Changes between Version 45 and Version 46 of Scientific Advisory Board/Agenda/2013-06-18


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2013-05-15T17:42:58+02:00 (7 years ago)
Author:
clevy
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Scientific Advisory Board/Agenda/2013-06-18

    v45 v46  
    131312:30                    Opening of the meeting ( ) 
    1414 
    15 12:45 – 2:00             Brief presentation of available documents: 10 mn for each: CMCC ( ) , CNRS ( ), INGV (P. Oddo), Mercator (Y. Drillet), !MetOffice ( ), NERC-NOC (  ) , others: CONCEPTS & CCCma, Canada ( ) 
     1512:45 – 2:00             '''Brief presentation of available documents: '''10 mn for each: CMCC ( ) , CNRS ( ), INGV (P. Oddo), Mercator (Y. Drillet), !MetOffice ( ), NERC-NOC (  ) , others: CONCEPTS & CCCma, Canada ( ) 
    1616 
    17 2:00 –  2:20              Proposed presentations: About Gung-Ho (Nigel Wood – Met Office) 
     172:00 –  2:20              Proposed presentations:  
     18 
     19    '''About Gung-Ho '''(Nigel Wood – Met Office) 
    1820 
    19212:20 – 3:00            Coffee Break 
    2022 
    21 3:00 – 4:30            Discussion on documents and additional contributions 
     233:00 – 4:30            '''Discussion on documents and additional contributions''' 
    2224 
    23254:30 – 6:00            Thematic discussions, proposed sessions:[[BR]][[BR]]'''Session 1: NEMO platform: seamless to what extend?''' (Leaders: J. Holt and P. Marsaleix) With ORCA12 (global 1/12°) are we reaching an optimal level? Should we continue moving towards higher resolutions or should we stop there and work in a probabilistic way to quantify errors?[[BR]]In the future, is the NEMO platform expected to be modelling all time and space scales from global to coastal (up to rivers, tide banks, module sedimentary module, etc…) or is there a boundary in small scales (coastal) and associated processes where NEMO should stop, and/or be properly connected to another modelling platform?'''''''''''