Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of 2017WP/WAVE-2_Clementi_add_coupling

Timestamp:

2017-05-18T01:18:18+02:00 (7 years ago)

Author:

nicolasmartin

Comment:

New page from template WorkPlanAction?

2017WP/WAVE-2_Clementi_add_coupling

@@ +1 @@
+= '''''WAVE-2_Clementi add coupling'''''
+
+The PI is responsible to closely follow the progress of the action, and especially to contact NEMO project manager if the delay on preview (or review) are longer than the 2 weeks expected.
+
+== Help
+
+The action has to be detailed briefly in the 'Summary' section for later inclusion in other pages.\\
+Edit the 'Summary' section as with an ordinary wiki page.
+* ''Italic formatting'' shows the default values or help.
+* Set specific TracLinks (development ticket and branch).
+
+Out of this, the rest of the page can be edited on-line inside the form fields considering the following color code given hereafter.
+
+{{{#!th
+   Role / Color code
+}}}
+||  [[span(PI(S), style=background-color:lightgrey)]]  ||  [[span(Previewer(s), style=background-color:lightblue)]]  ||  [[span(Reviewer(s), style=background-color:lightgreen)]]  ||
+
+Record your modifications for the section you have edited by clicking on the corresponding button at the end of the section with 'Save ...' button. Just above, the log record will be updated.
+
+The informations inside the form fields and this wiki page itself are stored in 2 separate databases.\\
+As a consequence, there is absolutely no risk to make any modification in the page itself as long as you don't rename the page or modify the source code of `{{{#!TracForm ... }}}` processors.
+
+== Summary #summary
+
+|| '''Action'''       || WAVE-2_Clementi add coupling           ||
+|| '''PI(S)'''        || Emanuela Clementi                            ||
+{{{#!td
+'''Digest'''
+}}}
+{{{#!td
+Continue the implementation of selected wave-current processes:
+
+* Improve Stokes drift velocity calculation using Breivik et al. 2014 formulation;
+* Barotropic Stokes drift circulation included directly in the model prognostic velocity;
+  1. Stokes-Coriolis force includes the barotropic Stokes drift velocity;
+  1. RHS of ssh Eq. includes the barotropic Stokes drift divergence;
+  1. Baroclinic Stokes drift is added to the advective velocity used on tracers 
+* Stokes-Coriolis force available with all the vorticity schemes. 
+
+Meeting organization with the WAVE-WG to discuss further issues to be investigated and implemented:
+
+* Add Breivik et al. (2015) formulation of Stokes drift profile;
+* Vertical mixing enhancement due to wave breaking;
+* Start discussion on implementation of Langmuir circulation;
+* Start discussion on wave interaction with sea-ice;
+* Start discussion on small scale coastal wave-current coupling 
+}}}
+|-
+|| '''Dependencies''' || ''Depends on ...''                                                         ||
+|| '''Target'''       || ''Priority or deadline''                                                   ||
+|| '''Trac Ticket'''  || #XXXX                                                                      ||
+|| '''SVN branch'''   || [source:/branches/$YEAR/dev_r{REV}_{WGorINSTITUTE}-{NUM}_{PIS}-{KEYWORDS}] ||
+|| '''Previewer(s)''' || ''Names''                                                                  ||
+|| '''Reviewer(s)'''  || ''Names''                                                                  ||
+|| '''Status'''       || ''!Pending/In progress/Postponed/Ready''                                   ||
+|| '''Link'''         || [[ExtractUrl(.)]]                                                          ||  
+
+{{{#!comment
+DON'T REMOVE THIS VOID HEADING OR IT WILL BREAK THE INCLUDE FEATURE BETWEEN WIKI PAGES
+}}}
+==  ==
+{{{#!comment
+DON'T REMOVE THIS VOID HEADING OR IT WILL BREAK THE INCLUDE FEATURE BETWEEN WIKI PAGES
+}}}
+
+{{{#!Fold title=Abstract tag=h2
+[=#abstract]
+
+This section should be completed before starting to develop the code, in order to find agreement on the method beforehand.
+
+{{{#!TracForm
+#!subcontext abstract
+#!submit_label 'Save Abstract'
+#!keep_history yes
+
+=== Description
+
+ [tf.textarea:description -id=piform -class=taform 'Describe the goal of development, and the methodology.\n\nAdd reference documents or publications if relevant.' 0 20]
+
+=== Implementation
+
+ [tf.textarea:implementation -id=piform -class=taform 'Describe flow chart of the changes in the code.\n\nList the .F90 files and modules to be changed.\n\nDetailed list of new variables (including namelists) to be defined.\nGive for each the chosen name (following coding rules) and definition.' 0 20]
+
+=== Reference manual and web pages updates
+
+ [tf.textarea:manual -id=piform -class=taform 'Using part 1 and 2, define the summary of changes to be done in the NEMO reference manual (tex files), and in the content of web pages.' 0 20]
+
+'''''Updated on [tf.form_updated_on:] by [tf.form_updater:]'''''
+
+}}}
+
+Once the PI has completed this section, he should send a mail to the previewer(s) asking them to preview the work within two weeks.
+
+}}}
+
+{{{#!Fold title=Preview tag=h2
+[=#preview]
+
+Since the preview step must be completed before the PI starts the coding, the previewer(s) answers are expected to be completed within the two weeks after the PI has sent his request.[[BR]]For each question, an iterative process should take place between PI and previewer(s) in order to reach a "YES" answer for each of the following questions.
+
+{{{#!TracForm
+#!subcontext preview_
+#!submit_label 'Save Preview'
+
+|| Questions || Answer || Comment ||
+|| Does the previewer agree with the proposed methodology? || [tf.select:2.1 -id=preform '' Yes No NR] || [tf.textarea:2.1c -id=preform 'Add a comment?' 50 10] ||
+|| Does the previewer agree with the proposed flowchart and list of routines to be changed? || [tf.select:2.2 -id=preform '' Yes No NR] || [tf.textarea:2.2c -id=preform 'Add a comment?' 50 10] ||
+|| Does the previewer agree with the proposed new list of variables, including agreement with coding rules? || [tf.select:2.3 -id=preform '' Yes No NR] || [tf.textarea:2.3c -id=preform 'Add a comment?' 50 10] ||
+|| Does the previewer agree with the proposed summary of updates in reference manual? || [tf.select:2.4 -id=preform '' Yes No NR] || [tf.textarea:2.4c -id=preform 'Add a comment?' 50 10] ||
+|| ... ... ... || [tf.select:2.X -id=preform '' Yes No NR] || [tf.textarea:2.Xc -id=preform 'Add a comment?' 50 10] ||
+
+'''''Updated on [tf.form_updated_on:] by [tf.form_updater:]'''''
+
+}}}
+
+Once all "YES" have been reached, the PI can start the development into his development branch.
+
+}}}
+
+{{{#!Fold title=Tests tag=h2
+[=#tests]
+
+Once the development is done, the PI should complete this section below and ask the reviewers to start their review in the lower section.
+
+{{{#!TracForm
+#!subcontext tests
+#!submit_label 'Save Tests'
+
+|| Questions || Answer || Comment ||
+|| Can this change be shown to produce expected impact? (if option activated)? || [tf.select:3.1 -id=piform '' Yes No NR] || [tf.textarea:3.1c -id=piform 'Add a comment?' 50 10] ||
+|| Can this change be shown to have a null impact? (if option not activated) || [tf.select:3.2 -id=piform '' Yes No NR] || [tf.textarea:3.2c -id=piform 'Add a comment?' 50 10] ||
+|| Detailed results of restartability and reproducibility when the option is activated. Please indicate the configuration used for this test || [tf.select:3.3 -id=piform '' Yes No NR] || [tf.textarea:3.3c -id=piform 'Add a comment?' 50 10] ||
+|| Detailed results of SETTE tests (restartability and reproducibility for each of the reference configuration) || [tf.select:3.4 -id=piform '' Yes No NR] || [tf.textarea:3.4c -id=piform 'Add a comment?' 50 10] ||
+|| Results of the required bit comparability tests been run: Are there no differences when activating the development? || [tf.select:3.5 -id=piform '' Yes No NR] || [tf.textarea:3.5c -id=piform 'Add a comment?' 50 10] ||
+|| If some differences appear, is reason for the change valid/understood? || [tf.select:3.6 -id=piform '' Yes No NR] || [tf.textarea:3.6c -id=piform 'Add a comment?' 50 10] ||
+|| If some differences appear, is the !ticket describing in detail the impact this change will have on model configurations? || [tf.select:3.7 -id=piform '' Yes No NR] || [tf.textarea:3.7c -id=piform 'Add a comment?' 50 10] ||
+|| Is this change expected to preserve all diagnostics? || [tf.select:3.8 -id=piform '' Yes No NR] || [tf.textarea:3.8c -id=piform 'Add a comment?' 50 10] ||
+|| If no, is reason for the change valid/understood? || [tf.select:3.9 -id=piform '' Yes No NR] || [tf.textarea:3.9c -id=piform 'Add a comment?' 50 10] ||
+|| Are there significant changes in run time/memory? || [tf.select:3.10 -id=piform '' Yes No NR] || [tf.textarea:3.10c -id=piform 'Add a comment?' 50 10] ||
+|| ... ... ... || [tf.select:3.XX -id=piform '' Yes No NR] || [tf.textarea:3.XXc -id=piform 'Add a comment?' 50 10] ||
+
+'''''Updated on [tf.form_updated_on:] by [tf.form_updater:]'''''
+
+}}}
+
+}}}
+
+{{{#!Fold title=Review tag=h2
+[=#review]
+
+A successful review is needed to schedule the merge of this development into the future NEMO release during next Merge Party (usually in November).
+
+{{{#!TracForm
+#!subcontext review
+#!submit_label 'Save Review'
+
+=== Code changes and documentation
+
+|| Question || Answer || Comment ||
+|| Is the proposed methodology now implemented? || [tf.select:3.11 -id=revform '' Yes No NR] || [tf.textarea:3.11c -id=revform 'Add a comment?' 50 10] ||
+|| Are the code changes in agreement with the flowchart defined at Preview step? || [tf.select:3.12 -id=revform '' Yes No NR] || [tf.textarea:3.12c -id=revform 'Add a comment?' 50 10] ||
+|| Are the code changes in agreement with list of routines and variables as proposed at Preview step?[[BR]]If not, are the discrepancies acceptable? || [tf.select:3.13 -id=revform '' Yes No NR] || [tf.textarea:3.13c -id=revform 'Add a comment?' 50 10] ||
+|| Is the in-line documentation accurate and sufficient? || [tf.select:3.14 -id=revform '' Yes No NR] || [tf.textarea:3.14c -id=revform 'Add a comment?' 50 10] ||
+|| Do the code changes comply with NEMO coding standards? || [tf.select:3.15 -id=revform '' Yes No NR] || [tf.textarea:3.15c -id=revform 'Add a comment?' 50 10] ||
+|| Is the !ticket of development documented with sufficient details for others to understand the impact of the change? || [tf.select:3.16 -id=revform '' Yes No NR] || [tf.textarea:3.16c -id=revform 'Add a comment?' 50 10] ||
+|| Are the reference manual tex files now updated following the proposed summary in preview section? || [tf.select:3.17 -id=revform '' Yes No NR] || [tf.textarea:3.17c -id=revform 'Add a comment?' 50 10] ||
+|| Is there a need for some documentation on the web pages (in addition to in-line and reference manual)?[[BR]]If yes, please describe and ask PI. A yes answer must include all documentation available. || [tf.select:3.18 -id=revform '' Yes No NR] || [tf.textarea:3.18c -id=revform 'Add a comment?' 50 10] ||
+|| ... ... ... || [tf.select:3.XX -id=revform '' Yes No NR] || [tf.textarea:3.XXc -id=revform 'Add a comment?' 50 10] ||
+
+==== Review Summary
+
+Is the review fully successful? [tf.select:status -id=revform '' Yes No]
+
+[tf.textarea:comment -id=revform 'If not, please indicate what is still missing.' 50 10]
+
+'''''Updated on [tf.form_updated_on:] by [tf.form_updater:]'''''
+
+}}}
+
+Once review is successful, the development must be scheduled for merge during next Merge Party Meeting.
+
+}}}