Changes between Version 7 and Version 8 of ticket/1495_UKMO_ISF


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2015-08-04T13:54:30+02:00 (5 years ago)
Author:
mathiot
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • ticket/1495_UKMO_ISF

    v7 v8  
    3232---- 
    3333=== Testing === 
    34 Testing could consider (where appropriate) other configurations in addition to NVTK]. 
     34Testing could consider (where appropriate) other configurations in addition to NVTK]. All the validation test are done with the version 3.6_STABLE at revision r5554. 
    3535 
    36 ||NVTK Tested||!'''YES/NO!'''|| 
    37 ||Other model configurations||!'''YES/NO!'''|| 
    38 ||Processor configurations tested||[ Enter processor configs tested here ]|| 
    39 ||If adding new functionality please confirm that the [[BR]]New code doesn't change results when it is switched off [[BR]]and !''works!'' when switched on||!'''YES/NO/NA!'''|| 
     36||NVTK Tested||'''YES'''|| 
     37||Other model configurations||'''YES (ePERIANT025)'''|| 
     38||Processor configurations tested||37/35/836|| 
     39||If adding new functionality please confirm that the [[BR]]New code doesn't change results when it is switched off [[BR]]and ''works'' when switched on||'''YES'''|| 
    4040 
    4141(Answering UNSURE is likely to generate further questions from reviewers.) 
     
    4747 
    4848=== Bit Comparability === 
    49 ||Does this change preserve answers in your tested standard configurations (to the last bit) ?||!'''YES/NO !'''|| 
    50 ||Does this change bit compare across various processor configurations. (1xM, Nx1 and MxN are recommended)||!'''YES/NO!'''|| 
    51 ||Is this change expected to preserve answers in all possible model configurations?||!'''YES/NO!'''|| 
    52 ||Is this change expected to preserve all diagnostics? [[BR]]!,,!''Preserving answers in model runs does not necessarily imply preserved diagnostics. !''||!'''YES/NO!'''|| 
     49||Does this change preserve answers in your tested standard configurations (to the last bit) ?||'''YES (except for ISOMIP)'''|| 
     50||Does this change bit compare across various processor configurations. (1xM, Nx1 and MxN are recommended)||'''YES'''|| 
     51||Is this change expected to preserve answers in all possible model configurations?||'''YES (for untested possible configuration a flag is set up to flase to stop the model)'''|| 
     52||Is this change expected to preserve all diagnostics? [[BR]]!,,!''Preserving answers in model runs does not necessarily imply preserved diagnostics. !''||'''YES'''|| 
    5353 
    54 If you answered !'''NO!''' to any of the above, please provide further details: 
     54If you answered '''NO''' to any of the above, please provide further details: 
    5555 
    5656 * Which routine(s) are causing the difference? 
     
    6262---- 
    6363=== System Changes === 
    64 ||Does your change alter namelists?||!'''YES/NO !'''|| 
    65 ||Does your change require a change in compiler options?||!'''YES/NO !'''|| 
     64||Does your change alter namelists?||'''YES'''|| 
     65||Does your change require a change in compiler options?||'''NO'''|| 
    6666 
    6767If any of these apply, please document the changes required here....... 
     68 
     69{{{ 
     70!----------------------------------------------------------------------- 
     71&namsbc        !   Surface Boundary Condition (surface module) 
     72!----------------------------------------------------------------------- 
     73   ... 
     74   ln_rnf      = .true.    !  runoffs                                   (T   => fill namsbc_rnf) 
     75   ln_isf      = .false.   !  ice shelf                                 (T   => fill namsbc_isf) 
     76   ... 
     77}}} 
     78{{{ 
     79!----------------------------------------------------------------------- 
     80&namsbc_isf    !  Top boundary layer (ISF) 
     81!----------------------------------------------------------------------- 
     82... 
     83! for all case 
     84   nn_isf      = 1         !  ice shelf melting/freezing 
     85                           !  1 = presence of ISF    2 = bg03 parametrisation 
     86                           !  3 = rnf file for isf   4 = ISF fwf specified 
     87                           !  option 1 and 4 need ln_isfcav = .true. (domzgr) 
     88... 
     89}}} 
     90 and in namsbc_isf ln_divisf was removed and in namsbc nn_isf was moved to namsbc_isf. 
    6891 
    6992----