| 49 | | > {{{ |
| 50 | | > Il me semble que pour être cohérent avec la non-réalisation d'un DECK, il doit prendre les SST du piControl officiel. Que dit le protocole pour ces simulations à SST fixées ? SST observées ou SST du piControl ? |
| 51 | | > }}} |
| 52 | | > translation |
| 53 | | > {{{ |
| 54 | | > to be coherent with the fact we not rerun a deck, we need to use SST from the offical picontrol simulation. Before to made this choice we need to check the protocol for fixed sst ? observed or picontrol sst ? |
| 55 | | > }}} |
| 56 | | [[BR]] |
| 57 | | > Ramiro:: |
| 58 | | > {{{ verify protocol to know if we use sst from obsevation or from picontrol run}}} |
| 59 | | > |
| 60 | | > > - The protocol indicates that: Fixed SST ERF simulation. Use pre-industrial climatological average SST and sea-ice distributions. |
| 61 | | > > - The official paper describing AerChemMIP indicates: |
| 62 | | > > The control simulation for these experiments will use 1850concentrations of WMGHGs and emissions of NTCFs, |
| 63 | | > > run for 30 years in atmosphere-only mode with SSTs and sea ice prescribed as a (monthly varying) climatology |
| 64 | | > > taken from 30 years of the pre-industrial control (experiment piClim-control; see Table 6) following the |
| 65 | | > > Radiative Forcing Model Intercomparison Project (RFMIP) specification (Pincus et al., 2016). |
| 66 | | > '''We have then to use the piClim-control''' |
| 67 | | > |
| 68 | | [[BR]] |
| 69 | | > Anne:: |
| 70 | | > ask Arnaud path for the official ipslcm6 picontrol simulation. --> path send by email 20200504 |
| 71 | | > 2020504 : Arnaud:: |
| 72 | | > > J'ai fait les xmls pour 30 ans de 1850 à 1879 mais vous pouvez prendre une autre periode de 30 ans que celle-là |
| 73 | | > > si vous le souhaitez...à la fois par rapport au protocole demandé mais peut etre aussi par rapport à la periode |
| 74 | | > > de 30 ans du picontrol de laquelle vous voulez extraire les sst de forcage (peut etre que certains 30 ans sont "mieux" que d'autres"...)... |
| 75 | | > > Translation : |
| 76 | | > > I did xmls files for 30 years from 1850 to 1879, but you can use an other 30 years periods than this one if the |
| 77 | | > > protocol ask it, or if you prefer an other period from the picontrol simulation |
| 78 | | |
| 79 | | |
| 80 | | |
| 81 | | |
| 82 | | |
| 83 | | === 3.b AER === |
| 84 | | [[BR]] |
| | 76 | Ramiro:: |
| | 77 | {{{ TODO: verify protocol to know if we use sst from obsevation or from picontrol run}}} |
| | 78 | |
| | 79 | > - The protocol indicates that: Fixed SST ERF simulation. Use pre-industrial climatological average SST and sea-ice distributions. |
| | 80 | > - The official paper describing AerChemMIP indicates: |
| | 81 | > The control simulation for these experiments will use 1850concentrations of WMGHGs and emissions of NTCFs, |
| | 82 | > run for 30 years in atmosphere-only mode with SSTs and sea ice prescribed as a (monthly varying) climatology |
| | 83 | > taken from 30 years of the pre-industrial control (experiment piClim-control; see Table 6) following the |
| | 84 | > Radiative Forcing Model Intercomparison Project (RFMIP) specification (Pincus et al., 2016). |
| | 85 | '''We have then to use the piClim-control''' |
| | 86 | |
| | 87 | Anne:: |
| | 88 | {{{ TODO: ask Arnaud path for the official ipslcm6 picontrol simulation. --> path send by email 20200504}}} |
| | 89 | 2020504 : Arnaud:: |
| | 90 | > J'ai fait les xmls pour 30 ans de 1850 à 1879 mais vous pouvez prendre une autre periode de 30 ans que celle-là |
| | 91 | > si vous le souhaitez...à la fois par rapport au protocole demandé mais peut etre aussi par rapport à la periode |
| | 92 | > de 30 ans du picontrol de laquelle vous voulez extraire les sst de forcage (peut etre que certains 30 ans sont "mieux" que d'autres"...)... |
| | 93 | > Translation : |
| | 94 | > I did xmls files for 30 years from 1850 to 1879, but you can use an other 30 years periods than this one if the |
| | 95 | > protocol ask it, or if you prefer an other period from the picontrol simulation |
| | 96 | }}} |
| | 97 | |
| | 98 | {{{#!th rowspan=4 align=justify style="background: #eff" |
| | 99 | AER |
| | 100 | }}} |
| | 101 | |---------------- |
| | 102 | {{{#!td |
| | 103 | |
