1 | \documentclass[../main/NEMO_manual]{subfiles} |
---|
2 | \usepackage{fontspec} |
---|
3 | \usepackage{fontawesome} |
---|
4 | |
---|
5 | \begin{document} |
---|
6 | |
---|
7 | \chapter{Surface Boundary Condition (SBC, SAS, ISF, ICB)} |
---|
8 | \label{chap:SBC} |
---|
9 | |
---|
10 | \thispagestyle{plain} |
---|
11 | |
---|
12 | \chaptertoc |
---|
13 | |
---|
14 | \paragraph{Changes record} ~\\ |
---|
15 | |
---|
16 | {\footnotesize |
---|
17 | \begin{tabularx}{\textwidth}{l||X|X} |
---|
18 | Release & Author(s) & Modifications \\ |
---|
19 | \hline |
---|
20 | {\em X.X} & {\em Pierre Mathiot} & {\em update of the ice shelf section (2019 development)} \\ |
---|
21 | {\em 4.0} & {\em ...} & {\em ...} \\ |
---|
22 | {\em 3.6} & {\em ...} & {\em ...} \\ |
---|
23 | {\em 3.4} & {\em ...} & {\em ...} \\ |
---|
24 | {\em <=3.4} & {\em ...} & {\em ...} |
---|
25 | \end{tabularx} |
---|
26 | } |
---|
27 | |
---|
28 | \clearpage |
---|
29 | |
---|
30 | \begin{listing} |
---|
31 | \nlst{namsbc} |
---|
32 | \caption{\forcode{&namsbc}} |
---|
33 | \label{lst:namsbc} |
---|
34 | \end{listing} |
---|
35 | |
---|
36 | The ocean needs seven fields as surface boundary condition: |
---|
37 | |
---|
38 | \begin{itemize} |
---|
39 | \item the two components of the surface ocean stress $\left( {\tau_u \;,\;\tau_v} \right)$ |
---|
40 | \item the incoming solar and non solar heat fluxes $\left( {Q_{ns} \;,\;Q_{sr} } \right)$ |
---|
41 | \item the surface freshwater budget $\left( {\textit{emp}} \right)$ |
---|
42 | \item the surface salt flux associated with freezing/melting of seawater $\left( {\textit{sfx}} \right)$ |
---|
43 | \item the atmospheric pressure at the ocean surface $\left( p_a \right)$ |
---|
44 | \end{itemize} |
---|
45 | |
---|
46 | Four different ways are available to provide the seven fields to the ocean. They are controlled by |
---|
47 | namelist \nam{sbc}{sbc} variables: |
---|
48 | |
---|
49 | \begin{itemize} |
---|
50 | \item a bulk formulation (\np[=.true.]{ln_blk}{ln\_blk}), featuring a selection of four bulk parameterization algorithms, |
---|
51 | \item a flux formulation (\np[=.true.]{ln_flx}{ln\_flx}), |
---|
52 | \item a coupled or mixed forced/coupled formulation (exchanges with a atmospheric model via the OASIS coupler), |
---|
53 | (\np{ln_cpl}{ln\_cpl} or \np[=.true.]{ln_mixcpl}{ln\_mixcpl}), |
---|
54 | \item a user defined formulation (\np[=.true.]{ln_usr}{ln\_usr}). |
---|
55 | \end{itemize} |
---|
56 | |
---|
57 | The frequency at which the forcing fields have to be updated is given by the \np{nn_fsbc}{nn\_fsbc} namelist parameter. |
---|
58 | |
---|
59 | When the fields are supplied from data files (bulk, flux and mixed formulations), |
---|
60 | the input fields do not need to be supplied on the model grid. |
---|
61 | Instead, a file of coordinates and weights can be supplied to map the data from the input fields grid to |
---|
62 | the model points (so called "Interpolation on the Fly", see \autoref{subsec:SBC_iof}). |
---|
63 | If the "Interpolation on the Fly" option is used, input data belonging to land points (in the native grid) |
---|
64 | should be masked or filled to avoid spurious results in proximity of the coasts, as |
---|
65 | large sea-land gradients characterize most of the atmospheric variables. |
---|
66 | |
---|
67 | In addition, the resulting fields can be further modified using several namelist options. |
---|
68 | These options control: |
---|
69 | |
---|
70 | \begin{itemize} |
---|
71 | \item the rotation of vector components supplied relative to an east-north coordinate system onto |
---|
72 | the local grid directions in the model, |
---|
73 | \item the use of a land/sea mask for input fields (\np[=.true.]{nn_lsm}{nn\_lsm}), |
---|
74 | \item the addition of a surface restoring term to observed SST and/or SSS (\np[=.true.]{ln_ssr}{ln\_ssr}), |
---|
75 | \item the modification of fluxes below ice-covered areas (using climatological ice-cover or a sea-ice model) |
---|
76 | (\np[=0..3]{nn_ice}{nn\_ice}), |
---|
77 | \item the addition of river runoffs as surface freshwater fluxes or lateral inflow (\np[=.true.]{ln_rnf}{ln\_rnf}), |
---|
78 | \item the addition of a freshwater flux adjustment in order to avoid a mean sea-level drift |
---|
79 | (\np[=0..2]{nn_fwb}{nn\_fwb}), |
---|
80 | \item the transformation of the solar radiation (if provided as daily mean) into an analytical diurnal cycle |
---|
81 | (\np[=.true.]{ln_dm2dc}{ln\_dm2dc}), |
---|
82 | \item the activation of wave effects from an external wave model (\np[=.true.]{ln_wave}{ln\_wave}), |
---|
83 | \item a neutral drag coefficient is read from an external wave model (\np[=.true.]{ln_cdgw}{ln\_cdgw}), |
---|
84 | \item the Stokes drift from an external wave model is accounted for (\np[=.true.]{ln_sdw}{ln\_sdw}), |
---|
85 | \item the choice of the Stokes drift profile parameterization (\np[=0..2]{nn_sdrift}{nn\_sdrift}), |
---|
86 | \item the surface stress given to the ocean is modified by surface waves (\np[=.true.]{ln_tauwoc}{ln\_tauwoc}), |
---|
87 | \item the surface stress given to the ocean is read from an external wave model (\np[=.true.]{ln_tauw}{ln\_tauw}), |
---|
88 | \item the Stokes-Coriolis term is included (\np[=.true.]{ln_stcor}{ln\_stcor}), |
---|
89 | \item the light penetration in the ocean (\np[=.true.]{ln_traqsr}{ln\_traqsr} with namelist \nam{tra_qsr}{tra\_qsr}), |
---|
90 | \item the atmospheric surface pressure gradient effect on ocean and ice dynamics (\np[=.true.]{ln_apr_dyn}{ln\_apr\_dyn} with namelist \nam{sbc_apr}{sbc\_apr}), |
---|
91 | \item the effect of sea-ice pressure on the ocean (\np[=.true.]{ln_ice_embd}{ln\_ice\_embd}). |
---|
92 | \end{itemize} |
---|
93 | |
---|
94 | In this chapter, we first discuss where the surface boundary conditions appear in the model equations. |
---|
95 | Then we present the three ways of providing the surface boundary conditions, |
---|
96 | followed by the description of the atmospheric pressure and the river runoff. |
---|
97 | Next, the scheme for interpolation on the fly is described. |
---|
98 | Finally, the different options that further modify the fluxes applied to the ocean are discussed. |
---|
99 | One of these is modification by icebergs (see \autoref{sec:SBC_ICB_icebergs}), |
---|
100 | which act as drifting sources of fresh water. |
---|
101 | |
---|
102 | %% ================================================================================================= |
---|
103 | \section{Surface boundary condition for the ocean} |
---|
104 | \label{sec:SBC_ocean} |
---|
105 | |
---|
106 | The surface ocean stress is the stress exerted by the wind and the sea-ice on the ocean. |
---|
107 | It is applied in \mdl{dynzdf} module as a surface boundary condition of the computation of |
---|
108 | the momentum vertical mixing trend (see \autoref{eq:DYN_zdf_sbc} in \autoref{sec:DYN_zdf}). |
---|
109 | As such, it has to be provided as a 2D vector interpolated onto the horizontal velocity ocean mesh, |
---|
110 | \ie\ resolved onto the model (\textbf{i},\textbf{j}) direction at $u$- and $v$-points. |
---|
111 | |
---|
112 | The surface heat flux is decomposed into two parts, a non solar and a solar heat flux, |
---|
113 | $Q_{ns}$ and $Q_{sr}$, respectively. |
---|
114 | The former is the non penetrative part of the heat flux |
---|
115 | (\ie\ the sum of sensible, latent and long wave heat fluxes plus |
---|
116 | the heat content of the mass exchange between the ocean and sea-ice). |
---|
117 | It is applied in \mdl{trasbc} module as a surface boundary condition trend of |
---|
118 | the first level temperature time evolution equation |
---|
119 | (see \autoref{eq:TRA_sbc} and \autoref{eq:TRA_sbc_lin} in \autoref{subsec:TRA_sbc}). |
---|
120 | The latter is the penetrative part of the heat flux. |
---|
121 | It is applied as a 3D trend of the temperature equation (\mdl{traqsr} module) when |
---|
122 | \np[=.true.]{ln_traqsr}{ln\_traqsr}. |
---|
123 | The way the light penetrates inside the water column is generally a sum of decreasing exponentials |
---|
124 | (see \autoref{subsec:TRA_qsr}). |
---|
125 | |
---|
126 | The surface freshwater budget is provided by the \textit{emp} field. |
---|
127 | It represents the mass flux exchanged with the atmosphere (evaporation minus precipitation) and |
---|
128 | possibly with the sea-ice and ice shelves (freezing minus melting of ice). |
---|
129 | It affects the ocean in two different ways: |
---|
130 | $(i)$ it changes the volume of the ocean, and therefore appears in the sea surface height equation as %GS: autoref ssh equation to be added |
---|
131 | a volume flux, and |
---|
132 | $(ii)$ it changes the surface temperature and salinity through the heat and salt contents of |
---|
133 | the mass exchanged with atmosphere, sea-ice and ice shelves. |
---|
134 | |
---|
135 | %\colorbox{yellow}{Miss: } |
---|
136 | %A extensive description of all namsbc namelist (parameter that have to be |
---|
137 | %created!) |
---|
138 | %Especially the \np{nn_fsbc}{nn\_fsbc}, the \mdl{sbc\_oce} module (fluxes + mean sst sss ssu |
---|
139 | %ssv) \ie\ information required by flux computation or sea-ice |
---|
140 | %\mdl{sbc\_oce} containt the definition in memory of the 7 fields (6+runoff), add |
---|
141 | %a word on runoff: included in surface bc or add as lateral obc{\ldots}. |
---|
142 | %Sbcmod manage the ``providing'' (fourniture) to the ocean the 7 fields |
---|
143 | %Fluxes update only each nf\_sbc time step (namsbc) explain relation |
---|
144 | %between nf\_sbc and nf\_ice, do we define nf\_blk??? ? only one |
---|
145 | %nf\_sbc |
---|
146 | %Explain here all the namlist namsbc variable{\ldots}. |
---|
147 | % explain : use or not of surface currents |
---|
148 | %\colorbox{yellow}{End Miss } |
---|
149 | |
---|
150 | The ocean model provides, at each time step, to the surface module (\mdl{sbcmod}) |
---|
151 | the surface currents, temperature and salinity. |
---|
152 | These variables are averaged over \np{nn_fsbc}{nn\_fsbc} time-step (\autoref{tab:SBC_ssm}), and |
---|
153 | these averaged fields are used to compute the surface fluxes at the frequency of \np{nn_fsbc}{nn\_fsbc} time-steps. |
---|
154 | |
---|
155 | \begin{table}[tb] |
---|
156 | \centering |
---|
157 | \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|} |
---|
158 | \hline |
---|
159 | Variable description & Model variable & Units & point \\ |
---|
160 | \hline |
---|
161 | i-component of the surface current & ssu\_m & $m.s^{-1}$ & U \\ |
---|
162 | \hline |
---|
163 | j-component of the surface current & ssv\_m & $m.s^{-1}$ & V \\ |
---|
164 | \hline |
---|
165 | Sea surface temperature & sst\_m & \r{}$K$ & T \\\hline |
---|
166 | Sea surface salinty & sss\_m & $psu$ & T \\ \hline |
---|
167 | \end{tabular} |
---|
168 | \caption[Ocean variables provided to the surface module)]{ |
---|
169 | Ocean variables provided to the surface module (\texttt{SBC}). |
---|
170 | The variable are averaged over \protect\np{nn_fsbc}{nn\_fsbc} time-step, |
---|
171 | \ie\ the frequency of computation of surface fluxes.} |
---|
172 | \label{tab:SBC_ssm} |
---|
173 | \end{table} |
---|
174 | |
---|
175 | %\colorbox{yellow}{Penser a} mettre dans le restant l'info nn\_fsbc ET nn\_fsbc*rdt de sorte de reinitialiser la moyenne si on change la frequence ou le pdt |
---|
176 | |
---|
177 | %% ================================================================================================= |
---|
178 | \section{Input data generic interface} |
---|
179 | \label{sec:SBC_input} |
---|
180 | |
---|
181 | A generic interface has been introduced to manage the way input data |
---|
182 | (2D or 3D fields, like surface forcing or ocean T and S) are specified in \NEMO. |
---|
183 | This task is achieved by \mdl{fldread}. |
---|
184 | The module is designed with four main objectives in mind: |
---|
185 | \begin{enumerate} |
---|
186 | \item optionally provide a time interpolation of the input data every specified model time-step, whatever their input frequency is, |
---|
187 | and according to the different calendars available in the model. |
---|
188 | \item optionally provide an on-the-fly space interpolation from the native input data grid to the model grid. |
---|
189 | \item make the run duration independent from the period cover by the input files. |
---|
190 | \item provide a simple user interface and a rather simple developer interface by |
---|
191 | limiting the number of prerequisite informations. |
---|
192 | \end{enumerate} |
---|
193 | |
---|
194 | As a result, the user has only to fill in for each variable a structure in the namelist file to |
---|
195 | define the input data file and variable names, the frequency of the data (in hours or months), |
---|
196 | whether its is climatological data or not, the period covered by the input file (one year, month, week or day), |
---|
197 | and three additional parameters for the on-the-fly interpolation. |
---|
198 | When adding a new input variable, the developer has to add the associated structure in the namelist, |
---|
199 | read this information by mirroring the namelist read in \rou{sbc\_blk\_init} for example, |
---|
200 | and simply call \rou{fld\_read} to obtain the desired input field at the model time-step and grid points. |
---|
201 | |
---|
202 | The only constraints are that the input file is a NetCDF file, the file name follows a nomenclature |
---|
203 | (see \autoref{subsec:SBC_fldread}), the period it cover is one year, month, week or day, and, |
---|
204 | if on-the-fly interpolation is used, a file of weights must be supplied (see \autoref{subsec:SBC_iof}). |
---|
205 | |
---|
206 | Note that when an input data is archived on a disc which is accessible directly from the workspace where |
---|
207 | the code is executed, then the user can set the \np{cn_dir}{cn\_dir} to the pathway leading to the data. |
---|
208 | By default, the data are assumed to be in the same directory as the executable, so that cn\_dir='./'. |
---|
209 | |
---|
210 | %% ================================================================================================= |
---|
211 | \subsection[Input data specification (\textit{fldread.F90})]{Input data specification (\protect\mdl{fldread})} |
---|
212 | \label{subsec:SBC_fldread} |
---|
213 | |
---|
214 | The structure associated with an input variable contains the following information: |
---|
215 | \begin{forlines} |
---|
216 | ! file name ! frequency (hours) ! variable ! time interp. ! clim ! 'yearly'/ ! weights ! rotation ! land/sea mask ! |
---|
217 | ! ! (if <0 months) ! name ! (logical) ! (T/F) ! 'monthly' ! filename ! pairing ! filename ! |
---|
218 | \end{forlines} |
---|
219 | where |
---|
220 | \begin{description} |
---|
221 | \item [File name]: the stem name of the NetCDF file to be opened. |
---|
222 | This stem will be completed automatically by the model, with the addition of a '.nc' at its end and |
---|
223 | by date information and possibly a prefix (when using AGRIF). |
---|
224 | \autoref{tab:SBC_fldread} provides the resulting file name in all possible cases according to |
---|
225 | whether it is a climatological file or not, and to the open/close frequency (see below for definition). |
---|
226 | \begin{table}[htbp] |
---|
227 | \centering |
---|
228 | \begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|c|} |
---|
229 | \hline |
---|
230 | & daily or weekLL & monthly & yearly \\ |
---|
231 | \hline |
---|
232 | \np[=.false.]{clim}{clim} & fn\_yYYYYmMMdDD.nc & fn\_yYYYYmMM.nc & fn\_yYYYY.nc \\ |
---|
233 | \hline |
---|
234 | \np[=.true.]{clim}{clim} & not possible & fn\_m??.nc & fn \\ |
---|
235 | \hline |
---|
236 | \end{tabular} |
---|
237 | \caption[Naming nomenclature for climatological or interannual input file]{ |
---|
238 | Naming nomenclature for climatological or interannual input file, |
---|
239 | as a function of the open/close frequency. |
---|
240 | The stem name is assumed to be 'fn'. |
---|
241 | For weekly files, the 'LLL' corresponds to the first three letters of the first day of the week |
---|
242 | (\ie\ 'sun','sat','fri','thu','wed','tue','mon'). |
---|
243 | The 'YYYY', 'MM' and 'DD' should be replaced by the actual year/month/day, |
---|
244 | always coded with 4 or 2 digits. |
---|
245 | Note that (1) in mpp, if the file is split over each subdomain, |
---|
246 | the suffix '.nc' is replaced by '\_PPPP.nc', |
---|
247 | where 'PPPP' is the process number coded with 4 digits; |
---|
248 | (2) when using AGRIF, the prefix '\_N' is added to files, where 'N' is the child grid number. |
---|
249 | } |
---|
250 | \label{tab:SBC_fldread} |
---|
251 | \end{table} |
---|
252 | \item [Record frequency]: the frequency of the records contained in the input file. |
---|
253 | Its unit is in hours if it is positive (for example 24 for daily forcing) or in months if negative |
---|
254 | (for example -1 for monthly forcing or -12 for annual forcing). |
---|
255 | Note that this frequency must REALLY be an integer and not a real. |
---|
256 | On some computers, setting it to '24.' can be interpreted as 240! |
---|
257 | \item [Variable name]: the name of the variable to be read in the input NetCDF file. |
---|
258 | \item [Time interpolation]: a logical to activate, or not, the time interpolation. |
---|
259 | If set to 'false', the forcing will have a steplike shape remaining constant during each forcing period. |
---|
260 | For example, when using a daily forcing without time interpolation, the forcing remaining constant from |
---|
261 | 00h00'00'' to 23h59'59". |
---|
262 | If set to 'true', the forcing will have a broken line shape. |
---|
263 | Records are assumed to be dated at the middle of the forcing period. |
---|
264 | For example, when using a daily forcing with time interpolation, |
---|
265 | linear interpolation will be performed between mid-day of two consecutive days. |
---|
266 | \item [Climatological forcing]: a logical to specify if a input file contains climatological forcing which can be cycle in time, |
---|
267 | or an interannual forcing which will requires additional files if |
---|
268 | the period covered by the simulation exceeds the one of the file. |
---|
269 | See the above file naming strategy which impacts the expected name of the file to be opened. |
---|
270 | \item [Open/close frequency]: the frequency at which forcing files must be opened/closed. |
---|
271 | Four cases are coded: |
---|
272 | 'daily', 'weekLLL' (with 'LLL' the first 3 letters of the first day of the week), 'monthly' and 'yearly' which |
---|
273 | means the forcing files will contain data for one day, one week, one month or one year. |
---|
274 | Files are assumed to contain data from the beginning of the open/close period. |
---|
275 | For example, the first record of a yearly file containing daily data is Jan 1st even if |
---|
276 | the experiment is not starting at the beginning of the year. |
---|
277 | \item [Others]: 'weights filename', 'pairing rotation' and 'land/sea mask' are associated with |
---|
278 | on-the-fly interpolation which is described in \autoref{subsec:SBC_iof}. |
---|
279 | \end{description} |
---|
280 | |
---|
281 | Additional remarks:\\ |
---|
282 | (1) The time interpolation is a simple linear interpolation between two consecutive records of the input data. |
---|
283 | The only tricky point is therefore to specify the date at which we need to do the interpolation and |
---|
284 | the date of the records read in the input files. |
---|
285 | Following \citet{leclair.madec_OM09}, the date of a time step is set at the middle of the time step. |
---|
286 | For example, for an experiment starting at 0h00'00" with a one-hour time-step, |
---|
287 | a time interpolation will be performed at the following time: 0h30'00", 1h30'00", 2h30'00", etc. |
---|
288 | However, for forcing data related to the surface module, |
---|
289 | values are not needed at every time-step but at every \np{nn_fsbc}{nn\_fsbc} time-step. |
---|
290 | For example with \np[=3]{nn_fsbc}{nn\_fsbc}, the surface module will be called at time-steps 1, 4, 7, etc. |
---|
291 | The date used for the time interpolation is thus redefined to the middle of \np{nn_fsbc}{nn\_fsbc} time-step period. |
---|
292 | In the previous example, this leads to: 1h30'00", 4h30'00", 7h30'00", etc. \\ |
---|
293 | (2) For code readablility and maintenance issues, we don't take into account the NetCDF input file calendar. |
---|
294 | The calendar associated with the forcing field is build according to the information provided by |
---|
295 | user in the record frequency, the open/close frequency and the type of temporal interpolation. |
---|
296 | For example, the first record of a yearly file containing daily data that will be interpolated in time is assumed to |
---|
297 | start Jan 1st at 12h00'00" and end Dec 31st at 12h00'00". \\ |
---|
298 | (3) If a time interpolation is requested, the code will pick up the needed data in the previous (next) file when |
---|
299 | interpolating data with the first (last) record of the open/close period. |
---|
300 | For example, if the input file specifications are ''yearly, containing daily data to be interpolated in time'', |
---|
301 | the values given by the code between 00h00'00" and 11h59'59" on Jan 1st will be interpolated values between |
---|
302 | Dec 31st 12h00'00" and Jan 1st 12h00'00". |
---|
303 | If the forcing is climatological, Dec and Jan will be keep-up from the same year. |
---|
304 | However, if the forcing is not climatological, at the end of |
---|
305 | the open/close period, the code will automatically close the current file and open the next one. |
---|
306 | Note that, if the experiment is starting (ending) at the beginning (end) of |
---|
307 | an open/close period, we do accept that the previous (next) file is not existing. |
---|
308 | In this case, the time interpolation will be performed between two identical values. |
---|
309 | For example, when starting an experiment on Jan 1st of year Y with yearly files and daily data to be interpolated, |
---|
310 | we do accept that the file related to year Y-1 is not existing. |
---|
311 | The value of Jan 1st will be used as the missing one for Dec 31st of year Y-1. |
---|
312 | If the file of year Y-1 exists, the code will read its last record. |
---|
313 | Therefore, this file can contain only one record corresponding to Dec 31st, |
---|
314 | a useful feature for user considering that it is too heavy to manipulate the complete file for year Y-1. |
---|
315 | |
---|
316 | %% ================================================================================================= |
---|
317 | \subsection{Interpolation on-the-fly} |
---|
318 | \label{subsec:SBC_iof} |
---|
319 | |
---|
320 | Interpolation on the Fly allows the user to supply input files required for the surface forcing on |
---|
321 | grids other than the model grid. |
---|
322 | To do this, he or she must supply, in addition to the source data file(s), a file of weights to be used to |
---|
323 | interpolate from the data grid to the model grid. |
---|
324 | The original development of this code used the SCRIP package |
---|
325 | (freely available \href{http://climate.lanl.gov/Software/SCRIP}{here} under a copyright agreement). |
---|
326 | In principle, any package such as CDO can be used to generate the weights, but the variables in |
---|
327 | the input weights file must have the same names and meanings as assumed by the model. |
---|
328 | Two methods are currently available: bilinear and bicubic interpolations. |
---|
329 | Prior to the interpolation, providing a land/sea mask file, the user can decide to remove land points from |
---|
330 | the input file and substitute the corresponding values with the average of the 8 neighbouring points in |
---|
331 | the native external grid. |
---|
332 | Only "sea points" are considered for the averaging. |
---|
333 | The land/sea mask file must be provided in the structure associated with the input variable. |
---|
334 | The netcdf land/sea mask variable name must be 'LSM' and must have the same horizontal and vertical dimensions as |
---|
335 | the associated variables and should be equal to 1 over land and 0 elsewhere. |
---|
336 | The procedure can be recursively applied by setting nn\_lsm > 1 in namsbc namelist. |
---|
337 | Note that nn\_lsm=0 forces the code to not apply the procedure, even if a land/sea mask file is supplied. |
---|
338 | |
---|
339 | %% ================================================================================================= |
---|
340 | \subsubsection{Bilinear interpolation} |
---|
341 | \label{subsec:SBC_iof_bilinear} |
---|
342 | |
---|
343 | The input weights file in this case has two sets of variables: |
---|
344 | src01, src02, src03, src04 and wgt01, wgt02, wgt03, wgt04. |
---|
345 | The "src" variables correspond to the point in the input grid to which the weight "wgt" is applied. |
---|
346 | Each src value is an integer corresponding to the index of a point in the input grid when |
---|
347 | written as a one dimensional array. |
---|
348 | For example, for an input grid of size 5x10, point (3,2) is referenced as point 8, since (2-1)*5+3=8. |
---|
349 | There are four of each variable because bilinear interpolation uses the four points defining |
---|
350 | the grid box containing the point to be interpolated. |
---|
351 | All of these arrays are on the model grid, so that values src01(i,j) and wgt01(i,j) are used to |
---|
352 | generate a value for point (i,j) in the model. |
---|
353 | |
---|
354 | Symbolically, the algorithm used is: |
---|
355 | \[ |
---|
356 | f_{m}(i,j) = f_{m}(i,j) + \sum_{k=1}^{4} {wgt(k)f(idx(src(k)))} |
---|
357 | \] |
---|
358 | where function idx() transforms a one dimensional index src(k) into a two dimensional index, |
---|
359 | and wgt(1) corresponds to variable "wgt01" for example. |
---|
360 | |
---|
361 | %% ================================================================================================= |
---|
362 | \subsubsection{Bicubic interpolation} |
---|
363 | \label{subsec:SBC_iof_bicubic} |
---|
364 | |
---|
365 | Again, there are two sets of variables: "src" and "wgt". |
---|
366 | But in this case, there are 16 of each. |
---|
367 | The symbolic algorithm used to calculate values on the model grid is now: |
---|
368 | |
---|
369 | \[ |
---|
370 | \begin{split} |
---|
371 | f_{m}(i,j) = f_{m}(i,j) +& \sum_{k=1}^{4} {wgt(k)f(idx(src(k)))} |
---|
372 | + \sum_{k=5 }^{8 } {wgt(k)\left.\frac{\partial f}{\partial i}\right| _{idx(src(k))} } \\ |
---|
373 | +& \sum_{k=9 }^{12} {wgt(k)\left.\frac{\partial f}{\partial j}\right| _{idx(src(k))} } |
---|
374 | + \sum_{k=13}^{16} {wgt(k)\left.\frac{\partial ^2 f}{\partial i \partial j}\right| _{idx(src(k))} } |
---|
375 | \end{split} |
---|
376 | \] |
---|
377 | The gradients here are taken with respect to the horizontal indices and not distances since |
---|
378 | the spatial dependency has been included into the weights. |
---|
379 | |
---|
380 | %% ================================================================================================= |
---|
381 | \subsubsection{Implementation} |
---|
382 | \label{subsec:SBC_iof_imp} |
---|
383 | |
---|
384 | To activate this option, a non-empty string should be supplied in |
---|
385 | the weights filename column of the relevant namelist; |
---|
386 | if this is left as an empty string no action is taken. |
---|
387 | In the model, weights files are read in and stored in a structured type (WGT) in the fldread module, |
---|
388 | as and when they are first required. |
---|
389 | This initialisation procedure determines whether the input data grid should be treated as cyclical or not by |
---|
390 | inspecting a global attribute stored in the weights input file. |
---|
391 | This attribute must be called "ew\_wrap" and be of integer type. |
---|
392 | If it is negative, the input non-model grid is assumed to be not cyclic. |
---|
393 | If zero or greater, then the value represents the number of columns that overlap. |
---|
394 | $E.g.$ if the input grid has columns at longitudes 0, 1, 2, .... , 359, then ew\_wrap should be set to 0; |
---|
395 | if longitudes are 0.5, 2.5, .... , 358.5, 360.5, 362.5, ew\_wrap should be 2. |
---|
396 | If the model does not find attribute ew\_wrap, then a value of -999 is assumed. |
---|
397 | In this case, the \rou{fld\_read} routine defaults ew\_wrap to value 0 and |
---|
398 | therefore the grid is assumed to be cyclic with no overlapping columns. |
---|
399 | (In fact, this only matters when bicubic interpolation is required.) |
---|
400 | Note that no testing is done to check the validity in the model, |
---|
401 | since there is no way of knowing the name used for the longitude variable, |
---|
402 | so it is up to the user to make sure his or her data is correctly represented. |
---|
403 | |
---|
404 | Next the routine reads in the weights. |
---|
405 | Bicubic interpolation is assumed if it finds a variable with name "src05", otherwise bilinear interpolation is used. |
---|
406 | The WGT structure includes dynamic arrays both for the storage of the weights (on the model grid), |
---|
407 | and when required, for reading in the variable to be interpolated (on the input data grid). |
---|
408 | The size of the input data array is determined by examining the values in the "src" arrays to |
---|
409 | find the minimum and maximum i and j values required. |
---|
410 | Since bicubic interpolation requires the calculation of gradients at each point on the grid, |
---|
411 | the corresponding arrays are dimensioned with a halo of width one grid point all the way around. |
---|
412 | When the array of points from the data file is adjacent to an edge of the data grid, |
---|
413 | the halo is either a copy of the row/column next to it (non-cyclical case), |
---|
414 | or is a copy of one from the first few columns on the opposite side of the grid (cyclical case). |
---|
415 | |
---|
416 | %% ================================================================================================= |
---|
417 | \subsubsection{Limitations} |
---|
418 | \label{subsec:SBC_iof_lim} |
---|
419 | |
---|
420 | \begin{enumerate} |
---|
421 | \item The case where input data grids are not logically rectangular (irregular grid case) has not been tested. |
---|
422 | \item This code is not guaranteed to produce positive definite answers from positive definite inputs when |
---|
423 | a bicubic interpolation method is used. |
---|
424 | \item The cyclic condition is only applied on left and right columns, and not to top and bottom rows. |
---|
425 | \item The gradients across the ends of a cyclical grid assume that the grid spacing between |
---|
426 | the two columns involved are consistent with the weights used. |
---|
427 | \item Neither interpolation scheme is conservative. (There is a conservative scheme available in SCRIP, |
---|
428 | but this has not been implemented.) |
---|
429 | \end{enumerate} |
---|
430 | |
---|
431 | %% ================================================================================================= |
---|
432 | \subsubsection{Utilities} |
---|
433 | \label{subsec:SBC_iof_util} |
---|
434 | |
---|
435 | % to be completed |
---|
436 | A set of utilities to create a weights file for a rectilinear input grid is available |
---|
437 | (see the directory NEMOGCM/TOOLS/WEIGHTS). |
---|
438 | |
---|
439 | %% ================================================================================================= |
---|
440 | \subsection{Standalone surface boundary condition scheme (SAS)} |
---|
441 | \label{subsec:SBC_SAS} |
---|
442 | |
---|
443 | \begin{listing} |
---|
444 | \nlst{namsbc_sas} |
---|
445 | \caption{\forcode{&namsbc_sas}} |
---|
446 | \label{lst:namsbc_sas} |
---|
447 | \end{listing} |
---|
448 | |
---|
449 | In some circumstances, it may be useful to avoid calculating the 3D temperature, |
---|
450 | salinity and velocity fields and simply read them in from a previous run or receive them from OASIS. |
---|
451 | For example: |
---|
452 | |
---|
453 | \begin{itemize} |
---|
454 | \item Multiple runs of the model are required in code development to |
---|
455 | see the effect of different algorithms in the bulk formulae. |
---|
456 | \item The effect of different parameter sets in the ice model is to be examined. |
---|
457 | \item Development of sea-ice algorithms or parameterizations. |
---|
458 | \item Spinup of the iceberg floats |
---|
459 | \item Ocean/sea-ice simulation with both models running in parallel (\np[=.true.]{ln_mixcpl}{ln\_mixcpl}) |
---|
460 | \end{itemize} |
---|
461 | |
---|
462 | The Standalone Surface scheme provides this capacity. |
---|
463 | Its options are defined through the \nam{sbc_sas}{sbc\_sas} namelist variables. |
---|
464 | A new copy of the model has to be compiled with a configuration based on ORCA2\_SAS\_LIM. |
---|
465 | However, no namelist parameters need be changed from the settings of the previous run (except perhaps nn\_date0). |
---|
466 | In this configuration, a few routines in the standard model are overriden by new versions. |
---|
467 | Routines replaced are: |
---|
468 | |
---|
469 | \begin{itemize} |
---|
470 | \item \mdl{nemogcm}: This routine initialises the rest of the model and repeatedly calls the stp time stepping routine (\mdl{step}). |
---|
471 | Since the ocean state is not calculated all associated initialisations have been removed. |
---|
472 | \item \mdl{step}: The main time stepping routine now only needs to call the sbc routine (and a few utility functions). |
---|
473 | \item \mdl{sbcmod}: This has been cut down and now only calculates surface forcing and the ice model required. |
---|
474 | New surface modules that can function when only the surface level of the ocean state is defined can also be added |
---|
475 | (\eg\ icebergs). |
---|
476 | \item \mdl{daymod}: No ocean restarts are read or written (though the ice model restarts are retained), |
---|
477 | so calls to restart functions have been removed. |
---|
478 | This also means that the calendar cannot be controlled by time in a restart file, |
---|
479 | so the user must check that nn\_date0 in the model namelist is correct for his or her purposes. |
---|
480 | \item \mdl{stpctl}: Since there is no free surface solver, references to it have been removed from \rou{stp\_ctl} module. |
---|
481 | \item \mdl{diawri}: All 3D data have been removed from the output. |
---|
482 | The surface temperature, salinity and velocity components (which have been read in) are written along with |
---|
483 | relevant forcing and ice data. |
---|
484 | \end{itemize} |
---|
485 | |
---|
486 | One new routine has been added: |
---|
487 | |
---|
488 | \begin{itemize} |
---|
489 | \item \mdl{sbcsas}: This module initialises the input files needed for reading temperature, salinity and |
---|
490 | velocity arrays at the surface. |
---|
491 | These filenames are supplied in namelist namsbc\_sas. |
---|
492 | Unfortunately, because of limitations with the \mdl{iom} module, |
---|
493 | the full 3D fields from the mean files have to be read in and interpolated in time, |
---|
494 | before using just the top level. |
---|
495 | Since fldread is used to read in the data, Interpolation on the Fly may be used to change input data resolution. |
---|
496 | \end{itemize} |
---|
497 | |
---|
498 | The user can also choose in the \nam{sbc_sas}{sbc\_sas} namelist to read the mean (nn\_fsbc time-step) fraction of solar net radiation absorbed in the 1st T level using |
---|
499 | (\np[=.true.]{ln_flx}{ln\_flx}) and to provide 3D oceanic velocities instead of 2D ones (\np{ln_flx}{ln\_flx}\forcode{=.true.}). In that last case, only the 1st level will be read in. |
---|
500 | |
---|
501 | %% ================================================================================================= |
---|
502 | \section[Flux formulation (\textit{sbcflx.F90})]{Flux formulation (\protect\mdl{sbcflx})} |
---|
503 | \label{sec:SBC_flx} |
---|
504 | |
---|
505 | % Laurent: DO NOT mix up ``bulk formulae'' (the classic equation) and the ``bulk |
---|
506 | % parameterization'' (i.e NCAR, COARE, ECMWF...) |
---|
507 | |
---|
508 | \begin{listing} |
---|
509 | \nlst{namsbc_flx} |
---|
510 | \caption{\forcode{&namsbc_flx}} |
---|
511 | \label{lst:namsbc_flx} |
---|
512 | \end{listing} |
---|
513 | |
---|
514 | In the flux formulation (\np[=.true.]{ln_flx}{ln\_flx}), |
---|
515 | the surface boundary condition fields are directly read from input files. |
---|
516 | The user has to define in the namelist \nam{sbc_flx}{sbc\_flx} the name of the file, |
---|
517 | the name of the variable read in the file, the time frequency at which it is given (in hours), |
---|
518 | and a logical setting whether a time interpolation to the model time step is required for this field. |
---|
519 | See \autoref{subsec:SBC_fldread} for a more detailed description of the parameters. |
---|
520 | |
---|
521 | Note that in general, a flux formulation is used in associated with a restoring term to observed SST and/or SSS. |
---|
522 | See \autoref{subsec:SBC_ssr} for its specification. |
---|
523 | |
---|
524 | |
---|
525 | |
---|
526 | |
---|
527 | |
---|
528 | |
---|
529 | |
---|
530 | %% ================================================================================================= |
---|
531 | \pagebreak |
---|
532 | \newpage |
---|
533 | \section[Bulk formulation (\textit{sbcblk.F90})]{Bulk formulation (\protect\mdl{sbcblk})} |
---|
534 | \label{sec:SBC_blk} |
---|
535 | |
---|
536 | % L. Brodeau, December 2019... % |
---|
537 | |
---|
538 | \begin{listing} |
---|
539 | \nlst{namsbc_blk} |
---|
540 | \caption{\forcode{&namsbc_blk}} |
---|
541 | \label{lst:namsbc_blk} |
---|
542 | \end{listing} |
---|
543 | |
---|
544 | If the bulk formulation is selected (\np[=.true.]{ln_blk}{ln\_blk}), the air-sea |
---|
545 | fluxes associated with surface boundary conditions are estimated by means of the |
---|
546 | traditional \emph{bulk formulae}. As input, bulk formulae rely on a prescribed |
---|
547 | near-surface atmosphere state (typically extracted from a weather reanalysis) |
---|
548 | and the prognostic sea (-ice) surface state averaged over \np{nn_fsbc}{nn\_fsbc} |
---|
549 | time-step(s). |
---|
550 | |
---|
551 | % Turbulent air-sea fluxes are computed using the sea surface properties and |
---|
552 | % atmospheric SSVs at height $z$ above the sea surface, with the traditional |
---|
553 | % aerodynamic bulk formulae: |
---|
554 | |
---|
555 | Note: all the NEMO Fortran routines involved in the present section have been |
---|
556 | initially developed (and are still developed in parallel) in |
---|
557 | the \href{https://brodeau.github.io/aerobulk/}{\texttt{AeroBulk}} open-source project |
---|
558 | \citep{brodeau.barnier.ea_JPO17}. |
---|
559 | |
---|
560 | %%% Bulk formulae are this: |
---|
561 | \subsection{Bulk formulae}\label{subsec:SBC_blkform} |
---|
562 | % |
---|
563 | In NEMO, the set of equations that relate each component of the surface fluxes |
---|
564 | to the near-surface atmosphere and sea surface states writes |
---|
565 | % |
---|
566 | \begin{subequations}\label{eq_bulk} |
---|
567 | \label{eq:SBC_bulk_form} |
---|
568 | \begin{eqnarray} |
---|
569 | \mathbf{\tau} &=& \rho~ C_D ~ \mathbf{U}_z ~ U_B \\ |
---|
570 | Q_H &=& \rho~C_H~C_P~\big[ \theta_z - T_s \big] ~ U_B \\ |
---|
571 | E &=& \rho~C_E ~\big[ q_s - q_z \big] ~ U_B \\ |
---|
572 | Q_L &=& -L_v \, E \\ |
---|
573 | % |
---|
574 | Q_{sr} &=& (1 - a) Q_{sw\downarrow} \\ |
---|
575 | Q_{ir} &=& \delta (Q_{lw\downarrow} -\sigma T_s^4) |
---|
576 | \end{eqnarray} |
---|
577 | \end{subequations} |
---|
578 | % |
---|
579 | with |
---|
580 | \[ \theta_z \simeq T_z+\gamma z \] |
---|
581 | \[ q_s \simeq 0.98\,q_{sat}(T_s,p_a ) \] |
---|
582 | % |
---|
583 | from which, the the non-solar heat flux is \[ Q_{ns} = Q_L + Q_H + Q_{ir} \] |
---|
584 | % |
---|
585 | where $\mathbf{\tau}$ is the wind stress vector, $Q_H$ the sensible heat flux, |
---|
586 | $E$ the evaporation, $Q_L$ the latent heat flux, and $Q_{ir}$ the net longwave |
---|
587 | flux. |
---|
588 | % |
---|
589 | $Q_{sw\downarrow}$ and $Q_{lw\downarrow}$ are the surface downwelling shortwave |
---|
590 | and longwave radiative fluxes, respectively. |
---|
591 | % |
---|
592 | Note: a positive sign for $\mathbf{\tau}$, $Q_H$, $Q_L$, $Q_{sr}$ or $Q_{ir}$ |
---|
593 | implies a gain of the relevant quantity for the ocean, while a positive $E$ |
---|
594 | implies a freshwater loss for the ocean. |
---|
595 | % |
---|
596 | $\rho$ is the density of air. $C_D$, $C_H$ and $C_E$ are the bulk transfer |
---|
597 | coefficients for momentum, sensible heat, and moisture, respectively. |
---|
598 | % |
---|
599 | $C_P$ is the heat capacity of moist air, and $L_v$ is the latent heat of |
---|
600 | vaporization of water. |
---|
601 | % |
---|
602 | $\theta_z$, $T_z$ and $q_z$ are the potential temperature, absolute temperature, |
---|
603 | and specific humidity of air at height $z$ above the sea surface, |
---|
604 | respectively. $\gamma z$ is a temperature correction term which accounts for the |
---|
605 | adiabatic lapse rate and approximates the potential temperature at height |
---|
606 | $z$ \citep{josey.gulev.ea_2013}. |
---|
607 | % |
---|
608 | $\mathbf{U}_z$ is the wind speed vector at height $z$ above the sea surface |
---|
609 | (possibly referenced to the surface current $\mathbf{u_0}$, |
---|
610 | section \ref{s_res1}.\ref{ss_current}). |
---|
611 | % |
---|
612 | The bulk scalar wind speed, namely $U_B$, is the scalar wind speed, |
---|
613 | $|\mathbf{U}_z|$, with the potential inclusion of a gustiness contribution. |
---|
614 | % |
---|
615 | $a$ and $\delta$ are the albedo and emissivity of the sea surface, respectively.\\ |
---|
616 | % |
---|
617 | %$p_a$ is the mean sea-level pressure (SLP). |
---|
618 | % |
---|
619 | $T_s$ is the sea surface temperature. $q_s$ is the saturation specific humidity |
---|
620 | of air at temperature $T_s$; it includes a 2\% reduction to account for the |
---|
621 | presence of salt in seawater \citep{sverdrup.johnson.ea_1942,kraus.businger_QJRMS96}. |
---|
622 | Depending on the bulk parametrization used, $T_s$ can either be the temperature |
---|
623 | at the air-sea interface (skin temperature, hereafter SSST) or at typically a |
---|
624 | few tens of centimeters below the surface (bulk sea surface temperature, |
---|
625 | hereafter SST). |
---|
626 | % |
---|
627 | The SSST differs from the SST due to the contributions of two effects of |
---|
628 | opposite sign, the \emph{cool skin} and \emph{warm layer} (hereafter CS and WL, |
---|
629 | respectively, see section\,\ref{subsec:SBC_skin}). |
---|
630 | % |
---|
631 | Technically, when the ECMWF or COARE* bulk parametrizations are selected |
---|
632 | (\np[=.true.]{ln_ECMWF}{ln\_ECMWF} or \np[=.true.]{ln_COARE*}{ln\_COARE\*}), |
---|
633 | $T_s$ is the SSST, as opposed to the NCAR bulk parametrization |
---|
634 | (\np[=.true.]{ln_NCAR}{ln\_NCAR}) for which $T_s$ is the bulk SST (\ie~temperature |
---|
635 | at first T-point level). |
---|
636 | |
---|
637 | For more details on all these aspects the reader is invited to refer |
---|
638 | to \citet{brodeau.barnier.ea_JPO17}. |
---|
639 | |
---|
640 | |
---|
641 | |
---|
642 | \subsection{Bulk parametrizations}\label{subsec:SBC_blk_ocean} |
---|
643 | %%%\label{subsec:SBC_param} |
---|
644 | |
---|
645 | Accuracy of the estimate of surface turbulent fluxes by means of bulk formulae |
---|
646 | strongly relies on that of the bulk transfer coefficients: $C_D$, $C_H$ and |
---|
647 | $C_E$. They are estimated with what we refer to as a \emph{bulk |
---|
648 | parametrization} algorithm. When relevant, these algorithms also perform the |
---|
649 | height adjustment of humidity and temperature to the wind reference measurement |
---|
650 | height (from \np{rn_zqt}{rn\_zqt} to \np{rn_zu}{rn\_zu}). |
---|
651 | |
---|
652 | |
---|
653 | |
---|
654 | For the open ocean, four bulk parametrization algorithms are available in NEMO: |
---|
655 | \begin{itemize} |
---|
656 | \item NCAR, formerly known as CORE, \citep{large.yeager_rpt04,large.yeager_CD09} |
---|
657 | \item COARE 3.0 \citep{fairall.bradley.ea_JC03} |
---|
658 | \item COARE 3.6 \citep{edson.jampana.ea_JPO13} |
---|
659 | \item ECMWF (IFS documentation, cy45) |
---|
660 | \end{itemize} |
---|
661 | |
---|
662 | |
---|
663 | With respect to version 3, the principal advances in version 3.6 of the COARE |
---|
664 | bulk parametrization are built around improvements in the representation of the |
---|
665 | effects of waves on |
---|
666 | fluxes \citep{edson.jampana.ea_JPO13,brodeau.barnier.ea_JPO17}. This includes |
---|
667 | improved relationships of surface roughness, and whitecap fraction on wave |
---|
668 | parameters. It is therefore recommended to chose version 3.6 over 3. |
---|
669 | |
---|
670 | |
---|
671 | |
---|
672 | |
---|
673 | \subsection{Cool-skin and warm-layer parametrizations}\label{subsec:SBC_skin} |
---|
674 | %\subsection[Cool-skin and warm-layer parameterizations |
---|
675 | %(\forcode{ln_skin_cs} \& \forcode{ln_skin_wl})]{Cool-skin and warm-layer parameterizations (\protect\np{ln_skin_cs}{ln\_skin\_cs} \& \np{ln_skin_wl}{ln\_skin\_wl})} |
---|
676 | %\label{subsec:SBC_skin} |
---|
677 | % |
---|
678 | As opposed to the NCAR bulk parametrization, more advanced bulk |
---|
679 | parametrizations such as COARE3.x and ECMWF are meant to be used with the skin |
---|
680 | temperature $T_s$ rather than the bulk SST (which, in NEMO is the temperature at |
---|
681 | the first T-point level, see section\,\ref{subsec:SBC_blkform}). |
---|
682 | % |
---|
683 | As such, the relevant cool-skin and warm-layer parametrization must be |
---|
684 | activated through \np[=T]{ln_skin_cs}{ln\_skin\_cs} |
---|
685 | and \np[=T]{ln_skin_wl}{ln\_skin\_wl} to use COARE3.x or ECMWF in a consistent |
---|
686 | way. |
---|
687 | |
---|
688 | \texttt{\#LB: ADD BLBLA ABOUT THE TWO CS/WL PARAMETRIZATIONS (ECMWF and COARE) !!!} |
---|
689 | |
---|
690 | For the cool-skin scheme parametrization COARE and ECMWF algorithms share the same |
---|
691 | basis: \citet{fairall.bradley.ea_JGR96}. With some minor updates based |
---|
692 | on \citet{zeng.beljaars_GRL05} for ECMWF, and \citet{fairall.ea_19} for COARE |
---|
693 | 3.6. |
---|
694 | |
---|
695 | For the warm-layer scheme, ECMWF is based on \citet{zeng.beljaars_GRL05} with a |
---|
696 | recent update from \citet{takaya.bidlot.ea_JGR10} (consideration of the |
---|
697 | turbulence input from Langmuir circulation). |
---|
698 | |
---|
699 | Importantly, COARE warm-layer scheme \citep{fairall.ea_19} includes a prognostic |
---|
700 | equation for the thickness of the warm-layer, while it is considered as constant |
---|
701 | in the ECWMF algorithm. |
---|
702 | |
---|
703 | |
---|
704 | \subsection{Appropriate use of each bulk parametrization} |
---|
705 | |
---|
706 | \subsubsection{NCAR} |
---|
707 | |
---|
708 | NCAR bulk parametrizations (formerly known as CORE) is meant to be used with the |
---|
709 | CORE II atmospheric forcing \citep{large.yeager_CD09}. The expected sea surface |
---|
710 | temperature is the bulk SST. Hence the following namelist parameters must be |
---|
711 | set: |
---|
712 | % |
---|
713 | \begin{verbatim} |
---|
714 | ... |
---|
715 | ln_NCAR = .true. |
---|
716 | ... |
---|
717 | rn_zqt = 10. ! Air temperature & humidity reference height (m) |
---|
718 | rn_zu = 10. ! Wind vector reference height (m) |
---|
719 | ... |
---|
720 | ln_skin_cs = .false. ! use the cool-skin parameterization |
---|
721 | ln_skin_wl = .false. ! use the warm-layer parameterization |
---|
722 | ... |
---|
723 | ln_humi_sph = .true. ! humidity "sn_humi" is specific humidity [kg/kg] |
---|
724 | \end{verbatim} |
---|
725 | |
---|
726 | |
---|
727 | \subsubsection{ECMWF} |
---|
728 | % |
---|
729 | With an atmospheric forcing based on a reanalysis of the ECMWF, such as the |
---|
730 | Drakkar Forcing Set \citep{brodeau.barnier.ea_OM10}, we strongly recommend to |
---|
731 | use the ECMWF bulk parametrizations with the cool-skin and warm-layer |
---|
732 | parametrizations activated. In ECMWF reanalyzes, since air temperature and |
---|
733 | humidity are provided at the 2\,m height, and given that the humidity is |
---|
734 | distributed as the dew-point temperature, the namelist must be tuned as follows: |
---|
735 | % |
---|
736 | \begin{verbatim} |
---|
737 | ... |
---|
738 | ln_ECMWF = .true. |
---|
739 | ... |
---|
740 | rn_zqt = 2. ! Air temperature & humidity reference height (m) |
---|
741 | rn_zu = 10. ! Wind vector reference height (m) |
---|
742 | ... |
---|
743 | ln_skin_cs = .true. ! use the cool-skin parameterization |
---|
744 | ln_skin_wl = .true. ! use the warm-layer parameterization |
---|
745 | ... |
---|
746 | ln_humi_dpt = .true. ! humidity "sn_humi" is dew-point temperature [K] |
---|
747 | ... |
---|
748 | \end{verbatim} |
---|
749 | % |
---|
750 | Note: when \np{ln_ECMWF}{ln\_ECMWF} is selected, the selection |
---|
751 | of \np{ln_skin_cs}{ln\_skin\_cs} and \np{ln_skin_wl}{ln\_skin\_wl} implicitly |
---|
752 | triggers the use of the ECMWF cool-skin and warm-layer parametrizations, |
---|
753 | respectively (found in \textit{sbcblk\_skin\_ecmwf.F90}). |
---|
754 | |
---|
755 | |
---|
756 | \subsubsection{COARE 3.x} |
---|
757 | % |
---|
758 | Since the ECMWF parametrization is largely based on the COARE* parametrization, |
---|
759 | the two algorithms are very similar in terms of structure and closure |
---|
760 | approach. As such, the namelist tuning for COARE 3.x is identical to that of |
---|
761 | ECMWF: |
---|
762 | % |
---|
763 | \begin{verbatim} |
---|
764 | ... |
---|
765 | ln_COARE3p6 = .true. |
---|
766 | ... |
---|
767 | ln_skin_cs = .true. ! use the cool-skin parameterization |
---|
768 | ln_skin_wl = .true. ! use the warm-layer parameterization |
---|
769 | ... |
---|
770 | \end{verbatim} |
---|
771 | |
---|
772 | Note: when \np[=T]{ln_COARE3p0}{ln\_COARE3p0} is selected, the selection |
---|
773 | of \np{ln_skin_cs}{ln\_skin\_cs} and \np{ln_skin_wl}{ln\_skin\_wl} implicitly |
---|
774 | triggers the use of the COARE cool-skin and warm-layer parametrizations, |
---|
775 | respectively (found in \textit{sbcblk\_skin\_coare.F90}). |
---|
776 | |
---|
777 | |
---|
778 | %lulu |
---|
779 | |
---|
780 | |
---|
781 | |
---|
782 | % In a typical bulk algorithm, the BTCs under neutral stability conditions are |
---|
783 | % defined using \emph{in-situ} flux measurements while their dependence on the |
---|
784 | % stability is accounted through the \emph{Monin-Obukhov Similarity Theory} and |
---|
785 | % the \emph{flux-profile} relationships \citep[\eg{}][]{Paulson_1970}. BTCs are |
---|
786 | % functions of the wind speed and the near-surface stability of the atmospheric |
---|
787 | % surface layer (hereafter ASL), and hence, depend on $U_B$, $T_s$, $T_z$, $q_s$ |
---|
788 | % and $q_z$. |
---|
789 | |
---|
790 | |
---|
791 | |
---|
792 | \subsection{Prescribed near-surface atmospheric state} |
---|
793 | |
---|
794 | The atmospheric fields used depend on the bulk formulae used. In forced mode, |
---|
795 | when a sea-ice model is used, a specific bulk formulation is used. Therefore, |
---|
796 | different bulk formulae are used for the turbulent fluxes computation over the |
---|
797 | ocean and over sea-ice surface. |
---|
798 | % |
---|
799 | |
---|
800 | %The choice is made by setting to true one of the following namelist |
---|
801 | %variable: \np{ln_NCAR}{ln\_NCAR}, \np{ln_COARE_3p0}{ln\_COARE\_3p0}, \np{ln_COARE_3p6}{ln\_COARE\_3p6} |
---|
802 | %and \np{ln_ECMWF}{ln\_ECMWF}. |
---|
803 | |
---|
804 | Common options are defined through the \nam{sbc_blk}{sbc\_blk} namelist variables. |
---|
805 | The required 9 input fields are: |
---|
806 | |
---|
807 | \begin{table}[htbp] |
---|
808 | \centering |
---|
809 | \begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|c|} |
---|
810 | \hline |
---|
811 | Variable description & Model variable & Units & point \\ |
---|
812 | \hline |
---|
813 | i-component of the 10m air velocity & wndi & $m.s^{-1}$ & T \\ |
---|
814 | \hline |
---|
815 | j-component of the 10m air velocity & wndj & $m.s^{-1}$ & T \\ |
---|
816 | \hline |
---|
817 | 10m air temperature & tair & $K$ & T \\ |
---|
818 | \hline |
---|
819 | Specific humidity & humi & $-$ & T \\ |
---|
820 | Relative humidity & ~ & $\%$ & T \\ |
---|
821 | Dew-point temperature & ~ & $K$ & T \\ |
---|
822 | \hline |
---|
823 | Downwelling longwave radiation & qlw & $W.m^{-2}$ & T \\ |
---|
824 | \hline |
---|
825 | Downwelling shortwave radiation & qsr & $W.m^{-2}$ & T \\ |
---|
826 | \hline |
---|
827 | Total precipitation (liquid + solid) & precip & $Kg.m^{-2}.s^{-1}$ & T \\ |
---|
828 | \hline |
---|
829 | Solid precipitation & snow & $Kg.m^{-2}.s^{-1}$ & T \\ |
---|
830 | \hline |
---|
831 | Mean sea-level pressure & slp & $hPa$ & T \\ |
---|
832 | \hline |
---|
833 | \end{tabular} |
---|
834 | \label{tab:SBC_BULK} |
---|
835 | \end{table} |
---|
836 | |
---|
837 | Note that the air velocity is provided at a tracer ocean point, not at a velocity ocean point ($u$- and $v$-points). |
---|
838 | It is simpler and faster (less fields to be read), but it is not the recommended method when |
---|
839 | the ocean grid size is the same or larger than the one of the input atmospheric fields. |
---|
840 | |
---|
841 | The \np{sn_wndi}{sn\_wndi}, \np{sn_wndj}{sn\_wndj}, \np{sn_qsr}{sn\_qsr}, \np{sn_qlw}{sn\_qlw}, \np{sn_tair}{sn\_tair}, \np{sn_humi}{sn\_humi}, \np{sn_prec}{sn\_prec}, |
---|
842 | \np{sn_snow}{sn\_snow}, \np{sn_tdif}{sn\_tdif} parameters describe the fields and the way they have to be used |
---|
843 | (spatial and temporal interpolations). |
---|
844 | |
---|
845 | \np{cn_dir}{cn\_dir} is the directory of location of bulk files |
---|
846 | %\np{ln_taudif}{ln\_taudif} is the flag to specify if we use High Frequency (HF) tau information (.true.) or not (.false.) |
---|
847 | \np{rn_zqt}{rn\_zqt}: is the height of humidity and temperature measurements (m) |
---|
848 | \np{rn_zu}{rn\_zu}: is the height of wind measurements (m) |
---|
849 | |
---|
850 | Three multiplicative factors are available: |
---|
851 | \np{rn_pfac}{rn\_pfac} and \np{rn_efac}{rn\_efac} allow to adjust (if necessary) the global freshwater budget by |
---|
852 | increasing/reducing the precipitations (total and snow) and or evaporation, respectively. |
---|
853 | The third one,\np{rn_vfac}{rn\_vfac}, control to which extend the ice/ocean velocities are taken into account in |
---|
854 | the calculation of surface wind stress. |
---|
855 | Its range must be between zero and one, and it is recommended to set it to 0 at low-resolution (ORCA2 configuration). |
---|
856 | |
---|
857 | As for the flux parametrization, information about the input data required by the model is provided in |
---|
858 | the namsbc\_blk namelist (see \autoref{subsec:SBC_fldread}). |
---|
859 | |
---|
860 | |
---|
861 | \subsubsection{Air humidity} |
---|
862 | |
---|
863 | Air humidity can be provided as three different parameters: specific humidity |
---|
864 | [kg/kg], relative humidity [\%], or dew-point temperature [K] (LINK to namelist |
---|
865 | parameters)... |
---|
866 | |
---|
867 | |
---|
868 | ~\\ |
---|
869 | |
---|
870 | |
---|
871 | |
---|
872 | |
---|
873 | |
---|
874 | |
---|
875 | |
---|
876 | |
---|
877 | |
---|
878 | |
---|
879 | %% ================================================================================================= |
---|
880 | %\subsection[Ocean-Atmosphere Bulk formulae (\textit{sbcblk\_algo\_coare3p0.F90, sbcblk\_algo\_coare3p6.F90, %sbcblk\_algo\_ecmwf.F90, sbcblk\_algo\_ncar.F90})]{Ocean-Atmosphere Bulk formulae (\mdl{sbcblk\_algo\_coare3p0}, %\mdl{sbcblk\_algo\_coare3p6}, \mdl{sbcblk\_algo\_ecmwf}, \mdl{sbcblk\_algo\_ncar})} |
---|
881 | %\label{subsec:SBC_blk_ocean} |
---|
882 | |
---|
883 | %Four different bulk algorithms are available to compute surface turbulent momentum and heat fluxes over the ocean. |
---|
884 | %COARE 3.0, COARE 3.6 and ECMWF schemes mainly differ by their roughness lenghts computation and consequently |
---|
885 | %their neutral transfer coefficients relationships with neutral wind. |
---|
886 | %\begin{itemize} |
---|
887 | %\item NCAR (\np[=.true.]{ln_NCAR}{ln\_NCAR}): The NCAR bulk formulae have been developed by \citet{large.yeager_rpt04}. |
---|
888 | % They have been designed to handle the NCAR forcing, a mixture of NCEP reanalysis and satellite data. |
---|
889 | % They use an inertial dissipative method to compute the turbulent transfer coefficients |
---|
890 | % (momentum, sensible heat and evaporation) from the 10m wind speed, air temperature and specific humidity. |
---|
891 | % This \citet{large.yeager_rpt04} dataset is available through |
---|
892 | % the \href{http://nomads.gfdl.noaa.gov/nomads/forms/mom4/NCAR.html}{GFDL web site}. |
---|
893 | % Note that substituting ERA40 to NCEP reanalysis fields does not require changes in the bulk formulea themself. |
---|
894 | % This is the so-called DRAKKAR Forcing Set (DFS) \citep{brodeau.barnier.ea_OM10}. |
---|
895 | %\item COARE 3.0 (\np[=.true.]{ln_COARE_3p0}{ln\_COARE\_3p0}): See \citet{fairall.bradley.ea_JC03} for more details |
---|
896 | %\item COARE 3.6 (\np[=.true.]{ln_COARE_3p6}{ln\_COARE\_3p6}): See \citet{edson.jampana.ea_JPO13} for more details |
---|
897 | %\item ECMWF (\np[=.true.]{ln_ECMWF}{ln\_ECMWF}): Based on \href{https://www.ecmwf.int/node/9204}{IFS (Cy40r1)} %implementation and documentation. |
---|
898 | % Surface roughness lengths needed for the Obukhov length are computed |
---|
899 | % following \citet{beljaars_QJRMS95}. |
---|
900 | %\end{itemize} |
---|
901 | |
---|
902 | %% ================================================================================================= |
---|
903 | \subsection{Ice-Atmosphere Bulk formulae} |
---|
904 | \label{subsec:SBC_blk_ice} |
---|
905 | |
---|
906 | |
---|
907 | \texttt{\#out\_of\_place:} |
---|
908 | For sea-ice, three possibilities can be selected: |
---|
909 | a constant transfer coefficient (1.4e-3; default |
---|
910 | value), \citet{lupkes.gryanik.ea_JGR12} (\np{ln_Cd_L12}{ln\_Cd\_L12}), |
---|
911 | and \citet{lupkes.gryanik_JGR15} (\np{ln_Cd_L15}{ln\_Cd\_L15}) parameterizations |
---|
912 | \texttt{\#out\_of\_place.} |
---|
913 | |
---|
914 | |
---|
915 | |
---|
916 | |
---|
917 | Surface turbulent fluxes between sea-ice and the atmosphere can be computed in three different ways: |
---|
918 | |
---|
919 | \begin{itemize} |
---|
920 | \item Constant value (\np[ Cd_ice=1.4e-3 ]{constant value}{constant\ value}): |
---|
921 | default constant value used for momentum and heat neutral transfer coefficients |
---|
922 | \item \citet{lupkes.gryanik.ea_JGR12} (\np[=.true.]{ln_Cd_L12}{ln\_Cd\_L12}): |
---|
923 | This scheme adds a dependency on edges at leads, melt ponds and flows |
---|
924 | of the constant neutral air-ice drag. After some approximations, |
---|
925 | this can be resumed to a dependency on ice concentration (A). |
---|
926 | This drag coefficient has a parabolic shape (as a function of ice concentration) |
---|
927 | starting at 1.5e-3 for A=0, reaching 1.97e-3 for A=0.5 and going down 1.4e-3 for A=1. |
---|
928 | It is theoretically applicable to all ice conditions (not only MIZ). |
---|
929 | \item \citet{lupkes.gryanik_JGR15} (\np[=.true.]{ln_Cd_L15}{ln\_Cd\_L15}): |
---|
930 | Alternative turbulent transfer coefficients formulation between sea-ice |
---|
931 | and atmosphere with distinct momentum and heat coefficients depending |
---|
932 | on sea-ice concentration and atmospheric stability (no melt-ponds effect for now). |
---|
933 | The parameterization is adapted from ECHAM6 atmospheric model. |
---|
934 | Compared to Lupkes2012 scheme, it considers specific skin and form drags |
---|
935 | to compute neutral transfer coefficients for both heat and momentum fluxes. |
---|
936 | Atmospheric stability effect on transfer coefficient is also taken into account. |
---|
937 | \end{itemize} |
---|
938 | |
---|
939 | %% ================================================================================================= |
---|
940 | \section[Coupled formulation (\textit{sbccpl.F90})]{Coupled formulation (\protect\mdl{sbccpl})} |
---|
941 | \label{sec:SBC_cpl} |
---|
942 | |
---|
943 | \begin{listing} |
---|
944 | \nlst{namsbc_cpl} |
---|
945 | \caption{\forcode{&namsbc_cpl}} |
---|
946 | \label{lst:namsbc_cpl} |
---|
947 | \end{listing} |
---|
948 | |
---|
949 | In the coupled formulation of the surface boundary condition, |
---|
950 | the fluxes are provided by the OASIS coupler at a frequency which is defined in the OASIS coupler namelist, |
---|
951 | while sea and ice surface temperature, ocean and ice albedo, and ocean currents are sent to |
---|
952 | the atmospheric component. |
---|
953 | |
---|
954 | A generalised coupled interface has been developed. |
---|
955 | It is currently interfaced with OASIS-3-MCT versions 1 to 4 (\key{oasis3}). |
---|
956 | An additional specific CPP key (\key{oa3mct\_v1v2}) is needed for OASIS-3-MCT versions 1 and 2. |
---|
957 | It has been successfully used to interface \NEMO\ to most of the European atmospheric GCM |
---|
958 | (ARPEGE, ECHAM, ECMWF, HadAM, HadGAM, LMDz), as well as to \href{http://wrf-model.org/}{WRF} |
---|
959 | (Weather Research and Forecasting Model). |
---|
960 | |
---|
961 | When PISCES biogeochemical model (\key{top}) is also used in the coupled system, |
---|
962 | the whole carbon cycle is computed. |
---|
963 | In this case, CO$_2$ fluxes will be exchanged between the atmosphere and the ice-ocean system |
---|
964 | (and need to be activated in \nam{sbc_cpl}{sbc\_cpl} ). |
---|
965 | |
---|
966 | The namelist above allows control of various aspects of the coupling fields (particularly for vectors) and |
---|
967 | now allows for any coupling fields to have multiple sea ice categories (as required by LIM3 and CICE). |
---|
968 | When indicating a multi-category coupling field in \nam{sbc_cpl}{sbc\_cpl}, the number of categories will be determined by |
---|
969 | the number used in the sea ice model. |
---|
970 | In some limited cases, it may be possible to specify single category coupling fields even when |
---|
971 | the sea ice model is running with multiple categories - |
---|
972 | in this case, the user should examine the code to be sure the assumptions made are satisfactory. |
---|
973 | In cases where this is definitely not possible, the model should abort with an error message. |
---|
974 | |
---|
975 | %% ================================================================================================= |
---|
976 | \section[Atmospheric pressure (\textit{sbcapr.F90})]{Atmospheric pressure (\protect\mdl{sbcapr})} |
---|
977 | \label{sec:SBC_apr} |
---|
978 | |
---|
979 | \begin{listing} |
---|
980 | \nlst{namsbc_apr} |
---|
981 | \caption{\forcode{&namsbc_apr}} |
---|
982 | \label{lst:namsbc_apr} |
---|
983 | \end{listing} |
---|
984 | |
---|
985 | The optional atmospheric pressure can be used to force ocean and ice dynamics |
---|
986 | (\np[=.true.]{ln_apr_dyn}{ln\_apr\_dyn}, \nam{sbc}{sbc} namelist). |
---|
987 | The input atmospheric forcing defined via \np{sn_apr}{sn\_apr} structure (\nam{sbc_apr}{sbc\_apr} namelist) |
---|
988 | can be interpolated in time to the model time step, and even in space when the interpolation on-the-fly is used. |
---|
989 | When used to force the dynamics, the atmospheric pressure is further transformed into |
---|
990 | an equivalent inverse barometer sea surface height, $\eta_{ib}$, using: |
---|
991 | \[ |
---|
992 | % \label{eq:SBC_ssh_ib} |
---|
993 | \eta_{ib} = - \frac{1}{g\,\rho_o} \left( P_{atm} - P_o \right) |
---|
994 | \] |
---|
995 | where $P_{atm}$ is the atmospheric pressure and $P_o$ a reference atmospheric pressure. |
---|
996 | A value of $101,000~N/m^2$ is used unless \np{ln_ref_apr}{ln\_ref\_apr} is set to true. |
---|
997 | In this case, $P_o$ is set to the value of $P_{atm}$ averaged over the ocean domain, |
---|
998 | \ie\ the mean value of $\eta_{ib}$ is kept to zero at all time steps. |
---|
999 | |
---|
1000 | The gradient of $\eta_{ib}$ is added to the RHS of the ocean momentum equation (see \mdl{dynspg} for the ocean). |
---|
1001 | For sea-ice, the sea surface height, $\eta_m$, which is provided to the sea ice model is set to $\eta - \eta_{ib}$ |
---|
1002 | (see \mdl{sbcssr} module). |
---|
1003 | $\eta_{ib}$ can be written in the output. |
---|
1004 | This can simplify altimetry data and model comparison as |
---|
1005 | inverse barometer sea surface height is usually removed from these date prior to their distribution. |
---|
1006 | |
---|
1007 | When using time-splitting and BDY package for open boundaries conditions, |
---|
1008 | the equivalent inverse barometer sea surface height $\eta_{ib}$ can be added to BDY ssh data: |
---|
1009 | \np{ln_apr_obc}{ln\_apr\_obc} might be set to true. |
---|
1010 | |
---|
1011 | %% ================================================================================================= |
---|
1012 | \section[Surface tides (\textit{sbctide.F90})]{Surface tides (\protect\mdl{sbctide})} |
---|
1013 | \label{sec:SBC_tide} |
---|
1014 | |
---|
1015 | \begin{listing} |
---|
1016 | \nlst{nam_tide} |
---|
1017 | \caption{\forcode{&nam_tide}} |
---|
1018 | \label{lst:nam_tide} |
---|
1019 | \end{listing} |
---|
1020 | |
---|
1021 | The tidal forcing, generated by the gravity forces of the Earth-Moon and Earth-Sun sytems, |
---|
1022 | is activated if \np{ln_tide}{ln\_tide} and \np{ln_tide_pot}{ln\_tide\_pot} are both set to \forcode{.true.} in \nam{_tide}{\_tide}. |
---|
1023 | This translates as an additional barotropic force in the momentum \autoref{eq:MB_PE_dyn} such that: |
---|
1024 | \[ |
---|
1025 | % \label{eq:SBC_PE_dyn_tides} |
---|
1026 | \frac{\partial {\mathrm {\mathbf U}}_h }{\partial t}= ... |
---|
1027 | +g\nabla (\Pi_{eq} + \Pi_{sal}) |
---|
1028 | \] |
---|
1029 | where $\Pi_{eq}$ stands for the equilibrium tidal forcing and |
---|
1030 | $\Pi_{sal}$ is a self-attraction and loading term (SAL). |
---|
1031 | |
---|
1032 | The equilibrium tidal forcing is expressed as a sum over a subset of |
---|
1033 | constituents chosen from the set of available tidal constituents |
---|
1034 | defined in file \hf{SBC/tide} (this comprises the tidal |
---|
1035 | constituents \textit{M2, N2, 2N2, S2, K2, K1, O1, Q1, P1, M4, Mf, Mm, |
---|
1036 | Msqm, Mtm, S1, MU2, NU2, L2}, and \textit{T2}). Individual |
---|
1037 | constituents are selected by including their names in the array |
---|
1038 | \np{clname}{clname} in \nam{_tide}{\_tide} (e.g., \np{clname}{clname}\forcode{(1)='M2', } |
---|
1039 | \np{clname}{clname}\forcode{(2)='S2'} to select solely the tidal consituents \textit{M2} |
---|
1040 | and \textit{S2}). Optionally, when \np{ln_tide_ramp}{ln\_tide\_ramp} is set to |
---|
1041 | \forcode{.true.}, the equilibrium tidal forcing can be ramped up |
---|
1042 | linearly from zero during the initial \np{rdttideramp}{rdttideramp} days of the |
---|
1043 | model run. |
---|
1044 | |
---|
1045 | The SAL term should in principle be computed online as it depends on |
---|
1046 | the model tidal prediction itself (see \citet{arbic.garner.ea_DSR04} for a |
---|
1047 | discussion about the practical implementation of this term). |
---|
1048 | Nevertheless, the complex calculations involved would make this |
---|
1049 | computationally too expensive. Here, two options are available: |
---|
1050 | $\Pi_{sal}$ generated by an external model can be read in |
---|
1051 | (\np[=.true.]{ln_read_load}{ln\_read\_load}), or a ``scalar approximation'' can be |
---|
1052 | used (\np[=.true.]{ln_scal_load}{ln\_scal\_load}). In the latter case |
---|
1053 | \[ |
---|
1054 | \Pi_{sal} = \beta \eta, |
---|
1055 | \] |
---|
1056 | where $\beta$ (\np{rn_scal_load}{rn\_scal\_load} with a default value of 0.094) is a |
---|
1057 | spatially constant scalar, often chosen to minimize tidal prediction |
---|
1058 | errors. Setting both \np{ln_read_load}{ln\_read\_load} and \np{ln_scal_load}{ln\_scal\_load} to |
---|
1059 | \forcode{.false.} removes the SAL contribution. |
---|
1060 | |
---|
1061 | %% ================================================================================================= |
---|
1062 | \section[River runoffs (\textit{sbcrnf.F90})]{River runoffs (\protect\mdl{sbcrnf})} |
---|
1063 | \label{sec:SBC_rnf} |
---|
1064 | |
---|
1065 | \begin{listing} |
---|
1066 | \nlst{namsbc_rnf} |
---|
1067 | \caption{\forcode{&namsbc_rnf}} |
---|
1068 | \label{lst:namsbc_rnf} |
---|
1069 | \end{listing} |
---|
1070 | |
---|
1071 | %River runoff generally enters the ocean at a nonzero depth rather than through the surface. |
---|
1072 | %Many models, however, have traditionally inserted river runoff to the top model cell. |
---|
1073 | %This was the case in \NEMO\ prior to the version 3.3. The switch toward a input of runoff |
---|
1074 | %throughout a nonzero depth has been motivated by the numerical and physical problems |
---|
1075 | %that arise when the top grid cells are of the order of one meter. This situation is common in |
---|
1076 | %coastal modelling and becomes more and more often open ocean and climate modelling |
---|
1077 | %\footnote{At least a top cells thickness of 1~meter and a 3 hours forcing frequency are |
---|
1078 | %required to properly represent the diurnal cycle \citep{bernie.woolnough.ea_JC05}. see also \autoref{fig:SBC_dcy}.}. |
---|
1079 | |
---|
1080 | %To do this we need to treat evaporation/precipitation fluxes and river runoff differently in the |
---|
1081 | %\mdl{tra\_sbc} module. We decided to separate them throughout the code, so that the variable |
---|
1082 | %\textit{emp} represented solely evaporation minus precipitation fluxes, and a new 2d variable |
---|
1083 | %rnf was added which represents the volume flux of river runoff (in kg/m2s to remain consistent with |
---|
1084 | %emp). This meant many uses of emp and emps needed to be changed, a list of all modules which use |
---|
1085 | %emp or emps and the changes made are below: |
---|
1086 | |
---|
1087 | %Rachel: |
---|
1088 | River runoff generally enters the ocean at a nonzero depth rather than through the surface. |
---|
1089 | Many models, however, have traditionally inserted river runoff to the top model cell. |
---|
1090 | This was the case in \NEMO\ prior to the version 3.3, |
---|
1091 | and was combined with an option to increase vertical mixing near the river mouth. |
---|
1092 | |
---|
1093 | However, with this method numerical and physical problems arise when the top grid cells are of the order of one meter. |
---|
1094 | This situation is common in coastal modelling and is becoming more common in open ocean and climate modelling |
---|
1095 | \footnote{ |
---|
1096 | At least a top cells thickness of 1~meter and a 3 hours forcing frequency are required to |
---|
1097 | properly represent the diurnal cycle \citep{bernie.woolnough.ea_JC05}. |
---|
1098 | see also \autoref{fig:SBC_dcy}.}. |
---|
1099 | |
---|
1100 | As such from V~3.3 onwards it is possible to add river runoff through a non-zero depth, |
---|
1101 | and for the temperature and salinity of the river to effect the surrounding ocean. |
---|
1102 | The user is able to specify, in a NetCDF input file, the temperature and salinity of the river, |
---|
1103 | along with the depth (in metres) which the river should be added to. |
---|
1104 | |
---|
1105 | Namelist variables in \nam{sbc_rnf}{sbc\_rnf}, \np{ln_rnf_depth}{ln\_rnf\_depth}, \np{ln_rnf_sal}{ln\_rnf\_sal} and |
---|
1106 | \np{ln_rnf_temp}{ln\_rnf\_temp} control whether the river attributes (depth, salinity and temperature) are read in and used. |
---|
1107 | If these are set as false the river is added to the surface box only, assumed to be fresh (0~psu), |
---|
1108 | and/or taken as surface temperature respectively. |
---|
1109 | |
---|
1110 | The runoff value and attributes are read in in sbcrnf. |
---|
1111 | For temperature -999 is taken as missing data and the river temperature is taken to |
---|
1112 | be the surface temperatue at the river point. |
---|
1113 | For the depth parameter a value of -1 means the river is added to the surface box only, |
---|
1114 | and a value of -999 means the river is added through the entire water column. |
---|
1115 | After being read in the temperature and salinity variables are multiplied by the amount of runoff |
---|
1116 | (converted into m/s) to give the heat and salt content of the river runoff. |
---|
1117 | After the user specified depth is read ini, |
---|
1118 | the number of grid boxes this corresponds to is calculated and stored in the variable \np{nz_rnf}{nz\_rnf}. |
---|
1119 | The variable \textit{h\_dep} is then calculated to be the depth (in metres) of |
---|
1120 | the bottom of the lowest box the river water is being added to |
---|
1121 | (\ie\ the total depth that river water is being added to in the model). |
---|
1122 | |
---|
1123 | The mass/volume addition due to the river runoff is, at each relevant depth level, added to |
---|
1124 | the horizontal divergence (\textit{hdivn}) in the subroutine \rou{sbc\_rnf\_div} (called from \mdl{divhor}). |
---|
1125 | This increases the diffusion term in the vicinity of the river, thereby simulating a momentum flux. |
---|
1126 | The sea surface height is calculated using the sum of the horizontal divergence terms, |
---|
1127 | and so the river runoff indirectly forces an increase in sea surface height. |
---|
1128 | |
---|
1129 | The \textit{hdivn} terms are used in the tracer advection modules to force vertical velocities. |
---|
1130 | This causes a mass of water, equal to the amount of runoff, to be moved into the box above. |
---|
1131 | The heat and salt content of the river runoff is not included in this step, |
---|
1132 | and so the tracer concentrations are diluted as water of ocean temperature and salinity is moved upward out of |
---|
1133 | the box and replaced by the same volume of river water with no corresponding heat and salt addition. |
---|
1134 | |
---|
1135 | For the linear free surface case, at the surface box the tracer advection causes a flux of water |
---|
1136 | (of equal volume to the runoff) through the sea surface out of the domain, |
---|
1137 | which causes a salt and heat flux out of the model. |
---|
1138 | As such the volume of water does not change, but the water is diluted. |
---|
1139 | |
---|
1140 | For the non-linear free surface case, no flux is allowed through the surface. |
---|
1141 | Instead in the surface box (as well as water moving up from the boxes below) a volume of runoff water is added with |
---|
1142 | no corresponding heat and salt addition and so as happens in the lower boxes there is a dilution effect. |
---|
1143 | (The runoff addition to the top box along with the water being moved up through |
---|
1144 | boxes below means the surface box has a large increase in volume, whilst all other boxes remain the same size) |
---|
1145 | |
---|
1146 | In trasbc the addition of heat and salt due to the river runoff is added. |
---|
1147 | This is done in the same way for both vvl and non-vvl. |
---|
1148 | The temperature and salinity are increased through the specified depth according to |
---|
1149 | the heat and salt content of the river. |
---|
1150 | |
---|
1151 | In the non-linear free surface case (vvl), |
---|
1152 | near the end of the time step the change in sea surface height is redistrubuted through the grid boxes, |
---|
1153 | so that the original ratios of grid box heights are restored. |
---|
1154 | In doing this water is moved into boxes below, throughout the water column, |
---|
1155 | so the large volume addition to the surface box is spread between all the grid boxes. |
---|
1156 | |
---|
1157 | It is also possible for runnoff to be specified as a negative value for modelling flow through straits, |
---|
1158 | \ie\ modelling the Baltic flow in and out of the North Sea. |
---|
1159 | When the flow is out of the domain there is no change in temperature and salinity, |
---|
1160 | regardless of the namelist options used, |
---|
1161 | as the ocean water leaving the domain removes heat and salt (at the same concentration) with it. |
---|
1162 | |
---|
1163 | %\colorbox{yellow}{Nevertheless, Pb of vertical resolution and 3D input : increase vertical mixing near river mouths to mimic a 3D river |
---|
1164 | |
---|
1165 | %All river runoff and emp fluxes are assumed to be fresh water (zero salinity) and at the same temperature as the sea surface.} |
---|
1166 | |
---|
1167 | %\colorbox{yellow}{river mouths{\ldots}} |
---|
1168 | |
---|
1169 | %IF( ln_rnf ) THEN ! increase diffusivity at rivers mouths |
---|
1170 | % DO jk = 2, nkrnf ; avt(:,:,jk) = avt(:,:,jk) + rn_avt_rnf * rnfmsk(:,:) ; END DO |
---|
1171 | %ENDIF |
---|
1172 | |
---|
1173 | \cmtgm{ word doc of runoffs: |
---|
1174 | In the current \NEMO\ setup river runoff is added to emp fluxes, |
---|
1175 | these are then applied at just the sea surface as a volume change (in the variable volume case |
---|
1176 | this is a literal volume change, and in the linear free surface case the free surface is moved) |
---|
1177 | and a salt flux due to the concentration/dilution effect. |
---|
1178 | There is also an option to increase vertical mixing near river mouths; |
---|
1179 | this gives the effect of having a 3d river. |
---|
1180 | All river runoff and emp fluxes are assumed to be fresh water (zero salinity) and |
---|
1181 | at the same temperature as the sea surface. |
---|
1182 | Our aim was to code the option to specify the temperature and salinity of river runoff, |
---|
1183 | (as well as the amount), along with the depth that the river water will affect. |
---|
1184 | This would make it possible to model low salinity outflow, such as the Baltic, |
---|
1185 | and would allow the ocean temperature to be affected by river runoff. |
---|
1186 | |
---|
1187 | The depth option makes it possible to have the river water affecting just the surface layer, |
---|
1188 | throughout depth, or some specified point in between. |
---|
1189 | |
---|
1190 | To do this we need to treat evaporation/precipitation fluxes and river runoff differently in |
---|
1191 | the \mdl{tra_sbc} module. |
---|
1192 | We decided to separate them throughout the code, |
---|
1193 | so that the variable emp represented solely evaporation minus precipitation fluxes, |
---|
1194 | and a new 2d variable rnf was added which represents the volume flux of river runoff |
---|
1195 | (in $kg/m^2s$ to remain consistent with $emp$). |
---|
1196 | This meant many uses of emp and emps needed to be changed, |
---|
1197 | a list of all modules which use $emp$ or $emps$ and the changes made are below:} |
---|
1198 | |
---|
1199 | %% ================================================================================================= |
---|
1200 | \section[Ice Shelf (ISF)]{Interaction with ice shelves (ISF)} |
---|
1201 | \label{sec:isf} |
---|
1202 | |
---|
1203 | \begin{listing} |
---|
1204 | \nlst{namisf} |
---|
1205 | \caption{\forcode{&namisf}} |
---|
1206 | \label{lst:namisf} |
---|
1207 | \end{listing} |
---|
1208 | |
---|
1209 | The namelist variable in \ngn{namisf}, \np{ln_isf}{ln\_isf}, controls the ice shelf interactions: |
---|
1210 | \begin{description} |
---|
1211 | \item $\bullet$ representation of the ice shelf/ocean melting/freezing for opened cavity (cav, \np{ln_isfcav_mlt}{ln\_isfcav\_mlt}). |
---|
1212 | \item $\bullet$ parametrisation of the ice shelf/ocean melting/freezing for closed cavities (par, \np{ln_isfpar_mlt}{ln\_isfpar\_mlt}). |
---|
1213 | \item $\bullet$ coupling with an ice sheet model (\np{ln_isfcpl}{ln\_isfcpl}). |
---|
1214 | \end{description} |
---|
1215 | |
---|
1216 | \subsection{Ocean/Ice shelf fluxes in opened cavities} |
---|
1217 | |
---|
1218 | \np{ln_isfcav_mlt}{ln\_isfcav\_mlt}\forcode{ = .true.} activates the ocean/ice shelf thermodynamics interactions at the ice shelf/ocean interface. |
---|
1219 | If \np{ln_isfcav_mlt}\forcode{ = .false.}, thermodynamics interactions are desctivated but the ocean dynamics inside the cavity is still active. |
---|
1220 | The logical flag \np{ln_isfcav}{ln\_isfcav} control wether or not the ice shelf cavities are closed. \np{ln_isfcav}{ln\_isfcav} is not defined in the namelist but in the domcfg.nc input file.\\ |
---|
1221 | |
---|
1222 | 3 options are available to represent to ice-shelf/ocean fluxes at the interface: |
---|
1223 | \begin{description} |
---|
1224 | \item[\np{cn_isfcav_mlt}\forcode{ = 'spe'}]: |
---|
1225 | The fresh water flux is specified by a forcing fields \np{sn_isfcav_fwf}{sn\_isfcav\_fwf}. Convention of the input file is: positive toward the ocean (i.e. positive for melting and negative for freezing). |
---|
1226 | The latent heat fluxes is derived from the fresh water flux. |
---|
1227 | The heat content flux is derived from the fwf flux assuming a temperature set to the freezing point in the top boundary layer (\np{rn_htbl}{rn\_htbl}) |
---|
1228 | |
---|
1229 | \item[\np{cn_isfcav_mlt}\forcode{ = 'oasis'}]: |
---|
1230 | The \forcode{'oasis'} is a prototype of what could be a method to spread precipitation on Antarctic ice sheet as ice shelf melt inside the cavity when a coupled model Atmosphere/Ocean is used. |
---|
1231 | It has not been tested and therefore the model will stop if you try to use it. |
---|
1232 | Actions will be undertake in 2020 to build a comprehensive interface to do so for Greenland, Antarctic and ice shelf (cav), ice shelf (par), icebergs, subglacial runoff and runoff. |
---|
1233 | |
---|
1234 | \item[\np{cn_isfcav_mlt}\forcode{ = '2eq'}]: |
---|
1235 | The heat flux and the fresh water flux (negative for melting) resulting from ice shelf melting/freezing are parameterized following \citet{Grosfeld1997}. |
---|
1236 | This formulation is based on a balance between the vertical diffusive heat flux across the ocean top boundary layer (\autoref{eq:ISOMIP1}) |
---|
1237 | and the latent heat due to melting/freezing (\autoref{eq:ISOMIP2}): |
---|
1238 | |
---|
1239 | \begin{equation} |
---|
1240 | \label{eq:ISOMIP1} |
---|
1241 | \mathcal{Q}_h = \rho c_p \gamma (T_w - T_f) |
---|
1242 | \end{equation} |
---|
1243 | \begin{equation} |
---|
1244 | \label{eq:ISOMIP2} |
---|
1245 | q = \frac{-\mathcal{Q}_h}{L_f} |
---|
1246 | \end{equation} |
---|
1247 | |
---|
1248 | where $\mathcal{Q}_h$($W.m^{-2}$) is the heat flux,q($kg.s^{-1}m^{-2}$) the fresh-water flux, |
---|
1249 | $L_f$ the specific latent heat, $T_w$ the temperature averaged over a boundary layer below the ice shelf (explained below), |
---|
1250 | $T_f$ the freezing point using the pressure at the ice shelf base and the salinity of the water in the boundary layer, |
---|
1251 | and $\gamma$ the thermal exchange coefficient. |
---|
1252 | |
---|
1253 | \item[\np{cn_isfcav_mlt}\forcode{ = '3eq'}]: |
---|
1254 | For realistic studies, the heat and freshwater fluxes are parameterized following \citep{Jenkins2001}. This formulation is based on three equations: |
---|
1255 | a balance between the vertical diffusive heat flux across the boundary layer |
---|
1256 | , the latent heat due to melting/freezing of ice and the vertical diffusive heat flux into the ice shelf (\autoref{eq:3eq1}); |
---|
1257 | a balance between the vertical diffusive salt flux across the boundary layer and the salt source or sink represented by the melting/freezing (\autoref{eq:3eq2}); |
---|
1258 | and a linear equation for the freezing temperature of sea water (\autoref{eq:3eq3}, detailed of the linearisation coefficient in \citet{AsayDavis2016}): |
---|
1259 | |
---|
1260 | \begin{equation} |
---|
1261 | \label{eq:3eq1} |
---|
1262 | c_p \rho \gamma_T (T_w-T_b) = -L_f q - \rho_i c_{p,i} \kappa \frac{T_s - T_b}{h_{isf}} |
---|
1263 | \end{equation} |
---|
1264 | \begin{equation} |
---|
1265 | \label{eq:3eq2} |
---|
1266 | \rho \gamma_S (S_w - S_b) = (S_i - S_b)q |
---|
1267 | \end{equation} |
---|
1268 | \begin{equation} |
---|
1269 | \label{eq:3eq3} |
---|
1270 | T_b = \lambda_1 S_b + \lambda_2 +\lamda_3 zisf |
---|
1271 | \end{equation} |
---|
1272 | |
---|
1273 | where $T_b$ is the temperature at the interface, $S_b$ the salinity at the interface, $\gamma_T$ and $\gamma_S$ the exchange coefficients for temperature and salt, respectively, |
---|
1274 | $S_i$ the salinity of the ice (assumedto be 0), $h_{isf}$ the ice shelf thickness, $\rho_i$ the density of the iceshelf, |
---|
1275 | $c_{p,i}$ the specific heat capacity of the ice, $\kappa$ the thermal diffusivity of the ice |
---|
1276 | and $T_s$ the atmospheric surface temperature (at the ice/air interface, assumed to be -20C). |
---|
1277 | The Liquidus slope ($\lambda_1$), the liquidus intercept ($\lambda_2$) and the Liquidus pressure coefficient ($\lambda_3$) |
---|
1278 | for TEOS80 and TEOS10 are described in \citep{AsayDavis2016} and in \citep{Jourdain2017}. |
---|
1279 | The linear system formed by \autoref{eq:3eq1}, \autoref{eq:3eq2} and the linearised equation for the freezing temperature of sea water (\autoref{eq:3eq3}) can be solved for $S_b$ or $T_b$. |
---|
1280 | Afterward, the freshwater flux ($q$) and the heat flux ($\mathcal{Q}_h$) can be computed. |
---|
1281 | |
---|
1282 | \end{description} |
---|
1283 | |
---|
1284 | \begin{table}[h] |
---|
1285 | \centering |
---|
1286 | \caption{Description of the parameters hard coded into the ISF module} |
---|
1287 | \label{tab:isf} |
---|
1288 | \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|} |
---|
1289 | \hline |
---|
1290 | Symbol & Description & Value & Unit \\ |
---|
1291 | \hline |
---|
1292 | $C_p$ & Ocean specific heat & 3992 & $J.kg^{-1}.K^{-1}$ \\ |
---|
1293 | $L_f$ & Ice latent heat of fusion & $3.34 \times 10^5$ & $J.kg^{-1}$ \\ |
---|
1294 | $C_{p,i}$ & Ice specific heat & 2000 & $J.kg^{-1}.K^{-1}$ \\ |
---|
1295 | $\kappa$ & Heat diffusivity & $1.54 \times 10^{-6}$& $m^2.s^{-1}$ \\ |
---|
1296 | $\rho_i$ & Ice density & 920 & $kg.m^3$ \\ |
---|
1297 | \hline |
---|
1298 | \end{tabular} |
---|
1299 | \end{table} |
---|
1300 | |
---|
1301 | Temperature and salinity used to compute the fluxes in \autoref{eq:ISOMIP1}, \autoref{eq:3eq1} and \autoref{eq:3eq2} are the average temperature in the top boundary layer \citep{losch_JGR08}. |
---|
1302 | Its thickness is defined by \np{rn_htbl}{rn\_htbl}. |
---|
1303 | The fluxes and friction velocity are computed using the mean temperature, salinity and velocity in the first \np{rn_htbl}{rn\_htbl} m. |
---|
1304 | Then, the fluxes are spread over the same thickness (ie over one or several cells). |
---|
1305 | If \np{rn_htbl}{rn\_htbl} larger than top $e_{3}t$, there is no more direct feedback between the freezing point at the interface and the top cell temperature. |
---|
1306 | This can lead to super-cool temperature in the top cell under melting condition. |
---|
1307 | If \np{rn_htbl}{rn\_htbl} smaller than top $e_{3}t$, the top boundary layer thickness is set to the top cell thickness.\\ |
---|
1308 | |
---|
1309 | Each melt formula (\np{cn_isfcav_mlt}\forcode{ = '3eq'} or \np{cn_isfcav_mlt}\forcode{ = '2eq'}) depends on an exchange coeficient ($\Gamma^{T,S}$) between the ocean and the ice. |
---|
1310 | Below, the exchange coeficient $\Gamma^{T}$ and $\Gamma^{S}$ are respectively defined by \np{rn_gammat0}{rn\_gammat0} and \np{rn_gammas0}{rn\_gammas0}. |
---|
1311 | There are 3 different ways to compute the exchange velocity: |
---|
1312 | |
---|
1313 | \begin{description} |
---|
1314 | \item[\np{cn_gammablk}\forcode{='spe'}]: |
---|
1315 | The salt and heat exchange coefficients are constant and defined by: |
---|
1316 | \[ |
---|
1317 | \gamma^{T} = \Gamma^{T} |
---|
1318 | \] |
---|
1319 | \[ |
---|
1320 | \gamma^{S} = \Gamma^{S} |
---|
1321 | \] |
---|
1322 | This is the recommended formulation for ISOMIP. |
---|
1323 | |
---|
1324 | \item[\np{cn_gammablk}\forcode{='vel'}]: |
---|
1325 | The salt and heat exchange coefficients are velocity dependent and defined as |
---|
1326 | \[ |
---|
1327 | \gamma^{T} = \Gamma^{T} \times u_{*} |
---|
1328 | \] |
---|
1329 | \[ |
---|
1330 | \gamma^{S} = \Gamma^{S} \times u_{*} |
---|
1331 | \] |
---|
1332 | where $u_{*}$ is the friction velocity in the top boundary layer (ie first \np{rn_htbl}{rn\_htbl} meters). |
---|
1333 | See \citet{jenkins.nicholls.ea_JPO10} for all the details on this formulation. It is the recommended formulation for realistic application and ISOMIP+/MISOMIP configuration. |
---|
1334 | |
---|
1335 | \item[\np{cn_gammablk}\forcode{'vel\_stab'}]: |
---|
1336 | The salt and heat exchange coefficients are velocity and stability dependent and defined as: |
---|
1337 | \[ |
---|
1338 | \gamma^{T,S} = \frac{u_{*}}{\Gamma_{Turb} + \Gamma^{T,S}_{Mole}} |
---|
1339 | \] |
---|
1340 | where $u_{*}$ is the friction velocity in the top boundary layer (ie first \np{rn_tbl}{rn\_htbl} meters), |
---|
1341 | $\Gamma_{Turb}$ the contribution of the ocean stability and |
---|
1342 | $\Gamma^{T,S}_{Mole}$ the contribution of the molecular diffusion. |
---|
1343 | See \citet{holland.jenkins_JPO99} for all the details on this formulation. |
---|
1344 | This formulation has not been extensively tested in NEMO (not recommended). |
---|
1345 | \end{description} |
---|
1346 | |
---|
1347 | \subsection{Ocean/Ice shelf fluxes in parametrised cavities} |
---|
1348 | |
---|
1349 | \begin{description} |
---|
1350 | |
---|
1351 | \item[\np{cn_isfpar_mlt}\forcode{ = 'bg03'}]: |
---|
1352 | The ice shelf cavities are not represented. |
---|
1353 | The fwf and heat flux are computed using the \citet{beckmann.goosse_OM03} parameterisation of isf melting. |
---|
1354 | The fluxes are distributed along the ice shelf edge between the depth of the average grounding line (GL) |
---|
1355 | (\np{sn_isfpar_zmax}{sn\_isfpar\_zmax}) and the base of the ice shelf along the calving front |
---|
1356 | (\np{sn_isfpar_zmin}{sn\_isfpar\_zmin}) as in (\np{cn_isfpar_mlt}\forcode{ = 'spe'}). |
---|
1357 | The effective melting length (\np{sn_isfpar_Leff}{sn\_isfpar\_Leff}) is read from a file. |
---|
1358 | This parametrisation has not been tested since a while and based on \citet{Favier2019}, |
---|
1359 | this parametrisation should probably not be used. |
---|
1360 | |
---|
1361 | \item[\np{cn_isfpar_mlt}\forcode{ = 'spe'}]: |
---|
1362 | The ice shelf cavity is not represented. |
---|
1363 | The fwf (\np{sn_isfpar_fwf}{sn\_isfpar\_fwf}) is prescribed and distributed along the ice shelf edge between |
---|
1364 | the depth of the average grounding line (GL) (\np{sn_isfpar_zmax}{sn\_isfpar\_zmax}) and |
---|
1365 | the base of the ice shelf along the calving front (\np{sn_isfpar_zmin}{sn\_isfpar\_min}). Convention of the input file is positive toward the ocean (i.e. positive for melting and negative for freezing). |
---|
1366 | The heat flux ($Q_h$) is computed as $Q_h = fwf \times L_f$. |
---|
1367 | |
---|
1368 | \item[\np{cn_isfpar_mlt}\forcode{ = 'oasis'}]: |
---|
1369 | The \forcode{'oasis'} is a prototype of what could be a method to spread precipitation on Antarctic ice sheet as ice shelf melt inside the cavity when a coupled model Atmosphere/Ocean is used. |
---|
1370 | It has not been tested and therefore the model will stop if you try to use it. |
---|
1371 | Action will be undertake in 2020 to build a comprehensive interface to do so for Greenland, Antarctic and ice shelf (cav), ice shelf (par), icebergs, subglacial runoff and runoff. |
---|
1372 | |
---|
1373 | \end{description} |
---|
1374 | |
---|
1375 | \np{cn_isfcav_mlt}\forcode{ = '2eq'}, \np{cn_isfcav_mlt}\forcode{ = '3eq'} and \np{cn_isfpar_mlt}\forcode{ = 'bg03'} compute a melt rate based on |
---|
1376 | the water mass properties, ocean velocities and depth. |
---|
1377 | The resulting fluxes are thus highly dependent of the model resolution (horizontal and vertical) and |
---|
1378 | realism of the water masses onto the shelf.\\ |
---|
1379 | |
---|
1380 | \np{cn_isfcav_mlt}\forcode{ = 'spe'} and \np{cn_isfpar_mlt}\forcode{ = 'spe'} read the melt rate from a file. |
---|
1381 | You have total control of the fwf forcing. |
---|
1382 | This can be useful if the water masses on the shelf are not realistic or |
---|
1383 | the resolution (horizontal/vertical) are too coarse to have realistic melting or |
---|
1384 | for studies where you need to control your heat and fw input. |
---|
1385 | However, if your forcing is not consistent with the dynamics below you can reach unrealistic low water temperature.\\ |
---|
1386 | |
---|
1387 | The ice shelf fwf is implemented as a volume flux as for the runoff. |
---|
1388 | The fwf addition due to the ice shelf melting is, at each relevant depth level, added to |
---|
1389 | the horizontal divergence (\textit{hdivn}) in the subroutine \rou{isf\_hdiv}, called from \mdl{divhor}. |
---|
1390 | See the runoff section \autoref{sec:SBC_rnf} for all the details about the divergence correction.\\ |
---|
1391 | |
---|
1392 | Description and result of sensitivity tests to \np{ln_isfcav_mlt}{ln\_isfcav\_mlt} and \np{ln_isfpar_mlt}{ln\_isfpar\_mlt} are presented in \citet{mathiot.jenkins.ea_GMD17}. |
---|
1393 | The different options are illustrated in \autoref{fig:ISF}. |
---|
1394 | |
---|
1395 | \begin{figure}[!t] |
---|
1396 | \centering |
---|
1397 | \includegraphics[width=0.66\textwidth]{SBC_isf_v4.2} |
---|
1398 | \caption[Ice shelf location and fresh water flux definition]{ |
---|
1399 | Illustration of the location where the fwf is injected and |
---|
1400 | whether or not the fwf is interactif or not.} |
---|
1401 | \label{fig:ISF} |
---|
1402 | \end{figure} |
---|
1403 | |
---|
1404 | \subsection{Available outputs} |
---|
1405 | The following outputs are availables via XIOS: |
---|
1406 | \begin{description} |
---|
1407 | \item[for parametrised cavities]: |
---|
1408 | \begin{xmllines} |
---|
1409 | <field id="isftfrz_par" long_name="freezing point temperature in the parametrization boundary layer" unit="degC" /> |
---|
1410 | <field id="fwfisf_par" long_name="Ice shelf melt rate" unit="kg/m2/s" /> |
---|
1411 | <field id="qoceisf_par" long_name="Ice shelf ocean heat flux" unit="W/m2" /> |
---|
1412 | <field id="qlatisf_par" long_name="Ice shelf latent heat flux" unit="W/m2" /> |
---|
1413 | <field id="qhcisf_par" long_name="Ice shelf heat content flux of injected water" unit="W/m2" /> |
---|
1414 | <field id="fwfisf3d_par" long_name="Ice shelf melt rate" unit="kg/m2/s" grid_ref="grid_T_3D" /> |
---|
1415 | <field id="qoceisf3d_par" long_name="Ice shelf ocean heat flux" unit="W/m2" grid_ref="grid_T_3D" /> |
---|
1416 | <field id="qlatisf3d_par" long_name="Ice shelf latent heat flux" unit="W/m2" grid_ref="grid_T_3D" /> |
---|
1417 | <field id="qhcisf3d_par" long_name="Ice shelf heat content flux of injected water" unit="W/m2" grid_ref="grid_T_3D" /> |
---|
1418 | <field id="ttbl_par" long_name="temperature in the parametrisation boundary layer" unit="degC" /> |
---|
1419 | <field id="isfthermald_par" long_name="thermal driving of ice shelf melting" unit="degC" /> |
---|
1420 | \end{xmllines} |
---|
1421 | \item[for open cavities]: |
---|
1422 | \begin{xmllines} |
---|
1423 | <field id="isftfrz_cav" long_name="freezing point temperature at ocean/isf interface" unit="degC" /> |
---|
1424 | <field id="fwfisf_cav" long_name="Ice shelf melt rate" unit="kg/m2/s" /> |
---|
1425 | <field id="qoceisf_cav" long_name="Ice shelf ocean heat flux" unit="W/m2" /> |
---|
1426 | <field id="qlatisf_cav" long_name="Ice shelf latent heat flux" unit="W/m2" /> |
---|
1427 | <field id="qhcisf_cav" long_name="Ice shelf heat content flux of injected water" unit="W/m2" /> |
---|
1428 | <field id="fwfisf3d_cav" long_name="Ice shelf melt rate" unit="kg/m2/s" grid_ref="grid_T_3D" /> |
---|
1429 | <field id="qoceisf3d_cav" long_name="Ice shelf ocean heat flux" unit="W/m2" grid_ref="grid_T_3D" /> |
---|
1430 | <field id="qlatisf3d_cav" long_name="Ice shelf latent heat flux" unit="W/m2" grid_ref="grid_T_3D" /> |
---|
1431 | <field id="qhcisf3d_cav" long_name="Ice shelf heat content flux of injected water" unit="W/m2" grid_ref="grid_T_3D" /> |
---|
1432 | <field id="ttbl_cav" long_name="temperature in Losch tbl" unit="degC" /> |
---|
1433 | <field id="isfthermald_cav" long_name="thermal driving of ice shelf melting" unit="degC" /> |
---|
1434 | <field id="isfgammat" long_name="Ice shelf heat-transfert velocity" unit="m/s" /> |
---|
1435 | <field id="isfgammas" long_name="Ice shelf salt-transfert velocity" unit="m/s" /> |
---|
1436 | <field id="stbl" long_name="salinity in the Losh tbl" unit="1e-3" /> |
---|
1437 | <field id="utbl" long_name="zonal current in the Losh tbl at T point" unit="m/s" /> |
---|
1438 | <field id="vtbl" long_name="merid current in the Losh tbl at T point" unit="m/s" /> |
---|
1439 | <field id="isfustar" long_name="ustar at T point used in ice shelf melting" unit="m/s" /> |
---|
1440 | <field id="qconisf" long_name="Conductive heat flux through the ice shelf" unit="W/m2" /> |
---|
1441 | \end{xmllines} |
---|
1442 | \end{description} |
---|
1443 | |
---|
1444 | %% ================================================================================================= |
---|
1445 | \subsection{Ice sheet coupling} |
---|
1446 | \label{subsec:ISF_iscpl} |
---|
1447 | |
---|
1448 | Ice sheet/ocean coupling is done through file exchange at the restart step. |
---|
1449 | At each restart step, the procedure is this one: |
---|
1450 | |
---|
1451 | \begin{description} |
---|
1452 | \item[Step 1]: the ice sheet model send a new bathymetry and ice shelf draft netcdf file. |
---|
1453 | \item[Step 2]: a new domcfg.nc file is built using the DOMAINcfg tools. |
---|
1454 | \item[Step 3]: NEMO run for a specific period and output the average melt rate over the period. |
---|
1455 | \item[Step 4]: the ice sheet model run using the melt rate outputed in step 4. |
---|
1456 | \item[Step 5]: go back to 1. |
---|
1457 | \end{description} |
---|
1458 | |
---|
1459 | If \np{ln_iscpl}\forcode{ = .true.}, the isf draft is assume to be different at each restart step with |
---|
1460 | potentially some new wet/dry cells due to the ice sheet dynamics/thermodynamics. |
---|
1461 | The wetting and drying scheme, applied on the restart, is very simple. The 6 different possible cases for the tracer and ssh are: |
---|
1462 | |
---|
1463 | \begin{description} |
---|
1464 | \item[Thin a cell]: |
---|
1465 | T/S/ssh are unchanged. |
---|
1466 | |
---|
1467 | \item[Enlarge a cell]: |
---|
1468 | See case "Thin a cell down" |
---|
1469 | |
---|
1470 | \item[Dry a cell]: |
---|
1471 | Mask, T/S, U/V and ssh are set to 0. |
---|
1472 | |
---|
1473 | \item[Wet a cell]: |
---|
1474 | Mask is set to 1, T/S is extrapolated from neighbours, $ssh_n = ssh_b$. |
---|
1475 | If no neighbours, T/S is extrapolated from old top cell value. |
---|
1476 | If no neighbours along i,j and k (both previous tests failed), T/S/ssh and mask are set to 0. |
---|
1477 | |
---|
1478 | \item[Dry a column]: |
---|
1479 | mask, T/S and ssh are set to 0. |
---|
1480 | |
---|
1481 | \item[Wet a column]: |
---|
1482 | set mask to 1, T/S/ssh are extrapolated from neighbours. |
---|
1483 | If no neighbour, T/S/ssh and mask set to 0. |
---|
1484 | \end{description} |
---|
1485 | |
---|
1486 | The method described above will strongly affect the barotropic transport under an ice shelf when the geometry change. |
---|
1487 | In order to keep the model stable, an adjustment of the dynamics at the initialisation after the coupling step is needed. |
---|
1488 | The idea behind this is to keep $\pd[\eta]{t}$ as it should be without change in geometry at the initialisation. |
---|
1489 | This will prevent any strong velocity due to large pressure gradient. |
---|
1490 | To do so, we correct the horizontal divergence before $\pd[\eta]{t}$ is computed in the first time step.\\ |
---|
1491 | |
---|
1492 | Furthermore, as the before and now fields are not compatible (modification of the geometry), |
---|
1493 | the restart time step is prescribed to be an euler time step instead of a leap frog and $fields_b = fields_n$.\\ |
---|
1494 | |
---|
1495 | The horizontal extrapolation to fill new cell with realistic value is called \np{nn_drown}{nn\_drown} times. |
---|
1496 | It means that if the grounding line retreat by more than \np{nn_drown}{nn\_drown} cells between 2 coupling steps, |
---|
1497 | the code will be unable to fill all the new wet cells properly and the model is likely to blow up at the initialisation. |
---|
1498 | The default number is set up for the MISOMIP idealised experiments. |
---|
1499 | This coupling procedure is able to take into account grounding line and calving front migration. |
---|
1500 | However, it is a non-conservative proccess. |
---|
1501 | This could lead to a trend in heat/salt content and volume.\\ |
---|
1502 | |
---|
1503 | In order to remove the trend and keep the conservation level as close to 0 as possible, |
---|
1504 | a simple conservation scheme is available with \np{ln_isfcpl_cons}\forcode{ = .true.}. |
---|
1505 | The heat/salt/vol. gain/loss are diagnosed, as well as the location. |
---|
1506 | A correction increment is computed and applied each time step during the model run. |
---|
1507 | The corrective increment are applied into the cells itself (if it is a wet cell), the neigbouring cells or the closest wet cell (if the cell is now dry). |
---|
1508 | |
---|
1509 | %% ================================================================================================= |
---|
1510 | \section{Handling of icebergs (ICB)} |
---|
1511 | \label{sec:SBC_ICB_icebergs} |
---|
1512 | |
---|
1513 | \begin{listing} |
---|
1514 | \nlst{namberg} |
---|
1515 | \caption{\forcode{&namberg}} |
---|
1516 | \label{lst:namberg} |
---|
1517 | \end{listing} |
---|
1518 | |
---|
1519 | Icebergs are modelled as lagrangian particles in \NEMO\ \citep{marsh.ivchenko.ea_GMD15}. |
---|
1520 | Their physical behaviour is controlled by equations as described in \citet{martin.adcroft_OM10} ). |
---|
1521 | (Note that the authors kindly provided a copy of their code to act as a basis for implementation in \NEMO). |
---|
1522 | Icebergs are initially spawned into one of ten classes which have specific mass and thickness as |
---|
1523 | described in the \nam{berg}{berg} namelist: \np{rn_initial_mass}{rn\_initial\_mass} and \np{rn_initial_thickness}{rn\_initial\_thickness}. |
---|
1524 | Each class has an associated scaling (\np{rn_mass_scaling}{rn\_mass\_scaling}), |
---|
1525 | which is an integer representing how many icebergs of this class are being described as one lagrangian point |
---|
1526 | (this reduces the numerical problem of tracking every single iceberg). |
---|
1527 | They are enabled by setting \np[=.true.]{ln_icebergs}{ln\_icebergs}. |
---|
1528 | |
---|
1529 | Two initialisation schemes are possible. |
---|
1530 | \begin{description} |
---|
1531 | \item [{\np{nn_test_icebergs}{nn\_test\_icebergs}~$>$~0}] In this scheme, the value of \np{nn_test_icebergs}{nn\_test\_icebergs} represents the class of iceberg to generate |
---|
1532 | (so between 1 and 10), and \np{nn_test_icebergs}{nn\_test\_icebergs} provides a lon/lat box in the domain at each grid point of |
---|
1533 | which an iceberg is generated at the beginning of the run. |
---|
1534 | (Note that this happens each time the timestep equals \np{nn_nit000}{nn\_nit000}.) |
---|
1535 | \np{nn_test_icebergs}{nn\_test\_icebergs} is defined by four numbers in \np{nn_test_box}{nn\_test\_box} representing the corners of |
---|
1536 | the geographical box: lonmin,lonmax,latmin,latmax |
---|
1537 | \item [{\np[=-1]{nn_test_icebergs}{nn\_test\_icebergs}}] In this scheme, the model reads a calving file supplied in the \np{sn_icb}{sn\_icb} parameter. |
---|
1538 | This should be a file with a field on the configuration grid (typically ORCA) |
---|
1539 | representing ice accumulation rate at each model point. |
---|
1540 | These should be ocean points adjacent to land where icebergs are known to calve. |
---|
1541 | Most points in this input grid are going to have value zero. |
---|
1542 | When the model runs, ice is accumulated at each grid point which has a non-zero source term. |
---|
1543 | At each time step, a test is performed to see if there is enough ice mass to |
---|
1544 | calve an iceberg of each class in order (1 to 10). |
---|
1545 | Note that this is the initial mass multiplied by the number each particle represents (\ie\ the scaling). |
---|
1546 | If there is enough ice, a new iceberg is spawned and the total available ice reduced accordingly. |
---|
1547 | \end{description} |
---|
1548 | |
---|
1549 | Icebergs are influenced by wind, waves and currents, bottom melt and erosion. |
---|
1550 | The latter act to disintegrate the iceberg. |
---|
1551 | This is either all melted freshwater, |
---|
1552 | or (if \np{rn_bits_erosion_fraction}{rn\_bits\_erosion\_fraction}~$>$~0) into melt and additionally small ice bits |
---|
1553 | which are assumed to propagate with their larger parent and thus delay fluxing into the ocean. |
---|
1554 | Melt water (and other variables on the configuration grid) are written into the main \NEMO\ model output files. |
---|
1555 | |
---|
1556 | Extensive diagnostics can be produced. |
---|
1557 | Separate output files are maintained for human-readable iceberg information. |
---|
1558 | A separate file is produced for each processor (independent of \np{ln_ctl}{ln\_ctl}). |
---|
1559 | The amount of information is controlled by two integer parameters: |
---|
1560 | \begin{description} |
---|
1561 | \item [{\np{nn_verbose_level}{nn\_verbose\_level}}] takes a value between one and four and |
---|
1562 | represents an increasing number of points in the code at which variables are written, |
---|
1563 | and an increasing level of obscurity. |
---|
1564 | \item [{\np{nn_verbose_write}{nn\_verbose\_write}}] is the number of timesteps between writes |
---|
1565 | \end{description} |
---|
1566 | |
---|
1567 | Iceberg trajectories can also be written out and this is enabled by setting \np{nn_sample_rate}{nn\_sample\_rate}~$>$~0. |
---|
1568 | A non-zero value represents how many timesteps between writes of information into the output file. |
---|
1569 | These output files are in NETCDF format. |
---|
1570 | When \key{mpp\_mpi} is defined, each output file contains only those icebergs in the corresponding processor. |
---|
1571 | Trajectory points are written out in the order of their parent iceberg in the model's "linked list" of icebergs. |
---|
1572 | So care is needed to recreate data for individual icebergs, |
---|
1573 | since its trajectory data may be spread across multiple files. |
---|
1574 | |
---|
1575 | %% ================================================================================================= |
---|
1576 | \section[Interactions with waves (\textit{sbcwave.F90}, \forcode{ln_wave})]{Interactions with waves (\protect\mdl{sbcwave}, \protect\np{ln_wave}{ln\_wave})} |
---|
1577 | \label{sec:SBC_wave} |
---|
1578 | |
---|
1579 | \begin{listing} |
---|
1580 | \nlst{namsbc_wave} |
---|
1581 | \caption{\forcode{&namsbc_wave}} |
---|
1582 | \label{lst:namsbc_wave} |
---|
1583 | \end{listing} |
---|
1584 | |
---|
1585 | Ocean waves represent the interface between the ocean and the atmosphere, so \NEMO\ is extended to incorporate |
---|
1586 | physical processes related to ocean surface waves, namely the surface stress modified by growth and |
---|
1587 | dissipation of the oceanic wave field, the Stokes-Coriolis force and the Stokes drift impact on mass and |
---|
1588 | tracer advection; moreover the neutral surface drag coefficient from a wave model can be used to evaluate |
---|
1589 | the wind stress. |
---|
1590 | |
---|
1591 | Physical processes related to ocean surface waves can be accounted by setting the logical variable |
---|
1592 | \np[=.true.]{ln_wave}{ln\_wave} in \nam{sbc}{sbc} namelist. In addition, specific flags accounting for |
---|
1593 | different processes should be activated as explained in the following sections. |
---|
1594 | |
---|
1595 | Wave fields can be provided either in forced or coupled mode: |
---|
1596 | \begin{description} |
---|
1597 | \item [forced mode]: wave fields should be defined through the \nam{sbc_wave}{sbc\_wave} namelist |
---|
1598 | for external data names, locations, frequency, interpolation and all the miscellanous options allowed by |
---|
1599 | Input Data generic Interface (see \autoref{sec:SBC_input}). |
---|
1600 | \item [coupled mode]: \NEMO\ and an external wave model can be coupled by setting \np[=.true.]{ln_cpl}{ln\_cpl} |
---|
1601 | in \nam{sbc}{sbc} namelist and filling the \nam{sbc_cpl}{sbc\_cpl} namelist. |
---|
1602 | \end{description} |
---|
1603 | |
---|
1604 | %% ================================================================================================= |
---|
1605 | \subsection[Neutral drag coefficient from wave model (\forcode{ln_cdgw})]{Neutral drag coefficient from wave model (\protect\np{ln_cdgw}{ln\_cdgw})} |
---|
1606 | \label{subsec:SBC_wave_cdgw} |
---|
1607 | |
---|
1608 | The neutral surface drag coefficient provided from an external data source (\ie\ a wave model), |
---|
1609 | can be used by setting the logical variable \np[=.true.]{ln_cdgw}{ln\_cdgw} in \nam{sbc}{sbc} namelist. |
---|
1610 | Then using the routine \rou{sbcblk\_algo\_ncar} and starting from the neutral drag coefficent provided, |
---|
1611 | the drag coefficient is computed according to the stable/unstable conditions of the |
---|
1612 | air-sea interface following \citet{large.yeager_rpt04}. |
---|
1613 | |
---|
1614 | %% ================================================================================================= |
---|
1615 | \subsection[3D Stokes Drift (\forcode{ln_sdw} \& \forcode{nn_sdrift})]{3D Stokes Drift (\protect\np{ln_sdw}{ln\_sdw} \& \np{nn_sdrift}{nn\_sdrift})} |
---|
1616 | \label{subsec:SBC_wave_sdw} |
---|
1617 | |
---|
1618 | The Stokes drift is a wave driven mechanism of mass and momentum transport \citep{stokes_ibk09}. |
---|
1619 | It is defined as the difference between the average velocity of a fluid parcel (Lagrangian velocity) |
---|
1620 | and the current measured at a fixed point (Eulerian velocity). |
---|
1621 | As waves travel, the water particles that make up the waves travel in orbital motions but |
---|
1622 | without a closed path. Their movement is enhanced at the top of the orbit and slowed slightly |
---|
1623 | at the bottom, so the result is a net forward motion of water particles, referred to as the Stokes drift. |
---|
1624 | An accurate evaluation of the Stokes drift and the inclusion of related processes may lead to improved |
---|
1625 | representation of surface physics in ocean general circulation models. %GS: reference needed |
---|
1626 | The Stokes drift velocity $\mathbf{U}_{st}$ in deep water can be computed from the wave spectrum and may be written as: |
---|
1627 | |
---|
1628 | \[ |
---|
1629 | % \label{eq:SBC_wave_sdw} |
---|
1630 | \mathbf{U}_{st} = \frac{16{\pi^3}} {g} |
---|
1631 | \int_0^\infty \int_{-\pi}^{\pi} (cos{\theta},sin{\theta}) {f^3} |
---|
1632 | \mathrm{S}(f,\theta) \mathrm{e}^{2kz}\,\mathrm{d}\theta {d}f |
---|
1633 | \] |
---|
1634 | |
---|
1635 | where: ${\theta}$ is the wave direction, $f$ is the wave intrinsic frequency, |
---|
1636 | $\mathrm{S}($f$,\theta)$ is the 2D frequency-direction spectrum, |
---|
1637 | $k$ is the mean wavenumber defined as: |
---|
1638 | $k=\frac{2\pi}{\lambda}$ (being $\lambda$ the wavelength). \\ |
---|
1639 | |
---|
1640 | In order to evaluate the Stokes drift in a realistic ocean wave field, the wave spectral shape is required |
---|
1641 | and its computation quickly becomes expensive as the 2D spectrum must be integrated for each vertical level. |
---|
1642 | To simplify, it is customary to use approximations to the full Stokes profile. |
---|
1643 | Three possible parameterizations for the calculation for the approximate Stokes drift velocity profile |
---|
1644 | are included in the code through the \np{nn_sdrift}{nn\_sdrift} parameter once provided the surface Stokes drift |
---|
1645 | $\mathbf{U}_{st |_{z=0}}$ which is evaluated by an external wave model that accurately reproduces the wave spectra |
---|
1646 | and makes possible the estimation of the surface Stokes drift for random directional waves in |
---|
1647 | realistic wave conditions: |
---|
1648 | |
---|
1649 | \begin{description} |
---|
1650 | \item [{\np{nn_sdrift}{nn\_sdrift} = 0}]: exponential integral profile parameterization proposed by |
---|
1651 | \citet{breivik.janssen.ea_JPO14}: |
---|
1652 | |
---|
1653 | \[ |
---|
1654 | % \label{eq:SBC_wave_sdw_0a} |
---|
1655 | \mathbf{U}_{st} \cong \mathbf{U}_{st |_{z=0}} \frac{\mathrm{e}^{-2k_ez}} {1-8k_ez} |
---|
1656 | \] |
---|
1657 | |
---|
1658 | where $k_e$ is the effective wave number which depends on the Stokes transport $T_{st}$ defined as follows: |
---|
1659 | |
---|
1660 | \[ |
---|
1661 | % \label{eq:SBC_wave_sdw_0b} |
---|
1662 | k_e = \frac{|\mathbf{U}_{\left.st\right|_{z=0}}|} {|T_{st}|} |
---|
1663 | \quad \text{and }\ |
---|
1664 | T_{st} = \frac{1}{16} \bar{\omega} H_s^2 |
---|
1665 | \] |
---|
1666 | |
---|
1667 | where $H_s$ is the significant wave height and $\omega$ is the wave frequency. |
---|
1668 | |
---|
1669 | \item [{\np{nn_sdrift}{nn\_sdrift} = 1}]: velocity profile based on the Phillips spectrum which is considered to be a |
---|
1670 | reasonable estimate of the part of the spectrum mostly contributing to the Stokes drift velocity near the surface |
---|
1671 | \citep{breivik.bidlot.ea_OM16}: |
---|
1672 | |
---|
1673 | \[ |
---|
1674 | % \label{eq:SBC_wave_sdw_1} |
---|
1675 | \mathbf{U}_{st} \cong \mathbf{U}_{st |_{z=0}} \Big[exp(2k_pz)-\beta \sqrt{-2 \pi k_pz} |
---|
1676 | \textit{ erf } \Big(\sqrt{-2 k_pz}\Big)\Big] |
---|
1677 | \] |
---|
1678 | |
---|
1679 | where $erf$ is the complementary error function and $k_p$ is the peak wavenumber. |
---|
1680 | |
---|
1681 | \item [{\np{nn_sdrift}{nn\_sdrift} = 2}]: velocity profile based on the Phillips spectrum as for \np{nn_sdrift}{nn\_sdrift} = 1 |
---|
1682 | but using the wave frequency from a wave model. |
---|
1683 | |
---|
1684 | \end{description} |
---|
1685 | |
---|
1686 | The Stokes drift enters the wave-averaged momentum equation, as well as the tracer advection equations |
---|
1687 | and its effect on the evolution of the sea-surface height ${\eta}$ is considered as follows: |
---|
1688 | |
---|
1689 | \[ |
---|
1690 | % \label{eq:SBC_wave_eta_sdw} |
---|
1691 | \frac{\partial{\eta}}{\partial{t}} = |
---|
1692 | -\nabla_h \int_{-H}^{\eta} (\mathbf{U} + \mathbf{U}_{st}) dz |
---|
1693 | \] |
---|
1694 | |
---|
1695 | The tracer advection equation is also modified in order for Eulerian ocean models to properly account |
---|
1696 | for unresolved wave effect. The divergence of the wave tracer flux equals the mean tracer advection |
---|
1697 | that is induced by the three-dimensional Stokes velocity. |
---|
1698 | The advective equation for a tracer $c$ combining the effects of the mean current and sea surface waves |
---|
1699 | can be formulated as follows: |
---|
1700 | |
---|
1701 | \[ |
---|
1702 | % \label{eq:SBC_wave_tra_sdw} |
---|
1703 | \frac{\partial{c}}{\partial{t}} = |
---|
1704 | - (\mathbf{U} + \mathbf{U}_{st}) \cdot \nabla{c} |
---|
1705 | \] |
---|
1706 | |
---|
1707 | %% ================================================================================================= |
---|
1708 | \subsection[Stokes-Coriolis term (\forcode{ln_stcor})]{Stokes-Coriolis term (\protect\np{ln_stcor}{ln\_stcor})} |
---|
1709 | \label{subsec:SBC_wave_stcor} |
---|
1710 | |
---|
1711 | In a rotating ocean, waves exert a wave-induced stress on the mean ocean circulation which results |
---|
1712 | in a force equal to $\mathbf{U}_{st}$×$f$, where $f$ is the Coriolis parameter. |
---|
1713 | This additional force may have impact on the Ekman turning of the surface current. |
---|
1714 | In order to include this term, once evaluated the Stokes drift (using one of the 3 possible |
---|
1715 | approximations described in \autoref{subsec:SBC_wave_sdw}), |
---|
1716 | \np[=.true.]{ln_stcor}{ln\_stcor} has to be set. |
---|
1717 | |
---|
1718 | %% ================================================================================================= |
---|
1719 | \subsection[Wave modified stress (\forcode{ln_tauwoc} \& \forcode{ln_tauw})]{Wave modified sress (\protect\np{ln_tauwoc}{ln\_tauwoc} \& \np{ln_tauw}{ln\_tauw})} |
---|
1720 | \label{subsec:SBC_wave_tauw} |
---|
1721 | |
---|
1722 | The surface stress felt by the ocean is the atmospheric stress minus the net stress going |
---|
1723 | into the waves \citep{janssen.breivik.ea_rpt13}. Therefore, when waves are growing, momentum and energy is spent and is not |
---|
1724 | available for forcing the mean circulation, while in the opposite case of a decaying sea |
---|
1725 | state, more momentum is available for forcing the ocean. |
---|
1726 | Only when the sea state is in equilibrium, the ocean is forced by the atmospheric stress, |
---|
1727 | but in practice, an equilibrium sea state is a fairly rare event. |
---|
1728 | So the atmospheric stress felt by the ocean circulation $\tau_{oc,a}$ can be expressed as: |
---|
1729 | |
---|
1730 | \[ |
---|
1731 | % \label{eq:SBC_wave_tauoc} |
---|
1732 | \tau_{oc,a} = \tau_a - \tau_w |
---|
1733 | \] |
---|
1734 | |
---|
1735 | where $\tau_a$ is the atmospheric surface stress; |
---|
1736 | $\tau_w$ is the atmospheric stress going into the waves defined as: |
---|
1737 | |
---|
1738 | \[ |
---|
1739 | % \label{eq:SBC_wave_tauw} |
---|
1740 | \tau_w = \rho g \int {\frac{dk}{c_p} (S_{in}+S_{nl}+S_{diss})} |
---|
1741 | \] |
---|
1742 | |
---|
1743 | where: $c_p$ is the phase speed of the gravity waves, |
---|
1744 | $S_{in}$, $S_{nl}$ and $S_{diss}$ are three source terms that represent |
---|
1745 | the physics of ocean waves. The first one, $S_{in}$, describes the generation |
---|
1746 | of ocean waves by wind and therefore represents the momentum and energy transfer |
---|
1747 | from air to ocean waves; the second term $S_{nl}$ denotes |
---|
1748 | the nonlinear transfer by resonant four-wave interactions; while the third term $S_{diss}$ |
---|
1749 | describes the dissipation of waves by processes such as white-capping, large scale breaking |
---|
1750 | eddy-induced damping. |
---|
1751 | |
---|
1752 | The wave stress derived from an external wave model can be provided either through the normalized |
---|
1753 | wave stress into the ocean by setting \np[=.true.]{ln_tauwoc}{ln\_tauwoc}, or through the zonal and |
---|
1754 | meridional stress components by setting \np[=.true.]{ln_tauw}{ln\_tauw}. |
---|
1755 | |
---|
1756 | %% ================================================================================================= |
---|
1757 | \section{Miscellaneous options} |
---|
1758 | \label{sec:SBC_misc} |
---|
1759 | |
---|
1760 | %% ================================================================================================= |
---|
1761 | \subsection[Diurnal cycle (\textit{sbcdcy.F90})]{Diurnal cycle (\protect\mdl{sbcdcy})} |
---|
1762 | \label{subsec:SBC_dcy} |
---|
1763 | |
---|
1764 | \begin{figure}[!t] |
---|
1765 | \centering |
---|
1766 | \includegraphics[width=0.66\textwidth]{SBC_diurnal} |
---|
1767 | \caption[Reconstruction of the diurnal cycle variation of short wave flux]{ |
---|
1768 | Example of reconstruction of the diurnal cycle variation of short wave flux from |
---|
1769 | daily mean values. |
---|
1770 | The reconstructed diurnal cycle (black line) is chosen as |
---|
1771 | the mean value of the analytical cycle (blue line) over a time step, |
---|
1772 | not as the mid time step value of the analytically cycle (red square). |
---|
1773 | From \citet{bernie.guilyardi.ea_CD07}.} |
---|
1774 | \label{fig:SBC_diurnal} |
---|
1775 | \end{figure} |
---|
1776 | |
---|
1777 | \cite{bernie.woolnough.ea_JC05} have shown that to capture 90$\%$ of the diurnal variability of SST requires a vertical resolution in upper ocean of 1~m or better and a temporal resolution of the surface fluxes of 3~h or less. |
---|
1778 | %Unfortunately high frequency forcing fields are rare, not to say inexistent. GS: not true anymore ! |
---|
1779 | Nevertheless, it is possible to obtain a reasonable diurnal cycle of the SST knowning only short wave flux (SWF) at high frequency \citep{bernie.guilyardi.ea_CD07}. |
---|
1780 | Furthermore, only the knowledge of daily mean value of SWF is needed, |
---|
1781 | as higher frequency variations can be reconstructed from them, |
---|
1782 | assuming that the diurnal cycle of SWF is a scaling of the top of the atmosphere diurnal cycle of incident SWF. |
---|
1783 | The \cite{bernie.guilyardi.ea_CD07} reconstruction algorithm is available in \NEMO\ by |
---|
1784 | setting \np[=.true.]{ln_dm2dc}{ln\_dm2dc} (a \textit{\nam{sbc}{sbc}} namelist variable) when |
---|
1785 | using a bulk formulation (\np[=.true.]{ln_blk}{ln\_blk}) or |
---|
1786 | the flux formulation (\np[=.true.]{ln_flx}{ln\_flx}). |
---|
1787 | The reconstruction is performed in the \mdl{sbcdcy} module. |
---|
1788 | The detail of the algoritm used can be found in the appendix~A of \cite{bernie.guilyardi.ea_CD07}. |
---|
1789 | The algorithm preserves the daily mean incoming SWF as the reconstructed SWF at |
---|
1790 | a given time step is the mean value of the analytical cycle over this time step (\autoref{fig:SBC_diurnal}). |
---|
1791 | The use of diurnal cycle reconstruction requires the input SWF to be daily |
---|
1792 | (\ie\ a frequency of 24 hours and a time interpolation set to true in \np{sn_qsr}{sn\_qsr} namelist parameter). |
---|
1793 | Furthermore, it is recommended to have a least 8 surface module time steps per day, |
---|
1794 | that is $\rdt \ nn\_fsbc < 10,800~s = 3~h$. |
---|
1795 | An example of recontructed SWF is given in \autoref{fig:SBC_dcy} for a 12 reconstructed diurnal cycle, |
---|
1796 | one every 2~hours (from 1am to 11pm). |
---|
1797 | |
---|
1798 | \begin{figure}[!t] |
---|
1799 | \centering |
---|
1800 | \includegraphics[width=0.66\textwidth]{SBC_dcy} |
---|
1801 | \caption[Reconstruction of the diurnal cycle variation of short wave flux on an ORCA2 grid]{ |
---|
1802 | Example of reconstruction of the diurnal cycle variation of short wave flux from |
---|
1803 | daily mean values on an ORCA2 grid with a time sampling of 2~hours (from 1am to 11pm). |
---|
1804 | The display is on (i,j) plane.} |
---|
1805 | \label{fig:SBC_dcy} |
---|
1806 | \end{figure} |
---|
1807 | |
---|
1808 | Note also that the setting a diurnal cycle in SWF is highly recommended when |
---|
1809 | the top layer thickness approach 1~m or less, otherwise large error in SST can appear due to |
---|
1810 | an inconsistency between the scale of the vertical resolution and the forcing acting on that scale. |
---|
1811 | |
---|
1812 | %% ================================================================================================= |
---|
1813 | \subsection{Rotation of vector pairs onto the model grid directions} |
---|
1814 | \label{subsec:SBC_rotation} |
---|
1815 | |
---|
1816 | When using a flux (\np[=.true.]{ln_flx}{ln\_flx}) or bulk (\np[=.true.]{ln_blk}{ln\_blk}) formulation, |
---|
1817 | pairs of vector components can be rotated from east-north directions onto the local grid directions. |
---|
1818 | This is particularly useful when interpolation on the fly is used since here any vectors are likely to |
---|
1819 | be defined relative to a rectilinear grid. |
---|
1820 | To activate this option, a non-empty string is supplied in the rotation pair column of the relevant namelist. |
---|
1821 | The eastward component must start with "U" and the northward component with "V". |
---|
1822 | The remaining characters in the strings are used to identify which pair of components go together. |
---|
1823 | So for example, strings "U1" and "V1" next to "utau" and "vtau" would pair the wind stress components together and |
---|
1824 | rotate them on to the model grid directions; |
---|
1825 | "U2" and "V2" could be used against a second pair of components, and so on. |
---|
1826 | The extra characters used in the strings are arbitrary. |
---|
1827 | The rot\_rep routine from the \mdl{geo2ocean} module is used to perform the rotation. |
---|
1828 | |
---|
1829 | %% ================================================================================================= |
---|
1830 | \subsection[Surface restoring to observed SST and/or SSS (\textit{sbcssr.F90})]{Surface restoring to observed SST and/or SSS (\protect\mdl{sbcssr})} |
---|
1831 | \label{subsec:SBC_ssr} |
---|
1832 | |
---|
1833 | \begin{listing} |
---|
1834 | \nlst{namsbc_ssr} |
---|
1835 | \caption{\forcode{&namsbc_ssr}} |
---|
1836 | \label{lst:namsbc_ssr} |
---|
1837 | \end{listing} |
---|
1838 | |
---|
1839 | Options are defined through the \nam{sbc_ssr}{sbc\_ssr} namelist variables. |
---|
1840 | On forced mode using a flux formulation (\np[=.true.]{ln_flx}{ln\_flx}), |
---|
1841 | a feedback term \emph{must} be added to the surface heat flux $Q_{ns}^o$: |
---|
1842 | \[ |
---|
1843 | % \label{eq:SBC_dmp_q} |
---|
1844 | Q_{ns} = Q_{ns}^o + \frac{dQ}{dT} \left( \left. T \right|_{k=1} - SST_{Obs} \right) |
---|
1845 | \] |
---|
1846 | where SST is a sea surface temperature field (observed or climatological), |
---|
1847 | $T$ is the model surface layer temperature and |
---|
1848 | $\frac{dQ}{dT}$ is a negative feedback coefficient usually taken equal to $-40~W/m^2/K$. |
---|
1849 | For a $50~m$ mixed-layer depth, this value corresponds to a relaxation time scale of two months. |
---|
1850 | This term ensures that if $T$ perfectly matches the supplied SST, then $Q$ is equal to $Q_o$. |
---|
1851 | |
---|
1852 | In the fresh water budget, a feedback term can also be added. |
---|
1853 | Converted into an equivalent freshwater flux, it takes the following expression : |
---|
1854 | |
---|
1855 | \begin{equation} |
---|
1856 | \label{eq:SBC_dmp_emp} |
---|
1857 | \textit{emp} = \textit{emp}_o + \gamma_s^{-1} e_{3t} \frac{ \left(\left.S\right|_{k=1}-SSS_{Obs}\right)} |
---|
1858 | {\left.S\right|_{k=1}} |
---|
1859 | \end{equation} |
---|
1860 | |
---|
1861 | where $\textit{emp}_{o }$ is a net surface fresh water flux |
---|
1862 | (observed, climatological or an atmospheric model product), |
---|
1863 | \textit{SSS}$_{Obs}$ is a sea surface salinity |
---|
1864 | (usually a time interpolation of the monthly mean Polar Hydrographic Climatology \citep{steele.morley.ea_JC01}), |
---|
1865 | $\left.S\right|_{k=1}$ is the model surface layer salinity and |
---|
1866 | $\gamma_s$ is a negative feedback coefficient which is provided as a namelist parameter. |
---|
1867 | Unlike heat flux, there is no physical justification for the feedback term in \autoref{eq:SBC_dmp_emp} as |
---|
1868 | the atmosphere does not care about ocean surface salinity \citep{madec.delecluse_IWN97}. |
---|
1869 | The SSS restoring term should be viewed as a flux correction on freshwater fluxes to |
---|
1870 | reduce the uncertainties we have on the observed freshwater budget. |
---|
1871 | |
---|
1872 | %% ================================================================================================= |
---|
1873 | \subsection{Handling of ice-covered area (\textit{sbcice\_...})} |
---|
1874 | \label{subsec:SBC_ice-cover} |
---|
1875 | |
---|
1876 | The presence at the sea surface of an ice covered area modifies all the fluxes transmitted to the ocean. |
---|
1877 | There are several way to handle sea-ice in the system depending on |
---|
1878 | the value of the \np{nn_ice}{nn\_ice} namelist parameter found in \nam{sbc}{sbc} namelist. |
---|
1879 | \begin{description} |
---|
1880 | \item [nn\_ice = 0] there will never be sea-ice in the computational domain. |
---|
1881 | This is a typical namelist value used for tropical ocean domain. |
---|
1882 | The surface fluxes are simply specified for an ice-free ocean. |
---|
1883 | No specific things is done for sea-ice. |
---|
1884 | \item [nn\_ice = 1] sea-ice can exist in the computational domain, but no sea-ice model is used. |
---|
1885 | An observed ice covered area is read in a file. |
---|
1886 | Below this area, the SST is restored to the freezing point and |
---|
1887 | the heat fluxes are set to $-4~W/m^2$ ($-2~W/m^2$) in the northern (southern) hemisphere. |
---|
1888 | The associated modification of the freshwater fluxes are done in such a way that |
---|
1889 | the change in buoyancy fluxes remains zero. |
---|
1890 | This prevents deep convection to occur when trying to reach the freezing point |
---|
1891 | (and so ice covered area condition) while the SSS is too large. |
---|
1892 | This manner of managing sea-ice area, just by using a IF case, |
---|
1893 | is usually referred as the \textit{ice-if} model. |
---|
1894 | It can be found in the \mdl{sbcice\_if} module. |
---|
1895 | \item [nn\_ice = 2 or more] A full sea ice model is used. |
---|
1896 | This model computes the ice-ocean fluxes, |
---|
1897 | that are combined with the air-sea fluxes using the ice fraction of each model cell to |
---|
1898 | provide the surface averaged ocean fluxes. |
---|
1899 | Note that the activation of a sea-ice model is done by defining a CPP key (\key{si3} or \key{cice}). |
---|
1900 | The activation automatically overwrites the read value of nn\_ice to its appropriate value |
---|
1901 | (\ie\ $2$ for SI3 or $3$ for CICE). |
---|
1902 | \end{description} |
---|
1903 | |
---|
1904 | % {Description of Ice-ocean interface to be added here or in LIM 2 and 3 doc ?} |
---|
1905 | %GS: ocean-ice (SI3) interface is not located in SBC directory anymore, so it should be included in SI3 doc |
---|
1906 | |
---|
1907 | %% ================================================================================================= |
---|
1908 | \subsection[Interface to CICE (\textit{sbcice\_cice.F90})]{Interface to CICE (\protect\mdl{sbcice\_cice})} |
---|
1909 | \label{subsec:SBC_cice} |
---|
1910 | |
---|
1911 | It is possible to couple a regional or global \NEMO\ configuration (without AGRIF) |
---|
1912 | to the CICE sea-ice model by using \key{cice}. |
---|
1913 | The CICE code can be obtained from \href{http://oceans11.lanl.gov/trac/CICE/}{LANL} and |
---|
1914 | the additional 'hadgem3' drivers will be required, even with the latest code release. |
---|
1915 | Input grid files consistent with those used in \NEMO\ will also be needed, |
---|
1916 | and CICE CPP keys \textbf{ORCA\_GRID}, \textbf{CICE\_IN\_NEMO} and \textbf{coupled} should be used |
---|
1917 | (seek advice from UKMO if necessary). |
---|
1918 | Currently, the code is only designed to work when using the NCAR forcing option for \NEMO\ %GS: still true ? |
---|
1919 | (with \textit{calc\_strair}\forcode{=.true.} and \textit{calc\_Tsfc}\forcode{=.true.} in the CICE name-list), |
---|
1920 | or alternatively when \NEMO\ is coupled to the HadGAM3 atmosphere model |
---|
1921 | (with \textit{calc\_strair}\forcode{=.false.} and \textit{calc\_Tsfc}\forcode{=false}). |
---|
1922 | The code is intended to be used with \np{nn_fsbc}{nn\_fsbc} set to 1 |
---|
1923 | (although coupling ocean and ice less frequently should work, |
---|
1924 | it is possible the calculation of some of the ocean-ice fluxes needs to be modified slightly - |
---|
1925 | the user should check that results are not significantly different to the standard case). |
---|
1926 | |
---|
1927 | There are two options for the technical coupling between \NEMO\ and CICE. |
---|
1928 | The standard version allows complete flexibility for the domain decompositions in the individual models, |
---|
1929 | but this is at the expense of global gather and scatter operations in the coupling which |
---|
1930 | become very expensive on larger numbers of processors. |
---|
1931 | The alternative option (using \key{nemocice\_decomp} for both \NEMO\ and CICE) ensures that |
---|
1932 | the domain decomposition is identical in both models (provided domain parameters are set appropriately, |
---|
1933 | and \textit{processor\_shape~=~square-ice} and \textit{distribution\_wght~=~block} in the CICE name-list) and |
---|
1934 | allows much more efficient direct coupling on individual processors. |
---|
1935 | This solution scales much better although it is at the expense of having more idle CICE processors in areas where |
---|
1936 | there is no sea ice. |
---|
1937 | |
---|
1938 | %% ================================================================================================= |
---|
1939 | \subsection[Freshwater budget control (\textit{sbcfwb.F90})]{Freshwater budget control (\protect\mdl{sbcfwb})} |
---|
1940 | \label{subsec:SBC_fwb} |
---|
1941 | |
---|
1942 | For global ocean simulation, it can be useful to introduce a control of the mean sea level in order to |
---|
1943 | prevent unrealistic drift of the sea surface height due to inaccuracy in the freshwater fluxes. |
---|
1944 | In \NEMO, two way of controlling the freshwater budget are proposed: |
---|
1945 | |
---|
1946 | \begin{description} |
---|
1947 | \item [{\np[=0]{nn_fwb}{nn\_fwb}}] no control at all. |
---|
1948 | The mean sea level is free to drift, and will certainly do so. |
---|
1949 | \item [{\np[=1]{nn_fwb}{nn\_fwb}}] global mean \textit{emp} set to zero at each model time step. |
---|
1950 | %GS: comment below still relevant ? |
---|
1951 | %Note that with a sea-ice model, this technique only controls the mean sea level with linear free surface and no mass flux between ocean and ice (as it is implemented in the current ice-ocean coupling). |
---|
1952 | \item [{\np[=2]{nn_fwb}{nn\_fwb}}] freshwater budget is adjusted from the previous year annual mean budget which |
---|
1953 | is read in the \textit{EMPave\_old.dat} file. |
---|
1954 | As the model uses the Boussinesq approximation, the annual mean fresh water budget is simply evaluated from |
---|
1955 | the change in the mean sea level at January the first and saved in the \textit{EMPav.dat} file. |
---|
1956 | \end{description} |
---|
1957 | |
---|
1958 | \subsection[Closed sea freshwater budget control (\textit{sbcclo.F90})]{Closed sea freswater budget control (\protect\mdl{sbcclo})} |
---|
1959 | \label{subsec:SBC_clo} |
---|
1960 | |
---|
1961 | Some configurations include inland seas and lakes as ocean |
---|
1962 | points. This is particularly the case for configurations that are |
---|
1963 | coupled to an atmosphere model where one might want to include inland |
---|
1964 | seas and lakes as ocean model points in order to provide a better |
---|
1965 | bottom boundary condition for the atmosphere. However there is no |
---|
1966 | route for freshwater to run off from the lakes to the ocean and this |
---|
1967 | can lead to large drifts in the sea surface height over the lakes. The |
---|
1968 | closea module provides options to either fill in closed seas and lakes |
---|
1969 | at run time, or to set the net surface freshwater flux for each lake |
---|
1970 | to zero and put the residual flux into the ocean. |
---|
1971 | Full details on the usage on the closed sea module are available in \autoref{sec:MISC_closea} |
---|
1972 | |
---|
1973 | The following outputs are availables via XIOS: |
---|
1974 | \begin{xmllines} |
---|
1975 | <field id="wclosea" long_name="closed sea empmr correction" standard_name="closea_empmr" unit="kg/m2/s" /> |
---|
1976 | <field id="qclosea" long_name="closed sea heat content flux" standard_name="closea_heat_content_downward_flux" unit="W/m2" /> |
---|
1977 | \end{xmllines} |
---|
1978 | |
---|
1979 | |
---|
1980 | % Griffies doc: |
---|
1981 | % When running ocean-ice simulations, we are not explicitly representing land processes, |
---|
1982 | % such as rivers, catchment areas, snow accumulation, etc. However, to reduce model drift, |
---|
1983 | % it is important to balance the hydrological cycle in ocean-ice models. |
---|
1984 | % We thus need to prescribe some form of global normalization to the precipitation minus evaporation plus river runoff. |
---|
1985 | % The result of the normalization should be a global integrated zero net water input to the ocean-ice system over |
---|
1986 | % a chosen time scale. |
---|
1987 | % How often the normalization is done is a matter of choice. In mom4p1, we choose to do so at each model time step, |
---|
1988 | % so that there is always a zero net input of water to the ocean-ice system. |
---|
1989 | % Others choose to normalize over an annual cycle, in which case the net imbalance over an annual cycle is used |
---|
1990 | % to alter the subsequent year�s water budget in an attempt to damp the annual water imbalance. |
---|
1991 | % Note that the annual budget approach may be inappropriate with interannually varying precipitation forcing. |
---|
1992 | % When running ocean-ice coupled models, it is incorrect to include the water transport between the ocean |
---|
1993 | % and ice models when aiming to balance the hydrological cycle. |
---|
1994 | % The reason is that it is the sum of the water in the ocean plus ice that should be balanced when running ocean-ice models, |
---|
1995 | % not the water in any one sub-component. As an extreme example to illustrate the issue, |
---|
1996 | % consider an ocean-ice model with zero initial sea ice. As the ocean-ice model spins up, |
---|
1997 | % there should be a net accumulation of water in the growing sea ice, and thus a net loss of water from the ocean. |
---|
1998 | % The total water contained in the ocean plus ice system is constant, but there is an exchange of water between |
---|
1999 | % the subcomponents. This exchange should not be part of the normalization used to balance the hydrological cycle |
---|
2000 | % in ocean-ice models. |
---|
2001 | |
---|
2002 | \subinc{\input{../../global/epilogue}} |
---|
2003 | |
---|
2004 | \end{document} |
---|