Changeset 206

Timestamp:

05/25/12 10:26:17 (12 years ago)

Author:

pinsard

Message:

one new ref and one hal ref

File:

• branches/bibliolocean/data/biblioref.bib (modified) (4 diffs)

branches/bibliolocean/data/biblioref.bib

@@ -3 +3 @@
 
 @PREAMBLE{"Bibliographie du LOCEAN"}
+
+@article{DragonBarhenEtAl:MEPS:2012b,
+loceanbibid={01649},
+timestamp={20120525},
+hal_id = {hal-00700857},
+url = {http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00700857},
+title = {{Comparative analysis of methods for inferring successful foraging areas from Argos and {GPS} tracking data}},
+author = {{A}nne-{C}écile {D}ragon and Avner Bar-Hen and Pascal P. Monestiez and Christophe Guinet},
+abstract = {{Identifying animals' successful foraging areas is a major challenge, but such comprehensive knowledge is needed for the management and conservation of wild populations. In recent decades, numerous specific analytic methods have been developed to handle tracking data and to identify preferred foraging areas. In this study, we assessed the efficiency of different track-based methods on Argos and {GPS}  predators' tracks. We investigated (1) the consistency in the detection of foraging areas between track-based methods applied to 2 tracking data resolutions and (2) the similarity of foraging behaviour identification between track-based methods and an independent index of foraging success. We focused on methods that are commonly used in the literature: empirical descriptors of foraging effort, Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) and first passage time analysis. We applied these methods to satellite tracking data collected on 6 long-ranging elephant seals equipped with both Argos and {GPS}  tags. Seals were also equipped with time depth recorder loggers from which we estimated an independent index, based on the drift rate and the changes in the seals' body condition, as a proxy for foraging success along the tracks. Favourable foraging zones identified by track-based methods were compared to locations where the body condition of the seals significantly increased. With or without an environmental covariate, HMMs were the most reliable for identifying successful foraging areas on both high (GPS) and low (Argos) resolution data. Areas identified by HMMs as intensively used were congruent with the locations where seals significantly increased their body condition given a 4 d metabolisation lag.}},
+language = {Anglais},
+affiliation = {Centre d'{\'e}tudes biologiques de Chiz{\'e} - CEBC , LOCEAN-UPMC , Math{\'e}matiques appliqu{\'e}es Paris 5 - MAP5 , BioSP-INRA},
+pages = {253-267},
+journal = {{M}arine {E}cology {P}rogress {S}eries},
+volume = {452},
+audience = {internationale},
+doi = {10.3354/meps09618},
+year = {2012},
+}
 
 @article{BungeProvostEtAl:JGR:2007,
@@ -774 +792 @@
 }
 
-@article{DragonBarhenEtAl:MEPS:2012,
+@article{DragonBarhenEtAl:MEPS:2012a,
 loceanbibid={01602},
 timestamp={20120511},
@@ -785 +803 @@
 affiliation = {Centre d'{\'e}tudes biologiques de Chiz{\'e} - CEBC , MAP5-CNRS , LOCEAN-UPMC , Math{\'e}matiques appliqu{\'e}es Paris 5 - MAP5 , BioSP-INRA},
 pages = {243-257},
-  journal = {{M}arine {E}cology {P}rogress {S}eries},
+journal = {{M}arine {E}cology {P}rogress {S}eries},
 volume = {447},
 audience = {internationale},
@@ -8851 +8869 @@
   number = {5},
   loceanaffectation = {cnrs},
-  loceanteam = {surf}
+  loceanteam = {surf},
+  url={http://hal.ird.fr/ird-00685317}
 }