New URL for NEMO forge!   http://forge.nemo-ocean.eu

Since March 2022 along with NEMO 4.2 release, the code development moved to a self-hosted GitLab.
This present forge is now archived and remained online for history.
Changeset 7351 for branches/2016/dev_INGV_UKMO_2016/DOC/TexFiles/Chapters/Chap_STP.tex – NEMO

Ignore:
Timestamp:
2016-11-28T17:04:10+01:00 (7 years ago)
Author:
emanuelaclementi
Message:

ticket #1805 step 3: /2016/dev_INGV_UKMO_2016 aligned to the trunk at revision 7161

File:
1 edited

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
  • branches/2016/dev_INGV_UKMO_2016/DOC/TexFiles/Chapters/Chap_STP.tex

    r4147 r7351  
     1\documentclass[NEMO_book]{subfiles} 
     2\begin{document} 
    13 
    24% ================================================================ 
    3 % Chapter 2 Time Domain (step.F90) 
     5% Chapter 2 ——— Time Domain (step.F90) 
    46% ================================================================ 
    57\chapter{Time Domain (STP) } 
     
    2123 
    2224Having defined the continuous equations in Chap.~\ref{PE}, we need now to choose  
    23 a time discretization. In the present chapter, we provide a general description of the \NEMO  
     25a time discretization, a key feature of an ocean model as it exerts a strong influence   
     26on the structure of the computer code ($i.e.$ on its flowchart).  
     27In the present chapter, we provide a general description of the \NEMO  
    2428time stepping strategy and the consequences for the order in which the equations are 
    2529solved. 
     
    158162\end{equation}  
    159163 
     164%%gm 
     165%%gm   UPDATE the next paragraphs with time varying thickness ... 
     166%%gm 
     167 
    160168This scheme is rather time consuming since it requires a matrix inversion,  
    161169but it becomes attractive since a value of 3 or more is needed for N in 
     
    188196 
    189197% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
    190 %        Hydrostatic Pressure gradient 
    191 % ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
    192 \section{Hydrostatic Pressure Gradient --- semi-implicit scheme} 
    193 \label{STP_hpg_imp} 
     198%        Surface Pressure gradient 
     199% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
     200\section{Surface Pressure Gradient} 
     201\label{STP_spg_ts} 
     202 
     203===>>>>  TO BE written....  :-) 
    194204 
    195205%\gmcomment{  
    196206%>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
    197207\begin{figure}[!t]     \begin{center} 
    198 \includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{./TexFiles/Figures/Fig_TimeStepping_flowchart.pdf} 
     208\includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{Fig_TimeStepping_flowchart} 
    199209\caption{   \label{Fig_TimeStep_flowchart} 
    200210Sketch of the leapfrog time stepping sequence in \NEMO from \citet{Leclair_Madec_OM09}.  
     
    209219%>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
    210220%} 
    211  
    212 The range of stability of the Leap-Frog scheme can be extended by a factor of two 
    213 by introducing a semi-implicit computation of the hydrostatic pressure gradient term 
    214 \citep{Brown_Campana_MWR78}. Instead of evaluating the pressure at $t$, a linear  
    215 combination of values at $t-\rdt$, $t$ and $t+\rdt$ is used (see \S~\ref{DYN_hpg_imp}).   
    216 This technique, controlled by the \np{nn\_dynhpg\_rst} namelist parameter, does not  
    217 introduce a significant additional computational cost when tracers and thus density  
    218 is time stepped before the dynamics. This time step ordering is used in \NEMO  
    219 (Fig.\ref{Fig_TimeStep_flowchart}). 
    220  
    221  
    222 This technique, used in several GCMs (\NEMO, POP or MOM for instance),  
    223 makes the Leap-Frog scheme as efficient  
    224 \footnote{The efficiency is defined as the maximum allowed Courant number of the time  
    225 stepping scheme divided by the number of computations of the right-hand side per time step.}  
    226 as the Forward-Backward scheme used in MOM \citep{Griffies_al_OS05} and more  
    227 efficient than the LF-AM3 scheme (leapfrog time stepping combined with a third order 
    228 Adams-Moulthon interpolation for the predictor phase) used in ROMS  
    229 \citep{Shchepetkin_McWilliams_OM05}.  
    230  
    231 In fact, this technique is efficient when the physical phenomenon that  
    232 limits the time-step is internal gravity waves (IGWs). Indeed, it is  
    233 equivalent to applying a time filter to the pressure gradient to eliminate high  
    234 frequency IGWs. Obviously, the doubling of the time-step is achievable only  
    235 if no other factors control the time-step, such as the stability limits associated  
    236 with advection, diffusion or Coriolis terms. For example, it is inefficient in low resolution 
    237 global ocean configurations, since inertial oscillations in the vicinity of the North Pole  
    238 are the limiting factor for the time step. It is also often inefficient in very high  
    239 resolution configurations where strong currents and small grid cells exert  
    240 the strongest constraint on the time step. 
    241221 
    242222% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
     
    288268%>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
    289269\begin{figure}[!t]     \begin{center} 
    290 \includegraphics[width=0.90\textwidth]{./TexFiles/Figures/Fig_MLF_forcing.pdf} 
     270\includegraphics[width=0.90\textwidth]{Fig_MLF_forcing} 
    291271\caption{   \label{Fig_MLF_forcing} 
    292272Illustration of forcing integration methods.  
     
    424404} 
    425405%% 
     406\end{document} 
Note: See TracChangeset for help on using the changeset viewer.