Opened 5 years ago
Closed 4 years ago
#418 closed task (fixed)
Carbon mass conservation issue ?
Reported by: | nvuilsce | Owned by: | somebody |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | ORCHIDEE 2.0 |
Component: | Biogeochemical processes | Version: | |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
In the routine lcchange_main, on the vegetation tiles that gain area, one dilutes the carbon mass in order to account for the change in veget_max and the additional carbon that comes from the tiles that loose area
for instance, line 269 : https://forge.ipsl.jussieu.fr/orchidee/browser/trunk/ORCHIDEE/src_stomate/stomate_lcchange.f90?rev=4872#L269
This is not done exactly the same way for bm_to_litter (the flow of carbon that goes to litter):
https://forge.ipsl.jussieu.fr/orchidee/browser/trunk/ORCHIDEE/src_stomate/stomate_lcchange.f90?rev=4872#L274
I wonder why there is such difference. To my opinion, one should also mutiply bm_to_litter by veget_cov_max_old as it is done for the other varialbes. This should ensure that we conserve carbon mass.
Change History (6)
comment:1 Changed 5 years ago by bguenet
comment:2 Changed 5 years ago by jgipsl
- Milestone changed from ORCHIDEE 3.0 to ORCHIDEE 2.0
Done in the trunk rev [5090]
comment:3 Changed 5 years ago by jgipsl
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from new to closed
comment:4 Changed 4 years ago by jgipsl
- Resolution fixed deleted
- Status changed from closed to reopened
Commit [5090] is not correct according to description above. Parenthesis are missing.
comment:5 Changed 4 years ago by jgipsl
Correction on previous commit done in the trunk revision [5536]
comment:6 Changed 4 years ago by nvuilsce
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from reopened to closed
After discussion with Nicolas Viovy, Nicolas Vuichard and Bertrand Guenet we agreed that this must be corrected in the code
from
To