| 3 | This is the first evaluation at fluxnet sites of the CWRR scheme after the merge into the trunk version. |
| 4 | It is compared here to revision r1013 with the Choisnel-based scheme. |
| 5 | For most sites, diagnostic variables and time frequencies, the modeled fluxes are much less correlated with the observation with CWRR than with the Choisnel scheme. [[BR]] |
| 6 | The standard deviation of the modeled fluxes is also much lower than the one observed. |
| 7 | The less impacted vegetation type is the Grassland type for which the results with CWRR are relatively comparable to those obtained with Choisnel. |