| 123 | | * Vérifier le diagnostic necbLut ("In one of the comment of the LUC paper, I was recommended to try analyzing the "necbLut" variable that is defined as "Net Carbon Mass Flux into Land-Use Tile [kgC m-2 s-1]", i.e. it is carbon density for each land-use tile. The values of IPSL-CM6A-LR appeared quite different from other models (globally negative and ten-fold larger in magnitude than in other models). I looked at the variable definition of ORCHIDEE (line 583 of http://forge.ipsl.jussieu.fr/orchidee/browser/tags/ORCHIDEE_2_0/ORCHIDEE/src_xml/field_def_orchidee.xml |
| 124 | | ): npplut - ralut - rhlut - flulccproductlut. Here, it seems that the Ra was subtracted redundantly because NPP already excludes Ra. If you agree this is an error, I think it should be added to errata.") |
| | 123 | * Vérifier le diagnostic necbLut ("In one of the comment of the LUC paper, I was recommended to try analyzing the "necbLut" variable that is defined as "Net Carbon Mass Flux into Land-Use Tile [kgC m-2 s-1]", i.e. it is carbon density for each land-use tile. The values of IPSL-CM6A-LR appeared quite different from other models (globally negative and ten-fold larger in magnitude than in other models). I looked at the variable definition of ORCHIDEE (line 583 of http://forge.ipsl.jussieu.fr/orchidee/browser/tags/ORCHIDEE_2_0/ORCHIDEE/src_xml/field_def_orchidee.xml): npplut - ralut - rhlut - flulccproductlut. Here, it seems that the Ra was subtracted redundantly because NPP already excludes Ra. If you agree this is an error, I think it should be added to errata.") |
