New URL for NEMO forge!   http://forge.nemo-ocean.eu

Since March 2022 along with NEMO 4.2 release, the code development moved to a self-hosted GitLab.
This present forge is now archived and remained online for history.
ticket/1294_CNRS1_10_TEOS10_Ediag (diff) – NEMO

Changes between Version 2 and Version 3 of ticket/1294_CNRS1_10_TEOS10_Ediag


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2014-06-20T12:48:54+02:00 (10 years ago)
Author:
gm
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • ticket/1294_CNRS1_10_TEOS10_Ediag

    v2 v3  
    1 [[PageOutline]] 
    2 Last edited [[Timestamp]] 
    3  
    4 [[BR]] 
     1[[PageOutline]] Last edited [[Timestamp]] 
    52 
    63'''Author''' : Fabien Roquet , Gurvan Madec 
     
    85'''ticket''' : #1294 
    96 
    10 '''Branch''' : [https://forge.ipsl.jussieu.fr/nemo/browser/branches/2014/dev_CNRS1_10_TEOS10_Ediag      dev_CNRS1_10_TEOS10_Ediag ]  
     7'''Branch''' : [https://forge.ipsl.jussieu.fr/nemo/browser/branches/2014/dev_CNRS1_10_TEOS10_Ediag dev_CNRS1_10_TEOS10_Ediag] 
     8 
    119---- 
     10=== Description === 
     11Development branch related to CNRS-10 and NOC-10 action of 2014 work plan: 
    1212 
    13 === Description === 
    14  
    15 Development branch related to CNRS-10 and NOC-10 action of 2014 work plan:  
    16  - CNRS-1 : add Boussinesq TEOS10 ; add a simplified EOS ; improve the UNESCO 80 EOS 
    17  - CNRS-10 : complete the trends diagnostics (3D trends of tracers, momentum, kinetic energy and potential energy) ; manage the trends output (using xIOS) 
    18  
     13 * CNRS-1 : add Boussinesq TEOS10 ; add a simplified EOS ; improve the UNESCO 80 EOS ; correct the npc algorithm (see #1350) 
     14 * CNRS-10 : complete the trends diagnostics (3D trends of tracers, momentum, kinetic energy and potential energy) ; manage the trends output (using xIOS) 
    1915 
    2016---- 
    2117=== Changes === 
     18'''revision [https://forge.ipsl.jussieu.fr/nemo/log/branches/2014/dev_CNRS1_10_TEOS10_Ediag?rev=4615 4615] ''' contains the following changes (validated with GYRE only): 
    2219 
    23 '''revision [https://forge.ipsl.jussieu.fr/nemo/log/branches/2014/dev_CNRS1_10_TEOS10_Ediag?rev=4615 4615] ''' contains the following changes (validated with GYRE only): 
    24   - introduction of TEOS-10, EOS-80, and S_EOS   
    25   - introduction of a fully re-design trend diagnostics (directory TRD) and the associated call in TRA and DYN modules 
     20 * introduction of TEOS-10, EOS-80, and S_EOS 
     21 * introduction of a fully re-design trend diagnostics (directory TRD) and the associated call in TRA and DYN modules 
    2622 
     23'''revision [https://forge.ipsl.jussieu.fr/nemo/log/branches/2014/dev_CNRS1_10_TEOS10_Ediag?rev=4680 4680] '''contains the following changes (validated with ORCA2-LIM2 and ORCA1-LIM2): 
     24 
     25 * new version of tranpc.F90  (see #1350) 
     26 * small bug correction (use of eos_fzp) 
    2727 
    2828'''remaining to do :''' 
    29   - conversion from Conservative temperature (CT) to potential temperature (PT) to be done on averaged temperature ssm_sst, not at each time step of the averaging procedure  
    30   - ln_useCT  is a misleading namelist parameter, force a hard coding of its value depending on the dos chosen 
    31   - in forced mode in blk formula, use the CT to compute heat content of evaporation, not PT 
    32   - ... 
    33   - test with SETE (especially restartability and reproducibility ) 
     29 
     30 * conversion from Conservative temperature (CT) to potential temperature (PT) to be done on averaged temperature ssm_sst, not at each time step of the averaging procedure 
     31 * ln_useCT  is a misleading namelist parameter, force a hard coding of its value depending on the dos chosen 
     32 * in forced mode in blk formula, use the CT to compute heat content of evaporation, not PT 
     33 * ... 
     34 * test with SETE (especially restartability and reproducibility ) 
    3435 
    3536---- 
     
    3738Testing could consider (where appropriate) other configurations in addition to NVTK]. 
    3839 
    39 ||NVTK Tested||!'''YES/NO!'''|| 
    40 ||Other model configurations||!'''YES/NO!'''|| 
    41 ||Processor configurations tested||[ Enter processor configs tested here ]|| 
    42 ||If adding new functionality please confirm that the [[BR]]New code doesn't change results when it is switched off [[BR]]and !''works!'' when switched on||!'''YES/NO/NA!'''|| 
     40|| NVTK Tested || !'''YES/NO!''' || 
     41|| Other model configurations || !'''YES/NO!''' || 
     42|| Processor configurations tested || [ Enter processor configs tested here ] || 
     43|| If adding new functionality please confirm that the [[BR]]New code doesn't change results when it is switched off [[BR]]and !''works!'' when switched on || !'''YES/NO/NA!''' || 
    4344 
    4445(Answering UNSURE is likely to generate further questions from reviewers.) 
     
    5051 
    5152=== Bit Comparability === 
    52 ||Does this change preserve answers in your tested standard configurations (to the last bit) ?||!'''YES/NO !'''|| 
    53 ||Does this change bit compare across various processor configurations. (1xM, Nx1 and MxN are recommended)||!'''YES/NO!'''|| 
    54 ||Is this change expected to preserve answers in all possible model configurations?||!'''YES/NO!'''|| 
    55 ||Is this change expected to preserve all diagnostics? [[BR]]!,,!''Preserving answers in model runs does not necessarily imply preserved diagnostics. !''||!'''YES/NO!'''|| 
     53|| Does this change preserve answers in your tested standard configurations (to the last bit) ? || !'''YES/NO !''' || 
     54|| Does this change bit compare across various processor configurations. (1xM, Nx1 and MxN are recommended) || !'''YES/NO!''' || 
     55|| Is this change expected to preserve answers in all possible model configurations? || !'''YES/NO!''' || 
     56|| Is this change expected to preserve all diagnostics? [[BR]]!,,!''Preserving answers in model runs does not necessarily imply preserved diagnostics. !'' || !'''YES/NO!''' || 
    5657 
    5758If you answered !'''NO!''' to any of the above, please provide further details: 
     
    6566---- 
    6667=== System Changes === 
    67 ||Does your change alter namelists?||!'''YES/NO !'''|| 
    68 ||Does your change require a change in compiler options?||!'''YES/NO !'''|| 
     68|| Does your change alter namelists? || !'''YES/NO !''' || 
     69|| Does your change require a change in compiler options? || !'''YES/NO !''' || 
    6970 
    7071If any of these apply, please document the changes required here....... 
     
    7677---- 
    7778=== IPR issues === 
    78 ||Has the code been wholly (100%) produced by NEMO developers staff working exclusively on NEMO?||!'''YES/ NO !'''|| 
     79|| Has the code been wholly (100%) produced by NEMO developers staff working exclusively on NEMO? || !'''YES/ NO !''' || 
    7980 
    8081If No: