| 396 | |
| 397 | {{{#!th rowspan=12 align=justify style="background: #eba" |
| 398 | piClim-NH3 |
| 399 | }}} |
| 400 | |---------------- |
| 401 | {{{#!td |
| 402 | |
| 403 | DIFFERENCE with piClim-control |
| 404 | |
| 405 | |
| 406 | - The simulation is identical to piClim-Control but NH3 of 2014. |
| 407 | - This part will need changes on the surface fluxes but not like AER that changes all, but just those specific of NH3. |
| 408 | |
| 409 | }}} |
| 410 | |
| 411 | {{{#!th rowspan=12 align=justify style="background: #eba" |
| 412 | piClim-NOx |
| 413 | }}} |
| 414 | |---------------- |
| 415 | {{{#!td |
| 416 | |
| 417 | DIFFERENCE with piClim-control |
| 418 | |
| 419 | |
| 420 | - The simulation is identical to piClim-Control but NOx of 2014. |
| 421 | - This part will need changes on the surface fluxes but not like AER that changes all, but just those specific of NOx. |
| 422 | |
| 423 | }}} |
| 424 | |
| 425 | {{{#!th rowspan=12 align=justify style="background: #eba" |
| 426 | piClim-SO2 |
| 427 | }}} |
| 428 | |---------------- |
| 429 | {{{#!td |
| 430 | |
| 431 | DIFFERENCE with piClim-control |
| 432 | |
| 433 | |
| 434 | - The simulation is identical to piClim-Control but SO2 of 2014. |
| 435 | - This part will need changes on the surface fluxes but not like AER that changes all, but just those specific of SO2. |
| 436 | |
| 437 | }}} |
| 438 | |
| 439 | {{{#!th rowspan=12 align=justify style="background: #eba" |
| 440 | piClim-NTCF |
| 441 | }}} |
| 442 | |---------------- |
| 443 | {{{#!td |
| 444 | |
| 445 | DIFFERENCE with piClim-control |
| 446 | |
| 447 | We need to discuss implementation with Yves and Didier. |
| 448 | |
| 449 | }}} |