| 39 | | ''Since the preview step must be completed before the PI starts the coding, the previewer(s) answers are expected to be completed within the two weeks after the PI has sent the request to the previewer(s). \\ |
| 40 | | For each question, an iterative process should take place between PI and previewer(s) in order to reach a 'YES' answer for each of the following questions.'' |
| | 39 | Since the preview step must be completed before the PI starts the coding, the previewer(s) answers are expected to be completed within the two weeks after the PI has sent the request to the previewer(s). \\ |
| | 40 | An iterative process should take place between PI and previewer(s) in order to find a consensus on |
| | 41 | |
| | 42 | - the methodology |
| | 43 | - the flowchart and list of routines to be changed |
| | 44 | - the new list of variables wrt coding rules |
| | 45 | - the summary of updates in literature |
| 42 | | ||= Question ||= Answer \\('YES'|'NO'|'NA') || |
| 43 | | || Does the previewer agree with the methodology? || || |
| 44 | | || Does the previewer agree with the flowchart and list of routines to be changed? || || |
| 45 | | || Does the previewer agree with the new list of variables, including agreement with coding rules? || || |
| 46 | | || Does the previewer agree with the summary of updates in literature? || || |
| 47 | | |
| 48 | | ''Once all 'YES' have been reached, preview is ended and the PI can start the development into his development branch.'' |
| | 47 | Once an agreement has been reached, preview is ended and the PI can start the development into his branch. |
| 52 | | ||= Question ||= Answer \\('YES'|'NO'|'NA') || |
| 53 | | || Can this change be shown to produce expected impact (option activated)? || || |
| 54 | | || Can this change be shown to have a null impact (option not activated)? || || |
| 55 | | || Detailed results of restartability and reproducibility when the option is activated. \\Please indicate the configuration used for this test || || |
| 56 | | || Detailed results of SETTE tests (restartability and reproducibility for each of the reference configuration) || || |
| 57 | | || Results of the required bit comparability tests been run: are there no differences when activating the development? || || |
| 58 | | || If some differences appear, is reason for the change valid/understood? || || |
| 59 | | || If some differences appear, is the impact as expected on model configurations? || || |
| 60 | | || Is this change expected to preserve all diagnostics? || || |
| 61 | | || If no, is reason for the change valid/understood? || || |
| 62 | | || Are there significant changes in run time/memory? || || |
| | 51 | Detailed results of SETTE tests (restartability and reproducibility for each of the reference configuration) |
| | 52 | Detailed results of restartability and reproducibility when the option is activated. \\Please indicate the configuration used for this test |
| | 53 | |
| | 54 | - Can this change be shown to produce expected impact (option activated)? |
| | 55 | - Can this change be shown to have a null impact (option not activated)? |
| | 56 | - Results of the required bit comparability tests been run: are there no differences when activating the development? |
| | 57 | - If some differences appear, is reason for the change valid/understood? |
| | 58 | - If some differences appear, is the impact as expected on model configurations? |
| | 59 | - Is this change expected to preserve all diagnostics? |
| | 60 | - If no, is reason for the change valid/understood? |
| | 61 | - Are there significant changes in run time/memory? |
| 71 | | ||= Question ||= Answer \\('YES'|'NO'|'NA') || |
| 72 | | || Is the proposed methodology now implemented? || || |
| 73 | | || Are the code changes in agreement with the flowchart defined at preview step? || || |
| 74 | | || Are the code changes in agreement with list of routines and variables as proposed at preview step? \\If, not, are the discrepancies acceptable? || || |
| 75 | | || Is the in-line documentation accurate and sufficient? || || |
| 76 | | || Do the code changes comply with NEMO coding standards? || || |
| 77 | | || Is the development documented with sufficient details for others to understand the impact of the change? || || |
| 78 | | || Is the project literature (manual, guide, web, ...) now updated or completed following the proposed summary in preview section? || || |
| | 70 | - Is the proposed methodology now implemented? |
| | 71 | - Are the code changes in agreement with the flowchart defined at preview step? |
| | 72 | - Are the code changes in agreement with list of routines and variables as proposed at preview step? \\If, not, are the discrepancies acceptable? |
| | 73 | - Is the in-line documentation accurate and sufficient? |
| | 74 | - Do the code changes comply with NEMO coding standards? |
| | 75 | - Is the development documented with sufficient details for others to understand the impact of the change? |
| | 76 | - Is the project literature (manual, guide, web, ...) now updated or completed following the proposed summary in preview section? |
