Changes between Version 5 and Version 6 of DevelopmentActivities/Xios/Validation


Ignore:
Timestamp:
01/21/14 10:08:59 (8 years ago)
Author:
jgipsl
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • DevelopmentActivities/Xios/Validation

    v5 v6  
    55== Conclusion == 
    66 * No difference in results between IOIPSL and XIOS output for instaneous output frequency.  
    7  * Small differencies when the output is an average over several time steps : the output in Sechiba differs on the last significativs number for a few variables. All variables in Stomate are the same.  
     7 * Small differencies when the output is an average over several time steps : the output in Sechiba differs on the last significativs number for a few variables(lwdown, q2m, qair, swdown, t2m, tair). All variables in Stomate are the same.  
     8 * The start date has to be treated properly in the set up phase (in the configuration, by orchidee_ol.driver) 
    89 
    910== Details on simulations == 
     
    3637 
    3738== Time axes problem == 
    38 Dans IOIPSL : OK 
     39The start date, the time origin and calendar type is set in iodef.xml when using XIOS. These parameters have to be updated in the set up phase before each execution. This is not yet done. Therefor the time axis is start from zero each exectution even for a simulation starting from restart files. These parameters could be updated properly by the orchidee_ol.driver. [[BR]] 
     40 
     41In IOIPSL : OK 
    3942 * 19820101_19820102_1D_stomate_history.nc : time_counter = 43200, 129600  
    4043 * 19820103_19820104_1D_stomate_history.nc : time_counter = 216000, 302400 
    4144 
    42 Dans XIOS : PB!!! 
     45In XIOS : PB!! 
    4346 * 19820101_19820102_1D_stomate_history_xios.nc : time_counter = 43200, 129600 
    4447 * 19820103_19820104_1D_stomate_history_xios.nc : time_counter = 43200, 129600