[[PageOutline]] Last edited [[Timestamp]] [[BR]] '''Author''' : Rachel Furner '''ticket''' : #465 '''Branch''' : [https://forge.ipsl.jussieu.fr/nemo/browser/branches/DEV_R1821_Rivers] ---- === Description === ---- === Testing === Testing could consider (where appropriate) other configurations in addition to NVTK]. ||NVTK Tested||!'''YES/NO!'''|| ||Other model configurations||!'''YES/NO!'''|| ||Processor configurations tested||[ Enter processor configs tested here ]|| ||If adding new functionality please confirm that the [[BR]]New code doesn't change results when it is switched off [[BR]]and !''works!'' when switched on||!'''YES'''|| (Answering UNSURE is likely to generate further questions from reviewers.) 'Please add further summary details here' * Processor configurations tested * etc---- === Bit Comparability === ||Does this change preserve answers in your tested standard configurations (to the last bit) ?||!'''YES/NO !'''|| ||Does this change bit compare across various processor configurations. (1xM, Nx1 and MxN are recommended)||!'''YES/NO!'''|| ||Is this change expected to preserve answers in all possible model configurations?||!'''YES'''|| ||Is this change expected to preserve all diagnostics? [[BR]]!,,!''Preserving answers in model runs does not necessarily imply preserved diagnostics. !''||!'''YES'''|| If you answered !'''NO!''' to any of the above, please provide further details: * Which routine(s) are causing the difference? * Why the changes are not protected by a logical switch or new section-version * What is needed to achieve regression with the previous model release (e.g. a regression branch, hand-edits etc). If this is not possible, explain why not. * What do you expect to see occur in the test harness jobs? * Which diagnostics have you altered and why have they changed?Please add details here........ ---- === System Changes === ||Does your change alter namelists?||!'''YES '''|| ||Does your change require a change in compiler options?||!'''YES'''|| If any of these apply, please document the changes required here....... The namelist must be amended so namsbc_rnf is: !----------------------------------------------------------------------- &namsbc_rnf ! runoffs namelist surface boundary condition !----------------------------------------------------------------------- ! ! file name ! frequency (hours) ! variable ! time interpol. ! clim ! 'yearly'/ ! weights ! rotation ! ! ! ! (if <0 months) ! name ! (logical) ! (T/F) ! 'monthly' ! filename ! pairing ! cn_dir = './' ! root directory for the location of the runoff files ln_rnf_emp = .false. ! runoffs included into precipitation field (T) or into a file (F) sn_rnf = 'AMM_rivers' , 24 , 'rorunoff' , .false. , .true. , 'daily' , '' , '' sn_cnf = 'runoff_1m_nomask' , 0 , 'socoefr' , .false. , .true. , 'yearly' , '' , '' sn_sal_rnf = 'AMM_rivers' , 24 , 'rosaline' , .false. , .true. , 'daily' , '' , '' sn_tmp_rnf = 'AMM_rivers' , 24 , 'rotemper' , .false. , .true. , 'daily' , '' , '' sn_dep_rnf = 'AMM_rivers' , 24 , 'rodepth' , .false. , .true. , 'daily' , '' , '' ln_rnf_mouth = .false. ! specific treatment at rivers mouths rn_hrnf = 1000.e0 ! depth over which enhanced vertical mixing is used rn_avt_rnf = 10.e0 ! value of the additional vertical mixing coef. [m2/s] rn_rfact = 1.e0 ! multiplicative factor for runoff ln_rnf_att = .true. ! read in salinity, temperature and depth information for runoff / ---- === Resources === !''Please !''summarize!'' any changes in runtime or memory use caused by this change......!'' ---- === IPR issues === ||Has the code been wholly (100%) produced by NEMO developers staff working exclusively on NEMO?||!'''YES'''|| If No: * Identify the collaboration agreement details * Ensure the code routine header is in accordance with the agreement, (Copyright/Redistribution etc).Add further details here if required..........