New URL for NEMO forge!

Since March 2022 along with NEMO 4.2 release, the code development moved to a self-hosted GitLab.
This present forge is now archived and remained online for history.
ticket/1085/Review – NEMO

Version 2 (modified by hadcv, 11 years ago) (diff)


Last edited Timestamp?

For completion by the Sci/Tech/Code? reviewer

Reviewer: [ Enter your name here ]

Ticket Details, Documentation and Code changes

Do you understand the area of code being altered and the reasoning why it is being altered?YES/NO
Do the proposed code changes correspond with the stated reason for the change?YES/NO
Is the in-line documentation accurate and sufficient?YES/NO
Do the code changes comply with NEMO coding standards?YES/NO
Is the Ticket documented with sufficient detail for others to understand the impact of the change?YES/NO
Does any corresponding external documentation require updating?YES/NO
If yes, which docs and have the updates been drafted?YES/NO
Are namelist changes required for this change?YES
If yes, have they been done?YES
Has a completed Ticket Summary template been appended to the ticket to aid code reviewsYES
Does this summary correspond with your understanding of the full ticket?YES/NO

Ticket, Documentation and Code comments

Add specific Ticket, Documentation and code comments here


Has the NVTK and other jobs been tested with this change?YES/NO
Have the required bit comparability tests been run?YES/NO
Can this change be shown to have a null impact? (if option not selected)YES/NO
If no, is reason for the change valid/understood?YES/NO/NA
If no, ensure that the ticket details the impact this change will have on model configurations .YES/NO/NA
Is this change expected to preserve all diagnostics?YES
If no, is reason for the change valid/understood?N/A
Are there significant changes in run time/memory?NO

Testing Comments

  • More testing information can be found in the changeset documentation at wiki:ticket/1085

Code Review

Do the code changes comply with NEMO coding standards?YES/NO
Are code changes consistent with the design of NEMO?YES/NO
Is the code free of unwanted TABs?YES/NO
Has the code been wholly (100%) produced by NEMO developers working on NEMO?YES

Add specific code comments or suggested alterations here.

Review Summary

Add summary here

Approval for the trunk


The code reviewer may approve the change for the NEMO trunk when:

  1. their requests/comments have been addressed satisfactorily.
  2. the above check-list has been completed.

or the code reviewer may choose to reject & assign the change back to the code author.