New URL for NEMO forge!   http://forge.nemo-ocean.eu

Since March 2022 along with NEMO 4.2 release, the code development moved to a self-hosted GitLab.
This present forge is now archived and remained online for history.
2018WP/SharedActions/Status_dev_merge_2017_branch (diff) – NEMO

Changes between Version 34 and Version 35 of 2018WP/SharedActions/Status_dev_merge_2017_branch


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2018-03-26T11:30:28+02:00 (6 years ago)
Author:
mathiot
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • 2018WP/SharedActions/Status_dev_merge_2017_branch

    v34 v35  
    1616 
    1717 
    18 == 16 February 2018 : METO: eORCA1 and eORCA025 occasional failures with !NaNs  
     18== 16 February 2018 : METO: eORCA1 and eORCA025 occasional failures with !NaNs (SOLVED in r9415) 
    1919 
    2020I'm getting occasional failures with a segmentation fault in icb_ground in eORCA1 and eORCA025 built from the latest dev_merge_2017 branch (after several months of integration). I think icb_ground is acting as an error trap for NaN values produced in ice_dyn_rhg_evp. I will try to trace it back further next week. (Dave Storkey). 
    2121 
    2222'''Update 21 Feb:''' This looks like some kind of instability which doesn't get picked up by the checks in stp_ctl. There is very thick ice (~100m) and a negative top-level thickness (e3t) at a single point which I think results in a divide-by-zero in sbc_isf_div. It looks different to the instability in the the 300 timestep ORCA2LIM3PIS_ST run in SETTE, which doesn't show any abnormally thick ice.  
     23 
     24'''Update 21 March:''' The Ice thickness is not "low capped" by rn_himin before thermodynamics is running. In case of very small ice thickness, the ice diffusion blow up.  
    2325 
    2426== 12 February 2018 : ORCA2_LIM3_PISCES with icebergs is not reproducible