Changes between Version 32 and Version 33 of model/LMDZ6_3par

Timestamp:

06/13/16 17:28:02 (8 years ago)

Author:

nillod

Comment:

--

model/LMDZ6_3par

@@ -6 +6 @@
 2. Change LMDZ revision to `trunk 2541` in `mod.def`
 3. Install the model: `cd modipsl/util ; ./model LMDZOR_v6`
-
-3b. To enable debug version: edit `modipsl/config/LMDZOR/Makefile` and add ''debug'' option:
-{{{#!bash
-lmdz: ../../modeles/LMDZ
-   (cd ../../modeles/LMDZ ; ./makelmdz_fcm -debug -d $(RESOL_LMDZ) [...]
-   (cd ../../modeles/LMDZ ; ./makelmdz_fcm -debug -d $(RESOL_LMDZ) [...]
-}}}
-
 4. Activate RRTM mode in `modipsl/modeles/LMDZ/makelmdz_fcm`: `rrtm=true`
-
 5. Compile with L=79: `cd modipsl/config/LMDZOR ; gmake LMD144142-L79`
 
@@ -32 +23 @@
 
 === TESTS ===
+''All outputs were made with LMDZ6 rev 2550, physic=NPv5.4. Anomalies are performed by removing control run values (ie LMDZOR6.NOVOLC) in 1991-1993 period.''[[br]][[br]]
 
-Nomenclature:[[br]]
-'''2D''': corresponds to CMIP6 beta0 release forcing dataset zonally averaged for the 3 parameters.[[br]]
-'''AOD''': corresponds to SATO zonal AOD. The other 2 parameters are fixed.[[br]]
-'''Name of simulations''':[[br]]
-- LMDZOR6.VOLC.2D.2 and LMDZOR6.VOLC.2D.3: same boundary conditions (ERSST) and other forcings (ie CMIP6 beta release). Only difference is on period length (1M or 1Y). See table and figures below. To note unexplained differences in radiation balance in temperature response. We note about 0.5W/m2 between test 2 and 3 that go back to 0 at the end of the year (see figure) => problem with temporal interpolation ??? To be checked in coupled model framework.[[br]][[br]]
+'''Name of simulations and Nomenclature''':[[br]]
+- '''2D''': corresponds to CMIP6 beta0 release forcing dataset zonally averaged for the 3 parameters.[[br]]
+- '''AOD''': corresponds to SATO zonal AOD. The other 2 parameters are fixed.[[br]]
+- LMDZOR6.VOLC.2D.2 and LMDZOR6.VOLC.2D.3: same boundary conditions (ERSST) and other forcings (ie CMIP6 beta release). Only difference is on period length (1M or 1Y). See table and figures below. To note unexplained differences in radiation balance. We note about 0.5W/m2 between test 2 and 3 that goes back to 0 at the end of the year (see figure) => problem with temporal interpolation ??? To be checked in coupled model framework. Otherwise there is a problem with OD550_STRAT interpolation in southern hemisphere south of about 75degSouth. Global radiation balance at TOA (SW, LW and Net) and Surf temperature response are in good agrement with expected values (e.g Soden et al. 2002). However results are biaised by imposed SST, need to check this in the couple model framework.[[br]][[br]]
 - LMDZOR6.VOLC.AOD and LMDZOR6.VOLC.AOD.2:  same boundary conditions (ERSST) and other forcings (ie SATO AOD). Only difference is on period length (1M or 1Y). See table and figures below. Under analysis.
 
@@ -48 +39 @@
 ||LMDZOR6.NOVOLC         ||47  ||8CPU||0       ||    1Y||    3Y||NPv5.4 ||Yes ||DEVT||TSI only||ok 3Y||phylmd rev 2550/ctrl sim||
 
-== Outputs ==
-
-''All outputs were made with LMDZ6 rev 2550, physic=NPv5.4. Anomalies are performed by removing control run values (ie LMDZOR6.NOVOLC) in 1991-1993 period.''
-
-Forcings: 
-- 2D (or 3 params): read g, omega and piz in SW + absorption in LW.
-- AOD: only the zonal AOD is reading
 
 === LMDZOR6.VOLC.2D.2 (CMIP6 beta release0, 3 param) ===