Changes between Version 4 and Version 5 of ticket/1299

Timestamp:

2014-10-29T11:49:21+01:00 (9 years ago)

Author:

jamesharle

Comment:

--

ticket/1299

@@ -26 +26 @@
 Testing carried out on the AMM12 configuration in the trunk code. Six experiments were carried out to check the consistency of the code. These were:
 
-# Constant T/S boundary conditions on original vertical grid, with nb_jpk_bdy = 51 (first sanity test)
-# Constant T/S boundary conditions on staggered vertical grid, with nb_jpk_bdy = 51 (gdept(jpk = [1 51] ) same as native grid all depths in-between offset from native grid, second sanity test)
-# Realistic boundary conditions on original vertical grid, with nb_jpk_bdy = -1 (i.e. should be the identical to trunk code)
-# Realistic boundary conditions on original vertical grid, with nb_jpk_bdy = 51 (i.e. should be the identical to trunk code within rounding errors in interpolation routine)
-# Realistic boundary conditions on staggered vertical grid, with nb_jpk_bdy = 51 (gdept(jpk = [1 51] ) same as native grid all depths in-between offset from native grid)
-# Realistic boundary conditions on a reduced z-level staggered vertical grid, with nb_jpk_bdy = 31
+1. Constant T/S boundary conditions on original vertical grid, with nb_jpk_bdy = 51 (first sanity test)
+1. Constant T/S boundary conditions on staggered vertical grid, with nb_jpk_bdy = 51 (gdept(jpk = [1 51] ) same as native grid all depths in-between offset from native grid, second sanity test)
+1. Realistic boundary conditions on original vertical grid, with nb_jpk_bdy = -1 (i.e. should be the identical to trunk code)
+1. Realistic boundary conditions on original vertical grid, with nb_jpk_bdy = 51 (i.e. should be the identical to trunk code within rounding errors in interpolation routine)
+1. Realistic boundary conditions on staggered vertical grid, with nb_jpk_bdy = 51 (gdept(jpk = [1 51] ) same as native grid all depths in-between offset from native grid)
+1. Realistic boundary conditions on a reduced z-level staggered vertical grid, with nb_jpk_bdy = 31
 
 The datasets for the offset and reduced level input data where generated using the interp routine in matlab.
@@ -40 +40 @@
 
 How best to handle the baroclinic velocities in the case of a bathymetry mismatch between input data and native grid:
-# Set velocities to zero in depths on native grid deeper than bathymetry in input file
-# Down fill velocities for missing data
+1. Set velocities to zero in depths on native grid deeper than bathymetry in input file
+1. Down fill velocities for missing data
 
 in all cases a barotropic correction has to applied. At present a conservative remapping option does not exist. This should be a straight forward addition of a subroutine in fldread.F90