Opened 12 years ago

Closed 7 years ago

Last modified 4 years ago

#356 closed Enhancement (fixed)

eosbn2: should we update the equation of state ?

Reported by: lesommer Owned by: gm
Priority: low Milestone:
Component: OCE Version:
Severity: Keywords: EOS
Cc: Review:
MP ready?:
Progress:

Description

I think we should consider using the new, more accurate and less expensive equation of state by :

Mc Dougall?, T. J., D. R. Jackett, D. G. Wright, and R. Feistel, Accurate and computationally efficient algorithms for potential temperature and density of seawater, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 2003.
html

see e.g. the mitgcm online documentation

Commit History (0)

(No commits)

Change History (5)

comment:1 Changed 11 years ago by anonymous

  • Milestone 2009 Stream 3: New features deleted

Milestone 2009 Stream 3: New features deleted

comment:2 Changed 10 years ago by gm

It seems better to bypass the Mc Dougall? et al 2003 eos and consider the new standard eos (http://www.teos-10.org/)

Gurvan

comment:3 Changed 8 years ago by gm

  • Owner changed from NEMO team to gm

Work on the implementation of eos10 including a boussinesq eos10 version is currently undertake at Stockholm (F. Roquet with the collaboration of Trevor Mc Dougall? and myself)

hopefully available for every body with 1 or 2 years.

Gurvan

comment:4 Changed 7 years ago by gm

  • Resolution set to fixed
  • Status changed from new to closed

Introduction of TEOS10 is CNRS-1 item of 2014 workplan (see #1294).

comment:5 Changed 4 years ago by nicolasmartin

  • Keywords EOS added; eosbn2 removed
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.