Changes between Version 14 and Version 15 of ticket/1611_is_oce_cpl

Timestamp:

2015-10-05T18:31:18+02:00 (9 years ago)

Author:

mathiot

Comment:

--

ticket/1611_is_oce_cpl

@@ -44 +44 @@
  * domngb.F90: I add an optional argument to be able to do this beneath the ice shelf (i.e. at level jk instead of 1).
  * domain.F90: Call to domwri modified, because if coupling, mask could be change in iscpl routine (closed pool or other weird configuration due to the extrapolation process. (3 solutions: let as it is now, simplify it and move it to the end of istate.F90 or build a proper flood filling algorithm to apply in domzgr and keep the call to dom_wri as it is).
- * domzgr.F90: modification of zgr_isf, because in case of coupling, we do not dig the bathymetry to ensure at least 2 wet cells in the water column. (if no coupling, isf draft and bathy could be dig to ensure this condition). 
+ * domzgr.F90: modification of zgr_isf, because in case of coupling, we do not dig the bathymetry to ensure at least 2 wet cells in the water column. (if no coupling, isf draft and bathy could be dig to ensure this condition). '''NOT YET CLEAN'''
  * + small modifications in order to have dev_r5589_is_oce_cpl branch compatible to dev_r5151_UKMO_ISF. Could leads to some issue during the merge of these 2 branches (modification of umask_i by ssumask ...).