wiki:Evaluation/Fluxnet/r1013cwrr

r1013cwrr

This is the first evaluation at fluxnet sites of the CWRR scheme after the merge into the trunk version. It is compared here to revision r1013 with the Choisnel-based scheme. For most sites, diagnostic variables and time frequencies, the modeled fluxes are much less correlated with the observation with CWRR than with the Choisnel scheme.
The standard deviation of the modeled fluxes is also much lower than the one observed. The less impacted vegetation type is the Grassland type for which the results with CWRR are relatively comparable to those obtained with Choisnel.

CRO sites

all sites

NL-LanNL-LutNL-MolUS-Bo1US-Ne1US-Ne2US-Ne3

DBF sites

all sites

DE-HaiIT-Ro1IT-Ro2US-BarUS-Ha1US-MMSUS-WBWUS-WCr

EBF sites

all sites

AU-TumAU-WacBR-Sa3ID-Pag

ENF sites

all sites

CA-ManCA-NS1CA-NS2CA-NS3CA-NS4CA-NS5CA-QcuCA-QfoCA-SF1CA-SF2
FI-HyyFI-SodIL-YatNL-LooRU-ZotSE-FlaSE-NorSE-Sk2US-BloUS-Ho1
US-Ho2US-Me4

GRA sites

all sites

DK-LvaIT-AmpNL-Ca1US-AudUS-BkgUS-FPeUS-Goo

WSA sites

all sites

AU-HowBW-Ma1US-Ton
Last modified 8 years ago Last modified on 03/20/13 14:04:09