| | 4 | |
| | 5 | === On Wednesday, 19th October === |
| | 6 | |
| | 7 | In person with Juliette, Didier and Nicolas. |
| | 8 | |
| | 9 | Look on comparison of EDGAR inventory and the one of CEDS. Globally, their emissions are similar but if we look by sectors, there are different. In EDGAR, apparently, it could be better to drop fertilizers and biomass burning categories. |
| | 10 | |
| | 11 | Use of NMVOC proxy: seems to be a good idea but have to drop some sectors already taken into account in orchidee dataset. NMVOC better than NH,,3,, because too related to agricultural sector, neither to CO because too related to industry, then NMVOC seem to be the less polluted by one particular sector. |
| | 12 | |
| | 13 | __//**TO DO**//__ |
| | 14 | * Comparison of emissions (without soil emissions and fertilizers) and understood relationship between their subcategories; |
| | 15 | * Have a look on geographical repartition (in order to see if patterns are similar); |
| | 16 | * Proxy to recompute without soil emission and without domestic sector. (from 0 Tg/yr in 1750 to little in 1850); |
| | 17 | * See with Anne to come into coupled model. |
| | 18 | |
| | 19 | A few words on the next MERMAID meeting (December 14) with a presentation of N,,2,,O cycle and my work (introduction with Tian graph). |
