Changes between Version 2 and Version 3 of 2016WP/2016Shared Actions/Workshop_NEMO_in_CMIP6


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2015-11-10T09:26:40+01:00 (5 years ago)
Author:
clevy
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • 2016WP/2016Shared Actions/Workshop_NEMO_in_CMIP6

    v2 v3  
    11= Workshop to analyse and discuss the preliminary results of NEMO in CMIP6 - 28 & 29 January 2016 in Grenoble - France = 
    2 == Motivations  == 
     2Organizer: NEMO System Team 
     3 
     4=== Motivations === 
    35All the groups involved in the CMIP6 experiments are now setting up and testing their configurations (ESM or forced ocean in OCMIP). For those using NEMO or part of it as ocean, sea-ice and or biogeochemical component, it appears to be useful to share the analysis of their preparatory simulations in order to identify the robust results, the weaknesses and possible improvements. 
    46 
    5 == Goals  == 
     7=== Goals === 
    68Comparing results of NEMO in mainly 2 different global resolutions in different experiments, i.e forced or coupled with different atmospheric models can allow us to better understand and hopefully correct some biais by discriminating the adjustments of the coupled mode from the internal errors of the ocean model. 
    79 
     10=== '''NEMO configurations in play :''' === 
     11All groups are expected to be using nemo.v3_6_STABLE version of the platform. The configurations should be the ones used in CMIP6. The list below describes geographical extension and model resolution. All combination of NEMO components: dynamics, with or without NEMO sea-ice (LIM)  or biogeochemistry(PISCES) are welcome.[[BR]]ORCA1, ORCA025, …? 
     12 
    813==  == 
    9 Invited groups [[BR]]In order to facilitate extensive discussions on strengths and weaknesses of the results, we propose not to open the meeting widely, but to decide the list of invited groups. 
     14=== Invited groups === 
     15In order to facilitate extensive discussions on strengths and weaknesses of the results, we propose not to open the meeting widely, but to decide the list of invited groups. 
    1016 
    11 == Proposed agenda == 
    12 A 1.5 / 2 days meeting is suggested, in order to have time to share  and discuss the results. Meeting should take place after preliminary  analysis of a first set of experiments going on now, but earlier enough  for each group to take benefits of discussions for the CMIP6  experiments.  Agenda of the meeting should also be discussed: sessions  by configuration, by MIP, by open questions (for example: adjustment of  vertical parametrization in coupled mode, or coupling frequency...) 
     17=== Proposed agenda === 
     18A 1.5 / 2 days meeting is suggested, in order to have time to share  and discuss the results. Meeting should take place after preliminary  analysis of a first set of experiments going on now, but earlier enough  for each group to take benefits of discussions for the CMIP6  experiments.  Agenda of the meeting should also be discussed: sessions  by configuration, by MIP, by open questions (for example: adjustment of  vertical parametrization in coupled mode, or coupling frequency...) 
    1319 
    14 == Practical details == 
    15 == List of participants == 
    16 == Detailed list of experiments in discussion == 
     20=== Practical details === 
     21=== List of participants === 
     22|| Family Name || First name || Institution || email || 
     23|| || || || || 
     24 
     25=== Detailed list of experiments in discussion ===