Version 5 (modified by olegallou, 12 years ago) (diff) |
---|
Last edited Timestamp?
Author : Olivier Le Galloudec
ticket : #844
Branch : https://forge.ipsl.jussieu.fr/nemo/browser/branches/2011/dev_r2787_MERCATOR2_tidalharm
Description
Tidal harmonic package
Testing
Testing could consider (where appropriate) other configurations in addition to NVTK].
NVTK Tested | '''YES''' |
Other model configurations | '''YES''' |
Processor configurations tested | [ 1*1,4*4,2*8 ] |
If adding new functionality please confirm that the New code doesn't change results when it is switched off and ''works'' when switched on | '''YES |
(Answering UNSURE is likely to generate further questions from reviewers.)
'Please add further summary details here'
Tests done on IBM power 6:
- reproductiblity: ORCA2_LIM with time splitting and tidal potential forcing: compare 2*8 and 4*4 configurations: results are identical ( for 75 time steps, with key_mpp_rep )
- restartability: The restart capability is not implemented.
Tests on theoric ssh: I impose a sea surface heigh in input to the diagnostic with a known decomposition in harmonic and the output is the exact solution.
Bit Comparability
Does this change preserve answers in your tested standard configurations (to the last bit) ? | '''YES ''' |
Does this change bit compare across various processor configurations. (1xM, Nx1 and MxN are recommended) | '''YES''' |
Is this change expected to preserve answers in all possible model configurations? | '''YES''' |
Is this change expected to preserve all diagnostics? ,,''Preserving answers in model runs does not necessarily imply preserved diagnostics. '' | '''YES''' |
If you answered '''NO''' to any of the above, please provide further details:
- Which routine(s) are causing the difference?
- Why the changes are not protected by a logical switch or new section-version
- What is needed to achieve regression with the previous model release (e.g. a regression branch, hand-edits etc). If this is not possible, explain why not.
- What do you expect to see occur in the test harness jobs?
- Which diagnostics have you altered and why have they changed?Please add details here........
System Changes
Does your change alter namelists? | '''YES ''' |
Does your change require a change in compiler options? | '''NO ''' |
If any of these apply, please document the changes required here.......
Resources
IPR issues
Has the code been wholly (100%) produced by NEMO developers staff working exclusively on NEMO? | '''YES ''' |
If No:
- Identify the collaboration agreement details
- Ensure the code routine header is in accordance with the agreement, (Copyright/Redistribution? etc).Add further details here if required..........
Tidal Harmonic analyse on ORCA2_LIM
Configuration: ORCA2_LIM standard + time splitting + tidal potential forcing Experience:
- 1 year of simulation
We compare to TPXO 7.1 ATLAS http://volkov.oce.orst.edu/tides/atlas.html.
We can see the figure for the tidal composante M2 (real and imaginary part).
Attachments (4)
- ORCA2_M2_y_elev.gif (21.6 KB) - added by olegallou 12 years ago.
- ORCA2_M2_x_elev.gif (21.6 KB) - added by olegallou 12 years ago.
- TPXO_7.1_M2_y_elev.gif (30.3 KB) - added by olegallou 12 years ago.
- TPXO_7.1_M2_x_elev.gif (30.1 KB) - added by olegallou 12 years ago.
Download all attachments as: .zip