(i,k) = 1.5 * zflwp / zradef |
271 |
|
|
ccc zfice=1.0-MIN(MAX((t(i,k)-263.)/(273.-263.),0.0),1.0) |
272 |
|
|
ccc zmsac = 0.13*(1.0-zfice) + 0.08*zfice |
273 |
|
|
ccc pclemi(i,k) = 1.-EXP(-zmsac*zflwp) |
274 |
|
|
ccc if (.NOT.lo) pclc(i,k) = 0.0 |
275 |
|
|
ccc if (.NOT.lo) pcltau(i,k) = 0.0 |
276 |
|
|
ccc if (.NOT.lo) pclemi(i,k) = 0.0 |
277 |
|
|
ccc ENDDO |
278 |
|
|
ccc ENDDO |
279 |
|
|
cccccc print*, 'pas de nuage dans le rayonnement' |
280 |
|
|
cccccc DO k = 1, klev |
281 |
|
|
cccccc DO i = 1, klon |
282 |
|
|
cccccc pclc(i,k) = 0.0 |
283 |
|
|
cccccc pcltau(i,k) = 0.0 |
284 |
|
|
cccccc pclemi(i,k) = 0.0 |
285 |
|
|
cccccc ENDDO |
286 |
|
|
cccccc ENDDO |
287 |
|
|
C |
288 |
|
|
C COMPUTE CLOUD LIQUID PATH AND TOTAL CLOUDINESS |
289 |
|
|
C |
290 |
|
|
DO i = 1, klon |
291 |
|
|
pct(i)=1.0 |
292 |
|
|
pch(i)=1.0 |
293 |
|
|
pcm(i) = 1.0 |
294 |
|
|
pcl(i) = 1.0 |
295 |
|
|
pctlwp(i) = 0.0 |
296 |
|
|
ENDDO |
297 |
|
|
C |
298 |
|
|
DO k = klev, 1, -1 |
299 |
|
|
DO i = 1, klon |
300 |
|
|
pctlwp(i) = pctlwp(i) |
301 |
|
|
. + pqlwp(i,k)*(paprs(i,k)-paprs(i,k+1))/RG |
302 |
|
|
pct(i) = pct(i)*(1.0-pclc(i,k)) |
303 |
|
|
if (pplay(i,k).LE.cetahb*paprs(i,1)) |
304 |
|
|
. pch(i) = pch(i)*(1.0-pclc(i,k)) |
305 |
|
|
if (pplay(i,k).GT.cetahb*paprs(i,1) .AND. |
306 |
|
|
. pplay(i,k).LE.cetamb*paprs(i,1)) |
307 |
|
|
. pcm(i) = pcm(i)*(1.0-pclc(i,k)) |
308 |
|
|
if (pplay(i,k).GT.cetamb*paprs(i,1)) |
309 |
|
|
. pcl(i) = pcl(i)*(1.0-pclc(i,k)) |
310 |
|
|
ENDDO |
311 |
|
|
ENDDO |
312 |
|
|
C |
313 |
|
|
DO i = 1, klon |
314 |
|
|
pct(i)=1.-pct(i) |
315 |
|
|
pch(i)=1.-pch(i) |
316 |
|
|
pcm(i)=1.-pcm(i) |
317 |
|
|
pcl(i)=1.-pcl(i) |
318 |
|
|
ENDDO |
319 |
|
|
C |
320 |
|
|
RETURN |
321 |
|
|
END |