1 | <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" |
---|
2 | "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> |
---|
3 | |
---|
4 | <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> |
---|
5 | <head> |
---|
6 | <meta name="generator" content= |
---|
7 | "HTML Tidy for Linux/x86 (vers 1st December 2004), see www.w3.org" /> |
---|
8 | |
---|
9 | <title>Fortran coding standard for FCM</title> |
---|
10 | <meta name="author" content="FCM team" /> |
---|
11 | <meta name="descriptions" content="Fortran coding standard for FCM" /> |
---|
12 | <meta name="keywords" content="Fortran, coding standard, FCM" /> |
---|
13 | <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /> |
---|
14 | <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="style.css" /> |
---|
15 | <script type="text/javascript" src="fcm.js"> |
---|
16 | </script> |
---|
17 | </head> |
---|
18 | |
---|
19 | <body onload="javascript: FCM.load('doc/standards/', 'fortran-standard');"> |
---|
20 | <div id="ukmo-logo"> |
---|
21 | <img src="logo.png" alt="UK Met Office" /> |
---|
22 | </div> |
---|
23 | |
---|
24 | <h1>Fortran coding standard for FCM</h1> |
---|
25 | |
---|
26 | <address> |
---|
27 | Latest content update: 14 January 2010. <span id= |
---|
28 | "fcm-js-maintenance"></span> |
---|
29 | </address> |
---|
30 | |
---|
31 | <address> |
---|
32 | Questions regarding this document or permissions to quote from it should be |
---|
33 | directed to: |
---|
34 | </address> |
---|
35 | |
---|
36 | <address> |
---|
37 | <a href="mailto:iprmanager@metoffice.gov.uk">IPR Manager</a><br /> |
---|
38 | Met Office<br /> |
---|
39 | FitzRoy Road<br /> |
---|
40 | Exeter, Devon<br /> |
---|
41 | EX1 3PB<br /> |
---|
42 | United Kingdom |
---|
43 | </address> |
---|
44 | |
---|
45 | <address> |
---|
46 | © Crown Copyright 2006-10 |
---|
47 | </address> |
---|
48 | |
---|
49 | <address id="fcm-js-pdf"></address> |
---|
50 | <hr /> |
---|
51 | |
---|
52 | <div id="fcm-content"></div> |
---|
53 | |
---|
54 | <h2 id="intro">1. Introduction</h2> |
---|
55 | |
---|
56 | <p>Fortran is the standard programming language at the Met Office for |
---|
57 | developing scientific and research applications, in particular, for programs |
---|
58 | running on the supercomputers. This document describes some guidelines that |
---|
59 | should be followed by developers when writing Fortran code, especially for |
---|
60 | code in systems hosted by FCM.</p> |
---|
61 | |
---|
62 | <h2 id="fcm">2. Programming Fortran for the FCM build system</h2> |
---|
63 | |
---|
64 | <h3 id="fcm-general">2.1 General</h3> |
---|
65 | |
---|
66 | <p>To get the most out of the FCM build system, you should follow these |
---|
67 | guidelines when you develop your code:</p> |
---|
68 | |
---|
69 | <ol> |
---|
70 | <li>Each source file should contain one and no more than one top level |
---|
71 | program unit, (such as a <code>PROGRAM</code>, a standalone |
---|
72 | <code>SUBROUTINE</code>/<code>FUNCTION</code> or a <code>MODULE</code>). |
---|
73 | All top level standalone program units in a source tree should be uniquely |
---|
74 | named. ( <dfn>Top level</dfn> means a standalone program unit that is |
---|
75 | compilable independently, i.e. this rule does not restrict the naming and |
---|
76 | placements of sub-programs in a <code>CONTAINS</code> section.) FCM may |
---|
77 | fail to set up the dependency tree of your source correctly if you do not |
---|
78 | follow this rule. |
---|
79 | |
---|
80 | <p>A clash of program unit names happens most often when you have |
---|
81 | multiple versions of the same program unit in the same source tree. You |
---|
82 | should design your code to avoid this situation. If it is not possible to |
---|
83 | do so, you may have to use a pre-processor to ensure that there is only |
---|
84 | one copy of each program unit in the source tree. Another situation where |
---|
85 | clashes of program unit names may occur is when you are developing code |
---|
86 | that is shared between several projects. In this case, you may want to |
---|
87 | agree with the other projects a naming convention to define a unique |
---|
88 | namespace for program units in each project. (E.g. some projects at the |
---|
89 | Met Office have adopted a naming convention such that all shared program |
---|
90 | units in a project are named with a unique prefix.)</p> |
---|
91 | </li> |
---|
92 | |
---|
93 | <li>All code should be written using the free source form. (At Fortran 95, |
---|
94 | the free source form can have a maximum of 132 characters per line, and up |
---|
95 | to 39 continuations in a Fortran statement.) The fixed source form is |
---|
96 | obsolete, and is not supported by the interface file generators used by |
---|
97 | FCM.</li> |
---|
98 | |
---|
99 | <li>An interface should be provided when calling a <code>SUBROUTINE</code> |
---|
100 | or a <code>FUNCTION</code>. Not only is this considered good practice, it |
---|
101 | also allows FCM to determine the dependency relationship of your source |
---|
102 | files. An interface can be provided in these ways: |
---|
103 | |
---|
104 | <dl> |
---|
105 | <dt>Internal sub-program</dt> |
---|
106 | |
---|
107 | <dd> |
---|
108 | <p>Place sub-programs in the <code>CONTAINS</code> section of a |
---|
109 | standalone program unit. There are two advantages for this approach. |
---|
110 | Firstly, the sub-programs will get an automatic interface when the |
---|
111 | container program unit is compiled. Secondly, it should be easier for |
---|
112 | the compiler to provide optimisation when the sub-programs are |
---|
113 | internal to the caller. The disadvantage of this approach is that the |
---|
114 | sub-programs are local to the caller, and so they cannot be called by |
---|
115 | other program units. Therefore, this approach is only suitable for |
---|
116 | small sub-programs local to a particular program unit.</p> |
---|
117 | |
---|
118 | <p>Note: One way to share a sub-program unit between several top |
---|
119 | level program units is to make use of the Fortran |
---|
120 | <code>INCLUDE</code> statement. You can write the sub-program unit in |
---|
121 | a separate file and place it in the <code>CONTAINS</code> section of |
---|
122 | different program units using <code>INCLUDE</code> statements. The |
---|
123 | disadvantage of this approach is that when the program is compiled, a |
---|
124 | copy of the sub-program unit will be embedded within each of the top |
---|
125 | level program units. This may lead to an increase in size of the |
---|
126 | executable, and so this approach is still only suitable for small |
---|
127 | sub-programs local to a small number of program units.</p> |
---|
128 | |
---|
129 | <p>For example, if we have a <code>SUBROUTINE</code> in |
---|
130 | <samp>sub_prog.inc</samp>:</p> |
---|
131 | </dd> |
---|
132 | |
---|
133 | <dd> |
---|
134 | <pre> |
---|
135 | SUBROUTINE sub_prog(some, arg) |
---|
136 | ! Some declarations ... |
---|
137 | ! Some executable statements ... |
---|
138 | END SUBROUTINE sub_prog |
---|
139 | </pre> |
---|
140 | |
---|
141 | <p>It can be placed in a <code>MODULE</code> in |
---|
142 | <samp>bar.f90</samp>:</p> |
---|
143 | </dd> |
---|
144 | |
---|
145 | <dd> |
---|
146 | <pre> |
---|
147 | SUBROUTINE bar(more, arg) |
---|
148 | ! Some declarations ... |
---|
149 | ! Some executable statements ... |
---|
150 | CALL sub_prog(some, arg) |
---|
151 | ! More executable statements ... |
---|
152 | CONTAINS |
---|
153 | INCLUDE 'sub_prog.inc' |
---|
154 | END SUBROUTINE bar |
---|
155 | </pre> |
---|
156 | </dd> |
---|
157 | |
---|
158 | <dt>Module procedures</dt> |
---|
159 | |
---|
160 | <dd> |
---|
161 | <p>Place sub-programs in the <code>CONTAINS</code> section of a |
---|
162 | <code>MODULE</code>. Again, the sub-programs will have automatic |
---|
163 | interfaces when the <code>MODULE</code> is compiled. If you give the |
---|
164 | sub-programs the PUBLIC attribute (which is the default), you will be |
---|
165 | able to call them from anywhere using the current |
---|
166 | <code>MODULE</code>. You will also gain all the advantages offered by |
---|
167 | a <code>MODULE</code>. (E.g. a <code>MODULE</code> will allow you to |
---|
168 | design your code in a more object-oriented manner.) However, |
---|
169 | <code>MODULE</code> dependency can have an impact on the efficiency |
---|
170 | of incremental compilations. For example, if you modify items that |
---|
171 | are local to the <code>MODULE</code>, it is very difficult for the |
---|
172 | build system to detect that your change does not affect program units |
---|
173 | using the <code>MODULE</code>, so the build system will end up |
---|
174 | compiling the <code>MODULE</code> and all the program units that use |
---|
175 | it.</p> |
---|
176 | |
---|
177 | <p>For example, if we have a <code>MODULE</code> in |
---|
178 | <samp>my_mod.f90</samp>:</p> |
---|
179 | <pre> |
---|
180 | MODULE my_mod |
---|
181 | ! Some module declarations |
---|
182 | CONTAINS |
---|
183 | SUBROUTINE sub_prog(some, arg) |
---|
184 | ! Some declarations ... |
---|
185 | ! Some executable statements ... |
---|
186 | END SUBROUTINE sub_prog |
---|
187 | END MODULE my_mod |
---|
188 | </pre> |
---|
189 | |
---|
190 | <p>It can be imported to another program as such:</p> |
---|
191 | <pre> |
---|
192 | SUBROUTINE foo(some, arg) |
---|
193 | USE my_mod, ONLY: sub_prog |
---|
194 | ! Some declarations ... |
---|
195 | ! Some executable statements ... |
---|
196 | CALL sub_prog(some, arg) |
---|
197 | ! More executable statements ... |
---|
198 | END SUBROUTINE foo |
---|
199 | </pre> |
---|
200 | </dd> |
---|
201 | |
---|
202 | <dt>Interface files</dt> |
---|
203 | |
---|
204 | <dd> |
---|
205 | <p>For each source file containing a standalone |
---|
206 | <code>SUBROUTINE</code> or <code>FUNCTION</code>, FCM generates a |
---|
207 | file containing the interface of the <code>SUBROUTINE</code> or |
---|
208 | <code>FUNCTION</code>. By default, the generated file is named after |
---|
209 | the original source file, but with the file extension replaced by |
---|
210 | <samp>*.interface</samp>. In the specification section of the caller |
---|
211 | routine, you will then be able to declare the interface using a |
---|
212 | Fortran <code>INCLUDE</code> statement to include the interface file. |
---|
213 | This type of <code>INCLUDE</code> statement is detected automatically |
---|
214 | by FCM, which will use it to set up the dependency tree.</p> |
---|
215 | |
---|
216 | <p>The advantage of using an interface file is that the caller is now |
---|
217 | dependent on the interface file, rather than the |
---|
218 | <code>SUBROUTINE</code> or <code>FUNCTION</code> itself. If you |
---|
219 | change the <code>SUBROUTINE</code> or <code>FUNCTION</code> without |
---|
220 | modifying its interface, the build system will not re-compile the |
---|
221 | caller in incremental build, (but it will be intelligent enough to |
---|
222 | re-link the executable with the updated object).</p> |
---|
223 | |
---|
224 | <p>Note: By default, an interface file is named after the original |
---|
225 | source file. Bearing this in mind, it is worth noting that file names |
---|
226 | in a Unix/Linux system are case-sensitive, and so the interface file |
---|
227 | name declared by your <code>INCLUDE</code> statement is also case |
---|
228 | sensitive. If you use an incorrect case in the <code>INCLUDE</code> |
---|
229 | statement, the dependency tree will be set up incorrectly and the |
---|
230 | compilation will fail. Another problem is that if you do not name |
---|
231 | your file after the program unit, the dependency tree will be wrong. |
---|
232 | To avoid this problem, it is recommended that all source files are |
---|
233 | named in lower case after the program units they contain. |
---|
234 | (Alternatively, you can use the <code>TOOL::INTERFACE</code> option |
---|
235 | in the FCM build configuration file to allow you to alter the default |
---|
236 | behaviour so that the interface file is named after the program unit |
---|
237 | in lowercase. We may alter FCM in the future so that this will become |
---|
238 | the default. In the mean time, it is highly recommended that you use |
---|
239 | this option and design your new code accordingly.)</p> |
---|
240 | |
---|
241 | <p>For example, if we have a <code>SUBROUTINE</code> in |
---|
242 | <samp>sub_prog.f90</samp>:</p> |
---|
243 | <pre> |
---|
244 | SUBROUTINE sub_prog(some, arg) |
---|
245 | ! Some declarations ... |
---|
246 | ! Some executable statements ... |
---|
247 | END SUBROUTINE sub_prog |
---|
248 | </pre> |
---|
249 | |
---|
250 | <p>It can be imported to another program as such:</p> |
---|
251 | <pre> |
---|
252 | SUBROUTINE egg(some, arg) |
---|
253 | ! Some declarations ... |
---|
254 | INCLUDE 'sub_prog.interface' |
---|
255 | ! More declarations ... |
---|
256 | ! Some executable statements ... |
---|
257 | CALL sub_prog(some, arg) |
---|
258 | ! More executable statements ... |
---|
259 | END SUBROUTINE egg |
---|
260 | </pre> |
---|
261 | </dd> |
---|
262 | |
---|
263 | <dt>Interfaces in a module</dt> |
---|
264 | |
---|
265 | <dd> |
---|
266 | <p>There is also a half-way house approach between the second and the |
---|
267 | third options. You can have a dedicated <code>MODULE</code> where a |
---|
268 | large number of <code>INCLUDE</code> interface file statements are |
---|
269 | placed. Other program units get their interfaces by importing from |
---|
270 | this <code>MODULE</code>. A major disadvantage of this approach is |
---|
271 | that the sub-programs with their interfaces declared within this |
---|
272 | <code>MODULE</code> will not be able to call any other sub-programs |
---|
273 | declared within the same <code>MODULE</code>, as it will run into a |
---|
274 | cyclic dependency problem. Another disadvantage is that if an |
---|
275 | interface changes, the <code>MODULE</code> and all program units |
---|
276 | depending on the <code>MODULE</code> will have to be re-compiled, |
---|
277 | even though the change may be unrelated to some or all of these |
---|
278 | program units. For these reasons, this approach is only good if you |
---|
279 | have a bundle of sub-programs that have relatively stable interfaces |
---|
280 | and are very much independent of one another.</p> |
---|
281 | |
---|
282 | <p>Note: a similar approach can be useful when you have a library of |
---|
283 | legacy or external code. In this situation, you will simply declare |
---|
284 | the interfaces for all the library sub-programs in the |
---|
285 | <code>MODULE</code>. Any programs that call sub-programs within the |
---|
286 | library can then import their interfaces by using the |
---|
287 | <code>MODULE</code>.</p> |
---|
288 | |
---|
289 | <p>For example, if we have a <samp>MODULE my_i_mod</samp>:</p> |
---|
290 | <pre> |
---|
291 | MODULE my_i_mod |
---|
292 | ! Some declarations |
---|
293 | INCLUDE 'sub_prog.interface' |
---|
294 | ! More declarations |
---|
295 | END MODULE my_i_mod |
---|
296 | </pre> |
---|
297 | |
---|
298 | <p>Its <code>PUBLIC</code> procedures can be imported as such:</p> |
---|
299 | <pre> |
---|
300 | SUBROUTINE ham(some, arguments) |
---|
301 | USE my_i_mod, ONLY: sub_prog |
---|
302 | ! Some declarations ... |
---|
303 | ! Some executable statements ... |
---|
304 | CALL sub_prog(some, arguments) |
---|
305 | ! More executable statements ... |
---|
306 | END SUBROUTINE ham |
---|
307 | </pre> |
---|
308 | </dd> |
---|
309 | </dl> |
---|
310 | |
---|
311 | <p>FCM also supports the use of a <code>! DEPENDS ON</code> directive for |
---|
312 | users to specify a dependency from within a source file. This feature is |
---|
313 | documented in the <a href= |
---|
314 | "../user_guide/build.html#advanced_dependency">Further dependency |
---|
315 | features</a> sub-section of the <a href="../user_guide/">FCM user |
---|
316 | guide</a>. However, it is worth noting that this method is only included |
---|
317 | in FCM to support legacy code. It is not a feature recommended for new |
---|
318 | code, and its use should be gradually phased out from existing code.</p> |
---|
319 | </li> |
---|
320 | |
---|
321 | <li>Arguments and local variables should be declared in different |
---|
322 | statements. It makes your declaration clearer, and it is friendlier to the |
---|
323 | interface file generator. |
---|
324 | |
---|
325 | <dl> |
---|
326 | <dt>Common practice</dt> |
---|
327 | |
---|
328 | <dd> |
---|
329 | <pre> |
---|
330 | SUBROUTINE foo(a, b, c) |
---|
331 | INTEGER :: a, b, c, i, j, k |
---|
332 | ! ... |
---|
333 | END SUBROUTINE foo |
---|
334 | </pre> |
---|
335 | </dd> |
---|
336 | |
---|
337 | <dt>Better approach</dt> |
---|
338 | |
---|
339 | <dd> |
---|
340 | <pre> |
---|
341 | SUBROUTINE foo(a, b, c) |
---|
342 | INTEGER :: a, b, c |
---|
343 | INTEGER :: i, j, k |
---|
344 | ! ... |
---|
345 | END SUBROUTINE foo |
---|
346 | </pre> |
---|
347 | </dd> |
---|
348 | </dl> |
---|
349 | </li> |
---|
350 | |
---|
351 | <li>Use the <code>ONLY</code> clause in a <code>USE <module></code> |
---|
352 | statement to declare all imported symbols (i.e. parameters, variables, |
---|
353 | functions, subroutines, etc). This makes it easier to locate the source of |
---|
354 | each symbol, and avoids unintentional access to other <code>PUBLIC</code> |
---|
355 | symbols within the <code>MODULE</code>. It is also friendlier to the |
---|
356 | compiler and the interface file generator, as they will not have to import |
---|
357 | modules and symbols that are unnecessary.</li> |
---|
358 | |
---|
359 | <li>In its default settings, FCM recognises the following file extensions |
---|
360 | as Fortran free format source files: |
---|
361 | |
---|
362 | <ul> |
---|
363 | <li><samp>*.f90, *.f95</samp>: regular Fortran free format source |
---|
364 | files</li> |
---|
365 | |
---|
366 | <li><samp>*.F90, *.F95</samp>: Fortran free format source files that |
---|
367 | require pre-processing</li> |
---|
368 | |
---|
369 | <li><samp>*.inc</samp>: Include files that can be added to a regular |
---|
370 | Fortran free format source file with a Fortran <code>INCLUDE</code> |
---|
371 | statement</li> |
---|
372 | </ul> |
---|
373 | </li> |
---|
374 | </ol> |
---|
375 | |
---|
376 | <h3 id="fcm-cpp">2.2 Use of C pre-processor with Fortran</h3> |
---|
377 | |
---|
378 | <p>We do not recommend the use of C pre-processor with Fortran. However, it |
---|
379 | is acknowledged that there are some situations when it is necessary to |
---|
380 | pre-process Fortran code. FCM supports pre-processing in two ways. |
---|
381 | Pre-processing can be left to the compiler or it can be done in a separate |
---|
382 | early stage of the build process. A separate pre-process stage can be useful |
---|
383 | if pre-processing changes any of the following in a program unit:</p> |
---|
384 | |
---|
385 | <ul> |
---|
386 | <li>its name</li> |
---|
387 | |
---|
388 | <li>its calling interface</li> |
---|
389 | |
---|
390 | <li>its dependencies</li> |
---|
391 | </ul> |
---|
392 | |
---|
393 | <p>However, using a separate pre-process stage is not the best way of |
---|
394 | working, as it adds an overhead to the build process. If your code requires |
---|
395 | pre-processing, you should try to design it to avoid changes in the |
---|
396 | above.</p> |
---|
397 | |
---|
398 | <p>In practice, the only reasonable use of C pre-processor with Fortran is |
---|
399 | for code selection. For example, pre-processing is useful for isolating |
---|
400 | machine specific libraries or instructions, where it may be appropriate to |
---|
401 | use inline alternatives for small sections of code. Another example is when |
---|
402 | multiple versions of the same procedure exist in the source tree and you need |
---|
403 | to use the pre-processor to select the correct version for your build.</p> |
---|
404 | |
---|
405 | <p>Avoid using the C pre-processor for code inclusion, as you should be able |
---|
406 | to do the same via the Fortran <code>INCLUDE</code> statement. You should |
---|
407 | also avoid embedding pre-processor macros within the continuations of a |
---|
408 | Fortran statement, as it can make your code very confusing.</p> |
---|
409 | |
---|
410 | <h2 id="fortran">3. Programming Fortran in general</h2> |
---|
411 | |
---|
412 | <p>The guidelines in this section are recommended practices for programming |
---|
413 | Fortran in general. These are guidelines you should try to adhere to when you |
---|
414 | are developing new code. If you are modifying existing code, you should |
---|
415 | adhere to its existing standard and style where possible. If you want to |
---|
416 | change its standard and style, you should seek prior agreements with the |
---|
417 | owner and the usual developers of the code. Where possible, you should try to |
---|
418 | maintain the same layout and style within a source file, and preferably, |
---|
419 | within all the source code in a particular project.</p> |
---|
420 | |
---|
421 | <p>When reading these guidelines, it is assumed that you already have a good |
---|
422 | understanding of modern Fortran terminology. It is understood that these |
---|
423 | guidelines may not cover every aspect of your work. In such cases, you will |
---|
424 | be a winner if you use a bit of common sense, and always bearing in mind that |
---|
425 | some other people may have to maintain the code in the future.</p> |
---|
426 | |
---|
427 | <p>Always test your code before releasing it. Do not ignore compiler |
---|
428 | warnings, as they may point you to potential problems.</p> |
---|
429 | |
---|
430 | <h3 id="fortran-layout">3.1 Layout and formatting</h3> |
---|
431 | |
---|
432 | <p>The following is a list of recommended practices for layout and formatting |
---|
433 | when you write code in Fortran.</p> |
---|
434 | |
---|
435 | <ul> |
---|
436 | <li>Indent blocks with space characters. The use of 2 spaces per |
---|
437 | indentation level is wide spread at the Met Office. The use of 4 spaces per |
---|
438 | indentation level is most popular in the open source community because it |
---|
439 | is easier for the human eyes. If you are modifying existing scripts, you |
---|
440 | should stick to their existing styles. Otherwise, the use of 2 and 4 spaces |
---|
441 | per indentation level are both acceptable, as long as it is consistent |
---|
442 | within a source file. Where possible, comments should be indented with the |
---|
443 | code within a block.</li> |
---|
444 | |
---|
445 | <li>Use space and blank lines where appropriate to format your code to |
---|
446 | improve readability. (Use genuine spaces but avoid using tabs, as the <kbd> |
---|
447 | tab</kbd> character is not in the Fortran character set.) In the |
---|
448 | following example, the code on the right hand side is preferred: |
---|
449 | |
---|
450 | <dl> |
---|
451 | <dt>Common practice</dt> |
---|
452 | |
---|
453 | <dd> |
---|
454 | <pre> |
---|
455 | DO i=1,n |
---|
456 | a(i)%c=10*i/n |
---|
457 | b(i)%d=20+i |
---|
458 | ENDDO |
---|
459 | IF(this==that)THEN |
---|
460 | distance=0 |
---|
461 | time=0 |
---|
462 | ENDIF |
---|
463 | </pre> |
---|
464 | </dd> |
---|
465 | |
---|
466 | <dt>Better approach</dt> |
---|
467 | |
---|
468 | <dd> |
---|
469 | <pre> |
---|
470 | DO i = 1, n |
---|
471 | a(i)%c = 10 * i / n |
---|
472 | b(i)%d = 20 + i |
---|
473 | END DO |
---|
474 | |
---|
475 | IF (this == that) THEN |
---|
476 | distance = 0 |
---|
477 | time = 0 |
---|
478 | END IF |
---|
479 | </pre> |
---|
480 | </dd> |
---|
481 | </dl> |
---|
482 | </li> |
---|
483 | |
---|
484 | <li>Try to confine your line width to 80 characters, so that your code can |
---|
485 | be printed easily on A4 paper.</li> |
---|
486 | |
---|
487 | <li>Line up your statements, where appropriate, to improve readability. For |
---|
488 | example: |
---|
489 | |
---|
490 | <dl> |
---|
491 | <dt>Common practice</dt> |
---|
492 | |
---|
493 | <dd> |
---|
494 | <pre> |
---|
495 | REAL, INTENT(OUT) :: my_out(:) |
---|
496 | REAL, INTENT(INOUT) :: my_inout(:) |
---|
497 | REAL, INTENT(IN) :: my_in(:) |
---|
498 | ! ... |
---|
499 | CHARACTER(LEN=256) :: my_char |
---|
500 | ! ... |
---|
501 | my_char = 'This is a very very very very very very very very very very ' // & |
---|
502 | 'very very very very very very very very very very very very ' // & |
---|
503 | 'long character assignment' |
---|
504 | </pre> |
---|
505 | </dd> |
---|
506 | |
---|
507 | <dt>Better approach</dt> |
---|
508 | |
---|
509 | <dd> |
---|
510 | <pre> |
---|
511 | REAL, INTENT( OUT) :: my_out(:) |
---|
512 | REAL, INTENT(INOUT) :: my_inout(:) |
---|
513 | REAL, INTENT(IN ) :: my_in(:) |
---|
514 | ! ... |
---|
515 | CHARACTER(LEN=256) :: my_char |
---|
516 | ! ... |
---|
517 | my_char & |
---|
518 | = 'This is a very very very very very very very very very very ' & |
---|
519 | // 'very very very very very very very very very very very very ' & |
---|
520 | // 'long character assignment' |
---|
521 | </pre> |
---|
522 | </dd> |
---|
523 | </dl> |
---|
524 | </li> |
---|
525 | |
---|
526 | <li>Short and simple Fortran statements are easier to read and understand |
---|
527 | than long and complex ones. Where possible, avoid using continuation lines |
---|
528 | in a statement.</li> |
---|
529 | |
---|
530 | <li>Avoid putting multiple statements on the same line. It is not good for |
---|
531 | readability.</li> |
---|
532 | </ul> |
---|
533 | |
---|
534 | <h3 id="fortran-style">3.2 Style</h3> |
---|
535 | |
---|
536 | <p>The following is a list of recommended styles when you write code in |
---|
537 | Fortran.</p> |
---|
538 | |
---|
539 | <ul> |
---|
540 | <li>New code should be written using Fortran 95 syntax. Avoid unportable |
---|
541 | vendor/compiler extensions. Avoid Fortran 2003 features for the moment, as |
---|
542 | they will not become widely available in the near future. (Having said |
---|
543 | that, there is no harm in designing your code with the future in mind. For |
---|
544 | example, if there is a feature that is not in Fortran 95 and you know that |
---|
545 | it is in Fortran 2003, you may want to write your Fortran 95 code to make |
---|
546 | it easier for the future upgrade.)</li> |
---|
547 | |
---|
548 | <li>Write your program in UK English, unless you have a very good reason |
---|
549 | for not doing so. Write your comments in simple UK English and name your |
---|
550 | program units and variables based on sensible UK English words, bearing in |
---|
551 | mind that your code may be read by people who are not proficient English |
---|
552 | speakers.</li> |
---|
553 | |
---|
554 | <li>When naming your variables and program units, always bear in mind that |
---|
555 | Fortran is a case-insensitive language. (E.g. <var>EditOrExit</var> is the |
---|
556 | same as <var>EditorExit</var>.)</li> |
---|
557 | |
---|
558 | <li>Use only characters in the Fortran character set. In particular, accent |
---|
559 | characters and tabs are not allowed in code, although they are usually OK |
---|
560 | in comments. If your editor inserts tabs automatically, you should |
---|
561 | configure it to switch off the functionality when you are editing Fortran |
---|
562 | source files.</li> |
---|
563 | |
---|
564 | <li>Although Fortran has no reserved keywords, you should avoid naming your |
---|
565 | program units and variables with names that match an intrinsic |
---|
566 | <code>FUNCTION</code> or <code>SUBROUTINE</code>. Similarly, you should |
---|
567 | avoid naming your program units and variables with names that match a |
---|
568 | <em>keyword</em> in a Fortran statement.</li> |
---|
569 | |
---|
570 | <li>Be generous with comments, but avoid repeating the Fortran logic in |
---|
571 | words. State the reason for doing something instead.</li> |
---|
572 | |
---|
573 | <li>To improve readability, write your program in mainly lower case |
---|
574 | characters. Writing a program in mainly lower case also means that you will |
---|
575 | not have to use the <kbd>Shift/Caps Lock</kbd> keys often, hence, improving |
---|
576 | your code's accessibility. There is a lot of debate on using upper/lower |
---|
577 | cases in a case insensitive language such as Fortran. There is no right or |
---|
578 | wrong, but people have adopted the different approaches over time, each has |
---|
579 | its own merit. If you are starting a new project, you should choose a |
---|
580 | suitable option and stick to it. Otherwise, you should stick with the style |
---|
581 | in the existing code. Some options are listed here: |
---|
582 | |
---|
583 | <ul> |
---|
584 | <li>The ALL CAPS Fortran keywords approach, like most of the examples |
---|
585 | in this document, where all Fortran keywords and intrinsic procedures |
---|
586 | are written in ALL CAPS. This approach has the advantage that Fortran |
---|
587 | keywords stand out, but it does increase how often the Shift/Caps Lock |
---|
588 | key is used. Programmers who are used to some other programming |
---|
589 | languages may also find it difficult to read a program with a lot of |
---|
590 | upper case characters.</li> |
---|
591 | |
---|
592 | <li>The Title Case Fortran keywords approach, where all Fortran |
---|
593 | keywords are written with an initial capital case letter.</li> |
---|
594 | |
---|
595 | <li>The sentence case approach, where only the initial character in a |
---|
596 | Fortran statements is written in capital case letter, like a normal |
---|
597 | sentence.</li> |
---|
598 | |
---|
599 | <li>The all lower case approach, where all Fortran keywords are written |
---|
600 | in lower case letters.</li> |
---|
601 | |
---|
602 | <li>Some people have also proposed a variable naming convention where |
---|
603 | local variables start with an initial lower case letter, private module |
---|
604 | level variables with an initial capital case letter and public module |
---|
605 | variables written in all caps. However, this approach has been seen by |
---|
606 | many as too restrictive, and so its use has not been widely |
---|
607 | spread.</li> |
---|
608 | </ul> |
---|
609 | </li> |
---|
610 | |
---|
611 | <li>Use the new and clearer syntax for <code>LOGICAL</code> comparisons, |
---|
612 | i.e.: |
---|
613 | |
---|
614 | <ul> |
---|
615 | <li><code>==</code> instead of <code>.EQ.</code></li> |
---|
616 | |
---|
617 | <li><code>/=</code> instead of <code>.NE.</code></li> |
---|
618 | |
---|
619 | <li><code>></code> instead of <code>.GT.</code></li> |
---|
620 | |
---|
621 | <li><code><</code> instead of <code>.LT.</code></li> |
---|
622 | |
---|
623 | <li><code>>=</code> instead of <code>.GE.</code></li> |
---|
624 | |
---|
625 | <li><code><=</code> instead of <code>.LE.</code></li> |
---|
626 | </ul> |
---|
627 | </li> |
---|
628 | |
---|
629 | <li>Where appropriate, simplify your <code>LOGICAL</code> assignments, for |
---|
630 | example: |
---|
631 | |
---|
632 | <dl> |
---|
633 | <dt>Common practice</dt> |
---|
634 | |
---|
635 | <dd> |
---|
636 | <pre> |
---|
637 | IF (my_var == some_value) THEN |
---|
638 | something = .TRUE. |
---|
639 | something_else = .FALSE. |
---|
640 | ELSE |
---|
641 | something = .FALSE. |
---|
642 | something_else = .TRUE. |
---|
643 | END IF |
---|
644 | ! ... |
---|
645 | IF (something .EQV. .TRUE.) THEN |
---|
646 | CALL do_something() |
---|
647 | ! ... |
---|
648 | END IF |
---|
649 | </pre> |
---|
650 | </dd> |
---|
651 | |
---|
652 | <dt>Better approach</dt> |
---|
653 | |
---|
654 | <dd> |
---|
655 | <pre> |
---|
656 | something = (my_var == some_value) |
---|
657 | something_else = (my_var /= some_value) |
---|
658 | ! ... |
---|
659 | IF (something) THEN |
---|
660 | CALL do_something() |
---|
661 | ! ... |
---|
662 | END IF |
---|
663 | </pre> |
---|
664 | </dd> |
---|
665 | </dl> |
---|
666 | </li> |
---|
667 | |
---|
668 | <li>Positive logic is usually easier to understand. When you have an <code> |
---|
669 | IF</code>-<code>ELSE</code>-<code>END IF</code> construct, you should use |
---|
670 | positive logic in the <code>IF</code> test, provided that the positive |
---|
671 | and the negative blocks are about the same size. (However, it may be more |
---|
672 | appropriate to use negative logic if the negative block is significantly |
---|
673 | bigger than the positive block.) For example: |
---|
674 | |
---|
675 | <dl> |
---|
676 | <dt>Common practice</dt> |
---|
677 | |
---|
678 | <dd> |
---|
679 | <pre> |
---|
680 | IF (my_var != some_value) THEN |
---|
681 | CALL do_this() |
---|
682 | ELSE |
---|
683 | CALL do_that() |
---|
684 | END IF |
---|
685 | </pre> |
---|
686 | </dd> |
---|
687 | |
---|
688 | <dt>Better approach</dt> |
---|
689 | |
---|
690 | <dd> |
---|
691 | <pre> |
---|
692 | IF (my_var == some_value) THEN |
---|
693 | CALL do_that() |
---|
694 | ELSE |
---|
695 | CALL do_this() |
---|
696 | END IF |
---|
697 | </pre> |
---|
698 | </dd> |
---|
699 | </dl> |
---|
700 | </li> |
---|
701 | |
---|
702 | <li>To improve readability, you should always use the optional space to |
---|
703 | separate the following Fortran keywords: |
---|
704 | <pre> |
---|
705 | ELSE IF END DO END FORALL END FUNCTION |
---|
706 | END IF END INTERFACE END MODULE END PROGRAM |
---|
707 | END SELECT END SUBROUTINE END TYPE END WHERE |
---|
708 | SELECT CASE |
---|
709 | </pre> |
---|
710 | </li> |
---|
711 | |
---|
712 | <li>If you have a large or complex code block embedding other code blocks, |
---|
713 | you may consider naming some or all of them to improve readability.</li> |
---|
714 | |
---|
715 | <li>If you have a large or complex interface block or if you have one or |
---|
716 | more sub-program units in the <code>CONTAINS</code> section, you can |
---|
717 | improve readability by using the full version of the <code>END</code> |
---|
718 | statement (i.e. <code>END SUBROUTINE</code> <name> or <code>END |
---|
719 | FUNCTION</code> <name> instead of just <code>END</code>) at the end |
---|
720 | of each sub-program unit. For readability in general, the full version of |
---|
721 | the <code>END</code> statement is recommended over the simple |
---|
722 | <code>END</code>.</li> |
---|
723 | |
---|
724 | <li>Where possible, consider using <code>CYCLE</code>, <code>EXIT</code> or |
---|
725 | a <code>WHERE</code>-construct to simplify complicated |
---|
726 | <code>DO</code>-loops.</li> |
---|
727 | |
---|
728 | <li>When writing a <code>REAL</code> literal with an integer value, put a |
---|
729 | <code>0</code> after the decimal point (i.e. <samp>1.0</samp> as opposed to |
---|
730 | <samp>1.</samp>) to improve readability.</li> |
---|
731 | |
---|
732 | <li>Where reasonable and sensible to do so, you should try to match the |
---|
733 | names of dummy and actual arguments to a |
---|
734 | <code>SUBROUTINE</code>/<code>FUNCTION</code>.</li> |
---|
735 | |
---|
736 | <li>In an array assignment, it is recommended that you use array notations |
---|
737 | to improve readability. E.g.: |
---|
738 | |
---|
739 | <dl> |
---|
740 | <dt>Common practice</dt> |
---|
741 | |
---|
742 | <dd> |
---|
743 | <pre> |
---|
744 | INTEGER :: array1(10, 20), array2(10, 20) |
---|
745 | INTEGER :: scalar |
---|
746 | ! ... |
---|
747 | array1 = 1 |
---|
748 | array2 = array1 * scalar |
---|
749 | </pre> |
---|
750 | </dd> |
---|
751 | |
---|
752 | <dt>Better approach</dt> |
---|
753 | |
---|
754 | <dd> |
---|
755 | <pre> |
---|
756 | INTEGER :: array1(10, 20), array2(10, 20) |
---|
757 | INTEGER :: scalar |
---|
758 | ! ... |
---|
759 | array1(:, :) = 1 |
---|
760 | array2(:, :) = array1(:, :) * scalar |
---|
761 | </pre> |
---|
762 | </dd> |
---|
763 | </dl> |
---|
764 | </li> |
---|
765 | |
---|
766 | <li>Where appropriate, use parentheses to improve readability. E.g.: |
---|
767 | <code>a = (b * i) + (c / n)</code> is easier to read than <code>a = b * i + |
---|
768 | c / n</code>.</li> |
---|
769 | </ul> |
---|
770 | |
---|
771 | <h3 id="fortran-feature">3.3 Fortran features</h3> |
---|
772 | |
---|
773 | <p>The following is a list of Fortran features that you should use or |
---|
774 | avoid.</p> |
---|
775 | |
---|
776 | <ul> |
---|
777 | <li>Use <code>IMPLICIT NONE</code> in all program units. It means that you |
---|
778 | have declare all your variables explicitly. This helps to reduce bugs in |
---|
779 | your program that will otherwise be difficult to track.</li> |
---|
780 | |
---|
781 | <li>Design your derived data types carefully and use them to group related |
---|
782 | variables. Appropriate use of derived data types will allow you to design |
---|
783 | modules and procedures with simpler and cleaner interfaces.</li> |
---|
784 | |
---|
785 | <li>Where possible, module variables and procedures should be declared |
---|
786 | <code>PRIVATE</code>. This avoids unnecessary export of symbols, promotes |
---|
787 | data hiding and may also help the compiler to optimise the code.</li> |
---|
788 | |
---|
789 | <li>When you are passing an array argument to a |
---|
790 | <code>SUBROUTINE</code>/<code>FUNCTION</code>, and the |
---|
791 | <code>SUBROUTINE</code>/<code>FUNCTION</code> does not change the |
---|
792 | <code>SIZE</code>/<code>DIMENSION</code> of the array, you should pass it |
---|
793 | as an assumed shape array. Memory management of such an array is |
---|
794 | automatically handled by the <code>SUBROUTINE</code>/<code>FUNCTION</code>, |
---|
795 | and you do not have to worry about having to <code>ALLOCATE</code> or |
---|
796 | <code>DEALLOCATE</code> your array. It also helps the compiler to optimise |
---|
797 | the code.</li> |
---|
798 | |
---|
799 | <li>Use an array <code>POINTER</code> when you are passing an array |
---|
800 | argument to a <code>SUBROUTINE</code>, and the <code>SUBROUTINE</code> has |
---|
801 | to alter the <code>SIZE</code>/<code>DIMENSION</code> of the array. You |
---|
802 | should also use an array <code>POINTER</code> when you need a dynamic array |
---|
803 | in a component of a derived data type. (Note: Fortran 2003 allows passing |
---|
804 | <code>ALLOCATABLE</code> arrays as arguments as well as using |
---|
805 | <code>ALLOCATABLE</code> arrays as components of a derived data type. |
---|
806 | Therefore, the need for using an array <code>POINTER</code> should be |
---|
807 | reduced once Fortran 2003 becomes more widely accepted.)</li> |
---|
808 | |
---|
809 | <li>Where possible, an <code>ALLOCATE</code> statement for an |
---|
810 | <code>ALLOCATABLE</code> array (or a <code>POINTER</code> used as a dynamic |
---|
811 | array) should be coupled with a <code>DEALLOCATE</code> within the same |
---|
812 | scope. If an <code>ALLOCATABLE</code> array is a <code>PUBLIC</code> |
---|
813 | <code>MODULE</code> variable, it is highly desirable if its memory |
---|
814 | allocation and deallocation are only performed in procedures within the |
---|
815 | <code>MODULE</code> in which it is declared. You may consider writing |
---|
816 | specific <code>SUBROUTINE</code>s within the <code>MODULE</code> to handle |
---|
817 | these memory managements.</li> |
---|
818 | |
---|
819 | <li>Always define a <code>POINTER</code> before using it. You can define a |
---|
820 | <code>POINTER</code> in its declaration by pointing it to the intrinsic |
---|
821 | function <code>NULL()</code>. Alternatively, you can make sure that your |
---|
822 | <code>POINTER</code> is defined or nullified early on in the program unit. |
---|
823 | Similarly, <code>NULLIFY</code> a <code>POINTER</code> when it is no longer |
---|
824 | in use, either by using the <code>NULLIFY</code> statement or by pointing |
---|
825 | your <code>POINTER</code> to <code>NULL()</code>.</li> |
---|
826 | |
---|
827 | <li>Avoid the <code>DIMENSION</code> attribute or statement. Declare the |
---|
828 | <code>DIMENSION</code> with the declared variables. E.g.: |
---|
829 | |
---|
830 | <dl> |
---|
831 | <dt>Common practice</dt> |
---|
832 | |
---|
833 | <dd> |
---|
834 | <pre> |
---|
835 | INTEGER, DIMENSION(10) :: array1 |
---|
836 | INTEGER :: array2 |
---|
837 | DIMENSION :: array2(20) |
---|
838 | </pre> |
---|
839 | </dd> |
---|
840 | |
---|
841 | <dt>Better approach</dt> |
---|
842 | |
---|
843 | <dd> |
---|
844 | <pre> |
---|
845 | INTEGER :: array1(10), array2(20) |
---|
846 | </pre> |
---|
847 | </dd> |
---|
848 | </dl> |
---|
849 | </li> |
---|
850 | |
---|
851 | <li>Avoid <code>COMMON</code> blocks and <code>BLOCK DATA</code> program |
---|
852 | units. Use <code>PUBLIC</code> <code>MODULE</code> variables.</li> |
---|
853 | |
---|
854 | <li>Avoid the <code>EQUIVALENCE</code> statament. Use a |
---|
855 | <code>POINTER</code> or a derived data type, and the <code>TRANSFER</code> |
---|
856 | intrinsic function to convert between types.</li> |
---|
857 | |
---|
858 | <li>Avoid the <code>PAUSE</code> statement, as your program will hang in a |
---|
859 | batch environment. If you need to halt your program for interactive use, |
---|
860 | consider using a <code>READ*</code> statement instead.</li> |
---|
861 | |
---|
862 | <li>Avoid the <code>ENTRY</code> statement. Use a <code>MODULE</code> or |
---|
863 | internal <code>SUBROUTINE</code>.</li> |
---|
864 | |
---|
865 | <li>Avoid the <code>GOTO</code> statement. The only commonly acceptable |
---|
866 | usage of <code>GOTO</code> is for error trapping. In such case, the jump |
---|
867 | should be to a commented <code>9999 CONTINUE</code> statement near the end |
---|
868 | of the program unit. Typically, you will only find error handlers beyond |
---|
869 | the <code>9999 CONTINUE</code> statement.</li> |
---|
870 | |
---|
871 | <li>Avoid assigned <code>GOTO</code>, computed <code>GOTO</code>, |
---|
872 | arithmetic <code>IF</code>, etc. Use the appropriate modern constructs such |
---|
873 | as <code>IF</code>, <code>WHERE</code>, <code>SELECT CASE</code>, |
---|
874 | etc..</li> |
---|
875 | |
---|
876 | <li>Avoid numbered statement labels. <code>DO ... label CONTINUE</code> |
---|
877 | constructs should be replaced by <code>DO ... END DO</code> constructs. |
---|
878 | <code>FORMAT</code> statements should be replaced by format strings. (Tip: |
---|
879 | a format string can be a <code>CHARACTER</code> variable.)</li> |
---|
880 | |
---|
881 | <li>Avoid the <code>FORALL</code> statement/construct. Despite what it is |
---|
882 | supposed to do, <code>FORALL</code> is often difficult for compilers to |
---|
883 | optimise. (See, for example, <a href= |
---|
884 | "http://www.fortran.bcs.org/2007/jubilee/f50.pdf">Implementing the |
---|
885 | Standards including Fortran 2003</a> by <acronym title= |
---|
886 | "Numerical Algorithms Group">NAG</acronym>.) Stick to the equivalent |
---|
887 | <code>DO</code> construct, <code>WHERE</code> statement/construct or array |
---|
888 | assignments unless there are actual performance benefits using |
---|
889 | <code>FORALL</code> in your code.</li> |
---|
890 | |
---|
891 | <li>A <code>FUNCTION</code> should be <code>PURE</code>, i.e. it should |
---|
892 | have no side effects (e.g. altering an argument or module variable, or |
---|
893 | performing I/O). If you need to perform a task with side effects, you |
---|
894 | should use a <code>SUBROUTINE</code> instead.</li> |
---|
895 | |
---|
896 | <li>Avoid using a statement <code>FUNCTION</code>. Use an internal |
---|
897 | <code>FUNCTION</code> instead.</li> |
---|
898 | |
---|
899 | <li>Avoid <code>RECURSIVE</code> procedures if possible. |
---|
900 | <code>RECURSIVE</code> procedures are usually difficult to understand, and |
---|
901 | are always difficult to optimise in a supercomputer environment.</li> |
---|
902 | |
---|
903 | <li>Avoid using the specific names of intrinsic procedures. Use the generic |
---|
904 | names of intrinsic procedures where possible.</li> |
---|
905 | </ul> |
---|
906 | |
---|
907 | <h2 id="template">4. Program templates</h2> |
---|
908 | |
---|
909 | <p>The following is a basic template for a <code>FUNCTION</code>:</p> |
---|
910 | <pre> |
---|
911 | [<type>] FUNCTION <name>(<args, ...>) [RESULT(<result>)] |
---|
912 | |
---|
913 | !------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
---|
914 | ! (C) Crown copyright Met Office. All rights reserved. |
---|
915 | ! For further details please refer to the file COPYRIGHT.txt |
---|
916 | ! which you should have received as part of this distribution. |
---|
917 | !------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
---|
918 | ! DESCRIPTION |
---|
919 | ! <Explain what the function does.> |
---|
920 | ! |
---|
921 | !------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
---|
922 | USE <module>, ONLY : <symbols, ...> |
---|
923 | |
---|
924 | IMPLICIT NONE |
---|
925 | |
---|
926 | ! Function arguments: |
---|
927 | <arguments with INTENT(IN) ...> |
---|
928 | |
---|
929 | ! Function result: |
---|
930 | <declare the type returned by the function> |
---|
931 | |
---|
932 | ! Local declarations: |
---|
933 | <parameters, derived data types, variables, ...> |
---|
934 | |
---|
935 | ! INTERFACE blocks |
---|
936 | <INCLUDE interface files...> |
---|
937 | <other interface blocks...> |
---|
938 | |
---|
939 | <other specification statements ...> |
---|
940 | !------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
---|
941 | <executable statements ...> |
---|
942 | !------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
---|
943 | CONTAINS |
---|
944 | <sub-programs> |
---|
945 | END FUNCTION <name> |
---|
946 | </pre> |
---|
947 | |
---|
948 | <p>The basic templates for other types of program units are similar to that |
---|
949 | of a <code>FUNCTION</code>, with the following exceptions:</p> |
---|
950 | |
---|
951 | <ul> |
---|
952 | <li>A <code>PROGRAM</code> does not have arguments, so the arguments list |
---|
953 | in the header and the <cite>Arguments</cite> section in the declaration |
---|
954 | section should be removed. All declarations are local to a |
---|
955 | <code>PROGRAM</code>, so the <cite>Local Declarations</cite> section should |
---|
956 | be replaced by a simple <em>Declarations</em> section.</li> |
---|
957 | |
---|
958 | <li>A <code>SUBROUTINE</code> may have <code>INTENT(OUT)</code> and |
---|
959 | <code>INTENT(INOUT)</code> arguments.</li> |
---|
960 | |
---|
961 | <li>A <code>MODULE</code> does not have arguments, so the arguments list in |
---|
962 | the header and the <cite>Arguments</cite> section in the declaration |
---|
963 | section should be removed. Where appropriate, the <cite>Local |
---|
964 | Declarations</cite> section should be replaced by a <em>PUBLIC |
---|
965 | declarations</em> section and a <em>PRIVATE declarations</em> section.</li> |
---|
966 | </ul> |
---|
967 | |
---|
968 | <p>When you are distributing your code, you should include a |
---|
969 | <samp>COPYRIGHT.txt</samp> file at a top level directory in your source tree. |
---|
970 | The file should contain the detailed copyright information:</p> |
---|
971 | |
---|
972 | <ul> |
---|
973 | <li>the copyright year, ranging from the year the code is first distributed |
---|
974 | to the year the code is last distributed</li> |
---|
975 | |
---|
976 | <li>the copyright statement</li> |
---|
977 | |
---|
978 | <li>the owner of the code and his/her address</li> |
---|
979 | </ul> |
---|
980 | |
---|
981 | <p>For example:</p> |
---|
982 | <pre> |
---|
983 | !------------------------------------------------------------------------------! |
---|
984 | ! ! |
---|
985 | ! (C) Crown copyright 2005-6 Met Office. All rights reserved. ! |
---|
986 | ! ! |
---|
987 | ! Use, duplication or disclosure of this code is subject to the restrictions ! |
---|
988 | ! as set forth in the contract. If no contract has been raised with this copy ! |
---|
989 | ! of the code, the use, duplication or disclosure of it is strictly ! |
---|
990 | ! prohibited. Permission to do so must first be obtained in writing from the ! |
---|
991 | ! Head of Numerical Modelling at the following address: ! |
---|
992 | ! ! |
---|
993 | ! Met Office, FitzRoy Road, Exeter, Devon, EX1 3PB, United Kingdom ! |
---|
994 | ! ! |
---|
995 | !------------------------------------------------------------------------------! |
---|
996 | </pre> |
---|
997 | </body> |
---|
998 | </html> |
---|