Changes between Version 60 and Version 61 of Scientific Advisory Board/Agenda/2013-06-18


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2013-05-18T09:11:53+02:00 (7 years ago)
Author:
clevy
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Scientific Advisory Board/Agenda/2013-06-18

    v60 v61  
    151512:45 – 2:00             '''Brief presentation of available documents: '''10 mn for each: CMCC (tbd) , CNRS (tbd), INGV (P. Oddo), Mercator (Y. Drillet), !MetOffice (tbd), NERC-NOC (tbd) , others: CONCEPTS & CCCma, Canada (tbd) 
    1616 
    17 2:00 –  2:20              Proposed presentations: 
     172:00 –  2:20              Proposed presentations:'''[[BR]]                    About Gung-Ho '''       (Nigel Wood – Met Office) 
    1818 
    19   '''      About Gung-Ho '''      (Nigel Wood – Met Office) 
     192:20 – 2:50            Coffee Break 
    2020 
    21 2:20 – 3:00            Coffee Break 
     212:50 – 4:15            '''Discussion on documents and additional contributions''' 
    2222 
    23 3:00 – 4:30            '''Discussion on documents and additional contributions''' 
    24  
    25 4:30 – 6:00            Thematic discussions, proposed sessions:[[BR]][[BR]]'''Session 1: NEMO platform: seamless to what extend?''' (Leaders: J. Holt and P. Marsaleix) With ORCA12 (global 1/12°) are we reaching an optimal level? Should we continue moving towards higher resolutions or should we stop there and work in a probabilistic way to quantify errors?[[BR]]In the future, is the NEMO platform expected to be modelling all time and space scales from global to coastal (up to rivers, tide banks, module sedimentary module, etc…) or is there a boundary in small scales (coastal) and associated processes where NEMO should stop, and/or be properly connected to another modelling platform?''''''''''' 
     234:15 – 6:15            Thematic discussions, proposed sessions:[[BR]][[BR]]'''Session 1: NEMO platform: seamless to what extend?''' (Leaders: J. Holt and P. Marsaleix) With ORCA12 (global 1/12°) are we reaching an optimal level? Should we continue moving towards higher resolutions or should we stop there and work in a probabilistic way to quantify errors?[[BR]]In the future, is the NEMO platform expected to be modelling all time and space scales from global to coastal (up to rivers, tide banks, module sedimentary module, etc…) or is there a boundary in small scales (coastal) and associated processes where NEMO should stop, and/or be properly connected to another modelling platform?''''''''''' 
    2624 
    2725'''Session 2: New dynamical cores, HPC and science '''    (Leader: S. Masson) 
    2826 
    29 6:30                        Cocktail 
     27'''Session 3: NEMO validation and contours of user support: '''Although having all possible options working all the time is the NEMO user's dream, it is not possible. What is needed and where does the System Team stops? [6:30 (Leader : tbd)] 
     28 
     296:30 Cocktail 
    3030 
    3131'''Wednesday 19 June:''' 
     
    33339:00 – 10:30             Thematic discussions (cont’): 
    3434 
    35 '''Session 3: Is AGRIF a major feature of NEMO? '''(Leader: L. Debreu & tbd) If answer is yes, what is needed in mid-term to have it as a reliable component? 
     35'''Session 4: Is AGRIF a major feature of NEMO? '''(Leader: L. Debreu & tbd) If answer is yes, what is needed in mid-term to have it as a reliable component? 
    3636 
    37 '''Session 4: Sea-ice and biogeochemical components: '''which level of flexibility should we target to take efficiently in account the panel of available and used components for sea-ice (NEMO-LIM, CICE, GELATO…) and for biogeochemistry (NEMO-TOP, BFM, MEDUSA…)? (Leader: tbd) 
     37'''Session 5: Sea-ice and biogeochemical components: '''which level of flexibility should we target to take efficiently in account the panel of available and used components for sea-ice (NEMO-LIM, CICE, GELATO…) and for biogeochemistry (NEMO-TOP, BFM, MEDUSA…)? (Leader: tbd) 
    3838 
    39 '''Session 5: Contours and limits of the assimilation component of NEMO''' (Leader: tbd) 
     39'''Session 6: Contours and limits of the assimilation component of NEMO''' (Leader: tbd) 
    4040 
    414110:30 – 11:00            Coffee break[[BR]][[BR]]11:00 -12:00 '''           Conclusions “on the fly” '''by a group including CMCC(tbd), CNRS(tbd), INGV(tbd), Mercator(tbd), Met-Office(tbd), NERC-NOC(tbd):Suggestions of the committee: for the summary of final document, how to build NEMO’s roadmap for the next 10 years?[[BR]]Suggestions to Steering Committee for next steps (writing and discussing the final document) 
     
    6767|| Guarnieri || Antonio || yes || yes || yes || || || cons. exp. || 
    6868|| Bricaud || Clement || yes || yes || yes || || || Devcom - SysTeam || 
    69 || Drillet || Yann || yes || yes || yes ||9:00 || 18:00|| cons. exp. || 
     69|| Drillet || Yann || yes || yes || yes || 9:00 || 18:00 || cons. exp. || 
    7070|| Biastoch || Arne || yes || yes || yes || || || Invitee || 
    7171|| Iovino || Dorotea || yes || yes || yes || || || cons. exp. || 
     
    7878|| Joussaume || Sylvie || yes || yes || no || || || Steering Committee || 
    7979|| Debreu || Laurent || yes || yes || yes || !9:00 || !18:00 || Invitee || 
    80 ||Benshila ||Rachid ||yes || yes|| yes||Adaptative||Adaptative ||SysTeam || 
    81 ||Vancoppenolle ||Martin ||yes || yes|| No|||| ||SysTeam || 
    82 ||Pickles  ||Stephen ||yes ||yes ||yes || || ||Invitee || 
     80|| Benshila || Rachid || yes || yes || yes || Adaptative || Adaptative || SysTeam || 
     81|| Vancoppenolle || Martin || yes || yes || No || || || SysTeam || 
     82|| Pickles || Stephen || yes || yes || yes || || || Invitee || 
    8383|| || || || || || || || || 
    8484|| || || || || || || || ||