Changes between Version 68 and Version 69 of incadev/IPSLCM6-AER

Timestamp:

06/07/20 15:26:28 (4 years ago)

Author:

ramiro

Comment:

--

incadev/IPSLCM6-AER

@@ -187 +187 @@
 }}}
 
-{{{#!div style="background: #ffd; border: 3px ridge"
-
- IMPORTANT::
-    - A better understanding of how is operating the ping files. There are few inconsistencies in the final files, for example, we have in the NetCDF files: drydust but wetdustci and emidustci. Probably the ping files will resolve this in the last step but currently, the NetCDF variable names are somehow confusing. Similarly, we have drynh4 but wetnh4as as the variable name.
-    - The values of emioa is not fully consistent with the aerocom simulation. It can be that we are not saving the MSA related variables or an issue with the emissions in altitude. This was known in advance as OA definitions on ping-files we agreed without MSA but for double-checking, we need the MSA related variables. I have updated this and run a test to verify this issue. There were not saved modal information of NO3 for emission and deposition. The same for nh4. Although might not be necessary for official AerChemMIP variables, it would be useful for double-checking.
+{{{#!div style="background: #eba; border: 3px ridge"
+
+ IMPORTANT (BLOCKING ISSUE)::
+    - A better understanding of how is operating the ping files. There are few inconsistencies in the final files (maybe logical) for example, we have in the NetCDF files: drydust but wetdustci and emidustci. I think this is because drydust is defined as drydustci+seddustci. Probably the ping files will resolve this in the last step but currently, the NetCDF variable names are somehow confusing. Similarly, we have drynh4 but wetnh4as as the variable name.
+    - The values of emioa is not fully consistent with the AeroCOM simulation. It can be that we are not saving the MSA related variables or an issue with the emissions in altitude (or both). This was known in advance as OA definitions on ping-files we agreed without MSA. For double-checking, we need the MSA related variables and emissions in altitude. 
+    - There were not saved modal information of NO3 for emission and deposition. The same for nh4. Although might not be necessary for official AerChemMIP variables, it would be useful for double-checking.
     - The MDW variables were not saved => problem of communication. So I have uncommented the lines and added also number concentrations of the modes.
     - Preliminary analysis indicates that everything has reasonable values but OA that need to be checked.    
+    - It has been tried several runs where Emi_alt_AIPOMM and/or Emi_alt_ASPOMM are added on file_def_inca_AER_monthly_CM6.xml but it always crashed when any change is added to this file. 
+
+ DECISION NEED::
+    A. KEEP WITH current emioa and current situation
+    B. CHANGE XML files and rerun when necessary
+
 }}}
 
 == 5b. After launch a simulation == 
  1. Run 2 years and use check_CMIP6.sh script 
- 2. Send results to Anne/Arnaoud
+ 2. Send results to Anne and Arnaud
  3. After approval register the simulation at [[https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1hF2edFrYwVw1ttPgpRg1NnlbwMpjRqU3o0DJt3SRMC4/edit#gid=90403863]| List simulations]]
  4. The run the full simulation (check about the Smooth files setting)
@@ -244 +251 @@
 || 2020/06/05 || Ramiro   ||Run 30 yr runs                       || piClim-{NO3,SO2,OC,BC}   || RUNNING               ||
 || 2020/06/05 || Ramiro   ||STOP runs to discuss test of OA      || piClim-{NO3,SO2,OC,BC}   || Tests                ||
-|| 2020/06/05 || Ramiro   ||Runs 1 year test of piClim-OC        || Saving MSA               || Checks               ||
+|| 2020/06/05 || Ramiro   ||Runs tests of piClim-OC              || Saving MSA and/or Emi_alt || Checks               ||
+|| 2020/06/06 || Ramiro   ||Added BLOCK ISSUE in red             || BLOCK ISSUE || DOCUMENTATION               ||
+
 ----