Changes between Version 12 and Version 13 of ticket/0829


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2011-06-03T15:44:07+02:00 (9 years ago)
Author:
rblod
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • ticket/0829

    v12 v13  
    144144}}} 
    145145 
    146 At his point, this looks very nice, but I'm questioning myself if we shouldn't simply use a standard dynamic memory implementation. I don't have the knowledge to answer. I guess the answer can be formulated in term of performances : 
     146At his point, this looks very nice, but I'm questioning myself if we shouldn't simply use a standard dynamic memory implementation, instead of trying to do complicated things. I don't have the knowledge to answer. I guess the answer can be formulated in term of performances : 
    147147 * is it more expensive to allocate/deallocate at each call in a standard way 
    148148 * or to CALL a subroutine pointing toward an existing already allocated array