| 42 | | ||= Question ||= Discussion ||= Answer \\('YES'|'NO'|'NA') || |
| 43 | | || '''Does the previewer agree with the proposed methodology?''' || || || |
| 44 | | || '''Does the previewer agree with the proposed flowchart and list of routines to be changed?''' || || || |
| 45 | | || '''Does the previewer agree with the proposed new list of variables, including agreement with coding rules?''' || || || |
| 46 | | || '''Does the previewer agree with the proposed summary of updates in reference manual?''' || || || |
| | 42 | ||= Question ||= Answer \\('YES'|'NO'|'NA') || |
| | 43 | || '''Does the previewer agree with the proposed methodology?''' || || |
| | 44 | || '''Does the previewer agree with the proposed flowchart and list of routines to be changed?''' || || |
| | 45 | || '''Does the previewer agree with the proposed new list of variables, including agreement with coding rules?''' || || |
| | 46 | || '''Does the previewer agree with the proposed summary of updates in reference manual?''' || || |
| 52 | | ||= Question ||= Discussion ||= Answer \\('YES'|'NO'|'NA') || |
| 53 | | || Can this change be shown to produce expected impact? (if option activated)? || || || |
| 54 | | || Can this change be shown to have a null impact? (if option not activated) || || || |
| 55 | | || Detailed results of restartability and reproducibility when the option is activated. Please indicate the configuration used for this test || || || |
| 56 | | || Detailed results of SETTE tests (restartability and reproducibility for each of the reference configuration) || || || |
| 57 | | || Results of the required bit comparability tests been run: Are there no differences when activating the development? || || || |
| 58 | | || If some differences appear, is reason for the change valid/understood? || || || |
| 59 | | || If some differences appear, is the !ticket describing in detail the impact this change will have on model configurations? || || || |
| 60 | | || Is this change expected to preserve all diagnostics? || || || |
| 61 | | || If no, is reason for the change valid/understood? || || || |
| 62 | | || Are there significant changes in run time/memory? || || || |
| | 52 | ||= Question ||= Answer \\('YES'|'NO'|'NA') || |
| | 53 | || Can this change be shown to produce expected impact? (if option activated)? || || |
| | 54 | || Can this change be shown to have a null impact? (if option not activated) || || |
| | 55 | || Detailed results of restartability and reproducibility when the option is activated. Please indicate the configuration used for this test || || |
| | 56 | || Detailed results of SETTE tests (restartability and reproducibility for each of the reference configuration) || || |
| | 57 | || Results of the required bit comparability tests been run: Are there no differences when activating the development? || || |
| | 58 | || If some differences appear, is reason for the change valid/understood? || || |
| | 59 | || If some differences appear, is the !ticket describing in detail the impact this change will have on model configurations? || || |
| | 60 | || Is this change expected to preserve all diagnostics? || || |
| | 61 | || If no, is reason for the change valid/understood? || || |
| | 62 | || Are there significant changes in run time/memory? || || |
| 71 | | ||= Question ||= Discussion ||= Answer \\('YES'|'NO'|'NA') || |
| 72 | | || Is the proposed methodology now implemented? || || || |
| 73 | | || Are the code changes in agreement with the flowchart defined at Preview step? || || || |
| 74 | | || Are the code changes in agreement with list of routines and variables as proposed at Preview step? \\If, not, are the discrepancies acceptable? || || || |
| 75 | | || Is the in-line documentation accurate and sufficient? || || || |
| 76 | | || Do the code changes comply with NEMO coding standards? || || || |
| 77 | | || Is the !ticket of development documented with sufficient details for others to understand the impact of the change? || || || |
| 78 | | || Are the reference manual tex files now updated following the proposed summary in preview section? || || || |
| 79 | | || Is there a need for some documentation on the web pages (in addition to in-line and reference manual)? \\If yes, please describe and ask PI. A yes answer must include all documentation available. || || || |
| | 71 | ||= Question ||= Answer \\('YES'|'NO'|'NA') || |
| | 72 | || Is the proposed methodology now implemented? || || |
| | 73 | || Are the code changes in agreement with the flowchart defined at Preview step? || || |
| | 74 | || Are the code changes in agreement with list of routines and variables as proposed at Preview step? \\If, not, are the discrepancies acceptable? || || |
| | 75 | || Is the in-line documentation accurate and sufficient? || || |
| | 76 | || Do the code changes comply with NEMO coding standards? || || |
| | 77 | || Is the !ticket of development documented with sufficient details for others to understand the impact of the change? || || |
| | 78 | || Are the reference manual tex files now updated following the proposed summary in preview section? || || |
| | 79 | || Is there a need for some documentation on the web pages (in addition to in-line and reference manual)? \\If yes, please describe and ask PI. A yes answer must include all documentation available. || || |
