Changes between Version 3 and Version 4 of 2013WP/2013Action_institutions_INGV

Timestamp:

2012-12-06T12:46:16+01:00 (11 years ago)

Author:

poddo

Comment:

--

2013WP/2013Action_institutions_INGV

@@ -9 +9 @@
 
 || Name || Institution || % || Position ||
-|| Mario Adami || INGV, Bologna || 50 || young scientist ||
-|| Paolo Oddo || INGV, Bologna || 50 || INGV NEMO officer, senior scientist ||
+|| Emanuela Clementi || INGV, Bologna || 30 || young scientist ||
+|| Damiano DelRosso  || INGV, Bologna || 30 || research associate ||
+|| Paolo Oddo || INGV, Bologna || 40 || INGV NEMO officer, senior scientist ||
 
 
-'''total weeks : '''[[BR]] 20 + 20 = 40 wk (~1 man/year) [[BR]] [[BR]]
+'''total weeks : '''[[BR]] 15 + 15 + 15 = 45 wk (~1 man/year) [[BR]] [[BR]]
 
 Summary:
@@ -32 +33 @@
 
 === '''INGV.1 — Continuation of Surface Pressure effect developments in limited area model ''' ===
-''' Motivation:'''  If OBC-BDY merging has been completed and new developments can start, INGV would like to implement a new Volume/Mass constraint for the filtered free-surface. Actual version of the NEMO code forces, in case of filtered free surface, the total volume to be conserved each time-step. INGV proposes to control the mass exchange through the lateral open boundaries using a generalized Flather lateral boundary condition [[BR]]
+''' Motivation:'''  Once the OBC-BDY merging will be completed and new developments can start, INGV would like to implement a new Volume/Mass constraint for the filtered free-surface. Actual version of the NEMO code forces, in case of filtered free surface, the total volume to be conserved each time-step. INGV proposes to control the mass exchange through the lateral open boundaries using a generalized Flather lateral boundary condition. During this year INGV proposes a deep Study of model response and sensitivity to time-splitting and filtered free surface with and without the atmospheric pressure forcing. Producing a Peer-reviewed manuscript or NEMO-technical report [[BR]]
 
 ''' Status:'''  Preliminary test already done [[BR]]
@@ -42 +43 @@
 ''' Principal Investigator : '''  Paolo Oddo (paolo.oddo@bo.ingv.it) [[BR]]
 
-=== '''INGV.2 —  Continuation of wave wind drag coeff develpment ''' ===
+=== '''INGV.2 —  NEMO model reliability ''' ===
 ''' Motivation:''' [[BR]]
 ''' Status:'''   [[BR]]
-''' Main tasks:''' Test of different parameterizations for the turbulent part of the wind drag coefficient. [[BR]]
+''' Main tasks:''' Perform basic coherency/consistency tests. NEMO-technical report (wiki page). [[BR]]
 ''' Science Reviewer: '''  [[BR]]
 ''' System Reviewer:   '''  [[BR]]
 '''  Deadline: '''  [[BR]] 
 '''  Priority: '''  [[BR]] 
-'''  Principal Investigator :'''  Mario Adani (mario.adani@bo.ingv.it) [[BR]]
+'''  Principal Investigator :'''  Damiano DelRosso (damiano.delrosso@bo.ingv.it) [[BR]]
 
 === '''INGV.3 — River lateral open boundary conditions''' ===
-''' Motivation:''' A proper representation of river volume inflow. In case of large runoff, including the river effects only in the surface water balance (Evaporation minus Precipitation minus runoff/area) could limit the model capability in reproducing the dynamics in the Region Of Fresh water Influence (ROFI). An open lateral boundary condition with a vertical current profile is preferable.  [[BR]]
+''' Motivation:''' A proper representation of river volume inflow. In case of large runoff, including the river effects only in the surface water balance (Evaporation minus Precipitation minus runoff/area) could limit the model capability in reproducing the dynamics in the Region Of Fresh water Influence (ROFI). An open lateral boundary condition with a vertical current profile is preferable. However the full functionality of BDY module should allows to include rivers as LOBC. FIrst step will be to investigate this possibility and evaluate the need for further developments. [[BR]]
 ''' Status:'''   [[BR]]
 ''' Main tasks :'''  [[BR]]  
@@ -65 +66 @@
 ''' Motivation:''' full coupling of a wave model with NEMO.In two steps: [[BR]]
    a. Step1. By the end of 2012. Linear superposition of the Stokes velocity field, computed from an offline wave model, with circulation velocity from OGCM. [[BR]]
-   b. Step2. By the end of 2013. Implementation of all the wave-ogcm coupling terms in the model equations.   [[BR]]
+   Th study of this particular issue indicates the need to finalize the discussion before prooceede with any new implementation, INGV will lead the wave-coupling WG in the NEMO system team promoting the discussion.   [[BR]]
 ''' Status:'''  [[BR]]
 ''' Main tasks:'''  [[BR]]
@@ -72 +73 @@
 ''' Deadline:'''   [[BR]]
 ''' Priority:'''  [[BR]]
-''' Principal Investigator :'''  Mario Adani (mario.adani@bo.ingv.it) [[BR]]
+''' Principal Investigator :'''  Emanuela Clementi (emanuela.clementi@bo.ingv.it) [[BR]]
 
-=== '''INGV.5 — Atmospheric forcing interpolation''' ===
-''' Motivation:''' An issue that still need investigation for the NEMO air-sea physics concerns the horizontal interpolation of the input atmospheric fields. In the current version of the NEMO code, all the
-external fields are interpolated into the model T-Grid, then fluxes computed, and finally momentum fluxes interpolated into the corresponfing U and V-grids. Another possibility is to interpolate the input atmospheric data into all the necessary grids (U, V and T) and apply the bulk directly into the correct model grid. This requires some testing. [[BR]]
+=== '''INGV.5 — Participate to the COnfioguration Manager WG.''' ===
+''' Motivation:''' During the annual meeting the need to have a flexible and scientifically valid tool to configure new model set-ip has been identified. INGV will actively partipiate to this WG. . [[BR]]
 ''' Status:'''  [[BR]]
 ''' Main tasks:'''  [[BR]]
@@ -95 +95 @@
 ''' Principal Investigator :'''  Paolo Oddo (paolo.oddo@bo.ingv.it) [[BR]]
 
-=== '''INGV.7 — Rationalization of air-sea bulk formulae''' ===
-''' Motivation:''' In the current version of the NEMO, a user can choose between three different packages of air sea interaction bulk formulae. The packages differ in term of atmospheric input fields
-and bulk parametrizations. In theory the best way would be to let the user decide, what kind of bulk to be used for each component of the Heat, Salt and Mass fluxes. This work does not require implementation of the bulk but a quite hard rearranging of the current version of the code. [[BR]]
-''' Status:'''  [[BR]]
-''' Main tasks:'''  [[BR]]
-''' Science Reviewer:'''  [[BR]]
-''' System Reviewer:'''  [[BR]]
-''' Deadline:'''   [[BR]]
-''' Priority:'''  [[BR]]
-''' Principal Investigator :'''  Paolo Oddo (paolo.oddo@bo.ingv.it) [[BR]]