source: branches/2017/dev_merge_2017/DOC/texfiles/chapters/chap_SBC.tex @ 9373

Last change on this file since 9373 was 9373, checked in by nicolasmartin, 3 years ago

Global reorganisation of DOC directory: files/folders renaming

File size: 84.7 KB
3% ================================================================
4% Chapter —— Surface Boundary Condition (SBC, ISF, ICB)
5% ================================================================
6\chapter{Surface Boundary Condition (SBC, ISF, ICB) }
11$\ $\newline    % force a new ligne
15$\ $\newline    % force a new ligne
17The ocean needs six fields as surface boundary condition:
19   \item the two components of the surface ocean stress $\left( {\tau _u \;,\;\tau _v} \right)$
20   \item the incoming solar and non solar heat fluxes $\left( {Q_{ns} \;,\;Q_{sr} } \right)$
21   \item the surface freshwater budget $\left( {\textit{emp}} \right)$
22   \item the surface salt flux associated with freezing/melting of seawater $\left( {\textit{sfx}} \right)$
24plus an optional field:
26   \item the atmospheric pressure at the ocean surface $\left( p_a \right)$
29Five different ways to provide the first six fields to the ocean are available which
30are controlled by namelist \ngn{namsbc} variables: an analytical formulation (\np{ln\_ana}~=~true),
31a flux formulation (\np{ln\_flx}~=~true), a bulk formulae formulation (CORE
32(\np{ln\_blk\_core}~=~true), CLIO (\np{ln\_blk\_clio}~=~true) or MFS
33\footnote { Note that MFS bulk formulae compute fluxes only for the ocean component}
34(\np{ln\_blk\_mfs}~=~true) bulk formulae) and a coupled or mixed forced/coupled formulation
35(exchanges with a atmospheric model via the OASIS coupler) (\np{ln\_cpl} or \np{ln\_mixcpl}~=~true).
36When used ($i.e.$ \np{ln\_apr\_dyn}~=~true), the atmospheric pressure forces both ocean and ice dynamics.
38The frequency at which the forcing fields have to be updated is given by the \np{nn\_fsbc} namelist parameter.
39When the fields are supplied from data files (flux and bulk formulations), the input fields
40need not be supplied on the model grid. Instead a file of coordinates and weights can
41be supplied which maps the data from the supplied grid to the model points
42(so called "Interpolation on the Fly", see \S\ref{SBC_iof}).
43If the Interpolation on the Fly option is used, input data belonging to land points (in the native grid),
44can be masked to avoid spurious results in proximity of the coasts  as large sea-land gradients characterize
45most of the atmospheric variables.
47In addition, the resulting fields can be further modified using several namelist options.
48These options control
50\item the rotation of vector components supplied relative to an east-north
51coordinate system onto the local grid directions in the model ;
52\item the addition of a surface restoring term to observed SST and/or SSS (\np{ln\_ssr}~=~true) ;
53\item the modification of fluxes below ice-covered areas (using observed ice-cover or a sea-ice model) (\np{nn\_ice}~=~0,1, 2 or 3) ;
54\item the addition of river runoffs as surface freshwater fluxes or lateral inflow (\np{ln\_rnf}~=~true) ;
55\item the addition of isf melting as lateral inflow (parameterisation) or as fluxes applied at the land-ice ocean interface (\np{ln\_isf}) ;
56\item the addition of a freshwater flux adjustment in order to avoid a mean sea-level drift (\np{nn\_fwb}~=~0,~1~or~2) ;
57\item the transformation of the solar radiation (if provided as daily mean) into a diurnal cycle (\np{ln\_dm2dc}~=~true) ;
58and a neutral drag coefficient can be read from an external wave model (\np{ln\_cdgw}~=~true).
60The latter option is possible only in case core or mfs bulk formulas are selected.
62In this chapter, we first discuss where the surface boundary condition appears in the
63model equations. Then we present the five ways of providing the surface boundary condition,
64followed by the description of the atmospheric pressure and the river runoff.
65Next the scheme for interpolation on the fly is described.
66Finally, the different options that further modify the fluxes applied to the ocean are discussed.
67One of these is modification by icebergs (see \S\ref{ICB_icebergs}), which act as drifting sources of fresh water.
68Another example of modification is that due to the ice shelf melting/freezing (see \S\ref{SBC_isf}),
69which provides additional sources of fresh water.
72% ================================================================
73% Surface boundary condition for the ocean
74% ================================================================
75\section{Surface boundary condition for the ocean}
78The surface ocean stress is the stress exerted by the wind and the sea-ice
79on the ocean. It is applied in \mdl{dynzdf} module as a surface boundary condition of the
80computation of the momentum vertical mixing trend (see \eqref{Eq_dynzdf_sbc} in \S\ref{DYN_zdf}).
81As such, it has to be provided as a 2D vector interpolated
82onto the horizontal velocity ocean mesh, $i.e.$ resolved onto the model
83(\textbf{i},\textbf{j}) direction at $u$- and $v$-points.
85The surface heat flux is decomposed into two parts, a non solar and a solar heat
86flux, $Q_{ns}$ and $Q_{sr}$, respectively. The former is the non penetrative part
87of the heat flux ($i.e.$ the sum of sensible, latent and long wave heat fluxes
88plus the heat content of the mass exchange with the atmosphere and sea-ice).
89It is applied in \mdl{trasbc} module as a surface boundary condition trend of
90the first level temperature time evolution equation (see \eqref{Eq_tra_sbc} 
91and \eqref{Eq_tra_sbc_lin} in \S\ref{TRA_sbc}).
92The latter is the penetrative part of the heat flux. It is applied as a 3D
93trends of the temperature equation (\mdl{traqsr} module) when \np{ln\_traqsr}=\textit{true}.
94The way the light penetrates inside the water column is generally a sum of decreasing
95exponentials (see \S\ref{TRA_qsr}).
97The surface freshwater budget is provided by the \textit{emp} field.
98It represents the mass flux exchanged with the atmosphere (evaporation minus precipitation)
99and possibly with the sea-ice and ice shelves (freezing minus melting of ice).
100It affects both the ocean in two different ways:
101$(i)$   it changes the volume of the ocean and therefore appears in the sea surface height
102equation as a volume flux, and
103$(ii)$  it changes the surface temperature and salinity through the heat and salt contents
104of the mass exchanged with the atmosphere, the sea-ice and the ice shelves.
107%\colorbox{yellow}{Miss: }
109%A extensive description of all namsbc namelist (parameter that have to be
112%Especially the \np{nn\_fsbc}, the \mdl{sbc\_oce} module (fluxes + mean sst sss ssu
113%ssv) i.e. information required by flux computation or sea-ice
115%\mdl{sbc\_oce} containt the definition in memory of the 7 fields (6+runoff), add
116%a word on runoff: included in surface bc or add as lateral obc{\ldots}.
118%Sbcmod manage the ``providing'' (fourniture) to the ocean the 7 fields
120%Fluxes update only each nf{\_}sbc time step (namsbc) explain relation
121%between nf{\_}sbc and nf{\_}ice, do we define nf{\_}blk??? ? only one
124%Explain here all the namlist namsbc variable{\ldots}.
126% explain : use or not of surface currents
128%\colorbox{yellow}{End Miss }
130The ocean model provides, at each time step, to the surface module (\mdl{sbcmod})
131the surface currents, temperature and salinity. 
132These variables are averaged over \np{nn\_fsbc} time-step (\ref{Tab_ssm}),
133and it is these averaged fields which are used to computes the surface fluxes
134at a frequency of \np{nn\_fsbc} time-step.
138\begin{table}[tb]   \begin{center}   \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|}
140Variable description             & Model variable  & Units  & point \\  \hline
141i-component of the surface current  & ssu\_m & $m.s^{-1}$   & U \\   \hline
142j-component of the surface current  & ssv\_m & $m.s^{-1}$   & V \\   \hline
143Sea surface temperature          & sst\_m & \r{}$K$      & T \\   \hline
144Sea surface salinty              & sss\_m & $psu$        & T \\   \hline
146\caption{  \protect\label{Tab_ssm}   
147Ocean variables provided by the ocean to the surface module (SBC).
148The variable are averaged over nn{\_}fsbc time step,
149$i.e.$ the frequency of computation of surface fluxes.}
150\end{center}   \end{table}
153%\colorbox{yellow}{Penser a} mettre dans le restant l'info nn{\_}fsbc ET nn{\_}fsbc*rdt de sorte de reinitialiser la moyenne si on change la frequence ou le pdt
156% ================================================================
157%       Input Data
158% ================================================================
159\section{Input Data generic interface}
162A generic interface has been introduced to manage the way input data (2D or 3D fields,
163like surface forcing or ocean T and S) are specify in \NEMO. This task is archieved by fldread.F90.
164The module was design with four main objectives in mind:
166\item optionally provide a time interpolation of the input data at model time-step,
167whatever their input frequency is, and according to the different calendars available in the model.
168\item optionally provide an on-the-fly space interpolation from the native input data grid to the model grid.
169\item make the run duration independent from the period cover by the input files.
170\item provide a simple user interface and a rather simple developer interface by limiting the
171 number of prerequisite information.
174As a results the user have only to fill in for each variable a structure in the namelist file
175to defined the input data file and variable names, the frequency of the data (in hours or months),
176whether its is climatological data or not, the period covered by the input file (one year, month, week or day),
177and three additional parameters for on-the-fly interpolation. When adding a new input variable,
178the developer has to add the associated structure in the namelist, read this information
179by mirroring the namelist read in \rou{sbc\_blk\_init} for example, and simply call \rou{fld\_read} 
180to obtain the desired input field at the model time-step and grid points.
182The only constraints are that the input file is a NetCDF file, the file name follows a nomenclature
183(see \S\ref{SBC_fldread}), the period it cover is one year, month, week or day, and, if on-the-fly
184interpolation is used, a file of weights must be supplied (see \S\ref{SBC_iof}).
186Note that when an input data is archived on a disc which is accessible directly
187from the workspace where the code is executed, then the use can set the \np{cn\_dir} 
188to the pathway leading to the data. By default, the data are assumed to have been
189copied so that cn\_dir='./'.
191% -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
192% Input Data specification (\mdl{fldread})
193% -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
194\subsection{Input Data specification (\protect\mdl{fldread})}
197The structure associated with an input variable contains the following information:
198\begin{alltt}  {{\tiny   
200!  file name  ! frequency (hours) ! variable  ! time interp. !  clim  ! 'yearly'/ ! weights  ! rotation ! land/sea mask !
201!             !  (if <0  months)  !   name    !   (logical)  !  (T/F) ! 'monthly' ! filename ! pairing  ! filename      !
206\item[File name]: the stem name of the NetCDF file to be open.
207This stem will be completed automatically by the model, with the addition of a '.nc' at its end
208and by date information and possibly a prefix (when using AGRIF).
209Tab.\ref{Tab_fldread} provides the resulting file name in all possible cases according to whether
210it is a climatological file or not, and to the open/close frequency (see below for definition).
217                         & daily or weekLLL          & monthly                   &   yearly          \\   \hline
218clim = false   & fn\_yYYYYmMMdDD  &   fn\_yYYYYmMM   &   fn\_yYYYY  \\   \hline
219clim = true       & not possible                  &  fn\_m??.nc             &   fn                \\   \hline
222\caption{ \protect\label{Tab_fldread}   naming nomenclature for climatological or interannual input file,
223as a function of the Open/close frequency. The stem name is assumed to be 'fn'.
224For weekly files, the 'LLL' corresponds to the first three letters of the first day of the week ($i.e.$ 'sun','sat','fri','thu','wed','tue','mon'). The 'YYYY', 'MM' and 'DD' should be replaced by the
225actual year/month/day, always coded with 4 or 2 digits. Note that (1) in mpp, if the file is split
226over each subdomain, the suffix '.nc' is replaced by '\', where 'PPPP' is the
227process number coded with 4 digits; (2) when using AGRIF, the prefix
228'\_N' is added to files,
229where 'N'  is the child grid number.}
234\item[Record frequency]: the frequency of the records contained in the input file.
235Its unit is in hours if it is positive (for example 24 for daily forcing) or in months if negative
236(for example -1 for monthly forcing or -12 for annual forcing).
237Note that this frequency must really be an integer and not a real.
238On some computers, seting it to '24.' can be interpreted as 240!
240\item[Variable name]: the name of the variable to be read in the input NetCDF file.
242\item[Time interpolation]: a logical to activate, or not, the time interpolation. If set to 'false',
243the forcing will have a steplike shape remaining constant during each forcing period.
244For example, when using a daily forcing without time interpolation, the forcing remaining
245constant from 00h00'00'' to 23h59'59". If set to 'true', the forcing will have a broken line shape.
246Records are assumed to be dated the middle of the forcing period.
247For example, when using a daily forcing with time interpolation, linear interpolation will
248be performed between mid-day of two consecutive days.
250\item[Climatological forcing]: a logical to specify if a input file contains climatological forcing
251which can be cycle in time, or an interannual forcing which will requires additional files
252if the period covered by the simulation exceed the one of the file. See the above the file
253naming strategy which impacts the expected name of the file to be opened.
255\item[Open/close frequency]: the frequency at which forcing files must be opened/closed.
256Four cases are coded: 'daily', 'weekLLL' (with 'LLL' the first 3 letters of the first day of the week),
257'monthly' and 'yearly' which means the forcing files will contain data for one day, one week,
258one month or one year. Files are assumed to contain data from the beginning of the open/close period.
259For example, the first record of a yearly file containing daily data is Jan 1st even if the experiment
260is not starting at the beginning of the year.
262\item[Others]: 'weights filename', 'pairing rotation' and 'land/sea mask' are associted with on-the-fly interpolation
263which is described in \S\ref{SBC_iof}.
267Additional remarks:\\
268(1) The time interpolation is a simple linear interpolation between two consecutive records of
269the input data. The only tricky point is therefore to specify the date at which we need to do
270the interpolation and the date of the records read in the input files.
271Following \citet{Leclair_Madec_OM09}, the date of a time step is set at the middle of the
272time step. For example, for an experiment starting at 0h00'00" with a one hour time-step,
273a time interpolation will be performed at the following time: 0h30'00", 1h30'00", 2h30'00", etc.
274However, for forcing data related to the surface module, values are not needed at every
275time-step but at every \np{nn\_fsbc} time-step. For example with \np{nn\_fsbc}~=~3,
276the surface module will be called at time-steps 1, 4, 7, etc. The date used for the time interpolation
277is thus redefined to be at the middle of \np{nn\_fsbc} time-step period. In the previous example,
278this leads to: 1h30'00", 4h30'00", 7h30'00", etc. \\ 
279(2) For code readablility and maintenance issues, we don't take into account the NetCDF input file
280calendar. The calendar associated with the forcing field is build according to the information
281provided by user in the record frequency, the open/close frequency and the type of temporal interpolation.
282For example, the first record of a yearly file containing daily data that will be interpolated in time
283is assumed to be start Jan 1st at 12h00'00" and end Dec 31st at 12h00'00". \\
284(3) If a time interpolation is requested, the code will pick up the needed data in the previous (next) file
285when interpolating data with the first (last) record of the open/close period.
286For example, if the input file specifications are ''yearly, containing daily data to be interpolated in time'',
287the values given by the code between 00h00'00" and 11h59'59" on Jan 1st will be interpolated values
288between Dec 31st 12h00'00" and Jan 1st 12h00'00". If the forcing is climatological, Dec and Jan will
289be keep-up from the same year. However, if the forcing is not climatological, at the end of the
290open/close period the code will automatically close the current file and open the next one.
291Note that, if the experiment is starting (ending) at the beginning (end) of an open/close period
292we do accept that the previous (next) file is not existing. In this case, the time interpolation
293will be performed between two identical values. For example, when starting an experiment on
294Jan 1st of year Y with yearly files and daily data to be interpolated, we do accept that the file
295related to year Y-1 is not existing. The value of Jan 1st will be used as the missing one for
296Dec 31st of year Y-1. If the file of year Y-1 exists, the code will read its last record.
297Therefore, this file can contain only one record corresponding to Dec 31st, a useful feature for
298user considering that it is too heavy to manipulate the complete file for year Y-1.
301% -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
302% Interpolation on the Fly
303% -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
304\subsection [Interpolation on-the-Fly] {Interpolation on-the-Fly}
307Interpolation on the Fly allows the user to supply input files required
308for the surface forcing on grids other than the model grid.
309To do this he or she must supply, in addition to the source data file,
310a file of weights to be used to interpolate from the data grid to the model grid.
311The original development of this code used the SCRIP package (freely available
312\href{}{here} under a copyright agreement).
313In principle, any package can be used to generate the weights, but the
314variables in the input weights file must have the same names and meanings as
315assumed by the model.
316Two methods are currently available: bilinear and bicubic interpolation.
317Prior to the interpolation, providing a land/sea mask file, the user can decide to
318 remove land points from the input file and substitute the corresponding values
319with the average of the 8 neighbouring points in the native external grid.
320 Only "sea points" are considered for the averaging. The land/sea mask file must
321be provided in the structure associated with the input variable.
322 The netcdf land/sea mask variable name must be 'LSM' it must have the same
323horizontal and vertical dimensions of the associated variable and should
324be equal to 1 over land and 0 elsewhere.
325The procedure can be recursively applied setting nn\_lsm > 1 in namsbc namelist.
326Note that nn\_lsm=0 forces the code to not apply the procedure even if a file for land/sea mask is supplied.
328\subsubsection{Bilinear Interpolation}
331The input weights file in this case has two sets of variables: src01, src02,
332src03, src04 and wgt01, wgt02, wgt03, wgt04.
333The "src" variables correspond to the point in the input grid to which the weight
334"wgt" is to be applied. Each src value is an integer corresponding to the index of a
335point in the input grid when written as a one dimensional array.  For example, for an input grid
336of size 5x10, point (3,2) is referenced as point 8, since (2-1)*5+3=8.
337There are four of each variable because bilinear interpolation uses the four points defining
338the grid box containing the point to be interpolated.
339All of these arrays are on the model grid, so that values src01(i,j) and
340wgt01(i,j) are used to generate a value for point (i,j) in the model.
342Symbolically, the algorithm used is:
345f_{m}(i,j) = f_{m}(i,j) + \sum_{k=1}^{4} {wgt(k)f(idx(src(k)))}
347where function idx() transforms a one dimensional index src(k) into a two dimensional index,
348and wgt(1) corresponds to variable "wgt01" for example.
350\subsubsection{Bicubic Interpolation}
353Again there are two sets of variables: "src" and "wgt".
354But in this case there are 16 of each.
355The symbolic algorithm used to calculate values on the model grid is now:
357\begin{equation*} \begin{split}
358f_{m}(i,j) =  f_{m}(i,j) +& \sum_{k=1}^{4} {wgt(k)f(idx(src(k)))}     
359              +   \sum_{k=5}^{8} {wgt(k)\left.\frac{\partial f}{\partial i}\right| _{idx(src(k))} }    \\
360              +& \sum_{k=9}^{12} {wgt(k)\left.\frac{\partial f}{\partial j}\right| _{idx(src(k))} }   
361              +   \sum_{k=13}^{16} {wgt(k)\left.\frac{\partial ^2 f}{\partial i \partial j}\right| _{idx(src(k))} }
364The gradients here are taken with respect to the horizontal indices and not distances since the spatial dependency has been absorbed into the weights.
369To activate this option, a non-empty string should be supplied in the weights filename column
370of the relevant namelist; if this is left as an empty string no action is taken.
371In the model, weights files are read in and stored in a structured type (WGT) in the fldread
372module, as and when they are first required.
373This initialisation procedure determines whether the input data grid should be treated
374as cyclical or not by inspecting a global attribute stored in the weights input file.
375This attribute must be called "ew\_wrap" and be of integer type.
376If it is negative, the input non-model grid is assumed not to be cyclic.
377If zero or greater, then the value represents the number of columns that overlap.
378$E.g.$ if the input grid has columns at longitudes 0, 1, 2, .... , 359, then ew\_wrap should be set to 0;
379if longitudes are 0.5, 2.5, .... , 358.5, 360.5, 362.5, ew\_wrap should be 2.
380If the model does not find attribute ew\_wrap, then a value of -999 is assumed.
381In this case the \rou{fld\_read} routine defaults ew\_wrap to value 0 and therefore the grid
382is assumed to be cyclic with no overlapping columns.
383(In fact this only matters when bicubic interpolation is required.)
384Note that no testing is done to check the validity in the model, since there is no way
385of knowing the name used for the longitude variable,
386so it is up to the user to make sure his or her data is correctly represented.
388Next the routine reads in the weights.
389Bicubic interpolation is assumed if it finds a variable with name "src05", otherwise
390bilinear interpolation is used. The WGT structure includes dynamic arrays both for
391the storage of the weights (on the model grid), and when required, for reading in
392the variable to be interpolated (on the input data grid).
393The size of the input data array is determined by examining the values in the "src"
394arrays to find the minimum and maximum i and j values required.
395Since bicubic interpolation requires the calculation of gradients at each point on the grid,
396the corresponding arrays are dimensioned with a halo of width one grid point all the way around.
397When the array of points from the data file is adjacent to an edge of the data grid,
398the halo is either a copy of the row/column next to it (non-cyclical case), or is a copy
399of one from the first few columns on the opposite side of the grid (cyclical case).
405\item  The case where input data grids are not logically rectangular has not been tested.
406\item  This code is not guaranteed to produce positive definite answers from positive definite inputs
407          when a bicubic interpolation method is used.
408\item  The cyclic condition is only applied on left and right columns, and not to top and bottom rows.
409\item  The gradients across the ends of a cyclical grid assume that the grid spacing between
410          the two columns involved are consistent with the weights used.
411\item  Neither interpolation scheme is conservative. (There is a conservative scheme available
412          in SCRIP, but this has not been implemented.)
418% to be completed
419A set of utilities to create a weights file for a rectilinear input grid is available
420(see the directory NEMOGCM/TOOLS/WEIGHTS).
422% -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
423% Standalone Surface Boundary Condition Scheme
424% -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
425\subsection [Standalone Surface Boundary Condition Scheme] {Standalone Surface Boundary Condition Scheme}
432In some circumstances it may be useful to avoid calculating the 3D temperature, salinity and velocity fields
433and simply read them in from a previous run or receive them from OASIS. 
434For example:
437\item  Multiple runs of the model are required in code development to see the effect of different algorithms in
438       the bulk formulae.
439\item  The effect of different parameter sets in the ice model is to be examined.
440\item  Development of sea-ice algorithms or parameterizations.
441\item  spinup of the iceberg floats
442\item  ocean/sea-ice simulation with both media running in parallel (\np{ln\_mixcpl}~=~\textit{true})
445The StandAlone Surface scheme provides this utility.
446Its options are defined through the \ngn{namsbc\_sas} namelist variables.
447A new copy of the model has to be compiled with a configuration based on ORCA2\_SAS\_LIM.
448However no namelist parameters need be changed from the settings of the previous run (except perhaps nn{\_}date0)
449In this configuration, a few routines in the standard model are overriden by new versions.
450Routines replaced are:
453\item \mdl{nemogcm} : This routine initialises the rest of the model and repeatedly calls the stp time stepping routine (step.F90)
454       Since the ocean state is not calculated all associated initialisations have been removed.
455\item  \mdl{step} : The main time stepping routine now only needs to call the sbc routine (and a few utility functions).
456\item  \mdl{sbcmod} : This has been cut down and now only calculates surface forcing and the ice model required.  New surface modules
457       that can function when only the surface level of the ocean state is defined can also be added (e.g. icebergs).
458\item  \mdl{daymod} : No ocean restarts are read or written (though the ice model restarts are retained), so calls to restart functions
459       have been removed.  This also means that the calendar cannot be controlled by time in a restart file, so the user
460       must make sure that nn{\_}date0 in the model namelist is correct for his or her purposes.
461\item  \mdl{stpctl} : Since there is no free surface solver, references to it have been removed from \rou{stp\_ctl} module.
462\item  \mdl{diawri} : All 3D data have been removed from the output.  The surface temperature, salinity and velocity components (which
463       have been read in) are written along with relevant forcing and ice data.
466One new routine has been added:
469\item  \mdl{sbcsas} : This module initialises the input files needed for reading temperature, salinity and velocity arrays at the surface.
470       These filenames are supplied in namelist namsbc{\_}sas.  Unfortunately because of limitations with the \mdl{iom} module,
471       the full 3D fields from the mean files have to be read in and interpolated in time, before using just the top level.
472       Since fldread is used to read in the data, Interpolation on the Fly may be used to change input data resolution.
476% Missing the description of the 2 following variables:
477%   ln_3d_uve   = .true.    !  specify whether we are supplying a 3D u,v and e3 field
478%   ln_read_frq = .false.    !  specify whether we must read frq or not
482% ================================================================
483% Analytical formulation (sbcana module)
484% ================================================================
485\section  [Analytical formulation (\textit{sbcana}) ]
486      {Analytical formulation (\protect\mdl{sbcana} module) }
493The analytical formulation of the surface boundary condition is the default scheme.
494In this case, all the six fluxes needed by the ocean are assumed to
495be uniform in space. They take constant values given in the namelist
496\ngn{namsbc{\_}ana} by the variables \np{rn\_utau0}, \np{rn\_vtau0}, \np{rn\_qns0},
497\np{rn\_qsr0}, and \np{rn\_emp0} ($\textit{emp}=\textit{emp}_S$). The runoff is set to zero.
498In addition, the wind is allowed to reach its nominal value within a given number
499of time steps (\np{nn\_tau000}).
501If a user wants to apply a different analytical forcing, the \mdl{sbcana} 
502module can be modified to use another scheme. As an example,
503the \mdl{sbc\_ana\_gyre} routine provides the analytical forcing for the
504GYRE configuration (see GYRE configuration manual, in preparation).
507% ================================================================
508% Flux formulation
509% ================================================================
510\section  [Flux formulation (\textit{sbcflx}) ]
511      {Flux formulation (\protect\mdl{sbcflx} module) }
517In the flux formulation (\np{ln\_flx}=true), the surface boundary
518condition fields are directly read from input files. The user has to define
519in the namelist \ngn{namsbc{\_}flx} the name of the file, the name of the variable
520read in the file, the time frequency at which it is given (in hours), and a logical
521setting whether a time interpolation to the model time step is required
522for this field. See \S\ref{SBC_fldread} for a more detailed description of the parameters.
524Note that in general, a flux formulation is used in associated with a
525restoring term to observed SST and/or SSS. See \S\ref{SBC_ssr} for its
529% ================================================================
530% Bulk formulation
531% ================================================================
532\section  [Bulk formulation (\textit{sbcblk\_core}, \textit{sbcblk\_clio} or \textit{sbcblk\_mfs}) ]
533      {Bulk formulation \small{(\protect\mdl{sbcblk\_core} \protect\mdl{sbcblk\_clio} \protect\mdl{sbcblk\_mfs} modules)} }
536In the bulk formulation, the surface boundary condition fields are computed
537using bulk formulae and atmospheric fields and ocean (and ice) variables.
539The atmospheric fields used depend on the bulk formulae used. Three bulk formulations
540are available : the CORE, the CLIO and the MFS bulk formulea. The choice is made by setting to true
541one of the following namelist variable : \np{ln\_core} ; \np{ln\_clio} or  \np{ln\_mfs}.
543Note : in forced mode, when a sea-ice model is used, a bulk formulation (CLIO or CORE) have to be used.
544Therefore the two bulk (CLIO and CORE) formulea include the computation of the fluxes over both
545an ocean and an ice surface.
547% -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
548%        CORE Bulk formulea
549% -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
550\subsection    [CORE Bulk formulea (\protect\np{ln\_core}=true)]
551            {CORE Bulk formulea (\protect\np{ln\_core}=true, \protect\mdl{sbcblk\_core})}
557The CORE bulk formulae have been developed by \citet{Large_Yeager_Rep04}.
558They have been designed to handle the CORE forcing, a mixture of NCEP
559reanalysis and satellite data. They use an inertial dissipative method to compute
560the turbulent transfer coefficients (momentum, sensible heat and evaporation)
561from the 10 metre wind speed, air temperature and specific humidity.
562This \citet{Large_Yeager_Rep04} dataset is available through the
563\href{}{GFDL web site}.
565Note that substituting ERA40 to NCEP reanalysis fields
566does not require changes in the bulk formulea themself.
567This is the so-called DRAKKAR Forcing Set (DFS) \citep{Brodeau_al_OM09}.
569Options are defined through the  \ngn{namsbc\_core} namelist variables.
570The required 8 input fields are:
573\begin{table}[htbp]   \label{Tab_CORE}
577Variable desciption              & Model variable  & Units   & point \\    \hline
578i-component of the 10m air velocity & utau      & $m.s^{-1}$         & T  \\  \hline
579j-component of the 10m air velocity & vtau      & $m.s^{-1}$         & T  \\  \hline
58010m air temperature              & tair      & \r{}$K$            & T   \\ \hline
581Specific humidity             & humi      & \%              & T \\      \hline
582Incoming long wave radiation     & qlw    & $W.m^{-2}$         & T \\      \hline
583Incoming short wave radiation    & qsr    & $W.m^{-2}$         & T \\      \hline
584Total precipitation (liquid + solid)   & precip & $Kg.m^{-2}.s^{-1}$ & T \\   \hline
585Solid precipitation              & snow      & $Kg.m^{-2}.s^{-1}$ & T \\   \hline
591Note that the air velocity is provided at a tracer ocean point, not at a velocity ocean
592point ($u$- and $v$-points). It is simpler and faster (less fields to be read),
593but it is not the recommended method when the ocean grid size is the same
594or larger than the one of the input atmospheric fields.
596The \np{sn\_wndi}, \np{sn\_wndj}, \np{sn\_qsr}, \np{sn\_qlw}, \np{sn\_tair}, \np{sn\_humi},
597\np{sn\_prec}, \np{sn\_snow}, \np{sn\_tdif} parameters describe the fields
598and the way they have to be used (spatial and temporal interpolations).
600\np{cn\_dir} is the directory of location of bulk files
601\np{ln\_taudif} is the flag to specify if we use Hight Frequency (HF) tau information (.true.) or not (.false.)
602\np{rn\_zqt}: is the height of humidity and temperature measurements (m)
603\np{rn\_zu}: is the height of wind measurements (m)
605Three multiplicative factors are availables :
606\np{rn\_pfac} and \np{rn\_efac} allows to adjust (if necessary) the global freshwater budget
607by increasing/reducing the precipitations (total and snow) and or evaporation, respectively.
608The third one,\np{rn\_vfac}, control to which extend the ice/ocean velocities are taken into account
609in the calculation of surface wind stress. Its range should be between zero and one,
610and it is recommended to set it to 0.
612% -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
613%        CLIO Bulk formulea
614% -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
615\subsection    [CLIO Bulk formulea (\protect\np{ln\_clio}=true)]
616            {CLIO Bulk formulea (\protect\np{ln\_clio}=true, \protect\mdl{sbcblk\_clio})}
622The CLIO bulk formulae were developed several years ago for the
623Louvain-la-neuve coupled ice-ocean model (CLIO, \cite{Goosse_al_JGR99}).
624They are simpler bulk formulae. They assume the stress to be known and
625compute the radiative fluxes from a climatological cloud cover.
627Options are defined through the  \ngn{namsbc\_clio} namelist variables.
628The required 7 input fields are:
631\begin{table}[htbp]   \label{Tab_CLIO}
635Variable desciption           & Model variable  & Units           & point \\  \hline
636i-component of the ocean stress     & utau         & $N.m^{-2}$         & U \\   \hline
637j-component of the ocean stress     & vtau         & $N.m^{-2}$         & V \\   \hline
638Wind speed module             & vatm         & $m.s^{-1}$         & T \\   \hline
63910m air temperature              & tair         & \r{}$K$            & T \\   \hline
640Specific humidity                & humi         & \%              & T \\   \hline
641Cloud cover                   &           & \%              & T \\   \hline
642Total precipitation (liquid + solid)   & precip    & $Kg.m^{-2}.s^{-1}$ & T \\   \hline
643Solid precipitation              & snow         & $Kg.m^{-2}.s^{-1}$ & T \\   \hline
649As for the flux formulation, information about the input data required by the
650model is provided in the namsbc\_blk\_core or namsbc\_blk\_clio
651namelist (see \S\ref{SBC_fldread}).
653% -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
654%        MFS Bulk formulae
655% -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
656\subsection    [MFS Bulk formulea (\protect\np{ln\_mfs}=true)]
657            {MFS Bulk formulea (\protect\np{ln\_mfs}=true, \protect\mdl{sbcblk\_mfs})}
663The MFS (Mediterranean Forecasting System) bulk formulae have been developed by
664 \citet{Castellari_al_JMS1998}.
665They have been designed to handle the ECMWF operational data and are currently
666in use in the MFS operational system \citep{Tonani_al_OS08}, \citep{Oddo_al_OS09}.
667The wind stress computation uses a drag coefficient computed according to \citet{Hellerman_Rosenstein_JPO83}.
668The surface boundary condition for temperature involves the balance between surface solar radiation,
669net long-wave radiation, the latent and sensible heat fluxes.
670Solar radiation is dependent on cloud cover and is computed by means of
671an astronomical formula \citep{Reed_JPO77}. Albedo monthly values are from \citet{Payne_JAS72} 
672as means of the values at $40^{o}N$ and $30^{o}N$ for the Atlantic Ocean (hence the same latitudinal
673band of the Mediterranean Sea). The net long-wave radiation flux
674\citep{Bignami_al_JGR95} is a function of
675air temperature, sea-surface temperature, cloud cover and relative humidity.
676Sensible heat and latent heat fluxes are computed by classical
677bulk formulae parameterised according to \citet{Kondo1975}.
678Details on the bulk formulae used can be found in \citet{Maggiore_al_PCE98} and \citet{Castellari_al_JMS1998}.
680Options are defined through the  \ngn{namsbc\_mfs} namelist variables.
681The required 7 input fields must be provided on the model Grid-T and  are:
683\item          Zonal Component of the 10m wind ($ms^{-1}$)  (\np{sn\_windi})
684\item          Meridional Component of the 10m wind ($ms^{-1}$)  (\np{sn\_windj})
685\item          Total Claud Cover (\%)  (\np{sn\_clc})
686\item          2m Air Temperature ($K$) (\np{sn\_tair})
687\item          2m Dew Point Temperature ($K$)  (\np{sn\_rhm})
688\item          Total Precipitation ${Kg} m^{-2} s^{-1}$ (\np{sn\_prec})
689\item          Mean Sea Level Pressure (${Pa}$) (\np{sn\_msl})
691% -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
692% ================================================================
693% Coupled formulation
694% ================================================================
695\section  [Coupled formulation (\textit{sbccpl}) ]
696      {Coupled formulation (\protect\mdl{sbccpl} module)}
702In the coupled formulation of the surface boundary condition, the fluxes are
703provided by the OASIS coupler at a frequency which is defined in the OASIS coupler,
704while sea and ice surface temperature, ocean and ice albedo, and ocean currents
705are sent to the atmospheric component.
707A generalised coupled interface has been developed.
708It is currently interfaced with OASIS-3-MCT (\key{oasis3}).
709It has been successfully used to interface \NEMO to most of the European atmospheric
711as well as to \href{}{WRF} (Weather Research and Forecasting Model).
713Note that in addition to the setting of \np{ln\_cpl} to true, the \key{coupled} have to be defined.
714The CPP key is mainly used in sea-ice to ensure that the atmospheric fluxes are
715actually recieved by the ice-ocean system (no calculation of ice sublimation in coupled mode).
716When PISCES biogeochemical model (\key{top} and \key{pisces}) is also used in the coupled system,
717the whole carbon cycle is computed by defining \key{cpl\_carbon\_cycle}. In this case,
718CO$_2$ fluxes will be exchanged between the atmosphere and the ice-ocean system (and need to be activated in \ngn{namsbc{\_}cpl} ).
720The namelist above allows control of various aspects of the coupling fields (particularly for
721vectors) and now allows for any coupling fields to have multiple sea ice categories (as required by LIM3
722and CICE).  When indicating a multi-category coupling field in namsbc{\_}cpl the number of categories will be
723determined by the number used in the sea ice model.  In some limited cases it may be possible to specify
724single category coupling fields even when the sea ice model is running with multiple categories - in this
725case the user should examine the code to be sure the assumptions made are satisfactory.  In cases where
726this is definitely not possible the model should abort with an error message.  The new code has been tested using
727ECHAM with LIM2, and HadGAM3 with CICE but although it will compile with \key{lim3} additional minor code changes
728may be required to run using LIM3.
731% ================================================================
732%        Atmospheric pressure
733% ================================================================
734\section   [Atmospheric pressure (\textit{sbcapr})]
735         {Atmospheric pressure (\protect\mdl{sbcapr})}
741The optional atmospheric pressure can be used to force ocean and ice dynamics
742(\np{ln\_apr\_dyn}~=~true, \textit{\ngn{namsbc}} namelist ).
743The input atmospheric forcing defined via \np{sn\_apr} structure (\textit{namsbc\_apr} namelist)
744can be interpolated in time to the model time step, and even in space when the
745interpolation on-the-fly is used. When used to force the dynamics, the atmospheric
746pressure is further transformed into an equivalent inverse barometer sea surface height,
747$\eta_{ib}$, using:
748\begin{equation} \label{SBC_ssh_ib}
749   \eta_{ib} = -  \frac{1}{g\,\rho_o}  \left( P_{atm} - P_o \right)
751where $P_{atm}$ is the atmospheric pressure and $P_o$ a reference atmospheric pressure.
752A value of $101,000~N/m^2$ is used unless \np{ln\_ref\_apr} is set to true. In this case $P_o$ 
753is set to the value of $P_{atm}$ averaged over the ocean domain, $i.e.$ the mean value of
754$\eta_{ib}$ is kept to zero at all time step.
756The gradient of $\eta_{ib}$ is added to the RHS of the ocean momentum equation
757(see \mdl{dynspg} for the ocean). For sea-ice, the sea surface height, $\eta_m$,
758which is provided to the sea ice model is set to $\eta - \eta_{ib}$ (see \mdl{sbcssr} module).
759$\eta_{ib}$ can be set in the output. This can simplify altimetry data and model comparison
760as inverse barometer sea surface height is usually removed from these date prior to their distribution.
762When using time-splitting and BDY package for open boundaries conditions, the equivalent
763inverse barometer sea surface height $\eta_{ib}$ can be added to BDY ssh data:
764\np{ln\_apr\_obc}  might be set to true.
766% ================================================================
767%        Tidal Potential
768% ================================================================
769\section   [Tidal Potential (\textit{sbctide})]
770                        {Tidal Potential (\protect\mdl{sbctide})}
777A module is available to compute the tidal potential and use it in the momentum equation.
778This option is activated when \np{ln\_tide} is set to true in \ngn{nam\_tide}.
780Some parameters are available in namelist \ngn{nam\_tide}:
782- \np{ln\_tide\_load} activate the load potential forcing and \np{filetide\_load} is  the associated file
784- \np{ln\_tide\_pot} activate the tidal potential forcing
786- \np{nb\_harmo} is the number of constituent used
788- \np{clname} is the name of constituent
790The tide is generated by the forces of gravity ot the Earth-Moon and Earth-Sun sytem;
791they are expressed as the gradient of the astronomical potential ($\vec{\nabla}\Pi_{a}$). \\
793The potential astronomical expressed, for the three types of tidal frequencies
794following, by : \\
795Tide long period :
799diurnal Tide :
801\Pi_{a}=gA_{k}(sin 2\phi)cos(\omega_{k}t+\lambda+V_{0k})
803Semi-diurnal tide:
809$A_{k}$ is the amplitude of the wave k, $\omega_{k}$ the pulsation of the wave k, $V_{0k}$ the astronomical phase of the wave
810$k$ to Greenwich.
812We make corrections to the astronomical potential.
813We obtain :
815\Pi-g\delta = (1+k-h) \Pi_{A}(\lambda,\phi)
817with $k$ a number of Love estimated to 0.6 which parameterised the astronomical tidal land,
818and $h$ a number of Love to 0.3 which parameterised the parameterisation due to the astronomical tidal land.
820A description of load potential can be found in  \citet{Arbic2010}
822% ================================================================
823%        River runoffs
824% ================================================================
825\section   [River runoffs (\textit{sbcrnf})]
826         {River runoffs (\protect\mdl{sbcrnf})}
832%River runoff generally enters the ocean at a nonzero depth rather than through the surface.
833%Many models, however, have traditionally inserted river runoff to the top model cell.
834%This was the case in \NEMO prior to the version 3.3. The switch toward a input of runoff
835%throughout a nonzero depth has been motivated by the numerical and physical problems
836%that arise when the top grid cells are of the order of one meter. This situation is common in
837%coastal modelling and becomes more and more often open ocean and climate modelling
838%\footnote{At least a top cells thickness of 1~meter and a 3 hours forcing frequency are
839%required to properly represent the diurnal cycle \citep{Bernie_al_JC05}. see also \S\ref{SBC_dcy}.}.
842%To do this we need to treat evaporation/precipitation fluxes and river runoff differently in the
843%\mdl{tra\_sbc} module.  We decided to separate them throughout the code, so that the variable
844%\textit{emp} represented solely evaporation minus precipitation fluxes, and a new 2d variable
845%rnf was added which represents the volume flux of river runoff (in kg/m2s to remain consistent with
846%emp).  This meant many uses of emp and emps needed to be changed, a list of all modules which use
847%emp or emps and the changes made are below:
851River runoff generally enters the ocean at a nonzero depth rather than through the surface.
852Many models, however, have traditionally inserted river runoff to the top model cell.
853This was the case in \NEMO prior to the version 3.3, and was combined with an option
854to increase vertical mixing near the river mouth.
856However, with this method numerical and physical problems arise when the top grid cells are
857of the order of one meter. This situation is common in coastal modelling and is becoming
858more common in open ocean and climate modelling
859\footnote{At least a top cells thickness of 1~meter and a 3 hours forcing frequency are
860required to properly represent the diurnal cycle \citep{Bernie_al_JC05}. see also \S\ref{SBC_dcy}.}.
862As such from V~3.3 onwards it is possible to add river runoff through a non-zero depth, and for the
863temperature and salinity of the river to effect the surrounding ocean.
864The user is able to specify, in a NetCDF input file, the temperature and salinity of the river, along with the   
865depth (in metres) which the river should be added to.
867Namelist variables in \ngn{namsbc\_rnf}, \np{ln\_rnf\_depth}, \np{ln\_rnf\_sal} and \np{ln\_rnf\_temp} control whether
868the river attributes (depth, salinity and temperature) are read in and used.  If these are set
869as false the river is added to the surface box only, assumed to be fresh (0~psu), and/or
870taken as surface temperature respectively.
872The runoff value and attributes are read in in sbcrnf. 
873For temperature -999 is taken as missing data and the river temperature is taken to be the
874surface temperatue at the river point.
875For the depth parameter a value of -1 means the river is added to the surface box only,
876and a value of -999 means the river is added through the entire water column.
877After being read in the temperature and salinity variables are multiplied by the amount of runoff (converted into m/s)
878to give the heat and salt content of the river runoff.
879After the user specified depth is read ini, the number of grid boxes this corresponds to is
880calculated and stored in the variable \np{nz\_rnf}.
881The variable \textit{h\_dep} is then calculated to be the depth (in metres) of the bottom of the
882lowest box the river water is being added to (i.e. the total depth that river water is being added to in the model).
884The mass/volume addition due to the river runoff is, at each relevant depth level, added to the horizontal divergence
885(\textit{hdivn}) in the subroutine \rou{sbc\_rnf\_div} (called from \mdl{divcur}).
886This increases the diffusion term in the vicinity of the river, thereby simulating a momentum flux.
887The sea surface height is calculated using the sum of the horizontal divergence terms, and so the
888river runoff indirectly forces an increase in sea surface height.
890The \textit{hdivn} terms are used in the tracer advection modules to force vertical velocities.
891This causes a mass of water, equal to the amount of runoff, to be moved into the box above.
892The heat and salt content of the river runoff is not included in this step, and so the tracer
893concentrations are diluted as water of ocean temperature and salinity is moved upward out of the box
894and replaced by the same volume of river water with no corresponding heat and salt addition.
896For the linear free surface case, at the surface box the tracer advection causes a flux of water
897(of equal volume to the runoff) through the sea surface out of the domain, which causes a salt and heat flux out of the model.
898As such the volume of water does not change, but the water is diluted.
900For the non-linear free surface case (\key{vvl}), no flux is allowed through the surface.
901Instead in the surface box (as well as water moving up from the boxes below) a volume of runoff water
902is added with no corresponding heat and salt addition and so as happens in the lower boxes there is a dilution effect.
903(The runoff addition to the top box along with the water being moved up through boxes below means the surface box has a large
904increase in volume, whilst all other boxes remain the same size)
906In trasbc the addition of heat and salt due to the river runoff is added.
907This is done in the same way for both vvl and non-vvl.
908The temperature and salinity are increased through the specified depth according to the heat and salt content of the river.
910In the non-linear free surface case (vvl), near the end of the time step the change in sea surface height is redistrubuted
911through the grid boxes, so that the original ratios of grid box heights are restored.
912In doing this water is moved into boxes below, throughout the water column, so the large volume addition to the surface box is spread between all the grid boxes.
914It is also possible for runnoff to be specified as a negative value for modelling flow through straits, i.e. modelling the Baltic flow in and out of the North Sea.
915When the flow is out of the domain there is no change in temperature and salinity, regardless of the namelist options used, as the ocean water leaving the domain removes heat and salt (at the same concentration) with it.
918%\colorbox{yellow}{Nevertheless, Pb of vertical resolution and 3D input : increase vertical mixing near river mouths to mimic a 3D river
920%All river runoff and emp fluxes are assumed to be fresh water (zero salinity) and at the same temperature as the sea surface.}
922%\colorbox{yellow}{river mouths{\ldots}}
924%IF( ln_rnf ) THEN                                     ! increase diffusivity at rivers mouths
925%        DO jk = 2, nkrnf   ;   avt(:,:,jk) = avt(:,:,jk) + rn_avt_rnf * rnfmsk(:,:)   ;   END DO
928%\gmcomment{  word doc of runoffs:
930%In the current \NEMO setup river runoff is added to emp fluxes, these are then applied at just the sea surface as a volume change (in the variable volume case this is a literal volume change, and in the linear free surface case the free surface is moved) and a salt flux due to the concentration/dilution effect.  There is also an option to increase vertical mixing near river mouths; this gives the effect of having a 3d river.  All river runoff and emp fluxes are assumed to be fresh water (zero salinity) and at the same temperature as the sea surface.
931%Our aim was to code the option to specify the temperature and salinity of river runoff, (as well as the amount), along with the depth that the river water will affect.  This would make it possible to model low salinity outflow, such as the Baltic, and would allow the ocean temperature to be affected by river runoff. 
933%The depth option makes it possible to have the river water affecting just the surface layer, throughout depth, or some specified point in between.
935%To do this we need to treat evaporation/precipitation fluxes and river runoff differently in the tra_sbc module.  We decided to separate them throughout the code, so that the variable emp represented solely evaporation minus precipitation fluxes, and a new 2d variable rnf was added which represents the volume flux of river runoff (in kg/m2s to remain consistent with emp).  This meant many uses of emp and emps needed to be changed, a list of all modules which use emp or emps and the changes made are below:
938% ================================================================
939%        Ice shelf melting
940% ================================================================
941\section   [Ice shelf melting (\textit{sbcisf})]
942                        {Ice shelf melting (\protect\mdl{sbcisf})}
947Namelist variable in \ngn{namsbc}, \np{nn\_isf}, controls the ice shelf representation used.
950The ice shelf cavity is represented (\np{ln\_isfcav}~=~true needed). The fwf and heat flux are computed.
951Two different bulk formula are available:
952   \begin{description}
953   \item[\np{nn\_isfblk}~=~1]
954   The bulk formula used to compute the melt is based the one described in \citet{Hunter2006}.
955        This formulation is based on a balance between the upward ocean heat flux and the latent heat flux at the ice shelf base.
957   \item[\np{nn\_isfblk}~=~2] 
958   The bulk formula used to compute the melt is based the one described in \citet{Jenkins1991}.
959        This formulation is based on a 3 equations formulation (a heat flux budget, a salt flux budget
960         and a linearised freezing point temperature equation).
961   \end{description}
963For this 2 bulk formulations, there are 3 different ways to compute the exchange coeficient:
964   \begin{description}
965        \item[\np{nn\_gammablk~=~0~}]
966   The salt and heat exchange coefficients are constant and defined by \np{rn\_gammas0} and \np{rn\_gammat0}
968   \item[\np{nn\_gammablk~=~1~}]
969   The salt and heat exchange coefficients are velocity dependent and defined as $\np{rn\_gammas0} \times u_{*}$ and $\np{rn\_gammat0} \times u_{*}$
970        where $u_{*}$ is the friction velocity in the top boundary layer (ie first \np{rn\_hisf\_tbl} meters).
971        See \citet{Jenkins2010} for all the details on this formulation.
973   \item[\np{nn\_gammablk~=~2~}]
974   The salt and heat exchange coefficients are velocity and stability dependent and defined as
975        $\gamma_{T,S} = \frac{u_{*}}{\Gamma_{Turb} + \Gamma^{T,S}_{Mole}}$
976        where $u_{*}$ is the friction velocity in the top boundary layer (ie first \np{rn\_hisf\_tbl} meters),
977        $\Gamma_{Turb}$ the contribution of the ocean stability and
978        $\Gamma^{T,S}_{Mole}$ the contribution of the molecular diffusion.
979        See \citet{Holland1999} for all the details on this formulation.
980        \end{description}
983A parameterisation of isf is used. The ice shelf cavity is not represented.
984The fwf is distributed along the ice shelf edge between the depth of the average grounding line (GL)
985(\np{sn\_depmax\_isf}) and the base of the ice shelf along the calving front (\np{sn\_depmin\_isf}) as in (\np{nn\_isf}~=~3).
986Furthermore the fwf and heat flux are computed using the \citet{Beckmann2003} parameterisation of isf melting.
987The effective melting length (\np{sn\_Leff\_isf}) is read from a file.
990A simple parameterisation of isf is used. The ice shelf cavity is not represented.
991The fwf (\np{sn\_rnfisf}) is prescribed and distributed along the ice shelf edge between the depth of the average grounding line (GL)
992(\np{sn\_depmax\_isf}) and the base of the ice shelf along the calving front (\np{sn\_depmin\_isf}).
993The heat flux ($Q_h$) is computed as $Q_h = fwf \times L_f$.
996The ice shelf cavity is opened (\np{ln\_isfcav}~=~true needed). However, the fwf is not computed but specified from file \np{sn\_fwfisf}).
997The heat flux ($Q_h$) is computed as $Q_h = fwf \times L_f$.\\
1001$\bullet$ \np{nn\_isf}~=~1 and \np{nn\_isf}~=~2 compute a melt rate based on the water mass properties, ocean velocities and depth.
1002 This flux is thus highly dependent of the model resolution (horizontal and vertical), realism of the water masses onto the shelf ...\\
1005$\bullet$ \np{nn\_isf}~=~3 and \np{nn\_isf}~=~4 read the melt rate from a file. You have total control of the fwf forcing.
1006This can be usefull if the water masses on the shelf are not realistic or the resolution (horizontal/vertical) are too
1007coarse to have realistic melting or for studies where you need to control your heat and fw input.\\ 
1009A namelist parameters control over how many meters the heat and fw fluxes are spread.
1010\np{rn\_hisf\_tbl}] is the top boundary layer thickness as defined in \citet{Losch2008}.
1011This parameter is only used if \np{nn\_isf}~=~1 or \np{nn\_isf}~=~4
1013If \np{rn\_hisf\_tbl} = 0., the fluxes are put in the top level whatever is its tickness.
1015If \np{rn\_hisf\_tbl} $>$ 0., the fluxes are spread over the first \np{rn\_hisf\_tbl} m (ie over one or several cells).\\
1017The ice shelf melt is implemented as a volume flux with in the same way as for the runoff.
1018The fw addition due to the ice shelf melting is, at each relevant depth level, added to the horizontal divergence
1019(\textit{hdivn}) in the subroutine \rou{sbc\_isf\_div}, called from \mdl{divcur}.
1020See the runoff section \ref{SBC_rnf} for all the details about the divergence correction.
1023\section{ Ice sheet coupling}
1028Ice sheet/ocean coupling is done through file exchange at the restart step. NEMO, at each restart step,
1029read the bathymetry and ice shelf draft variable in a netcdf file.
1030If \np{ln\_iscpl = ~true}, the isf draft is assume to be different at each restart step
1031with potentially some new wet/dry cells due to the ice sheet dynamics/thermodynamics.
1032The wetting and drying scheme applied on the restart is very simple and described below for the 6 different cases:
1034\item[Thin a cell down:]
1035   T/S/ssh are unchanged and U/V in the top cell are corrected to keep the barotropic transport (bt) constant ($bt_b=bt_n$).
1036\item[Enlarge  a cell:]
1037   See case "Thin a cell down"
1038\item[Dry a cell:]
1039   mask, T/S, U/V and ssh are set to 0. Furthermore, U/V into the water column are modified to satisfy ($bt_b=bt_n$).
1040\item[Wet a cell:] 
1041   mask is set to 1, T/S is extrapolated from neighbours, $ssh_n = ssh_b$ and U/V set to 0. If no neighbours along i,j and k, T/S/U/V and mask are set to 0.
1042\item[Dry a column:]
1043   mask, T/S, U/V are set to 0 everywhere in the column and ssh set to 0.
1044\item[Wet a column:]
1045   set mask to 1, T/S is extrapolated from neighbours, ssh is extrapolated from neighbours and U/V set to 0. If no neighbour, T/S/U/V and mask set to 0.
1047The extrapolation is call \np{nn\_drown} times. It means that if the grounding line retreat by more than \np{nn\_drown} cells between 2 coupling steps,
1048 the code will be unable to fill all the new wet cells properly. The default number is set up for the MISOMIP idealised experiments.\\
1049This coupling procedure is able to take into account grounding line and calving front migration. However, it is a non-conservative processe.
1050This could lead to a trend in heat/salt content and volume. In order to remove the trend and keep the conservation level as close to 0 as possible,
1051 a simple conservation scheme is available with \np{ln\_hsb = ~true}. The heat/salt/vol. gain/loss is diagnose, as well as the location.
1052Based on what is done on sbcrnf to prescribed a source of heat/salt/vol., the heat/salt/vol. gain/loss is removed/added,
1053 over a period of \np{rn\_fiscpl} time step, into the system.
1054So after \np{rn\_fiscpl} time step, all the heat/salt/vol. gain/loss due to extrapolation process is canceled.\\
1056As the before and now fields are not compatible (modification of the geometry), the restart time step is prescribed to be an euler time step instead of a leap frog and $fields_b = fields_n$.
1058% ================================================================
1059%        Handling of icebergs
1060% ================================================================
1061\section{Handling of icebergs (ICB)}
1067Icebergs are modelled as lagrangian particles in NEMO \citep{Marsh_GMD2015}.
1068Their physical behaviour is controlled by equations as described in \citet{Martin_Adcroft_OM10} ).
1069(Note that the authors kindly provided a copy of their code to act as a basis for implementation in NEMO).
1070Icebergs are initially spawned into one of ten classes which have specific mass and thickness as described
1071in the \ngn{namberg} namelist:
1072\np{rn\_initial\_mass} and \np{rn\_initial\_thickness}.
1073Each class has an associated scaling (\np{rn\_mass\_scaling}), which is an integer representing how many icebergs
1074of this class are being described as one lagrangian point (this reduces the numerical problem of tracking every single iceberg).
1075They are enabled by setting \np{ln\_icebergs}~=~true.
1077Two initialisation schemes are possible.
1080In this scheme, the value of \np{nn\_test\_icebergs} represents the class of iceberg to generate
1081(so between 1 and 10), and \np{nn\_test\_icebergs} provides a lon/lat box in the domain at each
1082grid point of which an iceberg is generated at the beginning of the run.
1083(Note that this happens each time the timestep equals \np{nn\_nit000}.)
1084\np{nn\_test\_icebergs} is defined by four numbers in \np{nn\_test\_box} representing the corners
1085of the geographical box: lonmin,lonmax,latmin,latmax
1087In this scheme the model reads a calving file supplied in the \np{sn\_icb} parameter.
1088This should be a file with a field on the configuration grid (typically ORCA) representing ice accumulation rate at each model point.
1089These should be ocean points adjacent to land where icebergs are known to calve.
1090Most points in this input grid are going to have value zero.
1091When the model runs, ice is accumulated at each grid point which has a non-zero source term.
1092At each time step, a test is performed to see if there is enough ice mass to calve an iceberg of each class in order (1 to 10).
1093Note that this is the initial mass multiplied by the number each particle represents ($i.e.$ the scaling).
1094If there is enough ice, a new iceberg is spawned and the total available ice reduced accordingly.
1097Icebergs are influenced by wind, waves and currents, bottom melt and erosion.
1098The latter act to disintegrate the iceberg. This is either all melted freshwater, or
1099(if \np{rn\_bits\_erosion\_fraction}~$>$~0) into melt and additionally small ice bits
1100which are assumed to propagate with their larger parent and thus delay fluxing into the ocean.
1101Melt water (and other variables on the configuration grid) are written into the main NEMO model output files.
1103Extensive diagnostics can be produced.
1104Separate output files are maintained for human-readable iceberg information.
1105A separate file is produced for each processor (independent of \np{ln\_ctl}).
1106The amount of information is controlled by two integer parameters:
1108\item[\np{nn\_verbose\_level}]  takes a value between one and four and represents
1109an increasing number of points in the code at which variables are written, and an
1110increasing level of obscurity.
1111\item[\np{nn\_verbose\_write}] is the number of timesteps between writes
1114Iceberg trajectories can also be written out and this is enabled by setting \np{nn\_sample\_rate}~$>$~0.
1115A non-zero value represents how many timesteps between writes of information into the output file.
1116These output files are in NETCDF format.
1117When \key{mpp\_mpi} is defined, each output file contains only those icebergs in the corresponding processor.
1118Trajectory points are written out in the order of their parent iceberg in the model's "linked list" of icebergs.
1119So care is needed to recreate data for individual icebergs, since its trajectory data may be spread across
1120multiple files.
1123% ================================================================
1124% Miscellanea options
1125% ================================================================
1126\section{Miscellaneous options}
1129% -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1130%        Diurnal cycle
1131% -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1132\subsection   [Diurnal  cycle (\textit{sbcdcy})]
1133         {Diurnal cycle (\protect\mdl{sbcdcy})}
1140\begin{figure}[!t]    \begin{center}
1142\caption{ \protect\label{Fig_SBC_diurnal}   
1143Example of recontruction of the diurnal cycle variation of short wave flux 
1144from daily mean values. The reconstructed diurnal cycle (black line) is chosen
1145as the mean value of the analytical cycle (blue line) over a time step, not
1146as the mid time step value of the analytically cycle (red square). From \citet{Bernie_al_CD07}.}
1147\end{center}   \end{figure}
1150\cite{Bernie_al_JC05} have shown that to capture 90$\%$ of the diurnal variability of
1151SST requires a vertical resolution in upper ocean of 1~m or better and a temporal resolution
1152of the surface fluxes of 3~h or less. Unfortunately high frequency forcing fields are rare,
1153not to say inexistent. Nevertheless, it is possible to obtain a reasonable diurnal cycle
1154of the SST knowning only short wave flux (SWF) at high frequency \citep{Bernie_al_CD07}.
1155Furthermore, only the knowledge of daily mean value of SWF is needed,
1156as higher frequency variations can be reconstructed from them, assuming that
1157the diurnal cycle of SWF is a scaling of the top of the atmosphere diurnal cycle
1158of incident SWF. The \cite{Bernie_al_CD07} reconstruction algorithm is available
1159in \NEMO by setting \np{ln\_dm2dc}~=~true (a \textit{\ngn{namsbc}} namelist variable) when using
1160CORE bulk formulea (\np{ln\_blk\_core}~=~true) or the flux formulation (\np{ln\_flx}~=~true).
1161The reconstruction is performed in the \mdl{sbcdcy} module. The detail of the algoritm used
1162can be found in the appendix~A of \cite{Bernie_al_CD07}. The algorithm preserve the daily
1163mean incomming SWF as the reconstructed SWF at a given time step is the mean value
1164of the analytical cycle over this time step (Fig.\ref{Fig_SBC_diurnal}).
1165The use of diurnal cycle reconstruction requires the input SWF to be daily
1166($i.e.$ a frequency of 24 and a time interpolation set to true in \np{sn\_qsr} namelist parameter).
1167Furthermore, it is recommended to have a least 8 surface module time step per day,
1168that is  $\rdt \ \np{nn\_fsbc} < 10,800~s = 3~h$. An example of recontructed SWF
1169is given in Fig.\ref{Fig_SBC_dcy} for a 12 reconstructed diurnal cycle, one every 2~hours
1170(from 1am to 11pm).
1173\begin{figure}[!t]  \begin{center}
1175\caption{ \protect\label{Fig_SBC_dcy}   
1176Example of recontruction of the diurnal cycle variation of short wave flux 
1177from daily mean values on an ORCA2 grid with a time sampling of 2~hours (from 1am to 11pm).
1178The display is on (i,j) plane. }
1179\end{center}   \end{figure}
1182Note also that the setting a diurnal cycle in SWF is highly recommended  when
1183the top layer thickness approach 1~m or less, otherwise large error in SST can
1184appear due to an inconsistency between the scale of the vertical resolution
1185and the forcing acting on that scale.
1187% -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1188%        Rotation of vector pairs onto the model grid directions
1189% -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1190\subsection{Rotation of vector pairs onto the model grid directions}
1193When using a flux (\np{ln\_flx}=true) or bulk (\np{ln\_clio}=true or \np{ln\_core}=true) formulation,
1194pairs of vector components can be rotated from east-north directions onto the local grid directions. 
1195This is particularly useful when interpolation on the fly is used since here any vectors are likely to be defined
1196relative to a rectilinear grid.
1197To activate this option a non-empty string is supplied in the rotation pair column of the relevant namelist.
1198The eastward component must start with "U" and the northward component with "V". 
1199The remaining characters in the strings are used to identify which pair of components go together.
1200So for example, strings "U1" and "V1" next to "utau" and "vtau" would pair the wind stress components together
1201and rotate them on to the model grid directions; "U2" and "V2" could be used against a second pair of components,
1202and so on.
1203The extra characters used in the strings are arbitrary.
1204The rot\_rep routine from the \mdl{geo2ocean} module is used to perform the rotation.
1206% -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1207%        Surface restoring to observed SST and/or SSS
1208% -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1209\subsection    [Surface restoring to observed SST and/or SSS (\textit{sbcssr})]
1210         {Surface restoring to observed SST and/or SSS (\protect\mdl{sbcssr})}
1216IOptions are defined through the  \ngn{namsbc\_ssr} namelist variables.
1217n forced mode using a flux formulation (\np{ln\_flx}~=~true), a
1218feedback term \emph{must} be added to the surface heat flux $Q_{ns}^o$:
1219\begin{equation} \label{Eq_sbc_dmp_q}
1220Q_{ns} = Q_{ns}^o + \frac{dQ}{dT} \left( \left. T \right|_{k=1} - SST_{Obs} \right)
1222where SST is a sea surface temperature field (observed or climatological), $T$ is
1223the model surface layer temperature and $\frac{dQ}{dT}$ is a negative feedback
1224coefficient usually taken equal to $-40~W/m^2/K$. For a $50~m$ 
1225mixed-layer depth, this value corresponds to a relaxation time scale of two months.
1226This term ensures that if $T$ perfectly matches the supplied SST, then $Q$ is
1227equal to $Q_o$.
1229In the fresh water budget, a feedback term can also be added. Converted into an
1230equivalent freshwater flux, it takes the following expression :
1232\begin{equation} \label{Eq_sbc_dmp_emp}
1233\textit{emp} = \textit{emp}_o + \gamma_s^{-1} e_{3t}  \frac{  \left(\left.S\right|_{k=1}-SSS_{Obs}\right)}
1234                                             {\left.S\right|_{k=1}}
1237where $\textit{emp}_{o }$ is a net surface fresh water flux (observed, climatological or an
1238atmospheric model product), \textit{SSS}$_{Obs}$ is a sea surface salinity (usually a time
1239interpolation of the monthly mean Polar Hydrographic Climatology \citep{Steele2001}),
1240$\left.S\right|_{k=1}$ is the model surface layer salinity and $\gamma_s$ is a negative
1241feedback coefficient which is provided as a namelist parameter. Unlike heat flux, there is no
1242physical justification for the feedback term in \ref{Eq_sbc_dmp_emp} as the atmosphere
1243does not care about ocean surface salinity \citep{Madec1997}. The SSS restoring
1244term should be viewed as a flux correction on freshwater fluxes to reduce the
1245uncertainties we have on the observed freshwater budget.
1247% -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1248%        Handling of ice-covered area
1249% -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1250\subsection{Handling of ice-covered area  (\textit{sbcice\_...})}
1253The presence at the sea surface of an ice covered area modifies all the fluxes
1254transmitted to the ocean. There are several way to handle sea-ice in the system
1255depending on the value of the \np{nn\_ice} namelist parameter found in \ngn{namsbc} namelist. 
1257\item[nn{\_}ice = 0]  there will never be sea-ice in the computational domain.
1258This is a typical namelist value used for tropical ocean domain. The surface fluxes
1259are simply specified for an ice-free ocean. No specific things is done for sea-ice.
1260\item[nn{\_}ice = 1]  sea-ice can exist in the computational domain, but no sea-ice model
1261is used. An observed ice covered area is read in a file. Below this area, the SST is
1262restored to the freezing point and the heat fluxes are set to $-4~W/m^2$ ($-2~W/m^2$)
1263in the northern (southern) hemisphere. The associated modification of the freshwater
1264fluxes are done in such a way that the change in buoyancy fluxes remains zero.
1265This prevents deep convection to occur when trying to reach the freezing point
1266(and so ice covered area condition) while the SSS is too large. This manner of
1267managing sea-ice area, just by using si IF case, is usually referred as the \textit{ice-if} 
1268model. It can be found in the \mdl{sbcice{\_}if} module.
1269\item[nn{\_}ice = 2 or more]  A full sea ice model is used. This model computes the
1270ice-ocean fluxes, that are combined with the air-sea fluxes using the ice fraction of
1271each model cell to provide the surface ocean fluxes. Note that the activation of a
1272sea-ice model is is done by defining a CPP key (\key{lim3} or \key{cice}).
1273The activation automatically overwrites the read value of nn{\_}ice to its appropriate
1274value ($i.e.$ $2$ for LIM-3 or $3$ for CICE).
1277% {Description of Ice-ocean interface to be added here or in LIM 2 and 3 doc ?}
1279\subsection   [Interface to CICE (\textit{sbcice\_cice})]
1280         {Interface to CICE (\protect\mdl{sbcice\_cice})}
1283It is now possible to couple a regional or global NEMO configuration (without AGRIF) to the CICE sea-ice
1284model by using \key{cice}.  The CICE code can be obtained from
1285\href{}{LANL} and the additional 'hadgem3' drivers will be required,
1286even with the latest code release.  Input grid files consistent with those used in NEMO will also be needed,
1287and CICE CPP keys \textbf{ORCA\_GRID}, \textbf{CICE\_IN\_NEMO} and \textbf{coupled} should be used (seek advice from UKMO
1288if necessary).  Currently the code is only designed to work when using the CORE forcing option for NEMO (with
1289\textit{calc\_strair~=~true} and \textit{calc\_Tsfc~=~true} in the CICE name-list), or alternatively when NEMO
1290is coupled to the HadGAM3 atmosphere model (with \textit{calc\_strair~=~false} and \textit{calc\_Tsfc~=~false}).
1291The code is intended to be used with \np{nn\_fsbc} set to 1 (although coupling ocean and ice less frequently
1292should work, it is possible the calculation of some of the ocean-ice fluxes needs to be modified slightly - the
1293user should check that results are not significantly different to the standard case).
1295There are two options for the technical coupling between NEMO and CICE.  The standard version allows
1296complete flexibility for the domain decompositions in the individual models, but this is at the expense of global
1297gather and scatter operations in the coupling which become very expensive on larger numbers of processors. The
1298alternative option (using \key{nemocice\_decomp} for both NEMO and CICE) ensures that the domain decomposition is
1299identical in both models (provided domain parameters are set appropriately, and
1300\textit{processor\_shape~=~square-ice} and \textit{distribution\_wght~=~block} in the CICE name-list) and allows
1301much more efficient direct coupling on individual processors.  This solution scales much better although it is at
1302the expense of having more idle CICE processors in areas where there is no sea ice.
1304% -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1305%        Freshwater budget control
1306% -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1307\subsection   [Freshwater budget control (\textit{sbcfwb})]
1308         {Freshwater budget control (\protect\mdl{sbcfwb})}
1311For global ocean simulation it can be useful to introduce a control of the mean sea
1312level in order to prevent unrealistic drift of the sea surface height due to inaccuracy
1313in the freshwater fluxes. In \NEMO, two way of controlling the the freshwater budget.
1315\item[\np{nn\_fwb}=0]  no control at all. The mean sea level is free to drift, and will
1316certainly do so.
1317\item[\np{nn\_fwb}=1]  global mean \textit{emp} set to zero at each model time step.
1318%Note that with a sea-ice model, this technique only control the mean sea level with linear free surface (\key{vvl} not defined) and no mass flux between ocean and ice (as it is implemented in the current ice-ocean coupling).
1319\item[\np{nn\_fwb}=2]  freshwater budget is adjusted from the previous year annual
1320mean budget which is read in the \textit{EMPave\_old.dat} file. As the model uses the
1321Boussinesq approximation, the annual mean fresh water budget is simply evaluated
1322from the change in the mean sea level at January the first and saved in the
1323\textit{EMPav.dat} file.
1326% -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1327%        Neutral Drag Coefficient from external wave model
1328% -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1329\subsection   [Neutral drag coefficient from external wave model (\textit{sbcwave})]
1330              {Neutral drag coefficient from external wave model (\protect\mdl{sbcwave})}
1336In order to read a neutral drag coeff, from an external data source ($i.e.$ a wave model), the
1337logical variable \np{ln\_cdgw} in \ngn{namsbc} namelist must be set to \textit{true}.
1338The \mdl{sbcwave} module containing the routine \np{sbc\_wave} reads the
1339namelist \ngn{namsbc\_wave} (for external data names, locations, frequency, interpolation and all
1340the miscellanous options allowed by Input Data generic Interface see \S\ref{SBC_input})
1341and a 2D field of neutral drag coefficient.
1342Then using the routine TURB\_CORE\_1Z or TURB\_CORE\_2Z, and starting from the neutral drag coefficent provided,
1343the drag coefficient is computed according to stable/unstable conditions of the air-sea interface following \citet{Large_Yeager_Rep04}.
1346% Griffies doc:
1347% When running ocean-ice simulations, we are not explicitly representing land processes,
1348% such as rivers, catchment areas, snow accumulation, etc. However, to reduce model drift,
1349% it is important to balance the hydrological cycle in ocean-ice models.
1350% We thus need to prescribe some form of global normalization to the precipitation minus evaporation plus river runoff.
1351% The result of the normalization should be a global integrated zero net water input to the ocean-ice system over
1352% a chosen time scale.
1353%How often the normalization is done is a matter of choice. In mom4p1, we choose to do so at each model time step,
1354% so that there is always a zero net input of water to the ocean-ice system.
1355% Others choose to normalize over an annual cycle, in which case the net imbalance over an annual cycle is used
1356% to alter the subsequent year�s water budget in an attempt to damp the annual water imbalance.
1357% Note that the annual budget approach may be inappropriate with interannually varying precipitation forcing.
1358% When running ocean-ice coupled models, it is incorrect to include the water transport between the ocean
1359% and ice models when aiming to balance the hydrological cycle.
1360% The reason is that it is the sum of the water in the ocean plus ice that should be balanced when running ocean-ice models,
1361% not the water in any one sub-component. As an extreme example to illustrate the issue,
1362% consider an ocean-ice model with zero initial sea ice. As the ocean-ice model spins up,
1363% there should be a net accumulation of water in the growing sea ice, and thus a net loss of water from the ocean.
1364% The total water contained in the ocean plus ice system is constant, but there is an exchange of water between
1365% the subcomponents. This exchange should not be part of the normalization used to balance the hydrological cycle
1366% in ocean-ice models.
Note: See TracBrowser for help on using the repository browser.