Changes between Version 89 and Version 90 of Scientific Advisory Board/Agenda/2013-06-18


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2013-06-11T12:21:32+02:00 (7 years ago)
Author:
clevy
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Scientific Advisory Board/Agenda/2013-06-18

    v89 v90  
    131310:30 - 10:45                Opening of the meeting (S. Joussaume) 
    1414 
    15 10:45 – 12:00             '''Brief presentation of available documents: '''10 mn for each: CMCC (S. Dobricic) , CNRS (G. Madec), INGV (P. Oddo), Mercator (Y. Drillet), !MetOffice (Richard Wood), NERC-NOC (tbd) , others: CONCEPTS & CCCma, Canada (Y. Drillet), EC-EARTH(tbd) 
     1510:45 – 12:00             '''Brief presentation of available documents: '''10 mn for each: CMCC (S. Dobricic) , CNRS (G. Madec), INGV (P. Oddo), Mercator (Y. Drillet), !MetOffice (Richard Wood), NERC-NOC (tbd) , others: CONCEPTS & CCCma, Canada (Y. Drillet), EC-EARTH & ECMWF(K. Mogensen) 
    1616 
    171712:00 –  12:20              Presentations:'''[[BR]]                    About Gung-Ho '''       (Nigel Wood – Met Office) 
     
    3939'''Session 4: Is AGRIF a major feature of NEMO? '''(Leader: L. Debreu & D. Iovino) If answer is yes, what is needed in mid-term to have it as a reliable component? 
    4040 
    41 '''Session 5: Contours and limits of the assimilation component of NEMO''' (Leader: P. Brasseur & tbd) 
     41'''Session 5: Contours and limits of the assimilation component of NEMO''' (Leader: P. Brasseur & S. Dobricic) 
    4242 
    4343'''Session 6: NEMO validation and contours of user support: '''Although  having all possible options working all the time is the NEMO user's  dream, it is not possible. What is needed and where does the System Team  stops? How many reference configurations should be supported by the System Team and what should they be? (Leader : P. Oddo & J. Siddorn)