Changes between Version 10 and Version 11 of ticket/0829


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2011-06-03T15:15:18+02:00 (9 years ago)
Author:
rblod
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • ticket/0829

    v10 v11  
    144144}}} 
    145145 
    146 At his point, this looks very nice, but I'm questioning myself if we shouldn't simply use a standard dynamic memory implementation. I guess the answer can be formulated in term of performances : 
    147  * is it more expensive to allocate/deallocate at each call  
    148  * or to CALL a subroutine pointing toward an existing allocated array 
     146At his point, this looks very nice, but I'm questioning myself if we shouldn't simply use a standard dynamic memory implementation. I don't have the knowledge to answer. I guess the answer can be formulated in term of performances : 
     147 * is it more expensive to allocate/deallocate at each call in a standard way 
     148 * or to CALL a subroutine pointing toward an existing already allocated array 
    149149 
    150150----