New URL for NEMO forge!   http://forge.nemo-ocean.eu

Since March 2022 along with NEMO 4.2 release, the code development moved to a self-hosted GitLab.
This present forge is now archived and remained online for history.
2021WP/VLD-03_Aimie_Moulin_Wave_Coupling_TestCase (diff) – NEMO

Changes between Version 13 and Version 14 of 2021WP/VLD-03_Aimie_Moulin_Wave_Coupling_TestCase


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2021-05-10T13:54:44+02:00 (3 years ago)
Author:
rblod
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • 2021WP/VLD-03_Aimie_Moulin_Wave_Coupling_TestCase

    v13 v14  
    5858}}} 
    5959 
    60 ''...'' 
     60I totally agree on the methodology, including the choices of forcing by WWIII offline, instead of coupling, in a sake of simplicity. References are provided, and the results show the test case has been completed. 
     61 
     62The main question raised by the developers, in term of practical implementation, is the way to integrate the alternative profile for Stokes drift computation, at least at short term, with 2 suggestions: 
     63 
     64a) include an additional Stokes Drift profile parameterization in sbcwave.F90, in the tescase MY_SRC.  The formulation for the Stokes drift decay should be the one from Michaud et al, 2012 for intermediate/shallow water. 
     65 
     66b) add a userdef parameterization for the vertical Stokes drift in OCE/USR/ folder.  
     67   
     68 
     69Solution b) could me more logical, but a eventually a bit "too much" for something which may not be changed a lot by users for other cases. So I would suggest solution a), and discuss at some point for next releases the inclusion of this option in the standard sbcwave. 
     70 
    6171 
    6272== Tests