Changes between Version 36 and Version 37 of DevelopersCommittee/Agenda/2013-06-18

Timestamp:

2013-05-15T09:58:25+02:00 (11 years ago)

Author:

clevy

Comment:

--

DevelopersCommittee/Agenda/2013-06-18

@@ -5 +5 @@
 
 == Proposed agenda ==
-Suggestions are welcome. If many additionnal suggestions, agenda will become tight and we might envisage to start earlier and/or finish later. If you know it already, please add your time of arrival to (TOA) and time of departure from the meeting in the list of participants below.
+'''Suggestions are welcome. If many additionnal suggestions, agenda will become tight and we might envisage to start earlier and/or finish later. If you know it already, please add your time of arrival to (TOA) and time of departure from the meeting in the list of participants below.'''
 
-==  ==
 '''Tuesday 18 June:''' General overview, presentation of the documents and presentation of other projects of interest and discussions
 
-12:00                    Welcome 
+12:00                    Welcome
 
-12:30                    Opening of the meeting ( ) 
+12:30                    Opening of the meeting ( )
 
-12:45 – 2:00             Brief presentation of available documents: 10 mn for each: CMCC ( ) , CNRS ( ), INGV (P. Oddo), Mercator (Y. Drillet), !MetOffice ( ), NERC-NOC (  ) , others: CONCEPTS & CCCma, Canada ( ) 
+12:45 – 2:00             Brief presentation of available documents: 10 mn for each: CMCC ( ) , CNRS ( ), INGV (P. Oddo), Mercator (Y. Drillet), !MetOffice ( ), NERC-NOC (  ) , others: CONCEPTS & CCCma, Canada ( )
 
 2:00 – [2:30 2:20]              Proposed presentations: About Gung-Ho (Nigel Wood – Met Office)
@@ -20 +19 @@
 [2:30 2:20] – 3:00            Coffee Break
 
-3:00 – 4:30            Discussion on documents and additional contributions 
+3:00 – 4:30            Discussion on documents and additional contributions
 
-4:30 – 6:00            Thematic discussions, proposed sessions:[[BR]][[BR]]'''Session 1: NEMO platform: seamless to what extend?''' (Leaders: J. Holt and P. Marsaleix) With ORCA12 (global 1/12°) are we reaching an optimal level? Should we continue moving towards higher resolutions or should we stop there and work in a probabilistic way to quantify errors?[[BR]]In the future, is the NEMO platform expected to be modelling all time and space scales from global to coastal (up to rivers, tide banks, module sedimentary module, etc…) or is there a boundary in small scales (coastal) and associated processes where NEMO should stop, and/or be properly connected to another modelling platform?''''''
+4:30 – 6:00            Thematic discussions, proposed sessions:[[BR]][[BR]]'''Session 1: NEMO platform: seamless to what extend?''' (Leaders: J. Holt and P. Marsaleix) With ORCA12 (global 1/12°) are we reaching an optimal level? Should we continue moving towards higher resolutions or should we stop there and work in a probabilistic way to quantify errors?[[BR]]In the future, is the NEMO platform expected to be modelling all time and space scales from global to coastal (up to rivers, tide banks, module sedimentary module, etc…) or is there a boundary in small scales (coastal) and associated processes where NEMO should stop, and/or be properly connected to another modelling platform?'''''''''''
 
 '''Session 2: New dynamical cores, HPC and science '''    (Leader: tbd)