Version 6 (modified by ctlod, 12 years ago) (diff)


PHC_9 run

This run is based on the PHC_8 one except on the way the wind stress and module are managed.
Wind stress seems to be too low (in PHC_8) in high latitudes compared to what we have in using standard
CLIO data this component is capital for the water mass formation & penetration in these areas so it must be increased. So we do the following test:

compute off-line the daily climatology of the fields (
U.u)clim and (U.v)clim using 6hourly wind velocities.
  • we use the wind module computed with the 6hourly wind velocities which is much more energetics than the one computed using climatological velocities.

Note that we don't substract the ocean/sea-ice velocities when computing the wind module since this last is now read.


DFS4 wind module and wind stress

Plots below show the folllowing fields:

   * (||wndm||.U)clim - ||wndm||clim.Uclim 
   * (||wndm||.V)clim - ||wndm||clim.Vclim

SST differences with Reynolds and PHC_8:


Temperature differences at z=105 m with Levitus and PHC_8:


SSS differences with Levitus and PHC_8:


Temperature differences in zonal average with Levitus and PHC_8:


Salinity differences in zonal average with Levitus and PHC_8:


Equatorial differences with Levitus and PHC_8 of zonal velocity U:


Equatorial differences with Levitus and PHC_8 of temperature:


Equatorial differences with Levitus and PHC_8 of salinity:


Pacific equatorial differences with Levitus and PHC_8 of temperature:


Qnet differences with PHC_8 :

Erp & Mxl fields:

Attachments (25)