Changeset 10442 for NEMO/trunk/doc/latex/NEMO/subfiles/chap_conservation.tex

Timestamp:

2018-12-21T15:18:38+01:00 (5 years ago)

Author:

nicolasmartin

Message:

Front page edition, cleaning in custom LaTeX commands and add index for single subfile compilation

• Use \thanks storing cmd to refer to the ST members list for 2018 in an footnote on the cover page
• NEMO and Fortran in small capitals
• Removing of unused or underused custom cmds, move local cmds to their respective .tex file
• Addition of new ones (\zstar, \ztilde, \sstar, \stilde, \ie, \eg, \fortran, \fninety)
• Fonts for indexed items: italic font for files (modules and .nc files), preformat for code (CPP keys, routines names and namelists content)

File:

• NEMO/trunk/doc/latex/NEMO/subfiles/chap_conservation.tex (modified) (8 diffs)

NEMO/trunk/doc/latex/NEMO/subfiles/chap_conservation.tex

@@ -35 +35 @@
 The alternative is to use diffusive schemes such as upstream or flux corrected schemes.
 This last option was rejected because we prefer a complete handling of the model diffusion,
-i.e. of the model physics rather than letting the advective scheme produces its own implicit diffusion without
+\ie of the model physics rather than letting the advective scheme produces its own implicit diffusion without
 controlling the space and time structure of this implicit diffusion.
 Note that in some very specific cases as passive tracer studies, the positivity of the advective scheme is required.
@@ -60 +60 @@
 \textbf{* relative, planetary and total vorticity term:}
 
-Let us define as either the relative, planetary and total potential vorticity, i.e. ?, ?, and ?, respectively.
+Let us define as either the relative, planetary and total potential vorticity, \ie, ?, and ?, respectively.
 The continuous formulation of the vorticity term satisfies following integral constraints:
 \[
@@ -122 +122 @@
 This properties is satisfied locally with the choice of discretization we have made (property (II.1.9)~).
 In addition, when the equation of state is linear
-(i.e. when an advective-diffusive equation for density can be derived from those of temperature and salinity)
+(\ie when an advective-diffusive equation for density can be derived from those of temperature and salinity)
 the change of horizontal kinetic energy due to the work of pressure forces is balanced by the change of
 potential energy due to buoyancy forces:
@@ -164 +164 @@
 
 In continuous formulation, the advective terms of the tracer equations conserve the tracer content and
-the quadratic form of the tracer, $i.e.$
+the quadratic form of the tracer, \ie
 \[
   % \label{eq:tra_tra2}
@@ -283 +283 @@
 In discrete form, all these properties are satisfied in $z$-coordinate (see Appendix C).
 In $s$-coordinates, only first order properties can be demonstrated,
-$i.e.$ the vertical momentum physics conserve momentum, potential vorticity, and horizontal divergence.
+\ie the vertical momentum physics conserve momentum, potential vorticity, and horizontal divergence.
 
 % -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -294 +294 @@
 the heat and salt contents are conserved (equations in flux form, second order centred finite differences).
 As a form flux is used to compute the temperature and salinity,
-the quadratic form of these quantities (i.e. their variance) globally tends to diminish.
+the quadratic form of these quantities (\ie their variance) globally tends to diminish.
 As for the advective term, there is generally no strict conservation of mass even if,
 in practice, the mass is conserved with a very good accuracy. 
@@ -309 +309 @@
 \]
 
-\textbf{* vertical physics: }conservation of tracer, dissipation of tracer variance, $i.e.$
+\textbf{* vertical physics: }conservation of tracer, dissipation of tracer variance, \ie
 
 \[
@@ -330 +330 @@
 \biblio
 
+\pindex
+
 \end{document}