Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of Developers/WorkingOnTickets
- Timestamp:
- 2017-09-19T17:21:56+02:00 (7 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Developers/WorkingOnTickets
v1 v2 21 21 22 22 Each expert is requested to check regularly the list of open tickets in order to: 23 * accept some assignments which are relevant to his expertise or good will 24 * propose assignments for newly created tickets 23 * [[span(''accept some assignments which are relevant to his expertise or good will'', style=color:lime)]] 25 24 26 In fact, if we intend to have an up-to-date ticketing system, there should be nearly no tickets under "new" status, and each expert should have a few (more than one...) tickets assigned to him. 25 * [[span(''propose assignments for newly created tickets'', style=color:lime)]] 27 26 27 '''In fact, to have an up-to-date ticketing system, there should be nearly no tickets under "new" status, and each expert should have a few (more than one...) tickets assigned to him/her.''' 28 28 29 Accepting assignments is indeed important in order to share a clear view on the list of tickets remaining to be taken in account. 29 30 31 == Workflow for a given ticket 32 Once an expert has accepted the assignment, the following items should be completed: 33 * in the ticket, describe the chosen answer(s) 34 * if some changes or fixes are to be commited in the NEMO reference, those should be tested before commit, including full SETTE tests in debug mode 35 * in the comments of commit, do not forget the associated ticket number 36 * check where commits are relevant (maybe at least 2 places: in the shared users version (3_6_STABLE for now) and in the trunk (version under development) 37 * when tasks are completed, close the ticket 30 38 31 39