r1118cwrr vs r1013cwrr
The observed variability is better reproduced with r1118 than with r1013 (ignore the year-to-year variability, for which they are often too few data for having significant result). The correlation is also in better agreement with the observed one, in general.
CRO sites
| NL-Lan | NL-Lut | NL-Mol | US-Bo1 | US-Ne1 | US-Ne2 | US-Ne3 |
DBF sites
| DE-Hai | IT-Ro1 | IT-Ro2 | US-Bar | US-Ha1 | US-MMS | US-WBW | US-WCr |
EBF sites
| AU-Tum | AU-Wac | BR-Sa3 | ID-Pag |
ENF sites
| CA-Man | CA-NS1 | CA-NS2 | CA-NS3 | CA-NS4 | CA-NS5 | CA-Qcu | CA-Qfo | CA-SF1 | CA-SF2 |
| FI-Hyy | FI-Sod | IL-Yat | NL-Loo | RU-Zot | SE-Fla | SE-Nor | SE-Sk2 | US-Blo | US-Ho1 |
| US-Ho2 | US-Me4 |
GRA sites
| DK-Lva | IT-Amp | NL-Ca1 | US-Aud | US-Bkg | US-FPe | US-Goo |
WSA sites
| AU-How | BW-Ma1 | US-Ton |
Last modified 11 years ago
Last modified on 2013-03-20T15:12:11+01:00
