Changes between Version 16 and Version 17 of 2021WP/HPC-02_Daley_Tiling

Timestamp:

2021-05-13T12:57:15+02:00 (3 years ago)

Author:

hadcv

Comment:

--

2021WP/HPC-02_Daley_Tiling

@@ -34 +34 @@
 
 [http://forge.ipsl.jussieu.fr/nemo/browser/NEMO/branches/2021/dev_r14393_HPC-03_Mele_Comm_Cleanup?rev=14776 dev_r14393_HPC-03_Mele_Comm_Cleanup@14776] has been merged into the branch.
- * [http://forge.ipsl.jussieu.fr/nemo/changeset?sfp_email=&sfph_mail=&reponame=&new=14819%40NEMO%2Fbranches%2F2021%2Fdev_r14273_HPC-02_Daley_Tiling/src/OCE&old=14776%40NEMO%2Fbranches%2F2021%2Fdev_r14393_HPC-03_Mele_Comm_Cleanup%2Fsrc%2FOCE Difference vs dev_r14393_HPC-03_Mele_Comm_Cleanup]
+ * [http://forge.ipsl.jussieu.fr/nemo/changeset?sfp_email=&sfph_mail=&reponame=&new=14805%40NEMO%2Fbranches%2F2021%2Fdev_r14273_HPC-02_Daley_Tiling/src/OCE&old=14776%40NEMO%2Fbranches%2F2021%2Fdev_r14393_HPC-03_Mele_Comm_Cleanup%2Fsrc%2FOCE Difference@14805 vs dev_r14393_HPC-03_Mele_Comm_Cleanup]
 
 ==== Changes to tiling framework
@@ -337 +337 @@
   * The increase in memory due to tiling may be because a number of additional arrays are declared when `ln_tile = .true.`
 
+=== SETTE (post merge)
+
+
 === Development testing
 
@@ -364 +367 @@
 This list does not include tests that fail due to pre-existing issues in the trunk (e.g. model crashes or restartability failures).
 
- * Results differ when using `nn_hls = 2` and standard (non-QCO) code
-  * **__TO BE COMPLETED__**
-  * **NOTE**: As the QCO code will replace the standard code, I don't think these issues are worth investigating. They are also very hard to track down, as they seem to disappear when unrelated scientific options (e.g. vertical mixing coefficients) are changed.
+ * Results differ when using `nn_hls = 2`
+  * Standard (non-QCO) code
+   * `ln_dynldf_blp = .true.` with `ln_dynldf_lev = .true.`
+   * `ln_dynldf_blp = .true.` with `ln_dynldf_hor = .true.`
+   * `ln_dynldf_lap = .true.` with `ln_dynldf_hor = .true.` and `ln_traldf_triad = .true.`
+  * Standard (non-QCO) and `key_linssh` code
+   * `ln_traldf_lap = .true.` with `ln_traldf_triad = .true.`
+   * `ln_traldf_blp = .true.` with `ln_traldf_triad = .true.` and `ln_traldf_msc = .true.`
+   * `ln_traldf_blp = .true.` with `ln_traldf_triad = .true.` and `ln_traldf_msc = .true.` and `ln_botmix_triad = .true.`
+  * QCO code
+   * `ln_dynldf_blp = .true.` with `ln_dynldf_lev = .true.` and `nn_dynldf_typ = 1`
+
+  * **NOTE**: These differences are very hard to track down, as they seem to disappear when unrelated scientific options (e.g. vertical mixing coefficients) are changed. They are also completely different test failures to those from the previous tests using r14805. This indicates that the differences are very small and sensitive; they could perhaps be investigated at a later point.
 
 __Expected failures
@@ -391 +404 @@
   * Specifically, this requires `ln_dynldf_hor .AND. ln_traldf_iso`
 
- * Code that requires AGRIF
-  * As tiling now requires `nn_hls = 2`, the AGRIF SETTE test does not run when `ln_tile = .true.`
-
  * Code that requires `ln_rnf_depth = .true.`
   * I was unable to produce the required input file