Changeset 3294 for trunk/DOC/TexFiles/Chapters/Chap_DYN.tex
- Timestamp:
- 2012-01-28T17:44:18+01:00 (13 years ago)
- File:
-
- 1 edited
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
-
trunk/DOC/TexFiles/Chapters/Chap_DYN.tex
- Property svn:executable deleted
r2541 r3294 189 189 the relative vorticity term and horizontal kinetic energy for the planetary vorticity 190 190 term (MIX scheme) ; or conserving both the potential enstrophy of horizontally non-divergent 191 flow and horizontal kinetic energy (ENE scheme) (see Appendix~\ref{Apdx_C_vor_zad}). 191 flow and horizontal kinetic energy (EEN scheme) (see Appendix~\ref{Apdx_C_vor_zad}). In the 192 case of ENS, ENE or MIX schemes the land sea mask may be slightly modified to ensure the 193 consistency of vorticity term with analytical equations (\textit{ln\_dynvor\_con}=true). 192 194 The vorticity terms are all computed in dedicated routines that can be found in 193 195 the \mdl{dynvor} module. … … 605 607 Pressure gradient formulations in an $s$-coordinate have been the subject of a vast 606 608 number of papers ($e.g.$, \citet{Song1998, Shchepetkin_McWilliams_OM05}). 607 A number of different pressure gradient options are coded, but they are not yet fully 608 documented or tested. 609 610 $\bullet$ Traditional coding (see for example \citet{Madec_al_JPO96}: (\np{ln\_dynhpg\_sco}=true, 611 \np{ln\_dynhpg\_hel}=true) 609 A number of different pressure gradient options are coded but the ROMS-like, density Jacobian with 610 cubic polynomial method is currently disabled whilst known bugs are under investigation. 611 612 $\bullet$ Traditional coding (see for example \citet{Madec_al_JPO96}: (\np{ln\_dynhpg\_sco}=true) 612 613 \begin{equation} \label{Eq_dynhpg_sco} 613 614 \left\{ \begin{aligned} … … 622 623 \eqref{Eq_dynhpg_zco_surf} - \eqref{Eq_dynhpg_zco}, and $z_T$ is the depth of 623 624 the $T$-point evaluated from the sum of the vertical scale factors at the $w$-point 624 ($e_{3w}$). The version \np{ln\_dynhpg\_hel}=true has been added by Aike 625 Beckmann and involves a redefinition of the relative position of $T$-points relative 626 to $w$-points. 627 628 $\bullet$ Weighted density Jacobian (WDJ) \citep{Song1998} (\np{ln\_dynhpg\_wdj}=true) 625 ($e_{3w}$). 626 627 $\bullet$ Pressure Jacobian scheme (prj) (a research paper in preparation) (\np{ln\_dynhpg\_prj}=true) 629 628 630 629 $\bullet$ Density Jacobian with cubic polynomial scheme (DJC) \citep{Shchepetkin_McWilliams_OM05} 631 (\np{ln\_dynhpg\_djc}=true) 632 633 $\bullet$ Rotated axes scheme (rot) \citep{Thiem_Berntsen_OM06} (\np{ln\_dynhpg\_rot}=true) 634 635 Note that expression \eqref{Eq_dynhpg_sco} is used when the variable volume 636 formulation is activated (\key{vvl}) because in that case, even with a flat bottom, 637 the coordinate surfaces are not horizontal but follow the free surface 638 \citep{Levier2007}. The other pressure gradient options are not yet available. 630 (\np{ln\_dynhpg\_djc}=true) (currently disabled; under development) 631 632 Note that expression \eqref{Eq_dynhpg_sco} is commonly used when the variable volume formulation is 633 activated (\key{vvl}) because in that case, even with a flat bottom, the coordinate surfaces are not 634 horizontal but follow the free surface \citep{Levier2007}. The pressure jacobian scheme 635 (\np{ln\_dynhpg\_prj}=true) is available as an improved option to \np{ln\_dynhpg\_sco}=true when 636 \key{vvl} is active. The pressure Jacobian scheme uses a constrained cubic spline to reconstruct 637 the density profile across the water column. This method maintains the monotonicity between the 638 density nodes The pressure can be calculated by analytical integration of the density profile and a 639 pressure Jacobian method is used to solve the horizontal pressure gradient. This method can provide 640 a more accurate calculation of the horizontal pressure gradient than the standard scheme. 639 641 640 642 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- … … 1162 1164 1163 1165 % ================================================================ 1166 % Neptune effect 1167 % ================================================================ 1168 \section [Neptune effect (\textit{dynnept})] 1169 {Neptune effect (\mdl{dynnept})} 1170 \label{DYN_nept} 1171 1172 The "Neptune effect" (thus named in \citep{HollowayOM86}) is a 1173 parameterisation of the potentially large effect of topographic form stress 1174 (caused by eddies) in driving the ocean circulation. Originally developed for 1175 low-resolution models, in which it was applied via a Laplacian (second-order) 1176 diffusion-like term in the momentum equation, it can also be applied in eddy 1177 permitting or resolving models, in which a more scale-selective bilaplacian 1178 (fourth-order) implementation is preferred. This mechanism has a 1179 significant effect on boundary currents (including undercurrents), and the 1180 upwelling of deep water near continental shelves. 1181 1182 The theoretical basis for the method can be found in 1183 \citep{HollowayJPO92}, including the explanation of why form stress is not 1184 necessarily a drag force, but may actually drive the flow. 1185 \citep{HollowayJPO94} demonstrate the effects of the parameterisation in 1186 the GFDL-MOM model, at a horizontal resolution of about 1.8 degrees. 1187 \citep{HollowayOM08} demonstrate the biharmonic version of the 1188 parameterisation in a global run of the POP model, with an average horizontal 1189 grid spacing of about 32km. 1190 1191 The NEMO implementation is a simplified form of that supplied by 1192 Greg Holloway, the testing of which was described in \citep{HollowayJGR09}. 1193 The major simplification is that a time invariant Neptune velocity 1194 field is assumed. This is computed only once, during start-up, and 1195 made available to the rest of the code via a module. Vertical 1196 diffusive terms are also ignored, and the model topography itself 1197 is used, rather than a separate topographic dataset as in 1198 \citep{HollowayOM08}. This implementation is only in the iso-level 1199 formulation, as is the case anyway for the bilaplacian operator. 1200 1201 The velocity field is derived from a transport stream function given by: 1202 1203 \begin{equation} \label{Eq_dynnept_sf} 1204 \psi = -fL^2H 1205 \end{equation} 1206 1207 where $L$ is a latitude-dependant length scale given by: 1208 1209 \begin{equation} \label{Eq_dynnept_ls} 1210 L = l_1 + (l_2 -l_1)\left ( {1 + \cos 2\phi \over 2 } \right ) 1211 \end{equation} 1212 1213 where $\phi$ is latitude and $l_1$ and $l_2$ are polar and equatorial length scales respectively. 1214 Neptune velocity components, $u^*$, $v^*$ are derived from the stremfunction as: 1215 1216 \begin{equation} \label{Eq_dynnept_vel} 1217 u^* = -{1\over H} {\partial \psi \over \partial y}\ \ \ ,\ \ \ v^* = {1\over H} {\partial \psi \over \partial x} 1218 \end{equation} 1219 1220 \smallskip 1221 %----------------------------------------------namdom---------------------------------------------------- 1222 \namdisplay{namdyn_nept} 1223 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1224 \smallskip 1225 1226 The Neptune effect is enabled when \np{ln\_neptsimp}=true (default=false). 1227 \np{ln\_smooth\_neptvel} controls whether a scale-selective smoothing is applied 1228 to the Neptune effect flow field (default=false) (this smoothing method is as 1229 used by Holloway). \np{rn\_tslse} and \np{rn\_tslsp} are the equatorial and 1230 polar values respectively of the length-scale parameter $L$ used in determining 1231 the Neptune stream function \eqref{Eq_dynnept_sf} and \eqref{Eq_dynnept_ls}. 1232 Values at intermediate latitudes are given by a cosine fit, mimicking the 1233 variation of the deformation radius with latitude. The default values of 12km 1234 and 3km are those given in \citep{HollowayJPO94}, appropriate for a coarse 1235 resolution model. The finer resolution study of \citep{HollowayOM08} increased 1236 the values of L by a factor of $\sqrt 2$ to 17km and 4.2km, thus doubling the 1237 stream function for a given topography. 1238 1239 The simple formulation for ($u^*$, $v^*$) can give unacceptably large velocities 1240 in shallow water, and \citep{HollowayOM08} add an offset to the depth in the 1241 denominator to control this problem. In this implementation we offer instead (at 1242 the suggestion of G. Madec) the option of ramping down the Neptune flow field to 1243 zero over a finite depth range. The switch \np{ln\_neptramp} activates this 1244 option (default=false), in which case velocities at depths greater than 1245 \np{rn\_htrmax} are unaltered, but ramp down linearly with depth to zero at a 1246 depth of \np{rn\_htrmin} (and shallower). 1247 1248 % ================================================================
Note: See TracChangeset
for help on using the changeset viewer.