Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #2318
- Timestamp:
- 2019-10-03T16:47:03+02:00 (5 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #2318 – Description
initial v1 31 31 }}} 32 32 33 Then for the special case e1t = e2t = dx we have esqt = dx **2 and esqt corresponds to Delta**2 in the Griffies and Hallberg (2000) MWR paper. This length scale is raised to the power of 4 in the definition of the bilaplacian viscosity, so a missing factor of 2 would give a bilaplacian viscosity 16x smaller at 4.0 than at 3.6 which is roughly what I see in my tests.33 Then for the special case e1t = e2t = dx we have esqt = dx!^2 and esqt corresponds to Delta!^2 in the Griffies and Hallberg (2000) MWR paper. This length scale is raised to the power of 4 in the definition of the bilaplacian viscosity, so a missing factor of 2 would give a bilaplacian viscosity 16x smaller at 4.0 than at 3.6 which is roughly what I see in my tests. 34 34 35 35 ==== Fix
