Changes between Version 91 and Version 92 of Scientific Advisory Board/Agenda/2013-06-18


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2013-06-11T14:06:45+02:00 (7 years ago)
Author:
clevy
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Scientific Advisory Board/Agenda/2013-06-18

    v91 v92  
    131310:30 - 10:45                Opening of the meeting (S. Joussaume) 
    1414 
    15 10:45 – 12:00             '''Brief presentation of available documents: '''10 mn for each: CMCC (S. Dobricic) , CNRS (G. Madec), INGV (P. Oddo), Mercator (Y. Drillet), !MetOffice & NERC-NOC (J. Holt) , others: CONCEPTS & CCCma, Canada (Y. Drillet), EC-EARTH & ECMWF(K. Mogensen) 
     1510:45 – 12:00             '''Brief presentation of available documents, '''10 mn for each:  
     16 
     17CMCC (S. Dobricic) , CNRS (G. Madec), INGV (P. Oddo), Mercator (Y. Drillet), !MetOffice & NERC-NOC (J. Holt),  
     18 
     19others: CONCEPTS & CCCma, Canada (Y. Drillet), EC-EARTH & ECMWF(K. Mogensen) 
    1620 
    172112:00 –  12:20              Presentations:'''[[BR]]                    About Gung-Ho '''       (Nigel Wood – Met Office) 
     
    21252:00 – 3:30            '''Discussion on the five white papers and additional contributions''' 
    2226 
    23 3:30 – 4:15            Thematic discussions:[[BR]][[BR]]'''Session 1: NEMO platform: seamless to what extend?''' (Leaders: J. Holt and P. Marsaleix) With ORCA12 (global 1/12°) are we reaching an optimal level? Should we continue moving towards higher resolutions or should we stop there and work in a probabilistic way to quantify errors?[[BR]]In the future, is the NEMO platform expected to be modelling all time and space scales from global to coastal (up to rivers, tide banks, module sedimentary module, etc…) or is there a boundary in small scales (coastal) and associated processes where NEMO should stop, and/or be properly connected to another modelling platform?[[BR]]Contours of NEMO in the future (components, diagnostics, data reduction) 
     273:30 – 4:15            Thematic discussions:[[BR]][[BR]]'''Session 1: NEMO platform: seamless to what extend? (Leaders: J. Holt and P. Marsaleix)'''  
     28 
     29With ORCA12 (global 1/12°) are we reaching an optimal level? Should we continue moving towards higher resolutions or should we stop there and work in a probabilistic way to quantify errors?[[BR]]In the future, is the NEMO platform expected to be modelling all time and space scales from global to coastal (up to rivers, tide banks, module sedimentary module, etc…) or is there a boundary in small scales (coastal) and associated processes where NEMO should stop, and/or be properly connected to another modelling platform?[[BR]]Contours of NEMO in the future (components, diagnostics, data reduction) 
    2430 
    25314:15 - 4:45   Coffee break 
     
    27334:45 - 6:15  Thematic discussions (cont’): 
    2834 
    29 '''Session 2: New dynamical cores, HPC and science '''    (Leader: S. Masson & N. Wood) 
     35'''Session 2: New dynamical cores, HPC and science     (Leaders: S. Masson & N. Wood)''' 
    3036 
    31 '''Session 3: Sea-ice and biogeochemical components: '''which level of  flexibility should we target to take efficiently in account the panel of  available and used components for sea-ice (NEMO-LIM, CICE, GELATO…) and  for biogeochemistry (NEMO-TOP, BFM, MEDUSA…)? (Leader: O. Aumont & M. Vancoppenolle) 
     37'''Session 3: Sea-ice and biogeochemical components (Leaders: O. Aumont & M. Vancoppenolle)''' 
     38 
     39Which level of  flexibility should we target to take efficiently in account the panel of  available and used components for sea-ice (NEMO-LIM, CICE, GELATO…) and  for biogeochemistry (NEMO-TOP, BFM, MEDUSA…)?  
    3240 
    33416:30 Cocktail at Peniche Marcounet Pont Marie, Voie Georges Pompidou, 75004 Paris 06 60 47 38 52, see map in attached document below 
     
    37459:00 – 11:00             Thematic discussions (cont’): 
    3846 
    39 '''Session 4: Is AGRIF a major feature of NEMO? '''(Leader: L. Debreu & D. Iovino) If answer is yes, what is needed in mid-term to have it as a reliable component? 
     47'''Session 4: Is AGRIF a major feature of NEMO? (Leaders: L. Debreu & D. Iovino)'''  
    4048 
    41 '''Session 5: Contours and limits of the assimilation component of NEMO''' (Leader: P. Brasseur & S. Dobricic) 
     49If answer is yes, what is needed in mid-term to have it as a reliable component? 
    4250 
    43 '''Session 6: NEMO validation and contours of user support: '''Although  having all possible options working all the time is the NEMO user's  dream, it is not possible. What is needed and where does the System Team  stops? How many reference configurations should be supported by the System Team and what should they be? (Leader : P. Oddo & J. Siddorn) 
     51'''Session 5: Contours and limits of the assimilation component of NEMO''' '''(Leaders: P. Brasseur & S. Dobricic)''' 
    4452 
    45 11:00 – 11:20            Coffee break[[BR]][[BR]]11:20 -12:00 '''           Conclusions “on the fly” '''by a group including CMCC(S. Dobricic), CNRS(tbd), INGV(P. Oddo), Mercator(Y. Drillet), Met-Office(R. Wood), NERC-NOC(tbd):Suggestions of the committee: for the summary of final document, how to build NEMO’s roadmap for the next 10 years?[[BR]]Suggestions to Steering Committee for next steps (writing and discussing the final document) 
     53'''Session 6: NEMO validation and contours of user support  (Leaders : P. Oddo & J. Siddorn)''' 
     54 
     55Although  having all possible options working all the time is the NEMO user's  dream, it is not possible. What is needed and where does the System Team  stops? How many reference configurations should be supported by the System Team and what should they be? 11:00 – 11:20            Coffee break[[BR]][[BR]]11:20 -12:00 '''           Conclusions “on the fly” by a group including: for CMCC(S. Dobricic), for CNRS(tbd), for INGV(P. Oddo), for Mercator(Y. Drillet), for Met-Office(R. Wood), for NERC-NOC(tbd)''' 
     56 
     57Suggestions of the committee: for the summary of final document, how to build NEMO’s roadmap for the next 10 years?[[BR]]Suggestions to Steering Committee for next steps (writing and discussing the final document) 
    4658 
    475912:30                        End of the meeting