Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of ESM2025-N-cycle/Meetings


Ignore:
Timestamp:
09/06/22 10:28:47 (20 months ago)
Author:
klaurent
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • ESM2025-N-cycle/Meetings

    v1 v2  
    1 = Meetings =  
     1= Meeting Reports ==  
     2 
     3 
     4=== On Wednesday, 24th August ===  
     5 
     6In person with Didier and Nicolas. PDF support [see attached file[[Image(meeting_220824.pdf)]]]. 
     7 
     8Resume of august simulations and work. 
     9 
     10* Transformation of CEDS emissions: from 1970 to 1999, use of netCDF file 2000 with a factor per sector to create netcdf emissions. Notebooks **Transform_2000nc_from1970_to1999_via_CEDScsv.ipynb** and **work_on_data_to_complete_sectors_with_unknows_categories.ipynb** 
     11* 2 simulations: L39.v03 as a base (pre-industrial, constrained to 285ppm), then pi_piscideeL (free, pre industrial, 40 years). 
     12 
     13Results seem good regarding vertical pressure profile, total loss N,,2,,O, pattern of emissions. Need to investigate more and continue. 
     14 
     15 
     16__//**TO DO**//__ 
     17* Make graph of pressure for those two simulations, 
     18* Continue piscideeL 5 years and compute mean of loss, 
     19* Resume differences between former simulations, 
     20* Re-create netCDF files with only manure_management (and not soil_emissions) for agricultural sector. 
     21 
     22 
     23 
     24=== On Tuesday, 12th July ===  
     25 
     26In person with Didier. 
     27 
     28Discussion of simulations and set-up to make. 
     29 
     30Check N,,2,,O loss in 1999 for v03 simulation (to be continued) and create pi_piscideeL run from it to turn 40 years (1980-2020, L means libre/free/not rescaled at 285 ppm). 
     31 
     32Explanation of how to create ncfiles from 1970 to 1999 from 2000's geographical repartition and ratio computed with total emissions per sector (csv file). 
     33Once done, adapt ciclad's code to transform them on Incasflx 144x142 grid. 
     34 
     35 
     36=== On Monday, 11th July ===  
     37 
     38In person with Didier, Nicolas and Juliette. 
     39 
     40Conversation on Workshop N,,2,,O source in Toulouse (6-8 July) : very interesting to see different communities (observation, inversion, modellers) 
     41 
     42First result with a decreasing total emission (from 285 ppm to 280 ppm in 20 years) : seems to be promising. 
     43 
     44Reflection on what is needed in order to **move to coupled system**. Remembrance of deadlines and expectations for ESM2025 project. Land emission per year ok, Nicolas will ask to Sarah or Laurent to have same emission for ocean. After that, work with Thibault Lurton and/or Anne Cozic to adapt code. 
     45 
     46**How to reconstruct anthropologic N,,2,,O emission between 1850 and 1970 ?**  Try to find some proxy (population or chemical species that exists during this period) 
     47 
     48 
     49__//**TO DO**//__ 
     50 * Reconstruct N,,2,,O emission with CEDS inventory with rescaling year by year (height with total budget and spatial with year 2000) 
     51 * When all is fixed, simulation from 1970 to 2015 in order to see if the model is coherent or not (with a rescaling at ~300ppm : CMIP6). 
     52 * Find information on Japanese model (the one of Prabir Patra) 
     53 * Get more information on Pisces simulation (does it use flag or many change in order to have it? Is it possible to have emissions per year from pre-industrial to present time?) 
     54 
     55__//**Next**//__ 
     56 * Computation of loss rate 
     57 * Coupled model (with Anne and Thibaut) 
     58 
     59 
     60 
     61=== On Wednesday, 29th June ===  
     62 
     63In person with Didier and Juliette + in visio with Marion. 
     64 
     65Explanation of the remapping problem with pisces' file. The common CDO functions doesn't work (not conservative + white columns or column with outliers). 
     66 
     67Solution : See Germain if he has some same files (grid 294x362 and not 292x292) + in correspondence with O. Marti for a better interpolation. //work in progress// 
     68 
     69 
     70__//**TO DO**//__ 
     71 * Understand and find a solution to the remapping problem. 
     72 * Send an e-mail to Sarah Berthet, in charge of different projects on N,,2,,O : could be seen during the N,,2,,O workshop in Toulouse (from 6th to 8th July). 
     73 * Simulations in 39 layers with invariants outputs in two different configurations. 
     74 * On profile picture, try to invert axis + use logarithm scale. 
     75 * Check availabilities for next meetings. 
     76 
     77==== + Meeting with Ddiier ==== 
     78 * See different scripts to compute the N,,2,,O-loss and N,,2,,O-burden. 
     79 * Show what and how to change Incasflx files in order to use a irregular grid as input (avoiding the remapping problem). 
     80 
     81 
     82=== On Wednesday, 15th June ===  
     83 
     84In person with Nicolas and Didier. 
     85 
     86Waiting for the first result with the 39-layers configuration.  
     87 
     88After the General Assembly of ESM2025, pisces emissions seems to be too high... In fact, there was a problem of units conversion (mostly because of a misunderstanding of input units (mol N rather than mol N,,2,,O). 
     89 
     90Nicolas asked if lightning is implemented because it seems to have an total emission between 0.5 and 2 Tg/Nyr. 
     91 
     92Some works will be presented during the N,,2,,O workshop in Toulouse from July, 6th to 8th. 
     93 
     94__//**To DO**//__ 
     95* Analyse the vertical profile when the 39-layers configuration of one year is done. 
     96* + See Didier for the next steps. 
     97* Re-compute the calculation with the good value of pisces emissions. 
     98 
     99=== On Wednesday, 1st June ===  
     100 
     101In person with Nicolas, Juliette, Didier. Special guest : Anne. 
     102 
     103Special demands to Anne :  
     104* Passage from 79 layers to 39 : is it easy and feasible ? Seems to change some configuration's files (oxidants for example). 
     105* svn for INCA ok, if need to change orchidee's sources, ask to Nicolas (but no need for this moment). 
     106* Make some time series for long run test (feasible with the training course), 
     107* Add output variables that would be computing into the code (have to see Anne when it will be time). 
     108 
     109Show results on Bouwman (with aqua and soil flux): slight difference again. Using mask 0/1 (and not fractional one) is better. 
     110 
     111Show on-going result of CEDS inventory (from McDuffie): problem with units, needs to calculate annual mean to correspond to article's images. 
     112 
     113__//**To DO**//__ 
     114* Finish charts of CEDS inventory. Notebooks used: CEDS_charts_supplementary_data_N2O.ipynb and Charts_N2O_CEDS.ipynb. 
     115* Schedule a meeting with Didier when 39 layers' configuration is ready. 
     116* Make simulation with oce and soil flux for Bouwman (not with aqua !!). 
     117 
     118=== On Wednesday, 18th May ===  
     119 
     120In person with Juliette, Didier, Nicolas. 
     121 
     122* Notebook **Budget_inventories** : total budget of N,,2,,O emissions (in tables), differences found between outputs INCASFLX and calculations in notebook (with mask, area and change units), different charts (by latitude, by land/ocean part, with histograms...) 
     123 
     124 
     125Using the mask with fraction:  
     126 
     127|| FracMask  ||||||     -   Output INCASFLX    -    ||||||     -  Notebook computing   -   || 
     128|| (Mt/yr) ||   Ocean  ||   Land   || Ratio O/L ||   Ocean  ||   Land   || Ratio O/L || 
     129||**Bouwman**  || 5.650486 || 11.83547 || 0.478  ||  13.967 ||  16.726  ||  0.835   || 
     130||             ||  32.3%   || 67.7%   ||        ||  45.5% ||  54.5% ||    || 
     131||**Transcom** || 6.634 || 16.614 || 0.399     ||  8.879 ||  14.421 ||  0.616   || 
     132||             ||  28.5%  || 71.5%  ||       ||  38.1% || 61.9% ||  || 
     133||**Piscidee** || 6.432 || 7.107 || 0.905      ||  6.579 ||  6.989 ||  0.941   || 
     134||             ||47.5%  ||  52.5%  ||        ||  48.5% ||  51.5% ||       || 
     135 
     136Using the mask with 0/1 values: 
     137 
     138|| 0/1 Mask ||||||     -   Output INCASFLX    -    ||||||     -  Notebook computing   -   || 
     139|| (Mt/yr) ||   Ocean  ||   Land   || Ratio O/L ||   Ocean  ||   Land   || Ratio O/L || 
     140||**Bouwman**  || 5.650486 || 11.83547 || 0.478      ||  12.797 ||  17.899 ||  0.714   || 
     141||             || 32.3% || 67.7%||          ||  41.7% ||  58.3% ||   || 
     142||**Transcom** || 6.634 || 16.614 || 0.399     ||  8.118 ||  15.184 ||  0.535   || 
     143||             || 28.5%  || 71.5%  ||       ||  34.8% ||  65.2% ||     || 
     144||**Piscidee** || 6.432 || 7.107 || 0.905      ||  6.174 ||  7.395 ||  0.834   || 
     145||             || 47.5% || 52.5% ||          ||  45.5% ||  54.5% ||      || 
     146 
     147 
     148Those differences can be explained by the different power that may exist between marine or continental fluxes at coasts notably. With mask, these two fluxes have the same importance so it changes total flux. 
     149 
     150Values per latitudes: 
     151|| (Tg/yr)  ||90-30S|| 30S-0||0-30N||30-90N||Total|| 
     152|| **Bouwman**  ||5.728||7.115||9.948||8.392||31.183|| 
     153|| **Trancsom** ||2.714||7.432||8.762||4.857||23.765|| 
     154|| **Piscidee** ||1.736||4.413||4.392||3.302||13.843|| 
     155 
     156 
     157Calcul file by file: 
     158From Transcom (orchidee+pisces) : (no mask + not output of sflx) -> correspond to values of table 2 thompson part 1. 
     159 
     160||  ||||||     -   Output INCASFLX    -    ||||||     -  Notebook computing   -   || 
     161|| (Mt/yr) ||   Ocean  ||   Land   || Ratio O/L ||   Ocean  ||   Land   || Ratio O/L || 
     162||**Transcom**  ||  6.634174 || 16.61481 ||  0.399293   || 4.23125 || 10.59692 || 0.399291    ||  
     163 
     164 
     165 
     166Transcom is not a pre-industrial inventory, it's actual. So, it's better to work with piscidee inventory. 
     167 
     168 
     169__//**To DO**//__ 
     170* Modify Bouwman run to take only 'oce' and 'soil' variables -> relaunch notebook to compare if it's better, 
     171* Continue modification in INCA's code. 
     172 
     173=== On Friday, 13th May === 
     174 
     175Informal with Didier. 
     176 
     177Preparation to change INCA's code in Irene. 
     178 
     179* Modify inca.card to take new NAT files and BBG from ciclad. 
     180* Modify mksflx_p2p.F90 to put flx_n2o_ant to zero and add aflux terms. 
     181* Modify sflx_inti.F90 to take into account BBG emissions. 
     182* Modify set_ub_vals.F90 to rescale N,,2,,O flux (with parallel part and constant N,,2,,O flux at 285 ppb) 
     183 
     184Launch different runs in order to check each step. 
     185 
     186__//**Next**//__ 
     187* Change ANT in ciclad, 
     188* Put flx_n2o_ant to 0, 
     189* Erase the rescaling, 
     190* Add N2O loss as an output... 
     191 
     192=== On Wednesday, 4th May ===  
     193 
     194In person with Juliette and Marion. 
     195 
     196* Presentation of the Wiki page. 
     197* Presentation of the two notebooks. 
     198* Discussion on the different conceptions used in ocean and land communities (different grids, different units in the flux (mol/m2/s vs kg/m2/s)...). 
     199 
     200On Analyse_3_sflx_NAT_dyn.ipynb, discussions on visualization with scale, calculation of the full emission on earth per year or per month. 
     201 
     202__//**To DO**//__ 
     203* Make an analysis per month, per hemisphere, in order to get the total flux emissions for each inventory. 
     204* Take information on where the inventories come from (especially Bouwman and Transcom). 
     205* Draw tables which resume datas used, total emissions, models used in files... 
     206* Compare native grid and regular grid for pisces. 
     207* Compare values of each file used with outputs of INCASFLX. 
     208* Compare total emissions on ocean and land with literature (ciais, ippc) and Bouwman and Trancsom inventories. 
     209 
     210=== On Wednesday, 20th April ===  
     211 
     212In person with Nicolas. 
     213 
     214Discussion on: 
     215 
     216* New page on Wiki/igcmg (this one !) 
     217* Explanation of the created notebooks (Data_viewer and Analyse_3_sflx_NAT_dyn) 
     218  * Data_viewer : interactive ok but add choices/texts... 
     219  * Analyse_3_sflx_NAT_dyn : change the seasonal analysis made. 
     220* Test with Nicolas' network to know about access to my notebooks. 
     221* Speak about dods/orchidee to avoid downloading images on wiki. 
     222 
     223Now, focus on N2O with long living time, but after, we can test on other compounds. 
     224 
     225__//**To DO**//__ 
     226* Change colorbar with mean+/-std, add some texts on Notebooks and add units on charts 
     227* Erase rescaling in Bouwman to have a better comparison 
     228* Analyse the 3 datasets in a different way : global tables with sum per year, per region, per type (ocean/land) (watch out units) 
     229* Give "procedure" and access to notebooks to all 
     230* Compare with Auburn data (and Tian 2020) 
     231* Look at Mendeley (or Zottero) for bibliography 
     232 
     233Nicolas: Paths to have regional masks (from Transcom) 
     234 
     235 
     236 
     237=== On Wednesday, 6th April ===  
     238 
     239In Visio with Nicolas, Juliette, Didier, Marion. 
     240 
     241Mainly, this meeting was to talk a bit more about the project and the work I(=Karine) can make before the training session (April 14th & 15th). 
     242 
     243Discussion on: 
     244* the first result made with INCAFLX and 3 different inventories, 
     245* the planning we can set up (which kind of simulation...) 
     246* the impact of N2O on chemistry (if everything is coupled),  
     247* the certainty (or uncertainty) of inventories used (to determine an appropriate scaling),  
     248* the work of Pierre for aquatic emissions (importance of river emissions), 
     249 
     250//Planning :// Run simulation without chemistry and no rescaling, first for pre-industrial, then until now to see/understand the correction we can make on both period (a different correction for each period). 
     251 
     252=> This have to be detailed and confirmed 
     253 
     254Maybe run only 10 years to know where are sinks, determine some lifetime/seasonal cycle in order to calculate the scaling we may use. 
     255 
     256Suggestions to work with the GES branch for the code (branch for coupled model with CO,,2,, , CH,,4,, and N,,2,,O) 
     257 
     258**Meeting every 2 weeks same day, same time (ie, Wednesday at 10:00)** 
     259 
     260 
     261__//**To DO**//__ 
     262* Ask for writing a Wiki page on IGCMG  
     263* Log on JupyterHub 
     264* Make an "experiment plan" for future simulations 
     265* Analyse the results that I've already (seasonal analyses, comparison between inventories with Bouwman as a reference, recap origin/grid resolution...) 
     266* Show the aquatic variable of Bouwman (and maybe some others) 
     267 
     268Didier : emissions file for pre-industrial fires to be send to Karine