Version 2 (modified by stortignauz, 5 years ago) (diff)

Last edited Timestamp?

For completion by the Sci/Tech/Code? reviewer

Reviewer: [ Andrea Storto ]

Ticket Details, Documentation and Code changes

Do you understand the area of code being altered and the reasoning why it is being altered?YES
Do the proposed code changes correspond with the stated reason for the change?YES
Is the in-line documentation accurate and sufficient?YES
Do the code changes comply with NEMO coding standards?YES
Is the Ticket documented with sufficient detail for others to understand the impact of the change?YES
Does any corresponding external documentation require updating?NO
If yes, which docs and have the updates been drafted?NA
Are namelist changes required for this change?YES
If yes, have they been done?YES
Has a completed Ticket Summary template been appended to the ticket to aid code reviewsYES
Does this summary correspond with your understanding of the full ticket?YES

Ticket, Documentation and Code comments

Add specific Ticket, Documentation and code comments here


Has the NVTK and other jobs been tested with this change?YES
Have the required bit comparability tests been run?YES
Can this change be shown to have a null impact? (if option not selected)YES
If no, is reason for the change valid/understood?NA
If no, ensure that the ticket details the impact this change will have on model configurations .NA
Is this change expected to preserve all diagnostics?YES
If no, is reason for the change valid/understood?NA
Are there significant changes in run time/memory?NO

Testing Comments

Add specific testing comments here

Add specific testing comments here

Code Review

Do the code changes comply with NEMO coding standards?YES
Are code changes consistent with the design of NEMO?YES
Is the code free of unwanted TABs?YES
Has the code been wholly (100%) produced by NEMO developers working on NEMO?YES
If no, ensure collaboration agreement has been added to the ticket keywordsNA

Add specific code comments or suggested alterations here.

Review Summary

The code implements the new warm layer/cool skin diagnostics in line with the NEMO code and without compromising any other code part. Tests show the success of the new package from both technical and scientific point of view

Approval for the trunk


The code reviewer may approve the change for the NEMO trunk when:

  1. their requests/comments have been addressed satisfactorily.
  2. the above check-list has been completed.

or the code reviewer may choose to reject & assign the change back to the code author.