Changeset 11565 for NEMO/trunk/doc/latex/NEMO/subfiles/chap_ZDF.tex

Timestamp:

2019-09-18T16:58:58+02:00 (5 years ago)

Author:

nicolasmartin

Message:

Cleaning of section titles

File:

• NEMO/trunk/doc/latex/NEMO/subfiles/chap_ZDF.tex (modified) (20 diffs)

NEMO/trunk/doc/latex/NEMO/subfiles/chap_ZDF.tex

@@ -58 +58 @@
 %        Constant
 % -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-\subsection[Constant (\forcode{ln_zdfcst=.true.})]
-{Constant (\protect\np{ln\_zdfcst}\forcode{=.true.})}
+\subsection[Constant (\forcode{ln_zdfcst})]{Constant (\protect\np{ln\_zdfcst})}
 \label{subsec:ZDF_cst}
 
@@ -81 +80 @@
 %        Richardson Number Dependent
 % -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-\subsection[Richardson number dependent (\forcode{ln_zdfric=.true.})]
-{Richardson number dependent (\protect\np{ln\_zdfric}\forcode{=.true.})}
+\subsection[Richardson number dependent (\forcode{ln_zdfric})]{Richardson number dependent (\protect\np{ln\_zdfric})}
 \label{subsec:ZDF_ric}
 
@@ -143 +141 @@
 %        TKE Turbulent Closure Scheme
 % -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-\subsection[TKE turbulent closure scheme (\forcode{ln_zdftke=.true.})]
-{TKE turbulent closure scheme (\protect\np{ln\_zdftke}\forcode{=.true.})}
+\subsection[TKE turbulent closure scheme (\forcode{ln_zdftke})]{TKE turbulent closure scheme (\protect\np{ln\_zdftke})}
 \label{subsec:ZDF_tke}
 %--------------------------------------------namzdf_tke--------------------------------------------------
@@ -427 +424 @@
 %        GLS Generic Length Scale Scheme
 % -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-\subsection[GLS: Generic Length Scale (\forcode{ln_zdfgls=.true.})]
-{GLS: Generic Length Scale (\protect\np{ln\_zdfgls}\forcode{=.true.})}
+\subsection[GLS: Generic Length Scale (\forcode{ln_zdfgls})]{GLS: Generic Length Scale (\protect\np{ln\_zdfgls})}
 \label{subsec:ZDF_gls}
 
@@ -552 +548 @@
 %        OSM OSMOSIS BL Scheme
 % -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-\subsection[OSM: OSMosis boundary layer scheme (\forcode{ln_zdfosm=.true.})]
-{OSM: OSMosis boundary layer scheme (\protect\np{ln\_zdfosm}\forcode{=.true.})}
+\subsection[OSM: OSMosis boundary layer scheme (\forcode{ln_zdfosm})]{OSM: OSMosis boundary layer scheme (\protect\np{ln\_zdfosm})}
 \label{subsec:ZDF_osm}
 %--------------------------------------------namzdf_osm---------------------------------------------------------
@@ -569 +564 @@
 %        TKE and GLS discretization considerations
 % -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-\subsection[ Discrete energy conservation for TKE and GLS schemes]
-{Discrete energy conservation for TKE and GLS schemes}
+\subsection[ Discrete energy conservation for TKE and GLS schemes]{Discrete energy conservation for TKE and GLS schemes}
 \label{subsec:ZDF_tke_ene}
 
@@ -688 +682 @@
 %       Non-Penetrative Convective Adjustment
 % -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-\subsection[Non-penetrative convective adjustment (\forcode{ln_tranpc=.true.})]
-{Non-penetrative convective adjustment (\protect\np{ln\_tranpc}\forcode{=.true.})}
+\subsection[Non-penetrative convective adjustment (\forcode{ln_tranpc})]{Non-penetrative convective adjustment (\protect\np{ln\_tranpc})}
 \label{subsec:ZDF_npc}
 
@@ -754 +747 @@
 %       Enhanced Vertical Diffusion
 % -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-\subsection[Enhanced vertical diffusion (\forcode{ln_zdfevd=.true.})]
-{Enhanced vertical diffusion (\protect\np{ln\_zdfevd}\forcode{=.true.})}
+\subsection[Enhanced vertical diffusion (\forcode{ln_zdfevd})]{Enhanced vertical diffusion (\protect\np{ln\_zdfevd})}
 \label{subsec:ZDF_evd}
 
@@ -781 +773 @@
 %       Turbulent Closure Scheme
 % -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-\subsection{Handling convection with turbulent closure schemes (\forcode{ln_zdf{tke,gls,osm}=.true.})}
+\subsection[Handling convection with turbulent closure schemes (\forcode{ln_zdf{tke,gls,osm}})]{Handling convection with turbulent closure schemes (\forcode{ln_zdf{tke,gls,osm}})}
 \label{subsec:ZDF_tcs}
 
@@ -809 +801 @@
 % Double Diffusion Mixing
 % ================================================================
-\section[Double diffusion mixing (\forcode{ln_zdfddm=.true.})]
-{Double diffusion mixing (\protect\np{ln\_zdfddm}\forcode{=.true.})}
+\section[Double diffusion mixing (\forcode{ln_zdfddm})]{Double diffusion mixing (\protect\np{ln\_zdfddm})}
 \label{subsec:ZDF_ddm}
 
@@ -905 +896 @@
 % Bottom Friction
 % ================================================================
- \section[Bottom and top friction (\textit{zdfdrg.F90})]
- {Bottom and top friction (\protect\mdl{zdfdrg})}
- \label{sec:ZDF_drg}
+\section[Bottom and top friction (\textit{zdfdrg.F90})] {Bottom and top friction (\protect\mdl{zdfdrg})}
+\label{sec:ZDF_drg}
 
 %--------------------------------------------namdrg--------------------------------------------------------
@@ -986 +976 @@
 %       Linear Bottom Friction
 % -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- \subsection[Linear top/bottom friction (\forcode{ln_lin=.true.})]
- {Linear top/bottom friction (\protect\np{ln\_lin}\forcode{=.true.)}}
- \label{subsec:ZDF_drg_linear}
+\subsection[Linear top/bottom friction (\forcode{ln_lin})]{Linear top/bottom friction (\protect\np{ln\_lin})}
+\label{subsec:ZDF_drg_linear}
 
 The linear friction parameterisation (including the special case of a free-slip condition) assumes that
@@ -1026 +1015 @@
 %       Non-Linear Bottom Friction
 % -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- \subsection[Non-linear top/bottom friction (\forcode{ln_non_lin=.true.})]
- {Non-linear top/bottom friction (\protect\np{ln\_non\_lin}\forcode{=.true.})}
- \label{subsec:ZDF_drg_nonlinear}
+\subsection[Non-linear top/bottom friction (\forcode{ln_non_lin})]{Non-linear top/bottom friction (\protect\np{ln\_non\_lin})}
+\label{subsec:ZDF_drg_nonlinear}
 
 The non-linear bottom friction parameterisation assumes that the top/bottom friction is quadratic:
@@ -1062 +1050 @@
 %       Bottom Friction Log-layer
 % -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- \subsection[Log-layer top/bottom friction (\forcode{ln_loglayer=.true.})]
- {Log-layer top/bottom friction (\protect\np{ln\_loglayer}\forcode{=.true.})}
- \label{subsec:ZDF_drg_loglayer}
+\subsection[Log-layer top/bottom friction (\forcode{ln_loglayer})]{Log-layer top/bottom friction (\protect\np{ln\_loglayer})}
+\label{subsec:ZDF_drg_loglayer}
 
 In the non-linear friction case, the drag coefficient, $C_D$, can be optionally enhanced using
@@ -1089 +1076 @@
 %       Explicit bottom Friction
 % -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- \subsection{Explicit top/bottom friction (\forcode{ln_drgimp=.false.})}
- \label{subsec:ZDF_drg_stability}
+\subsection[Explicit top/bottom friction (\forcode{ln_drgimp=.false.})]{Explicit top/bottom friction (\protect\np{ln\_drgimp}\forcode{=.false.})}
+\label{subsec:ZDF_drg_stability}
 
 Setting \np{ln\_drgimp} \forcode{= .false.} means that bottom friction is treated explicitly in time, which has the advantage of simplifying the interaction with the split-explicit free surface (see \autoref{subsec:ZDF_drg_ts}). The latter does indeed require the knowledge of bottom stresses in the course of the barotropic sub-iteration, which becomes less straightforward in the implicit case. In the explicit case, top/bottom stresses can be computed using \textit{before} velocities and inserted in the overall momentum tendency budget. This reads:
@@ -1150 +1137 @@
 %       Implicit Bottom Friction
 % -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- \subsection[Implicit top/bottom friction (\forcode{ln_drgimp=.true.})]
- {Implicit top/bottom friction (\protect\np{ln\_drgimp}\forcode{=.true.})}
- \label{subsec:ZDF_drg_imp}
+\subsection[Implicit top/bottom friction (\forcode{ln_drgimp=.true.})]{Implicit top/bottom friction (\protect\np{ln\_drgimp}\forcode{=.true.})}
+\label{subsec:ZDF_drg_imp}
 
 An optional implicit form of bottom friction has been implemented to improve model stability.
@@ -1181 +1167 @@
 %       Bottom Friction with split-explicit free surface
 % -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- \subsection[Bottom friction with split-explicit free surface]
- {Bottom friction with split-explicit free surface}
- \label{subsec:ZDF_drg_ts}
+\subsection[Bottom friction with split-explicit free surface]{Bottom friction with split-explicit free surface}
+\label{subsec:ZDF_drg_ts}
 
 With split-explicit free surface, the sub-stepping of barotropic equations needs the knowledge of top/bottom stresses. An obvious way to satisfy this is to take them as constant over the course of the barotropic integration and equal to the value used to update the baroclinic momentum trend. Provided \np{ln\_drgimp}\forcode{= .false.} and a centred or \textit{leap-frog} like integration of barotropic equations is used (\ie\ \forcode{ln_bt_fw=.false.}, cf \autoref{subsec:DYN_spg_ts}), this does ensure that barotropic and baroclinic dynamics feel the same stresses during one leapfrog time step. However, if \np{ln\_drgimp}\forcode{= .true.},  stresses depend on the \textit{after} value of the velocities which themselves depend on the barotropic iteration result. This cyclic dependency makes difficult obtaining consistent stresses in 2d and 3d dynamics. Part of this mismatch is then removed when setting the final barotropic component of 3d velocities to the time splitting estimate. This last step can be seen as a necessary evil but should be minimized since it interferes with the adjustment to the boundary conditions.
@@ -1199 +1184 @@
 % Internal wave-driven mixing
 % ================================================================
-\section[Internal wave-driven mixing (\forcode{ln_zdfiwm=.true.})]
-{Internal wave-driven mixing (\protect\np{ln\_zdfiwm}\forcode{=.true.})}
+\section[Internal wave-driven mixing (\forcode{ln_zdfiwm})]{Internal wave-driven mixing (\protect\np{ln\_zdfiwm})}
 \label{subsec:ZDF_tmx_new}
 
@@ -1264 +1248 @@
 % surface wave-induced mixing
 % ================================================================
-\section[Surface wave-induced mixing (\forcode{ln_zdfswm=.true.})]
-{Surface wave-induced mixing (\protect\np{ln\_zdfswm}\forcode{=.true.})}
+\section[Surface wave-induced mixing (\forcode{ln_zdfswm})]{Surface wave-induced mixing (\protect\np{ln\_zdfswm})}
 \label{subsec:ZDF_swm}
 
@@ -1298 +1281 @@
 % Adaptive-implicit vertical advection
 % ================================================================
-\section[Adaptive-implicit vertical advection (\forcode{ln_zad_Aimp=.true.})]
-{Adaptive-implicit vertical advection(\protect\np{ln\_zad\_Aimp}\forcode{=.true.})}
+\section[Adaptive-implicit vertical advection (\forcode{ln_zad_Aimp})]{Adaptive-implicit vertical advection(\protect\np{ln\_zad\_Aimp})}
 \label{subsec:ZDF_aimp}