Changeset 198 for altifloat/doc

Timestamp:

11/20/15 11:21:32 (9 years ago)

Author:

leila_ocean

Message:

Nov 20-1pm

Location:

altifloat/doc/ocean_modelling

Files:

• Draft1.tex (modified) (2 diffs)
• fig/summary_twin.pdf (added)

altifloat/doc/ocean_modelling/Draft1.tex

@@ -113 +113 @@
 \author{Leila Issa, Julien Brajard, Milad Fakhri, Daniel Hayes, Laurent Mortier and Pierre-Marie Poulain. }
 
-\address{}
+\address{ Department of Computer Science and Mathematics\\
+        Lebanese American University\\
+        Beirut, Lebanon\\
+    Email: leila.issa@lau.edu.lb
+}
+
 
 \begin{abstract}
@@ -419 +424 @@
 error (u,i,j,t)=\big | \big |\bo{u}_{true} (i,j,t)-\bo{u} (i,j,t) \big| \big|,
 \end{equation}
-between the true field and either the background or corrected fields. In the left panel, we show that error between the background and true fields, averaged in time over the duration of the experiment. The right side shows this same error after correction. On top of that, we observe the excellent agreement between the positions of the drifters simulated with the corrected field and the ``true" observations. Next, the correction in terms of direction is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:cerror}: we display the cosine of the angle between the background and true field on the left side versus the  cosine of the angle between the corrected and true fields on the right. Note that a cosine of one indicates a strong correlation in direction between the two fields. We see this strong correlation between true and corrected fields by observing how the blue color (left pannel of Fig.\ref{fig:cerror} ) turns into deep red (right pannel of Fig.\ref{fig:cerror} ) in the region where the drifters were deployed. Finally, in Fig. \ref{fig:summary}, we show the actual current maps before and after correction. We clearly see that the drifters 'fixed' the poorly simulated coastal meander.
+between the true field and either the background or corrected fields. In the left panel, we show that error between the background and true fields, averaged in time over the duration of the experiment. The right side shows this same error after correction. On top of that, we observe the excellent agreement between the positions of the drifters simulated with the corrected field and the ``true" observations. Next, the correction in terms of direction is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:cerror}: we display the cosine of the angle between the background and true field on the left side versus the  cosine of the angle between the corrected and true fields on the right. Note that a cosine of one indicates a strong correlation in direction between the two fields. We see this strong correlation between true and corrected fields by observing how the blue color (left pannel of Fig.\ref{fig:cerror} ) turns into deep red (right pannel of Fig.\ref{fig:cerror} ) in the region where the drifters were deployed. Finally, in Fig. \ref{fig:summary}, we show the actual current maps before and after correction. We clearly see that the drifters corrected the poorly simulated coastal meander.