145 | | * SPINUP_ANALYTIC_FG1: 2x2 degrees CRU-NCEP forcing cycles over 1901-1910 between 1901 and 2240 ([https://forge.ipsl.jussieu.fr/orchidee/wiki/Documentation/Forcings about the forcing]). Start from scratch. 15 PFTs, no land cover changes, nitrogen input for 1850, 1860 or 1900 depending on the species, and fixed CO2 concentrations ([https://forge.ipsl.jussieu.fr/orchidee/wiki/Documentation/UserGuide/SpinUpCarbon details and context]). |
146 | | * OOL_SEC_STO_FG1trans: 2x2 degrees CRU-NCEP forcing cycles over 1901-1910 between 1861 and 1900 ([https://forge.ipsl.jussieu.fr/orchidee/wiki/Documentation/Forcings about the forcing]). Restart from SPINUP_ANALYTIC_FG1. 15 PFTs, no land cover changes, nitrogen input for 1900, and annual CO2 concentrations. |
147 | | * OOL_SEC_STO_FG2: 2x2 degrees annual CRU-NCEP forcing between 1901 and 2010 ([https://forge.ipsl.jussieu.fr/orchidee/wiki/Documentation/Forcings about the forcing]). Restart from FG1trans. 15 PFTs, annual land cover changes, annual nitrogen input and annual CO2 concentrations. |
| 145 | * SPINUP_ANALYTIC_FG1: 2x2 degrees CRU-JRA forcing cycles over 1901-1910 between 1901 and 2240 ([https://forge.ipsl.jussieu.fr/orchidee/wiki/Documentation/Forcings about the forcing]). Start from scratch. 15 PFTs, no land cover changes, nitrogen input for 1850, 1860 or 1900 depending on the species, and fixed CO2 concentrations ([https://forge.ipsl.jussieu.fr/orchidee/wiki/Documentation/UserGuide/SpinUpCarbon details and context]). |
| 146 | * OOL_SEC_STO_FG1trans: 2x2 degrees CRU-JRA forcing cycles over 1901-1910 between 1861 and 1900 ([https://forge.ipsl.jussieu.fr/orchidee/wiki/Documentation/Forcings about the forcing]). Restart from SPINUP_ANALYTIC_FG1. 15 PFTs, no land cover changes, nitrogen input for 1900, and annual CO2 concentrations. |
| 147 | * OOL_SEC_STO_FG2: 2x2 degrees annual CRU-JRA forcing between 1901 and 2010 ([https://forge.ipsl.jussieu.fr/orchidee/wiki/Documentation/Forcings about the forcing]). Restart from FG1trans. 15 PFTs, annual land cover changes, annual nitrogen input and annual CO2 concentrations. |
150 | | * OOL_SEC_STO_FG4: ~0.5x0.5 degrees annual CRU-NCEP forcing between 1901 and 2010 ([https://forge.ipsl.jussieu.fr/orchidee/wiki/Documentation/Forcings about the forcing]). Start from scratch. 64 PFTs, European forest are defined at the species level with 4 age classes, forests outside of Europe are defined at the MTC level with 1 age class, annual land cover and tree species changes, annual input deposition, annual CO2 concentrations, annual forest management, and annual litter raking. |
| 150 | * OOL_SEC_STO_FG4: ~0.5x0.5 degrees annual CRU-JRA forcing between 1901 and 2010 ([https://forge.ipsl.jussieu.fr/orchidee/wiki/Documentation/Forcings about the forcing]). Start from scratch. 64 PFTs, European forest are defined at the species level with 4 age classes, forests outside of Europe are defined at the MTC level with 1 age class, annual land cover and tree species changes, annual input deposition, annual CO2 concentrations, annual forest management, and annual litter raking. |
157 | | * SPINUP_ANALYTIC_PRESENT: 2x2 degrees CRU-NCEP forcing cycles over 1990-2000 between 2001 and 2340. Start from scratch. 15 PFTs, no land cover changes, nitrogen input for the year 2000 (except for biological nitrogen fixation for which the map is always fixed to the year 1850), and fixed CO2 concentrations. '''Intended use''': contemporary data contain the effect of elevated CO2, nitrogen deposition, and warming. If we use SPINUP_ANALYTIC_FG1, it can not be evaluated whether the parameters used in the spinup will result in acceptable contemporary pools and fluxes. Using SPINUP_ANALYTIC_PRESENT can overcome this issue. Following this spinup pools and fluxes should be close to contemporary values (note that forest management is not yet accounted for in either set-up). The land cover map for the year 1860 was used such that the results of SPINUP_ANALYTIC_PRESENT and SPINUP_ANALYTIC_FG1 can be easily compared to evaluate whether the simulated impact of CO2, nitrogen and warming seems reasonable. |
| 157 | * SPINUP_ANALYTIC_PRESENT: 2x2 degrees CRU-JRA forcing cycles over 1990-2000 between 2001 and 2340. Start from scratch. 15 PFTs, no land cover changes, nitrogen input for the year 2000 (except for biological nitrogen fixation for which the map is always fixed to the year 1850), and fixed CO2 concentrations. '''Intended use''': contemporary data contain the effect of elevated CO2, nitrogen deposition, and warming. If we use SPINUP_ANALYTIC_FG1, it can not be evaluated whether the parameters used in the spinup will result in acceptable contemporary pools and fluxes. Using SPINUP_ANALYTIC_PRESENT can overcome this issue. Following this spinup pools and fluxes should be close to contemporary values (note that forest management is not yet accounted for in either set-up). The land cover map for the year 1860 was used such that the results of SPINUP_ANALYTIC_PRESENT and SPINUP_ANALYTIC_FG1 can be easily compared to evaluate whether the simulated impact of CO2, nitrogen and warming seems reasonable. |